RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the specific effects of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness (SATT) on trauma-related injury (TRI) development in patients with low-energy isolated blunt thoracic trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed between March 2018-March 2019. Patients admitted to our hospital because of blunt thoracic trauma were enrolled. SATT in axial CT images of the thorax was measured using the four anatomically designated localizations. Patients were analyzed in terms of demographic data, BMI, comorbid diseases, causes of injury, vital parameters, visual analog scale, trauma score, injury type, treatment, and hospitalization. A poor clinical outcome was defined as the development of a TRI. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 152 patients (43 female, 109 male). The mean age was 49 ± 19.1 years. There was a positive linear association between the BMI and SATT for all the patients in the study. TRI frequency was higher in the low-SATT subgroup than in the high-SATT group (p < 0.001). BMI and mean SATT values were related to a poor logistic regression analysis outcome (p < 0.01). Being in the low-BMI subgroup was a risk factor for TRI development (p < 0.01; OR:0.23;95% CI:0.08-0.61). CONCLUSION: We found that a low SATT and BMI were related to a poor clinical outcome in our study group. It is essential to carefully examine these patients in detail, even in low-energy trauma. Subcutaneous tissue over the thorax serves as a protective shield for other thoracic structures in patients with LEBTT.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Torácicos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Tecido Adiposo , Escala de Gravidade do FerimentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Sodium valproate and ibuprofen are drugs with known efficacy in the treatment of headache associated with acute migraine attacks. In this study, our aim was to compare the efficacy of these two drugs in the treatment of acute migraine attacks when administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study and included patients aged 18 to 65 years who presented to the emergency department with acute headache and met the criteria of 'migraine without aura' according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The patients were randomized into two groups and given a single dose of 800 mg sodium valproate or 800 mg ibuprofen in 150 mL of normal saline by IV infusion over five minutes. Changes in pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain over a two-hour period. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (49 patients in the sodium valproate group and 50 in the ibuprofen group) completed the trial, and their data were included in the statistical analysis. The mean decrease in the post-treatment delta NRS values was statistically significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group. The mean differences were 1.69 [confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.37, p<0.001], the mean difference between N0 and N2 was 3.61 (CI: 2.96-4.26, p < 0.001), the mean difference between N0 and N3 was 4.11 (CI: 3.54-4.67, p < 0.001), and the mean difference between N0 and N4 was 3.92 (CI: 3.67-4.46, p < 0.001). The number of patients who achieved the primary endpoint of pain relief was significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group (p < 0.001). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis showing the rates of reaching the targeted endpoint, there was a significant difference in the efficacy of the two-treatment group (χ2 = 79.98, CI: 80.35-99.65; p = 0.000).
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Ácido Valproico , Método Duplo-Cego , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical ibuprofen and topical piroxicam for acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either topical ibuprofen (n = 70) or topical piroxicam (n = 69). The first dose of gel was applied in the emergency department and the remaining doses were self-administered at home by the patients thrice daily for 72 h. For each patient, the initial baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score (V 0) was compared with the VAS scores at the 60 min (V1), 120 min (V2), 24 h (V3) and 72 h (V4) time points. The decreases in VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatments, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: In the topical ibuprofen group, the VAS scores were significantly lower at each measurement time point compared to baseline (p < .001). The results were as follows: V0 -V: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.56-1.61; V0 -V2: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.69; V0 -V3: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.81-2.07; V0 -V4: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.91-2.26. The mean percentage decrease in the VAS scores in the topical ibuprofen group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group (p < .001). The clinical effect of treatment was found to be significantly higher for the ibuprofen gel group (p < .001). There was no substantial difference in treatment-related adverse events between the groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen gel, which is a safe treatment option for geriatric patients, is more clinically effective than piroxicam gel. Response to Reviewers.
