To Tranexamic Acid or Not to Tranexamic Acid? Accuracy of Antifibrinolytic Administration at Altitude.

OBJECTIVE: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has demonstrated a reduction in all-cause mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhage. Administering TXA in the prehospital setting presents unique challenges because the identification of bleeding is based on clinical suspicion without advanced imaging or diagnostic tools. The objective of this study was to examine whether prehospital suspicion of bleeding is validated by in-hospital computed tomographic imaging and examination and to determine if patients received TXA in the absence of hemorrhage. The study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center supported by air medical transport services. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study examining 88 trauma patients receiving prehospital TXA to treat suspected hemorrhage. Adult trauma patients who received TXA during the study period and were transported to our level 1 trauma center were included. A panel of trauma surgeons reviewed CT imaging and examination findings to retrospectively identify significant hemorrhage. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of patients who received TXA during air medical transport did not have confirmed hemorrhage upon arrival. CONCLUSION: TXA was given to a significant number of patients who did not have confirmed hemorrhage upon arrival. We recommend that institutions using TXA perform this internal validation to ensure they are accurately identifying hemorrhage in the prehospital setting.

Blunt chest wall trauma: Rib fractures and associated injuries.

ABSTRACT: Blunt injuries to the chest wall, specifically those related to rib fractures, need to be promptly identified and effectively managed to reduce patient morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, judicious use of multimodal pain management and early identification of patients who will benefit from the surgical stabilization of rib fractures are paramount to optimal outcomes.

The Effect of Chronic Preoperative Opioid Use on Surgical Site Infections, Length of Stay, and Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid use in the United States is a well-recognized public health concern with many negative downstream consequences. Few data exist regarding the use of preoperative opioids in relation to outcomes after elective colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if chronic opioid use before colorectal surgery is associated with a detriment in postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of administrative data supplemented by individual chart review. SETTING: This study was conducted in a single-institution, multisurgeon, community colorectal training practice. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery over a 3-year time frame (2011-2014) were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opioid use was stratified based on total dose of morphine milligram equivalents (naive, sporadic use (>0-15 mg/day), regular use (>15-45 mg/day), and frequent use (>45 mg/day)). Primary outcomes were surgical site infections, length of hospital stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the 923 patients, 23% (n = 213) were using opioids preoperatively. The preoperative opioid group contained more women (p = 0.047), underwent more open surgery (p = 0.003), had more nonmalignant indications (p = 0.013), and had a higher ASA classification (p = 0.003). Although median hospital stay was longer (4.7 days vs 4.0, p < 0.001), there was no difference in any surgical site infections (10.3% vs 7.1%, p = 0.123) or readmissions (14.2% vs 14.1%, p=0.954). Multivariable analysis identified preoperative opioid use (17.0% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 6.8%-28.2%) and ASA 3 or 4 (27.2% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 17.1-38.3) to be associated with an increase in length of stay. LIMITATIONS: Retrospectively abstracted opioid use and small numbers limit the conclusions regarding any dose-related responses on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative opioid use was not associated with an increased rate of surgical site infections or readmissions, it was independently associated with an increased hospital length of stay. Innovative perioperative strategies will be necessary to eliminate these differences for patients on chronic opioids. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280. EFECTOS DEL CONSUMO CRÓNICO DE OPIOIDES EN EL PREOPERATORIO CON RELACIÓN A LAS INFECCIONES DE LA HERIDA QUIRÚRGICA, LA DURACIÓN DE LA ESTADÍA Y LA READMISIÓN: El consumo crónico de opioides en los Estados Unidos es un problema de salud pública bien reconocido a causa de sus multiples consecuencias negativas ulteriores. Existen pocos datos sobre el consumo de opioides en el preoperatorio relacionado con los resultados consecuentes a una cirugía colorrectal electiva.El propósito es determinar si el consumo crónico de opioides antes de la cirugía colorrectal se asocia con un detrimento en los resultados postoperatorios.Revisión retrospectiva de datos administrativos complementada por la revisión de un gráfico individual.Ejercicio durante la formación de multiples residentes en cirugía colorrectal enTodos los pacientes de cirugía colorrectal electiva durante un período de 3 años (2011-2014).El uso de opioides se estratificó en función de la dosis total de equivalentes de miligramos de morfínicos (uso previo, uso esporádico [> 0-15 mg / día], uso regular (> 15-45 mg / día) y uso frecuente (> 45 mg / día)). Los resultados primarios fueron las infecciones de la herida quirúrgica, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria y la readmisión.De los 923 pacientes, el 23% (n = 213) consumían opioides antes de la operación. El grupo con opioides preoperatorios tenía más mujeres (p = 0.047), se sometió a una cirugía abierta (p = 0.003), tenía mas indicaciones no malignas (p = 0.013) y tenía una clasificación ASA más alta (p = 0.003). Aunque la mediana de la estadía hospitalaria fue más larga (4,7 días frente a 4,0; p <0,001), no hubo diferencia en ninguna infección de la herida quirúrgica (10,3% frente a 7,1%, p = 0,123) o las readmisiones (14,2% frente a 14,1%, p = 0,954). El análisis multivariable identificó que el uso de opioides preoperatorios (17.0% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 6.8%, 28.2%) y ASA 3 o 4 (27.2% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 17.1, 38.3) se asocia con un aumento en LOS.La evaluación retrospectiva poco precisa del consumo de opioides y el pequeño número de casos limitan las conclusiones sobre cualquier respuesta relacionada con la dosis - resultado.Si bien el consumo de opioides preoperatorios no se asoció con un aumento en la tasa de infecciones de la herida quirúrgica o las readmisiones, ella se asoció de forma independiente con un aumento de la LOS hospitalaria. Serán necesarias estrategias perioperatorias innovadoras para eliminar estas diferencias en los pacientes consumidores cronicos de opioides. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Process Improvement: Examining a Novel Case Evaluation Tool and Standardized Simulations.

