Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Castration resistance occurs in most patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who are receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. Replacing androgens before progression of the disease is hypothesized to prolong androgen dependence. METHODS: Men with newly diagnosed, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, a performance status of 0 to 2, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 5 ng per milliliter or higher received a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue and an antiandrogen agent for 7 months. We then randomly assigned patients in whom the PSA level fell to 4 ng per milliliter or lower to continuous or intermittent androgen deprivation, with patients stratified according to prior or no prior hormonal therapy, performance status, and extent of disease (minimal or extensive). The coprimary objectives were to assess whether intermittent therapy was noninferior to continuous therapy with respect to survival, with a one-sided test with an upper boundary of the hazard ratio of 1.20, and whether quality of life differed between the groups 3 months after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 3040 patients were enrolled, of whom 1535 were included in the analysis: 765 randomly assigned to continuous androgen deprivation and 770 assigned to intermittent androgen deprivation. The median follow-up period was 9.8 years. Median survival was 5.8 years in the continuous-therapy group and 5.1 years in the intermittent-therapy group (hazard ratio for death with intermittent therapy, 1.10; 90% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.23). Intermittent therapy was associated with better erectile function and mental health (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively) at month 3 but not thereafter. There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of treatment-related high-grade adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings were statistically inconclusive. In patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the confidence interval for survival exceeded the upper boundary for noninferiority, suggesting that we cannot rule out a 20% greater risk of death with intermittent therapy than with continuous therapy, but too few events occurred to rule out significant inferiority of intermittent therapy. Intermittent therapy resulted in small improvements in quality of life. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00002651.).

Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346).

PURPOSE: Frequent prostate specific antigen testing for screening and monitoring prostate cancer has led to significant stage migration. We evaluated whether overall survival in hormone naïve patients with metastatic prostate cancer has improved during the era of prostate specific antigen use. We also assessed whether any patient subsets benefited differentially during this period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared overall survival in 3 sequential phase III trials of 3,096 men with hormone naïve, metastatic prostate cancer who received similar androgen deprivation therapy, including 2 trials performed before the prostate specific antigen era (S8494 and S8894) and the other done during this era (S9346). Overall survival was adjusted for patient and disease risk factors in the latter 2 trials. Subgroups were evaluated by interactions of risk factors with trial. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 30 months in S8494, 33 months in S8894 and 49 months in S9346. Adjusting for risk factors, there was a 22% lower risk of death in S9346 than in S8894 (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.87, p <0.001). The improvement in overall survival was greater in black American men (test of interaction p = 0.008). In S8494 and S8894 median survival for black men was 27 months, and 34 and 35 months for nonblack men, respectively. This racial difference disappeared in S9346 with overall survival of 48 and 49 months in black and nonblack men, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for risk factors, overall survival was significantly improved in the post-prostate specific antigen era trial. However, it cannot be concluded that this was attributable only to prostate specific antigen monitoring. Black men now have overall survival comparable to that of white men. Current estimates of survival should be used to design new trials in this population.

Whole gland primary prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry.

