Pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis.

AIMS: This study aimed at describing adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the concentration-effect relationship of adalimumab using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Adalimumab PK and PK-PD data were obtained from a multicentric observational study. Adalimumab (40 mg) was administered subcutaneously every other week, and its pharmacokinetics was described using a one-compartment model. The relationship between adalimumab concentration and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was described using an indirect response model with inhibition of CRP input, whereas the relationship between adalimumab concentration and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) was described using a direct inhibition model. Dose regimens that included a loading dose of adalimumab were simulated. RESULTS: Thirty patients treated for RA were analysed. The following pharmacokinetic and PK-PD parameters were estimated (interidividual coefficient of variation): apparent volume of distribution (Vd /F) = 10.8 l (92%); apparent clearance (CL/F) = 0.32 l day(-1) (17%); first-order absorption rate (ka ) = 0.28 day(-1) ; CRP input (kin ) = 22.0 mg l(-1) day(-1) (65%); adalimumab concentration leading to a 50% decrease in kin (C50 ) = 3.6 mg l(-1) (88%); baseline DAS28 (DAS0 ) = 5.5 mg l(-1) (11%); and adalimumab concentration leading to 50% decrease of DAS0 (IC50 ) = 11.0 mg l(-1) (71%). Simulations showed that a 160 mg loading dose should reduce the time to reach efficacy in terms of both CRP and DAS28 after the first injection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe adalimumab pharmacokinetics and the concentration-effect relationship in RA. A 160 mg loading dose may lead to an increased benefit from treatment in RA patients.

Relationship between inflammation and infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis.

AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody, is indicated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective was to evaluate the influence of the sources of infliximab pharmacokinetic variability in RA. METHODS: Eighty-four patients treated with infliximab for RA were included in a prospective noncomparative study. They were analysed between two consecutive infliximab infusions. Infliximab concentrations were measured before the infusion, 2 h, 1 and 4 weeks after the infusion and immediately before the next infusion. Infliximab concentrations were described using a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: The mean (interindividual standard deviation) estimated central volume of distribution was 2.3 l (36%) and systemic clearance was 0.019 l h(-1) (37%). The central volume of distribution increased with bodyweight; it was doubled between 50 and 90 kg. Systemic clearance increased with pre-infusion C-reactive protein concentration by 20%, varying from 3 to 14 mg l(-) 1, and was decreased by 30% when methotrexate was coadministered. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of methotrexate and inflammation on infliximab clearance suggests that individual adjustment of infliximab doses according to disease activity may be useful in RA.

Influence of methotrexate on infliximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in ankylosing spondylitis.

AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, has profoundly modified the treatment of several inflammatory diseases. The objective was to assess the influence of methotrexate on the variability of infliximab pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship in axial ankylosing spondylitis (AAS) patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with AAS were included in a prospective study. They were treated by infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹ infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12 and 18. Infliximab concentrations were measured before, and 2 and 4 h after each infusion, and at each intermediate visit (weeks 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 and 14). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was measured at each visit. Infliximab pharmacokinetics was described using a two-compartment model with first-order distribution and elimination constants. A population approach was used. Infliximab pharmacodynamics was described using the area under the BASDAI curve. RESULTS: A total of 507 blood samples and 329 BASDAI measurements were collected. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained (interindividual coefficient of variation): volumes of distribution for the central compartment = 2.4 l (9.6%) and peripheral compartment = 1.8 l (26%), systemic clearance = 0.23 l day⁻¹ (22%) and intercompartment clearance = 2.3 l day⁻¹. Methotrexate influenced neither pharmacokinetic nor BASDAI variability. CONCLUSIONS: Using the present dosage, the clinical efficacy of infliximab is only weakly influenced by its serum concentrations. The results do not support the combination of methotrexate with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in spondyloarthritis: an observational open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to human tumor necrosis factor alpha and which is approved for refractory spondyloarthritis (SpA). Individual adjustment of infliximab dosage may help to improve the therapeutic response in SpA. We investigated whether a knowledge of infliximab serum concentration modifies physician decision and improves the control of disease activity in SpA. METHODS: Thirty-two patients routinely treated with infliximab were included in an observational open-label study. On visit 1 (V1), according to disease activity, a preliminary therapeutic decision was selected among 4 therapeutic options (ie, decrease, increase, maintain the dosage of infliximab, or switch over for another treatment), and a blood sample was collected to measure infliximab trough serum concentration. The final therapeutic decision, based on both disease activity and infliximab serum concentration assessed at V1, was applied at the following infusion (V2). Clinical and biological evaluations were performed at V3 and V4 and compared with those at V1. RESULTS: The measurement of infliximab trough concentration modified the therapeutic decision for 10 patients (31%). For both patients with increased or decreased infliximab dosage at V2, median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was similar at V3 or V4 as compared with that at V1. However, a trend for an inverse relationship between infliximab serum concentrations and BASDAI was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of infliximab trough concentration modified the therapeutic decision for SpA patients with predominantly axial symptoms but did not improve the control of disease activity as estimated by the BASDAI.

