Correlation of surgeon-performed parathyroid ultrasound with the Perrier classification and gland weight.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound localisation of parathyroid glands correlates with gland weight. We hypothesise that gland identification is also dependent on anatomical location. Perrier et al. have described a uniform and reliable nomenclature for parathyroid locations. We aimed to correlate surgeon-performed ultrasound (SUS) with intra-operative Perrier classification and gland weight. METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained single operator SUS database of 194 patients referred with non-familial primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) at a tertiary centre between 2010 and 2015. Patients underwent MIBI localisation as well as on table SUS. Intra-operative pathological gland locations were classified according to the Perrier nomenclature. RESULTS: Mean weight of pathological glands found and missed by SUS was 1.07 ± 0.1 g and 0.48 ± 0.08 g respectively (p = 0.0001, unpaired t test). The weight of glands identified was greater than that of missed glands for each of the Perrier locations (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney). The proportion of pathological glands found at each Perrier location varied significantly (p < 0.0001, Chi Square); so we find proportionally more B-, D-, E- and F-type glands and miss more A- and C-type glands. The median weight of glands missed on SUS varied significantly across the Perrier groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.0034) and suggests that SUS can miss quite large glands (> 0.5 g) in locations B, C and F; whereas missed glands in locations A, D and E were all small (< 0.5 g). CONCLUSION: Whilst gland identification correlates well with gland weight, anatomical location has a significant impact on failure of localisation irrespective of gland weight. For the surgeon operating on PHPT patients with negative US localisation, particular attention should be paid to locations C, D and A as these are the sites where pathological glands are most often missed on pre-operative US.

Clinical and histopathological factors affecting failed sentinel node localization in axillary staging for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care in axillary staging of clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. AIMS: To analyze reasons for failure of SLN localization by means of a multivariate analysis of clinical and histopathological factors. METHODS: We performed a review of 164 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB. A superficial injection technique was used. RESULTS: 9/164 patients failed to show nodes. In 7/9 patients no evidence of radioactivity or blue dye was observed. Age and nodal status were the only statistically significant factors (p < 0.05). For every unit increase in age there was a 9% reduced chance of failed SLN localization. Patients with negative nodal status have 90% reduced risk of failed sentinel node localization than patients with macro or extra capsular nodal invasion. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that altered lymphatic dynamics secondary to tumour burden may play a role in failed sentinel node localization. We showed that in all failed localizations the radiocolloid persisted around the injection site, showing limited local diffusion only. While clinical and histopathological data may provide some clues as to why sentinel node localization fails, we further hypothesize that integrity of peri-areolar lymphatics is important for successful localization.

Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: There is variation in margin policy for breast conserving therapy (BCT) in the UK and Ireland. In response to the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology (SSO-ASTRO) margin consensus ('no ink on tumour' for invasive and 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) consensus (1 mm for invasive and DCIS), we report on current margin practice and unit infrastructure in the UK and Ireland and describe how these factors impact on re-excision rates. METHODS: A trainee collaborative-led multicentre prospective study was conducted in the UK and Ireland between 1st February and 31st May 2016. Data were collected on consecutive BCT patients and on local infrastructure and policies. RESULTS: A total of 79 sites participated in the data collection (75% screening units; average 372 cancers annually, range 70-900). For DCIS, 53.2% of units accept 1 mm and 38% accept 2-mm margins. For invasive disease 77.2% accept 1 mm and 13.9% accept 'no ink on tumour'. A total of 2858 patients underwent BCT with a mean re-excision rate of 17.2% across units (range 0-41%). The re-excision rate would be reduced to 15% if all units applied SSO-ASTRO guidelines and to 14.8% if all units followed ABS guidelines. Of those who required re-operation, 65% had disease present at margin. CONCLUSION: There continues to be large variation in margin policy and re-excision rates across units. Altering margin policies to follow either SSO-ASTRO or ABS guidelines would result in a modest reduction in the national re-excision rate. Most re-excisions are for involved margins rather than close margins.

Surgery for breast cancer in the elderly--how relevant?

Studies suggest that elderly women receive less aggressive treatment, experience higher disease progression and mortality from breast cancer. We report on an experience of 256 consecutive cases of symptomatic breast cancer in a population of over 75 years of age. 142/256 patients underwent surgical intervention in the form of breast conserving surgery or mastectomy, 114/256 did not. Mean follow up was 6.4 years. Our results show a statistically significant association between surgery and survival (p = 0.05, CI 0.00046-0.19641) and a strong statistically significant association between surgery and disease progression/recurrence (p = 0.001, CI 0.08713-0.03145). Women treated conservatively are significantly less fit hence suffering high cancer unrelated mortality; as a consequence they suffer higher disease related progression and mortality. In our study surgical treatment with adjuvant endocrine and/or radiotherapy was associated with a statistically significant advantage in terms of disease related mortality and local disease control.