PURPOSE: We report the largest data set to date to our knowledge regarding outcomes for primary whole gland prostate cryoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The COLD (Cryo On-Line Data) Registry consists of case report forms obtaining pretreatment and posttreatment information for patients undergoing whole gland prostate cryoablation. A total of 1,198 patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high risk groups. Biochemical success was defined according to the traditional American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition (3 increases) and the newer (Phoenix) definition (nadir +2). Biopsy was performed at physician discretion but most commonly for cause if a patient had an increasing or suspicious prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: Average patient age was 69.8 +/- 7.5 years. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen was 9.6 +/- 8.6 ng/ml and median Gleason sum was 7 (range 4 to 10). Patients were followed for 24.4 +/- 25.9 months with 136 having minimum 5-year data. The 5-year biochemical disease-free status for the entire population was 77.1% +/- 2.1% (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) and 72.9% +/- 2.1% (Phoenix). Five-year American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical disease-free status was 84.7% +/- 4.5%, 73.4% +/- 4.3% and 75.3% +/- 3.7% for the low, moderate and high risk groups, respectively. Using the Phoenix definition the biochemical disease-free status was 91.1% +/- 2.9%, 78.5% +/- 3.6% and 62.2% +/- 4.9%, respectively. As predicted based on intentional preservation of some prostatic tissue, 72.5 +/- 1.8% had a detectable prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater at 5 years. Biopsy after cryotherapy was positive during empiric without cause biopsy in 30 of 207 patients (14.5%), and the highly selected group biopsied based on suspicion of treatment failure due to abnormal or increasing prostate specific antigen had positive results in 38.0% (49 of 129). The rectal fistula rate was 0.4% and incontinence was 4.8% with 2.9% of patients using pads. Intercourse was reported by 25.2% but only 8.8% without pharmaceutical or device assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Whole gland cryoablation, practiced in a spectrum of academic and community users, maintains efficacy and morbidity similar to that of single center reports.

Salvage prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry.

PURPOSE: We report contemporary outcomes of salvage cryoablation at a large number of centers which have participated in the COLD (Cryo On-Line Data) Registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secure online database was developed to collect data for patients undergoing prostate cryoablation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with biochemical failure defined using the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, and the Phoenix definitions. RESULTS: Data from 279 patients who had undergone salvage cryoablation were entered. Average patient age was 70.0 +/- 7.1 years. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen was 7.6 +/- 8.2 ng/ml and Gleason score was 7.5 +/- 1.1 (median 7). Patients were followed for 21.6 +/- 24.9 months and 47 were followed longer than 5 years. The 5-year actuarial biochemical disease-free rates were 58.9% +/- 5.7% (American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) and 54.5% +/- 4.9% (Phoenix). As predicted based on the preservation of some prostatic tissue, 83% +/- 3.5% of patients had a detectable prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater at 5 years. Positive biopsies were observed in 15 of the 46 patients (32.6%) who underwent prostate biopsy after salvage cryotherapy. The incontinence rate (requiring pad use) was 4.4%. The rectal fistula rate was 1.2% and 3.2% of patients underwent transurethral prostate resection to remove sloughed tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical and local control rates support the use of salvage cryoablation for localized recurrence following failed radiation therapy. Efforts to continue to minimize these complications and to improve disease control in patients with persistent cancer following definitive radiotherapy should continue.

A population-based study examining the influence of a specialized rapid-access cancer clinic on initial treatment choice in localized prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment decisions in localized prostate cancer are complicated by the available choices. A rapid-access cancer clinic (RAC) has been unique to Calgary, AB, since 2007. This RAC offers multidisciplinary prostate cancer education by a urologist, medical oncologist, and radiation oncologist. It is hypothesized that treatment utilization data from decisions taken at RAC may serve to benchmark the appropriateness of treatment decisions on a population level. METHODS: Records of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer in Alberta between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2009 were reviewed with ethics approval. Records were linked to the Alberta Cancer Registry database. Clinical, treatment, and health services characteristics pertaining to patients attending RAC were compared to the general population. The primary endpoint was utilization rates of each initial treatment. RESULTS: During this two-year period, 2838 patients were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer; 375 attended RAC. The utilization rates among RAC patients vs. the whole Alberta population were: prostatectomy 60.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.3-65.2) vs. 48.0% (95% CI 47.1-50.7; χ2 p<0.001); active surveillance 16.0% (95% CI 12.3-19.7%) vs. 13.5% (95% CI 12.2-15.8; χ2 p=0.214); radiotherapy 11.7% (95% CI 8.5-15.0) vs. 18.0% (95% CI 16.9-20.5; χ2 p=0.002); and hormone therapy 8.0% (95% CI 5.2-10.8) vs. 17.4% (95% CI 16.1-18.9; χ2 p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A specialized clinic for localized prostate cancer may be associated with a higher likelihood of receiving surgery or active surveillance as initial treatment compared to the prostate cancer population in Alberta.