Trough infliximab concentrations predict efficacy and sustained control of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to human tumor necrosis factor alpha and is approved for refractory rheumatoid arthritis. We studied the association between infliximab concentration and long-term control of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated on a routine basis both in cross-sectional analysis and over the long term. Trough serum infliximab concentrations were measured in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving infliximab infusions during the period August to October 2006. Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28) and usual biologic markers. During a 42-week follow-up period, patients were classified into two groups: those continuing with the same or lower doses of infliximab (Group A = treatment success) and those who switched to another biopharmaceutical or required an increase in infliximab dose (Group B = treatment failure). Treatment maintenance for Group A was analyzed by categories of infliximab concentration at baseline and compared by the log rank test. In 28 patients, C-reactive protein and infliximab concentrations were inversely related. Infliximab concentration in patients with low disease activity (DAS28 3.2 or less) was higher than in those with persistent active disease (DAS28 greater than 3.2); median values were 3.26 and 0.16 mg/L, respectively (P < 0.01). Analysis after 42 weeks showed that patients in Group A had higher infliximab concentrations at baseline than those with treatment failure (P < 0.01). In rheumatoid arthritis, infliximab concentration is predictive of sustained efficacy with the same infliximab regimen and should be considered on a routine basis.

Methotrexate effect on immunogenicity and long-term maintenance of adalimumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a multicentric randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are responsible for decreased adalimumab efficacy in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). We aimed to evaluate the ability of methotrexate (MTX) to decrease adalimumab immunisation. METHODS: A total of 110 patients eligible to receive adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) every other week were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive, 2 weeks before adalimumab (W-2) and weekly, MTX 10 mg s.c. (MTX+) or not (MTX-). ADA detection and adalimumab serum concentration were assessed at weeks 4 (W4), 8 (W8), 12 (W12) and 26 (W26) after starting adalimumab (W0). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ADA at W26. Four years after the study completion, we retrospectively analysed adalimumab maintenance in relation with MTX co-treatment duration. RESULTS: We analysed data for 107 patients (MTX+; n=52; MTX-; n=55). ADA were detected at W26 in 39/107 (36.4%) patients: 13/52 (25%) in the MTX+ group and 26/55 (47.3%) in the MTX- group (p=0.03). Adalimumab concentration was significantly higher in the MTX+ than MTX- group at W4, W8, W12 and W26. The two groups did not differ in adverse events or efficacy. In the follow-up study, MTX co-treatment >W26 versus no MTX or ≤W26 was significantly associated with adalimumab long-term maintenance (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: MTX reduces the immunogenicity and ameliorate the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in axial SpA. A prolonged co-treatment of MTX>W26 seems to increase adalimumab long-term maintenance.

Ultrasonography and detection of subclinical joints and tendons involvements in Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients: A cross-sectional multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study in SLE population were (1) to describe ultrasonography (US) joint abnormalities, (2) to estimate the reliability of clinical swollen joint count (C-SJC) and SLEDAI (C-SLEDAI) versus US-SJC and US-SLEDAI scores, (3) to highlight specific patterns of lupus patients with Power Doppler (PD) abnormalities. METHOD: For this cross-sectional multicenter study, 151 consecutive adult SLE patients were recruited. Evaluation included a clinical standardized joint assessment, B-mode and PD US of 40 joints and 26 tendons blinded for clinical examination. Reliability and agreement between clinical and B-mode US were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [95% Confidence Interval]). RESULTS: We found a very high frequency of subclinical US abnormalities in asymptomatic patients: 85% of patients without joint symptoms had at least 1 US abnormality. Among them 46 patients (87%) had a history of joint involvement. The most frequent abnormalities were joint effusmaions (108 patients), synovial hypertrophy (SH, 109 patients) and synovitis (61 patients). Joint or tendon PD signal (grade>1) was found in 44% of patients (67/151). Synovitis were mainly located especially on MCPs and wrists. Even if reliability between clinical and grey-scale US SJC assessments was poor, reliability between clinical and US SLEDAI was good. Comparison between SLE patients with and without PD signal did not show any specific SLE pattern. CONCLUSION: US may be useful to assess joint involvement in SLE patients but did not significantly change SLEDAI score.

Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: alone or in combination with methotrexate? A pharmacokinetic comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX) has been shown to modify infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis. However, its combination with infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is not recommended. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of MTX on infliximab exposure in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients with AS patients who had predominantly axial symptoms were randomised to receive infliximab alone (infusions of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12 and 18) or infliximab combined with MTX (10 mg/week). Infliximab concentrations were measured before and 2 hours after each infusion and at 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14 and 18 weeks. We estimated individual cumulative area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) for infliximab concentration between baseline and week 18 (AUC(0-18)). Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at each visit. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score was the primary end point for clinical response. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included (infliximab group: n = 12, infliximab + MTX group: n = 14), and 507 serum samples were available for measurement of infliximab concentration. The two groups did not differ with regard to AUC(0-18) or evolution of BASDAI scores and biomarkers of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MTX and infliximab does not increase the exposure to infliximab over infliximab alone in patients with AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00507403.

Antibodies toward infliximab are associated with low infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and poor infliximab maintenance in rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: A proportion of patients receiving infliximab have antibodies toward infliximab (ATI), which are associated with increased risk of infusion reaction and reduced response to treatment. We studied the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and development of ATI as well as the association of the presence of ATI and maintenance of infliximab. METHODS: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving infliximab beginning in December 2005 were retrospectively followed until January 2009 or until infliximab discontinuation. Trough serum infliximab and ATI concentrations were measured at each visit. The patients were separated into two groups: ATI(pos) if ATI were detected at least once during the follow-up period and ATI(neg) otherwise. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to study the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and the development of ATI. Maintenance of infliximab in the two groups was studied by using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 108 patients: 17 with RA and 91 with SpA. ATI were detected in 21 patients (19%). The median time to ATI detection after initiation of infliximab was 3.7 months (1.7 to 26.0 months). For both RA and SpA patients, trough infliximab concentration during the initiation period was significantly lower for ATI(pos) than ATI(neg) patients. RA patients showed maintenance of infliximab at a median of 19.5 months (5.0 to 31.0 months) and 12.0 months (2.0 to 24.0 months) for ATI(neg) and ATI(pos) groups, respectively (P = 0.08). SpA patients showed infliximab maintenance at a median of 16.0 months (3.0 to 34.0 months) and 9.5 months (3.0 to 39.0 months) for ATI(neg) and ATI(pos) groups, respectively (P = 0.20). Among SpA patients, those who were being treated concomitantly with methotrexate had a lower risk of developing ATI than patients not taking methotrexate (0 of 14 patients (0%) vs. 25 of 77 patients (32%); P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: High concentrations of infliximab during treatment initiation reduce the development of ATI, and the absence of ATI may be associated with prolonged maintenance of infliximab. Thus, trough serum infliximab concentration should be monitored early in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Infliximab concentration monitoring improves the control of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Adjustment of infliximab dosage for individuals may be useful in improving therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Herein, we aimed to determine whether measurement of infliximab serum concentration modifies the therapeutic decision and improves the control of disease activity. METHODS: RA patients routinely treated with infliximab were included in an observational open-label study. On visit 1 (V1), according to the disease activity, a preliminary therapeutic decision was selected among four therapeutic options and a blood sample was collected to measure trough serum infliximab concentration. The final therapeutic decision, based on both disease activity and serum infliximab concentration assessed at V1, was applied at the following infusion (V2). Clinical and biological evaluations were performed at V3 and V4 and compared with those at V1. RESULTS: We included 24 patients. The final therapeutic decision differed from the preliminary decision for 12 patients (50%). For patients with increased infliximab dosage at V2, mean disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) decreased by about 20% at V3 or V4 as compared with V1 (P < 0.05). Decreased DAS28 was correlated with increased serum infliximab concentration (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of infliximab trough concentration modifies the therapeutic decision for RA patients and helps improve control of disease activity. Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in RA may be useful for individual dosage adjustment.