A quality improvement project was undertaken. The objectives of this study were to describe an original case evaluation tool, discuss barriers encountered, present a standardized simulation course, and evaluate the efficacy of this course. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging adjunct in the trauma bay for patients with noncompressible subdiaphragmatic hemorrhage. Compared with the alternative (emergency department thoracotomy), it is less invasive and allows for continuation of chest compressions, and early studies suggest a positive effect on mortality. Infrequent utilization of REBOA limits provider and support staff exposure to its indications and technical skills required to deploy the device. Furthermore, there is no standardized evaluation tool for collecting and reporting REBOA-related data. The REBOA Review Tool was designed to easily evaluate all the steps involved in deploying the REBOA tool and was implemented at our institution without difficulty. This tool provided meaningful feedback for areas that required improvement including ease of information retrieval and documentation of sheath removal. Standardized simulation courses were performed to further improve provider and support staff confidence in using the REBOA tool. Analysis of pre- and postsimulation surveys showed significant improvement in participants' confidence in their understanding and utilization of the REBOA tool and its indications. REBOA placement is a low-volume but high-impact procedure. Therefore, simulations to prepare and a standardized tool to learn from prior experience are vital to improving patient care.

Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors with Increased Mortality Among Patients with Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with one-third of all deaths from trauma. Preinjury exposure to cardiovascular drugs may affect TBI outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exacerbate brain cell damage and worsen functional outcomes in the laboratory setting. ß-blockers (BBs), however, appear to be associated with reduced mortality among patients with isolated TBI. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between preinjury ACEI and BB use and clinical outcome among patients with isolated TBI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients age ≥ 40 years admitted to an academic level 1 trauma center with isolated TBI between January 2010 and December 2014 was performed. Isolated TBI was defined as a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 3, with chest, abdomen, and extremity AIS scores ≤ 2. Preinjury medication use was determined through chart review. All patients with concurrent BB use were initially excluded. In-hospital mortality was the primary measured outcome. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, 600 patients were identified with isolated TBI who were naive to BB use. There was significantly higher mortality (P = .04) among patients who received ACEI before injury (10 of 96; 10%) than among those who did not (25 of 504; 5%). A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed a threefold increased risk of mortality in the ACEI cohort (P < .001), which was even greater than the twofold increased risk of mortality associated with an Injury Severity Score ≥ 16. A second analysis that included patients who received preinjury BBs (n = 98) demonstrated slightly reduced mortality in the ACEI cohort with only a twofold increased risk in multivariate analysis (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury exposure to ACEIs is associated with an increase in mortality among patients with isolated TBI. This effect is ameliorated in patients who receive BBs, which provides evidence that this class of medications may provide a protective benefit.

Surgical Site Infection after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Rare but Morbid.