Quality of life 2 years after salvage cryosurgery for the treatment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Previous research has raised concerns that although salvage cryosurgery may be an effective treatment to prevent the progression of prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure, the quality of life cost many be so severe as to prevent its acceptance as a viable treatment. The present study's purpose was to further the understanding of the quality of life outcomes of salvage cryosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 46 men with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy were recruited to participate in a prospective Phase II clinical trial using salvage cryosurgery. There were 2 questionnaires (i.e., the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and the Prostate Cancer Index) administered before cryosurgery, and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: Quality of life returned to preoperative levels by 24 months after cryosurgery in all domains, with the exception of urinary and sexual functioning. At 24 months, 29% of men reported urinary bother as a moderate-to-big problem, and 56% reported sexual bother as a moderate-to-big problem. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate prospectively men's quality of life for 2 years after salvage cryosurgery for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Long-term impairments in quality of life appear to be limited to the sexual and urinary function domains. Overall quality of life appears to be high. These results support salvage cryosurgery as a viable treatment option.

Pilot study to determine safety and short-term outcome of percutaneous cryoablation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (stages T1C-T3C NO MO).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of cryoablation in localized prostate cancer in our hands. Early end points are biopsy at 5 months and PSA at 12 months follow-up. METHODS: Percutaneous transperineal cryoablation was performed on 30 patients. A urethral warming catheter was used. All cases were newly diagnosed with no prior radiotherapy, or neoadjuvant hormones. A single freeze cycle was used in the first 10 cases and two cycles in the next 20 cases. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 30 cases are eligible for follow-up. Six of the first 10 patients had negative biopsies, the 4 positive patients have had repeat cryoablation and only 1 patient remains biopsy positive. In cases 11-30, there were two patients with positive biopsies ­ both retreated. At this time, 27/29 patients (93%) have a negative biopsy after one (23 patients) or two (6 patients) treatments. At 6 months, 20/29 patients (69%) have undetectable PSA; 25/29 have PSA less than 1 ng/ml. At 12 months, 17/23 cases have an undetectable PSA (74%). Complications were minimal; 3 cases (10%) suffered urethral sloughing requiring TURP. CONCLUSION: Early results are very encouraging, showing 93% negative biopsy rate after one (23 patients) or two (6 patients) treatments; PSA is undetectable in 74% (17/23 patients) at 1 year. Early results of cryoablation for prostate cancer are encouraging.

Furthering the prostate cancer screening debate (prostate cancer specific mortality and associated risks).

Screening for prostate cancer remains a contentious issue. As with other cancer screening programs, a key feature of the debate is verification of cancer-specific mortality reductions. Unfortunately the present evidence, two systematic reviews and six randomized controlled trials, have reported conflicting results. Furthermore, half of the studies are poor quality and the evidence is clouded by key weaknesses, including poor adherence to screening in the intervention arm or high rates of screening in the control arm. In high quality studies of prostate cancer screening (particularly prostate-specific antigen), in which actual compliance was anticipated in the study design, there is good evidence that prostate cancer mortality is reduced. The numbers needed to screen are at least as good as those of mammography for breast cancer and fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer. However, the risks associated with prostate cancer screening are considerable and must be weighed against the advantage of reduced cancer-specific mortality. Adverse events include 70% rate of false positives, important risks associated with prostate biopsy, and the serious consequences of prostate cancer treatment. The best evidence demonstrates prostate cancer screening will reduce prostate cancer mortality. It is time for the debate to move beyond this issue, and begin a well-informed discussion on the remaining complex issues associated with prostate cancer screening and appropriate management.

