RESUMO
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a life-threatening complication which can develop after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and some antibody-drug conjugates. Several SOS/VOD diagnostic and management guidelines exist, with the most recent and refined being the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation adult and paediatric guidelines. Timely diagnosis and effective management (including the availability of therapeutic options) significantly contribute to improved patient outcomes. In Australia and New Zealand, there is variability in clinical practice and access to SOS/VOD therapies. This review aims to summarise the current evidence for SOS/VOD diagnosis, prevention and treatment and to provide recommendations for SOS/VOD in the context of contemporary Australasian HSCT clinical practice.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva , Humanos , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/diagnóstico , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Nova Zelândia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Grade (G) 3B follicular lymphoma (FL) is a rare FL subtype which exists on a histological continuum between 'lowgrade' (Grade 1, 2 and 3A FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) appearing to share features with each. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are poorly understood due to lack of adequate representation in prospective trials and large-scale analyses. We analyzed 157 G3BFL cases from 18 international centers, and two comparator groups; G3AFL (n=302) and DLBCL (n=548). Composite histology with DLBCL or low-grade FL occurred in approximately half of the G3BFL cases. With a median of 5 years follow-up, the overall survival and progression-free survival of G3BFL patients was better than that of DLBCL patients (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively); however, G3BFL patients were younger (P<0.001) with better performance status (P<0.001), less extranodal disease (P<0.001) and more frequently had normal lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.001) at baseline. The overall and progression-free survival of patients with G3BFL and G3AFL were similar (P=0.83 and P=0.80, respectively). After frontline immunochemotherapy, 24% of G3BFL relapsed; relapse rates were 63% in the DLBCL cohort and 19% in the low-grade FL cohort. Eight percent of relapses occurred beyond 5 years. In this G3BFL cohort, the revised International Prognostic Index successfully delineated risk groups, but the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index did not. We conclude that patients with immunochemotherapy-treated G3BFL have similar survival outcomes to those with G3AFL, yet a favorable baseline profile and distinctly superior prognosis compared to patients with DLBCL.
Assuntos
Linfoma Folicular , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico , Linfoma Folicular/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/patologia , Prognóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Universal antiviral prophylaxis with letermovir is effective but unsubsidized in Australia. Valaciclovir demonstrates anti-CMV activity in high doses, but few current real-world studies explore its use as primary prophylaxis in high-risk patients post-alloHSCT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of alloHSCT recipients at high risk of clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi), defined as a plasma CMV DNA viral load of >400 IU/ml requiring preemptive therapy, or CMV disease. High-risk recipients were CMV seropositive and underwent T-cell depleted, haploidentical or umbilical cord stem-cell transplants. Consecutive patients transplanted from July 2018 to January 2020, treated with valaciclovir 2 g TDS from day +7 to +100 (HD-VALA), were compared to a historical cohort (July 2017-June 2018) who only received preemptive CMV therapy, and standard valaciclovir (SD-VALA) for varicella/herpes prophylaxis. We compared incidence of and time to cs-CMVi. RESULTS: In the SD-VALA cohort (n = 27, median CMV follow-up duration 259 days), 23/27 (85%) developed cs-CMVi at a median of 39 days. For the HD-VALA cohort (n = 35, median CMV follow-up duration 216 days), 19/35 (54%) developed cs-CMVi, at a median of 68 days. Time to cs-CMVi was significantly longer in HD-VALA cohort (p < .0001). On multivariate analysis, HD VALA reduced the risk of cs-CMVi (HR 0.32, p = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: In alloHSCT recipients at high risk for cs-CMVi, HD-VALA resulted in lower cumulative reactivation, and delayed reactivation, reducing requirement for preemptive CMV therapy in the early post-engraftment period.
Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Valaciclovir , Citomegalovirus , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Patients with post-haemopoietic stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T -cell (CAR-T) therapy face a significant risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 because of their immunosuppressed state. As case numbers in Australia and New Zealand continue to rise, guidance on management in this high-risk population is needed. Whilst we have learned much from international colleagues who faced high infection rates early in the pandemic, guidance relevant to local health system structures, medication availability and emerging therapies is essential to equip physicians to manage our patients optimally.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Linfócitos TAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/terapia , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Bleomicina/administração & dosagem , Dacarbazina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Vimblastina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Hydroxyurea (Hu) is widely used as first-line cytoreductive therapy for patients with high-risk Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-neg MPN), but a small proportion of patients have refractory disease or experience adverse effects. Studies have demonstrated busulfan (Bu) to be an active first-line agent, but data on its role as second-line or later therapy are minimal. To evaluate its efficacy and safety in this context, we undertook a multicenter audit of Ph-neg MPN patients who had received Bu as therapy for Hu intolerance or failure. Of 51 patients identified, 38 (75%) achieved either complete or partial hematological response following at least one Bu cycle. Bu was generally well tolerated, with only 21/135 (15%) cycles complicated by adverse effects, predominantly cytopenia; only 6% of cycles were ceased due to treatment complications. Bu is an effective and well-tolerated agent in patients with Ph-neg MPN in the setting of Hu intolerance or unresponsiveness.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Hidroxiureia/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hidroxiureia/administração & dosagem , Hidroxiureia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/complicações , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/genética , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/mortalidade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Retratamento , Análise de Sobrevida , Trombose/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Surgeons commonly need to treat patients receiving anticoagulant and anti-platelet therapy. This requires risk assessment and management to balance minimization of bleeding complications and avoidance of further ischaemic or thrombotic events. This review considers the evidence available to guide management of patients on anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy, including some of the new classes of anti-platelets and anticoagulants which clinicians may be less familiar with.