Background: Although surgical stabilization for rib fractures (SSRF) has been adopted widely over the past decade, little information is available regarding the prevalence and outcomes of post-operative surgical site infection (SSI). We hypothesized that SSI after SSRF is uncommon but morbid. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing SSRF at a level 1 trauma center from 2010-2020 were reviewed. The primary outcome was the prevalence of SSI, documented by clinical examination, radiography, systemic markers of infection, and microbiology. Results: Of 228 patients undergoing SSRF, 167 (73.2%) were male, the median age was 53 years (P25-P75; 41-63 years), injury severity score (ISS) was 19 (P25-P75, 13-26), with a median of eight fractured ribs (P25-P75, 6-11). All stabilization plates were titanium. SSRF was typically performed on post-injury day one (P25-P75, 0-2 days) after trauma. All patients received antibiotic agents within 30 minutes of incision, and a median of four ribs (P25-P75, 3-6) were repaired. Four (1.8%) patients developed an SSI and all underwent implant removal. Two patients required implant removal within 30 days (on post-operative day seven and 17) and two for chronic infection at seven and 17 months after SSRF. The causative organism was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteria in all patients. After implant removal, three patients received intravenous and oral antibiotic agents, ranging from two to six weeks, without recurrent infection. No patient required additional SSRF. Conclusions: Surgical site infection after SSRF is rare but morbid and can become symptomatic within one week to 17 months. Implant removal results in complete recovery.

The danger zone: Injuries and conditions associated with immediately fatal motorcycle crashes in the state of Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Immediately fatal motorcycle crashes have not been well characterized. This study catalogues injuries sustained in fatal motorcycle crashes and assesses the impact of crash conditions on injury patterns. METHODS: Autopsy records from the office of the medical examiner of Kent County, MI and publicly available traffic reports were queried for information pertaining to motorcyclists declared dead on-scene between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. RESULTS: A total of 71 autopsies of on-scene motorcycle crash fatalities were identified. The two most prevalent injuries were traumatic brain injury (TBI) (85%) and rib fractures (79%). The majority of fatalities occurred in daylight hours (54.3%) and in a 55 mph speed limit zone (63.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a catalogue of the injuries sustained in immediately fatal motorcycle crashes and the associated conditions. Advocacy efforts that highlight the risks associated with motorcycle riding and that promote safe riding practices are warranted.

Resident impact on operative duration for elective general surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Resident involvement in operations increases operative duration. This study investigated resident impact on operative time for a single general surgeon in an outpatient surgical setting. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of index general surgical operations meeting inclusion criteria. Operative duration, patient demographics, 30-day complication/readmission rates, and degree of resident involvement were collected. RESULTS: 625 cases were analyzed. Patient demographics were similar for all procedural comparison groups. Operative time increased with resident involvement for each operation-umbilical hernia repairs were associated with a 19% increase (22.3 ± 6.7 versus 26.5 ± 7.5 min, p = 0.002), laparoscopic cholecystectomies demonstrated a 15% increase (25.8 ± 8.7 versus 29.7 ± 10.2 min, p = 0.001), and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs demonstrated a 25% increase (32.1 ± 11.3 versus 40.2 ± 8.9 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Each surgeon must decide if the increase in operative duration caused by resident involvement is justified by the intangible benefits residents provide.

Patient perspectives on postoperative visits after common general operative procedures.

BACKGROUND: Many postoperative concerns after common general operative procedures may be addressed over the phone, thereby saving time and resources for both the patient and surgeon. METHODS: Over a 6-month time period, patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, and inguinal or umbilical hernia repair were mailed an anonymous survey. The primary outcome measure was whether or not patients felt their concerns could have been addressed adequately over the phone in place of an office visit. RESULTS: A total of 1,406 surveys were mailed with 339 responses (24%: 174 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 83 inguinal hernia, 41 appendectomy, and 41 umbilical hernia). One hundred twelve (33%) felt their concerns could have been addressed adequately over the phone without an office visit. Patients who spent less time with their doctor at the appointment favored telephone follow-up (P < .001). Patients undergoing inguinal hernia were less interested in telephone follow-up compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (15% vs 41%; P < .001), appendectomy (15% vs 34%; P = .018), and umbilical hernia (15% vs 37%; P = .010). Of 66 patients (20%) with self-reported complications, 44% sought care from a healthcare provider other than their primary surgeon. CONCLUSION: These observations are important for healthcare organizations seeking to maximize surgeon efficiency while improving patient satisfaction.