A randomized trial of external beam radiotherapy versus cryoablation in patients with localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Localized prostate cancer can be treated several different ways, but head-to-head comparisons of treatments are infrequent. The authors of this report conducted a randomized, unblinded, noninferiority trial to compare cryoablation with external beam radiotherapy in these patients. METHODS: From December 1997 through February 2003, 244 men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were assigned randomly to receive either cryoablation or radiotherapy (122 men in each arm). All received neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. The primary endpoint was disease progression at 36 months based on a trifecta definition: 1) radiologic evidence of metastatic disease, or 2) initiation of further antineoplastic therapy, or 3) biochemical failure. Two definitions of biochemical failure were used: 1) 2 consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with a final value >1.0 ng/mL, and 2) a rise above PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, disease-specific survival, and prostate biopsy at 36 months. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 100 months. Disease progression at 36 months was observed in 23.9% (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL, 17.1%) of men in the cryoablation arm and in 23.7% (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL, 13.2%) of men in the radiotherapy arm. No difference in overall or disease-specific survival were observed. At 36 months, more patients in the radiotherapy arm had a cancer-positive biopsy (28.9%) compared with patients in the cryoablation arm (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The observed difference in disease progression at 36 months was small, 0.2%; however, because of the wide confidence interval, from -10.8% to 11.2%, it was not possible to rule out inferiority (defined a priori as a 10% difference). With longer term follow-up, the trend favors cryoablation. Significantly fewer positive biopsies were documented after cryoablation than after radiotherapy.

A randomized trial of external beam radiotherapy versus cryoablation in patients with localized prostate cancer: quality of life outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial to compare external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to cryoablation for localized disease showed cryoablation to be noninferior to external beam EBRT in disease progression and overall and disease-specific survival. We report on the quality of life (QOL) outcomes for this trial. METHODS: From December 1997 through February 2003, 244 men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were randomly assigned to cryoablation or EBRT (median dose 68 Gy). All patients received neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ C30 and the Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) before treatment and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months post-treatment. RESULTS: Regardless of treatment arm, participants reported high levels of QOL with few exceptions. cryoablation was associated with more acute urinary dysfunction (mean PCI urinary function cryoablation=69.4; mean EBRT=90.7; P<.001), which resolved over time. No late arising QOL issues were observed. Both EBRT and cryoablation participants reported decreases in sexual function at 3 months with the cryoablation patients reporting poorer functioning (mean cryoablation=7.2: mean EBRT=32.9; P<.001). Mean sexual function score was 15 points lower at 3 years for the cryoablation group and 13% more of the cryoablation men said that sexuality was a moderate or big problem. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, no long-term QOL advantage for either treatment was apparent with the exception of poorer sexual function reported by those treated with cryoablation. Men who wish to increase their odds of retaining sexual function might be counseled to choose EBRT over cryoablation.

Prostate-specific antigen progression predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) is an indicator of progression in hormone-sensitive (HS) and castration-resistant (CR) prostate cancer (PC). We evaluated different definitions of PSA-P as predictors of overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,078 patients with HSPC who were on hormones (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] trial 9346 [S9346]) and 597 patients with CRPC who were treated with chemotherapy (SWOG trial 9916 [S9916]) were eligible for this analysis. PSA-P definitions tested included the following: PSA Working Group, Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG 2008), and other definitions. A time-varying approach analyzed associations between PSA-P at any time and OS. A landmark analysis examined the relationship between PSA-P status at 7 months for S9346, or 3 months for S9916, and subsequent OS. RESULTS: In the time-varying analysis, both working groups definitions were strongly associated with OS (P < .001) in both study settings. In patients enrolled onto S9346, both definitions predicted a 2.4-fold increased risk of death (ROD) and a greater than four-fold increased ROD if PSA-P occurred in the first 7 months. In S9916, they predicted a 40% increase in ROD and a two-fold increase in ROD if PSA-P occurred at 3 months. In landmark analyses of patients on S9346 by using the PCWG 2008 definition of PSA-P, median subsequent OS was 10 months versus 44 months in patients who did or did not have PSA-P by 7 months, respectively; in S9916, data were 11 months versus 18 months for patients who did or did not have PSA-P by 3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: PSA-P, defined as an increase of > or = 25% greater than the nadir and an absolute increase of at least 2 or 5 ng/mL, predicts OS in HSPC and CRPC and may be a suitable end point for phase II studies in these settings.