Assuntos
Analgésicos/normas , Manejo da Dor/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Geriatria/instrumentação , Geriatria/métodos , Geriatria/normas , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Ibuprofeno/normas , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Piroxicam/administração & dosagem , Piroxicam/normas , Piroxicam/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coolant spray application in musculoskeletal injuries is an effective and harmless method to treat pain and reduce functional limitation. This study assessed the clinical value of coolant spray application on patient comfort before and during the radiographic imaging process along with its early analgesic and anti-edema effects. METHODS: A total of 155 patients, admitted to the emergency department between April 1, 2019, and June 31, 2019, were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to either a coolant spray or a saline spray (placebo) group. To the coolant spray group patients, Cryos ®Spray (Phyto Performance, Italy) was applied. To the placebo group patients, a normal saline solution in a bottle covered with white opaque paper and refrigerated at 4 °C was sprayed. Radiographic images of the patients were scored for appropriateness of the standard imaging characteristics. RESULTS: The mean scores were 8.13 ± 1.8 and 6.58 ± 2.2 for the coolant spray and normal saline spray groups, respectively; the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (mean difference: -1.56, 95% CI:-2.20 to -0.92; p = .000). Patients with fractures on their radiographs and treated with coolant spray received higher scores than similar patients treated with normal saline spray (mean difference:-1.92, 95% CI:-3.28 to -0.55; p = .009). The proportion of patients requesting analgesic treatment before discharge was statistically lower in the coolant spray group compared to the normal saline group (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic images taken after coolant spray intervention in patients with acute ankle trauma were more successful in showing the target structures.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo/terapia , Crioterapia , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerossóis , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/terapia , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. The data for the 67 patients in the piroxicam group and the 69 in the capsaicin group were examined. The initial visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared with the 60th and 120th minute as well as the 24th and 72nd hour values. Differences between the VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatment and side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: In the capsaicin group, the mean difference in the delta VAS scores was significantly higher at each measurement time. The mean of the percentage of reduction in the VAS scores of the topical capsaicin group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group. The highest difference in terms of both outcomes was determined at the 72nd hour VAS change. Mean differences were 1.53 (95% CI: 0.85-2.221) and 19.7 (95% CI: 12.4-27.2) respectively (pâ¯<â¯0.001). In the capsaicin group, the clinical effect of the treatment was found significantly higher (pâ¯<â¯0.01). The difference between the clinical effectiveness of the groups regarding the treatment outcomes was also statistically significant (pâ¯<â¯0.001). There was no significant difference between the patient groups regarding the presence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topical capsaicin can be used as an alternative to topical piroxicam initially and at follow-up in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pain as there were no observable differences in side-effects between the two groups.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Capsaicina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/administração & dosagem , Piroxicam/administração & dosagem , Fármacos do Sistema Sensorial/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Ventricular septal (VS) rupture after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an uncommon complication in the reperfusion era. Bedside echocardiography (BECH) continues to be a strong diagnostic tool for emergency physicians treating dyspneic patients, especially for decision-making on the management strategies to use with these unstable patients. In the case we present here, a patient is diagnosed with a delayed mechanical complication after AMI, and a swift management plan is made with the aid of point-of-care BECH. The patient is a 72-year-old man with dyspnea who was admitted to the ED 5 days after receiving a primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for AMI; in the ED, the patient was diagnosed, via BECH, with a VS rupture. On arrival, his vital signs and the results of his physical examination depicted shock and low perfusion with wet lung. A cardiac examination revealed a new 2/6 harsh holosystolic murmur along the left sternal border without pretibial oedema. Emergency physicians performed BECH, and subcostal views of the heart revealed a wide interventricular septal rupture and left-to-right shunting with minimal pericardial effusion. The patient underwent surgery immediately to repair the defect. The post-operative course was uneventful, and he was discharged in stable condition on the seventh day after the surgery. The use of BECH to recognize a VS rupture is critical because such a defect may be the most important determinant of mortality in AMI patients who are in shock. BECH thus can influence clinicians' acute management and disposition decisions.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Ruptura Cardíaca Pós-Infarto/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Testes Imediatos , Idoso , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Background: This study aims to compare the surgical results, complications, mortality rates, and inpatient costs in two patient groups followed, whether in the intensive care unit or general ward after a major thoracic procedure and to examine clinical and surgical factors related to the development of complications. Methods: Between January 2018 and June 2021, a total of 485 patients (150 males, 335 females; mean age: 58.3±13.2 years; range, 22 to 86 years) who underwent a major thoracic surgery in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as the intensive care unit patients (n=254) and general ward patients (n=231). In the former group, the patients were followed in the intensive care unit for a day, while in the general ward group, the patients were taken directly to the ward. The groups were compared after propensity score matching. All patients were analyzed for risk factors of morbidity development. Results: After propensity score matching, 246 patients were enrolled including 123 patients in each group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any features except for late morbidity, and inpatient costs were higher in the intensive care unit group (p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 3, and secondary malignancy were found to be associated with morbidity (p<0.05). Conclusion: In experienced centers, it is both safe and costeffective to follow almost all of the major thoracic surgery patients postoperatively in the general ward.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.
