Mechanisms that underlie blood flow regulation at rest and during exercise.

The cardiovascular system must distribute oxygen and nutrients to the body while maintaining appropriate blood pressure. This is achieved through a combination of central and peripheral mechanisms that influence cardiac output and vasomotor tone throughout the vascular system. Furthermore, the capability to preferentially direct blood to tissues with increased metabolic demand (i.e., active hyperemia) is crucial to exercise tolerance. However, the interaction between these systems is difficult to understand without real-life examples. Fortunately, monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, and heart rate during a series of laboratory protocols will allow students to partition the contributions of these central and peripheral factors. The three protocols include 1) reactive hyperemia in the forearm, 2) small muscle mass handgrip exercise, and 3) large muscle mass cycling exercise. In addition to providing a detailed description of the required equipment, specific protocols, and expected outcomes, this report also reviews some of the common student misconceptions that are associated with the observed physiological responses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Blood flow regulation during exercise is a complicated process that involves many overlapping mechanisms. This laboratory will help students better understand how the body regulates blood flow to the active muscles using three separate protocols: 1) reactive hyperemia, 2) small muscle mass exercise, and 3) large muscle mass exercise.

Contrast sensitivity, optotype acuity and fixation eye movement abnormalities in amblyopia under binocular viewing.

INTRODUCTION: Visual function deficits are seen in amblyopic subjects during fellow and binocular viewing. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between Fixation Eye Movement (FEM) abnormalities and binocular contrast sensitivity and optotype acuity deficits in amblyopia. METHODS: We recruited 10 controls and 25 amblyopic subjects [Anisometropic = 6, Strabismic = 10, Mixed = 9]. We measured binocular contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies 1,2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 and binocular and monocular optotype acuity using a staircase procedure. We recorded FEMs using high-resolution video-oculography and classified subjects as having no nystagmus(None = 9) or nystagmus without FMN(n = 7) and with Fusion Maldevelopment Nystagmus (FMN)(n = 9). We computed the fixation instability, amplitude and velocity of the fast and slow FEMs. RESULTS: Amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus had worse binocular contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies 12 and 16 and binocular optotype acuity than controls. The abnormalities were most pronounced in amblyopic subjects with FMN. Fixation instability of the Fellow Eye and Amblyopic Eye and vergence instability, amplitude of fast FEMs and velocity of slow FEMs were increased with reduced binocular contrast sensitivity and reduced optotype acuity in amblyopic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation instability of Fellow Eye and Amblyopic Eye, optotype acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits are seen under binocular viewing in amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus but are most pronounced in those with FMN. FEMs abnormalities correlate with both lower order (contrast sensitivity) and higher order (optotype acuity) visual function impairment in amblyopia.

Tumor necrosis factor-α, TNF receptor, and soluble TNF receptor responses to aerobic exercise in the heat.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise in the heat on circulating concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, soluble TNF receptors (STNFR1&2), and surface expression of TNFR1&2 on monocyte subpopulations. Twelve recreationally active Caucasian men (24.4 ± 3.4 yrs.; 180.0 ± 6.8 cm; 81.5 ± 8.0 kg; 47.2 ± 4.8 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed an exercise protocol in three environmental conditions: high temperature/low humidity [HTLH; 35 °C, 20% relative humidity (RH)]; high temperature/moderate humidity (HTMH; 35 °C, 45%RH); and moderate temperature/moderate humidity (MTMH; 22 °C, 45%RH). Each protocol consisted of a 60-minute cycling trial at 60% VO2max, a 15-minute rest, and a time-to-exhaustion trial at 90% VO2max (TTE). Blood was sampled before (PRE), immediately after (POST) the 60-minute trial, immediately post-TTE (PTTE), and one-hour post-TTE (REC). Circulating TNF-α and STNFR1&2 were assayed. TNFR1&2 expression on monocyte subsets was measured by flow cytometry on a subset of participants (n = 8). TNF-α area under the curve with respect to increase (AUCi) was greater during HTMH compared to MTMH and HTLH. STNFR1 concentration was greater during HTMH compared to MTMH. With all trials combined, STNFR1 concentration increased from PRE to POST, PTTE, and REC. TNFR1 expression on non-classical monocytes was greater during HTMH compared to HTLH while TNFR2 expression was lower during HTLH compared to both MTMH and HTMH. Data suggest that exercise in the heat increases circulating TNF-α and STNFR1 concentration concomitantly. Furthermore, non-classical monocyte expression of TNFRs are impacted by temperature and humidity during exercise.