Potential for Isotoxic Re-irradiation Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

AIMS: The non-surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is an area of unmet need, with no defined standard treatment and extremely poor outcomes. Patients typically receive radiotherapy during initial multimodality treatment and historically re-irradiation has been limited to conservative doses with subsequent short-term symptom control. Recently, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has shown promise in re-irradiation of LRRC in England, but is limited to a relatively modest dose prescription of 30Gy in five fractions. We propose that SABR can be achieved in LRRC to higher doses using an isotoxic dose prescription with fixed 15% per annum tissue recovery for acceptable organ at risk (OAR) constraints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LRRC at a local centre treated with SABR re-irradiation were audited. Patients were identified, the dose and time since previous radiotherapy determined, re-irradiation OAR constraints calculated and retrospective re-planning carried out. RESULTS: In patients currently receiving SABR (17 patients, 21 targets), dose escalation above 30 Gy in five fractions was achievable, with a biological effective dose of 80 Gy (alpha/beta = 10) deliverable to 80% or more of the planning target volume in eight of the 21 targets. CONCLUSIONS: Isotoxic SABR re-irradiation should be considered a potential treatment option for LRRC to maximise patient outcomes while limiting excess toxicity. Although probably conservative, clinical outcome data are needed to determine the suitability of OAR constraints using 15% per annum tissue recovery and the impact on local control rates, patient quality of life and overall survival of isotoxic SABR.

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer in the UK in 2020.

AIMS: Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is the current standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer is increasing in the UK. However, the extent of IMRT implementation and current practice was not previously known. A national survey was commissioned to investigate the landscape of IMRT use for rectal cancer and to inform the development of national rectal cancer IMRT guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was developed by the National Rectal Cancer IMRT Guidance working group in collaboration with the Royal College of Radiologists and disseminated to all UK radiotherapy centres. The survey enquired about the implementation of IMRT with a focus on the following aspects of the workflow: dose fractionation schedules and use of a boost; pre-treatment preparation and simulation; target volume/organ at risk definition; treatment planning and treatment verification. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: In total, 44 of 63 centres (70%) responded to the survey; 30/44 (68%) and 36/44 (82%) centres currently use IMRT to treat all patients and selected patients with rectal cancer, respectively. There was general agreement concerning several aspects of the IMRT workflow, including patient positioning, use of intravenous contrast and bladder protocols. Greater variation in practice was identified regarding rectal protocols; use of a boost to primary/nodal disease; target volume delineation; organ at risk delineation and dose constraints and treatment verification. Delineation of individual small bowel loops and daily volumetric treatment verification were considered potentially feasible by most centres. CONCLUSION: This survey identified that IMRT is already used to treat rectal cancer in many UK radiotherapy centres, but there is heterogeneity between centres in its implementation and practice. These results have been a valuable aid in framing the recommendations within the new National Rectal Cancer IMRT Guidance.

The Pivotal Role of the Therapeutic Radiographer/Radiation Therapist in Image-guided Radiotherapy Research and Development.

The ability to personalise radiotherapy to fit the individual patient and their diagnosis has been realised through technological advancements. There is now more opportunity to utilise these technologies and deliver precision radiotherapy for more patients. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has enabled users to safely and accurately plan, treat and verify complex cases; and deliver a high dose to the target volume, while minimising dose to normal tissue. Rapid changes in IGRT have required a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, carefully deciding optimum protocols to achieve clinical benefit. Therapeutic radiographer/radiation therapists (RTTs) play a pivotal role in this MDT. There is already a great deal of evidence that illustrates the contribution of RTTs in IGRT development; implementation; quality assurance; and maintaining training and competency programmes. Often this has required the RTT to undertake additional roles and responsibilities. These publications show how the profession has evolved, expanding the scope of practice. There are now more opportunities for RTT-led IGRT research. This is not only undertaken in the more traditional aspects of practice, but in recent times, more RTTs are becoming involved in imaging biomarkers research and radiomic analysis. The aim of this overview is to describe the RTT contribution to the ongoing development of IGRT and to showcase some of the profession's involvement in IGRT research.

Study of diffusion weighted MRI as a predictive biomarker of response during radiotherapy for high and intermediate risk squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: The MeRInO study.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with intermediate and high risk squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx (OPSCC) continue to relapse locally despite radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The toxicity of the current combination of intensified dose per fraction radiotherapy and platinum based chemotherapy limits further uniform intensification. If a predictive biomarker for outcomes from CRT can be identified during treatment then individualised and adaptive treatment strategies may be employed. METHODS/DESIGN: The MeRInO study is a prospective observational imaging study of patients with intermediate and high risk, locally advanced OPSCC receiving radical RT or concurrent CRT Patients undergo diffusion weighted MRI prior to treatment (MRI_1) and during the third week of RT (MRI_2). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements will be made on each scan for previously specified target lesions (primary and lymph nodes) and change in ADC calculated. Patients will be followed up and disease status for each target lesion noted. The primary aim of the MeRInO study is to determine the threshold change in ADC from baseline to week 3 of RT that may identify the sub-group of non-responders during treatment. DISCUSSION: The use of DW-MRI as a predictive biomarker during RT for SCC H&N is in its infancy but studies to date have found that response to treatment may indeed be predicted by comparison of DW-MRI carried out before and during treatment. However, previous studies have included all sub-sites and biological sub-types. Establishing ADC thresholds that predict for local failure is an essential step towards using DW-MRI to improve the therapeutic ratio in treating SCC H&N. This would be done most robustly in a specific H&N sub-site and in sub-types with similar biological behaviour. The MeRInO study will help establish these thresholds in OPSCC.

Clinical commissioning of online seed matching protocol for prostate radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to clinically commission an online seed matching image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) protocol using modern hardware/software for patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy. An essential constraint was to achieve this within a busy centre without reducing patient throughput, which had been reported with other techniques. METHODS: 45 patients had 3 fiducial markers inserted into the prostate and were imaged daily using kilovoltage orthogonal images with online correction applied before treatment. A total of 1612 image pairs were acquired and analysed to identify interfractional motion, seed migration and interobserver variability, and assess ease of use. RESULTS: This method of IGRT was implemented successfully in our centre with no impact on treatment times and patient throughput. Systematic (Σ) interfractional set-up errors were 2.2, 2.7 and 3.9 mm in right-left (RL), superoinferior (SI) and anteroposterior (AP) directions, respectively. Random (σ) interfractional set-up errors were 3.2 (RL), 3.7 (SI) and 5.7 mm (AP). There were significant differences between patients. Seed migration and interobserver variability were not significant issues. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique is facilitated by the advanced imaging system, allowing a fast and effective method of correcting set-up errors before treatment. Extended implementation of this technique has improved treatment delivery to the majority of our prostate radiotherapy patients. The measurement of interfractional motion in this study is potentially valuable for margin reduction in intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric arc therapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This technique can be used within treatment time constraints, benefiting large numbers of patients by helping to avoid geographical miss and potentially reducing toxicity to organs at risk.