Salvage cryosurgery-how I do it.

Prostate cryosurgery has advanced over the last decade, and is now recognized as a treatment option for patients who have failed radiotherapy. Appropriate patient selection is imperative for successful salvage. Because the treatment is a local therapy, the recurrent cancer must be confined to the prostate and its immediate area, and up to half of patients who undergo salvage cryotherapy may eventually fail treatment because of occult synchronous metastases. Yet some patients with poor prognosticators may still benefit from salvage treatment.

The evolution and state of modern technology for prostate cryosurgery.

Cryosurgery is the in situ ablation of a target tissue by application of extreme cold temperature. The ability of cryosurgery to ablate tissue is unquestioned. It is the controlled application of a cryoinjury in a manner to minimize morbidity that is problematic. Prostate cryosurgery is complicated by the proximity of the prostate to adjacent structures that are sensitive to a freeze injury, namely the urethra, rectal wall, and neurovascular bundles. Several recent technological advances have led to the development of an effective treatment protocol with acceptable morbidity. These include the advent of real-time transrectal ultrasound, cryomachines with almost instant freeze-thaw control through the use of the Joule-Thompson effect, and warming catheters to effectively preserve the integrity of the urethra and external sphincter. Further, temperature monitoring at the posterior margin of the prostate sometimes combined with an injection of saline solution into Denonvilliers fascia has reduced the occurrence of urethrorectal fistula formation to 0% to 0.5% in modern series. We review the key innovations of prostate cryosurgery that differentiate this state-of-the-art procedure from that used by early investigators to even that of the early 1990s. Potential future innovations, specifically related to image guidance of the procedure, are also addressed.

Quality of life and sexuality of men with prostate cancer 3 years after cryosurgery.

The current study was designed to describe the long-term life quality and sexuality of men enrolled in a phase 2 clinical trial of cryosurgery for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. A total of 75 men were administered the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Prostate (FACT-P) before treatment and after treatment at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Additionally, these men completed a Sexuality Follow-Up Questionnaire (SFQ) 3 years after cryosurgery. By 12 months after cryosurgery, most FACT-P subscales had returned to pretreatment levels. Quality of life remained stable over the subsequent 2 years. The only exception to this general trend was persistent impairment in measures of social/family well-being. At 36 months, 13% (5 of 38) of patients had regained erectile functioning, and an additional 34% (13 of 38) of patients were sexually active with the help of aids. The 3-year quality-of-life outcomes support the renewed interest in cryosurgery. No late complications were observed. Whereas improvements in erectile function were observed between years 1 and 3 for some patients, most continue to experience erectile dysfunction. For these patients, aids are an important adjunct to the treatment of their erectile dysfunction.

Prostate cancer: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 3 weeks compared with needle biopsy at 6 months after cryoablation.

PURPOSE: To determine if nonenhancing tissue on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained 3 weeks after cryoablation of the prostate helps reliably and accurately predict nonviable cryoablated tissue at 6-month biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent cryoablation were followed up prospectively. Fifty-one underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 3 weeks (three had gadolinium allergy); 49, biopsy at 6 months (three refused and two had other primary malignancies); and all, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests at 6 weeks, 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter. MR images were evaluated and scored according to the degree of signal void and were correlated with the 6-month biopsy reports and, to a lesser degree, PSA levels. The biopsy reports were examined for the presence or absence of cancerous tissue, viable tissue, and nonviable tissue. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical and regression analyses. RESULTS: The correlation of MR imaging scores with PSA levels and MR imaging scores with biopsy findings resulted in P values of.337 and.780, respectively. A slight statistically significant trend existed for the relation of biopsy results with PSA levels, with a P value of.041, which was expected. CONCLUSION: Findings of postoperative gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging are not predictive of 6-month biopsy results or follow-up PSA levels.