Assuntos
Analgesia , Fraturas das Costelas , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Manejo da Dor , DorRESUMO
Introduction Football is the most popular sport in the world with its wide audience and important economic effects. This game is mainly played by professional football players, it is also an activity that is frequently played by non-professionals. Although members of the public mostly engage in this sport as a hobby and to develop a healthy lifestyle, vital injuries, such as head and thorax trauma can also occur during these recreational activities. In this study, our aim was to identify these severe traumas, investigate their causes and mechanisms, and make suggestions to reduce trauma among recreational football players. Methods This prospectively designed study included players aged over 14 years who presented to the emergency department with an injury incurred during a recreational football match activity. The demographic characteristics of the patients, warm-up status, match conditions, field conditions, and injury mechanisms, as well as post-injury outcomes, were recorded and analyzed with appropriate statistical methods. Results There were 167 patients included in the study and 140 of these patients were eligible for the study. We identified 45 cases with poor outcomes such as pneumocephalus, rib fractures, pneumothorax, Achilles tendon rupture, and bone fractures. (32.1%). Factors that could have an effect on poor outcomes were determined as a pre-match warm-up, pre-match sleep duration, and suitability of equipment. Player-to-player contact was determined as a mechanism of head and thorax trauma. Conclusions It may be beneficial to inform recreational football players about how player-to-player contact can cause head and thoracic trauma and establish a database of sports injuries in hospitals.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent disabling primary headache disorder that is classified into two major types: migraine without aura and migraine with aura. New therapeutic methods to reduce migraine headaches in the emergency department (ED) include intradermal mesotherapy. OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy of intradermal mesotherapy versus a systemic therapy in pain control in patients with headache related to migraine without aura. DESIGN: Prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to the ED over a 15-month period with headache related to migraine without aura were eligible for inclusion if they had a VAS score of 4 or above. Patients were randomly allocated to one session of mesotherapy or intravenous dexketoprofen. Changes in pain intensity were measured by the score on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. Efficacy was also assessed by the need for use of an analgesic drug within 24 hours, by readmission with the same complaint to the ED within 72 hours, and by adverse effect rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain intensity on the VAS scale. SAMPLE SIZE: 148 patients (154 enrolled and treated; 1 patient in the mesotherapy and 5 patients in the systemic therapy group lost to follow up). RESULTS: Pain intensity on the VAS scale decreased from a median score of 8 to 4 in the mesotherapy group and from 8 to 5 in the systemic therapy group. These differences were statistically significant from baseline for all time intervals (P=.001 to 30 minutes, P=.004 to 60 minutes, P=.005 to 120 minutes, and P=.002 to 24 hours). The need to use analgesics and the rate of readmission to the ED were higher in the systemic therapy group (P=.013 and P=.030, respectively). Adverse effect rates were minimal and similar in the study groups during the one-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Mesotherapy is more efficacious than intravenous dexketoprofen in the management of acute attack of migraine without aura in the ED. LIMITATIONS: Unblinded. Valid for assessing short-term pain relief, but not sufficient to predict long-term efficacy. Not generalizable because single center and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04519346).
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Mesoterapia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/análogos & derivados , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , TrometaminaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The most important problem for emergency physicians in patients presenting with chest pain is deciding whether to discharge the patient or not. Therefore, many scoring systems have been developed to help with this decision making process. We aim to achieve a modified HEART value by combining the VAS value with the HEART score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on age, sex, duration of the symptoms, pain severity using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), and the presence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEART score was calculated and modified (mHEART) by adding 1 point to the total HEART score for a VAS score of ≥7. RESULTS: During the study period, 4781 patients were admitted, and 293 participants were analyzed. Of the patients, 34(11.6%) experienced MACE within a month after the encounter. The mean VAS scores were 5.65±1.44. However, 77(26.3%) patients had VAS scores ≥7. Taking 3 as the threshold, 42(14.3%) patients had HEART scores of 4 and above, where 47(16.0%) had mHEART scores ≥4. The mHEART scoring demonstrated better test indicators than the HEART score. According to the HEART score, 6(2.3%) of the 251 patients predicted as negative would develop MACE, but this number decreased to 1(0.4%) in 246 using the mHEART score. CONCLUSION: Although the HEART score performs reasonably well in discriminating patients who are MACE negative, it is possible to further improve the score by adding the VAS item. After validation by other studies, we would suggest modifying the HEART score by including the VAS item.
RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.
RESUMO
Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening disease. Approximately half of the aortic dissection observed in women under 45 years old has been reported to be related to pregnancy. Herein, we present a case of type A aortic dissection diagnosed in postpartum period. A 37-year-old woman admitted to the emergency department with the complaint of sudden onset of dyspnea. Arterial blood pressure was measured as 170/100 mmHg in left arm and 90/60 mmHg in right arm. With a prediagnosis of aortic dissection, thoracic and abdominal computed tomograpy was performed and type A aortic dissection extending form carotid artery to renal arterial level was detected. Operation of aortic dissection together with coronary arterial repairment and aortic valve replacement were successfully performed. Aortic dissection is not uncommon in pregnancy and furthermore it is potentially life-threatening for both mother and fetus. A high level of suspicion is required for prompt diagnosis and treatment in the peripartum period.