Incidental renal mass found on focused assessment with sonography in trauma.

We present the case of a 9-year-old female who presented after minor blunt abdominal trauma during a sporting event. On focused assessment with sonography for trauma, she was found to have an incidental renal mass, which was ultimately diagnosed as a renal cell carcinoma. In this report, we focus on the use of bedside ultrasound as a screening test and the management of incidental findings.

Home Introduction of Baked Egg After Oral Food Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Baked egg (BE) introduction may accelerate resolution of egg allergy. Long-term data regarding the safety and success of BE introduction in the real world are limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of future egg consumption and barriers to advancement based on characteristics during and after BE oral food challenges (OFCs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive BE OFCs with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Goal doses ranged from 1/16 to 1/4 egg. Outcomes were categorized as pass (no reaction), fail (but allowed BE introduction), or fail (avoid). Status of egg introduction and reactions were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were included; 134 passed and 109 failed (70 of whom were instructed to introduce BE). At follow-up (median, 47 months), 90 (37%) were consuming direct egg, 26 (11%) lightly cooked egg, 39 (16%) BE, and 88 (36%) avoiding; 58% who failed versus 81% who passed were consuming some form of egg. Median egg white IgE level was significantly higher among avoiders versus introducers (8.7 vs 5.8; P = .008). Lower egg white IgE level and younger age were predictors of egg consumption in some form at follow-up (median IgE, 5.8 vs 8.4; P = .03; median age, 4.0 vs 8.0 years; P < .001). A total of 94 patients had a total of 136 reactions (132 mild, 4 severe); 22 (16.2%) were accidental exposures, 42 (30.9%) planned escalations, and 72 (52.9%) with previously tolerated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who underwent a BE OFC continued to consume some form of egg, often advancing to direct egg. However, many reverted to avoidance and adverse reactions were common.

Oral immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy.

The US Food and Drug Administration's approval of a peanut oral immunotherapy product in January 2020 is a landmark development in the field of food allergy therapy. While food allergy prevalence has been increasing, this product is the first approved therapy for food allergy. Oral immunotherapy has many similarities to subcutaneous immunotherapy and drug desensitization protocols, but does not lead to sustained unresponsiveness. The studies leading to approval of the Palforzia product demonstrated increase in the amount of peanut protein able to be consumed, with 67% of subjects randomized to the treatment arm able to consume 600 mg of peanut protein in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at study exit. However, side effects are an important consideration, and dropout rates in studies of Palforzia ranged from 11% to 21%. Postmarketing surveillance of this product will be critical in assessing its long-term risks and benefits.

Epidemiology of Food Allergy.

Understanding the epidemiology of food allergy is complicated by the difficulty of identifying it on a large scale. The prevalence of food allergy is higher in younger age groups and decreases with age. Allergy to peanut and egg seems to be more common in Northern Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia compared with Southern Europe, Eastern Europe and Asia, whereas shellfish and fish allergies may be more common in Asia. The rate of transient unrecognized food allergy may be high and variable recognition of food allergy may explain some of the differences seen in food allergy prevalence.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Baked Milk Introduction.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of baked milk (BM) introduction have demonstrated accelerated resolution of milk allergy. OBJECTIVE: Long-term data regarding real-world introduction of BM are lacking. We sought to characterize our experience of BM introduction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive BM oral food challenges performed in our clinic from 2009 to 2014, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients challenged, 99 (48%) passed and 187 were sent home with detailed instructions to incorporate BM into their diets. After a median of 49 months of follow-up, 43% of the 187 had progressed to direct milk, 20% to less-cooked forms of milk, 10% remained ingesting BM, and 28% were strictly avoiding milk. Higher milk IgE levels were associated with decreased odds of passing a BM challenge and advancing to less-cooked forms of milk. Predictors of progressing to less-cooked forms of milk were passing the challenge and younger age. There were 79 reported milk reactions involving 68 patients (33% of total) during follow-up. Of these, 78% were classified as mild, 14% severe, and 6 patients developed eosinophilic esophagitis. Of 11 severe reactions, 4 were accidental exposures, 3 were planned escalations, and 4 occurred with previously tolerated doses. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients who underwent a BM challenge, including those who failed their challenge, were able to progress to direct or less-cooked forms of milk. However, adverse reactions were common, and even a successful BM challenge does not guarantee future tolerance of BM or preclude later reactions, even to previously tolerated doses.