A method for recording single unit activity in lumbar spinal cord in rats anesthetized with nitrous oxide in a hyperbaric chamber.

The limited potency of nitrous oxide mandates the use of a hyperbaric chamber to produce anesthesia. Use of a hyperbaric chamber complicates anesthetic delivery, ventilation, and electrophysiological recording. We constructed a hyperbaric acrylic-aluminum chamber allowing recording of single unit activity in spinal cord of rats anesthetized only with N(2)O. Large aluminum plates secured to each other by rods that span the length of the chamber close each end of the chamber. The 122 cm long, 33 cm wide chamber housed ventilator, intravenous infusion pumps, recording headstage, including hydraulic microdrive and stepper motors (controlled by external computers). Electrical pass-throughs in the plates permitted electrical current or signals to enter or leave the chamber. In rats anesthetized only with N(2)O we recorded extracellular action potentials with a high signal-to-noise ratio. We also recorded electroencephalographic activity. This technique is well-suited to study actions of weak anesthetics such as N(2)O and Xe at working pressures of 4-5 atm or greater. The safety of such pressures depends on the wall thickness and chamber diameter.

Temporal and spatial determinants of sacral dorsal horn neuronal windup in relation to isoflurane-induced immobility.

BACKGROUND: Windup is a progressive increase in response of dorsal horn neurons to repetitive C-fiber stimulation that may underlie temporal summation of pain. We investigated the frequency- and intensity-dependency of windup, and the effects of isoflurane and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade, to determine if they parallel the influence of temporal and spatial summation of noxious stimuli on anesthetic requirements. METHODS: We recorded responses of rat sacral dorsal horn neurons to 20-s trains of electrical tail stimulation at different frequencies (0.3-10 Hz) and intensities (0.8-5 x stimulus threshold) during delivery of 0.7 to 1.3 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration isoflurane. Summed responses (area under the curve [AUC] windup), initial response, absolute windup (AUC minus 20 times the initial response), and slope of windup were quantified. RESULTS: Increases in stimulus intensity and frequency progressively increased AUC windup (P < 0.01 for both) and correlated with isoflurane concentrations required for immobility (R2 = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively). Increasing the isoflurane concentration significantly suppressed each measure of windup elicited by low-intensity and low-frequency, but not high-intensity and high-frequency stimulus trains. The initial response magnitude significantly correlated with slope of windup across stimulus intensities and isoflurane concentrations. The NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 significantly reduced windup (to 53%; P < 0.05) at 1 Hz. CONCLUSION: Windup of dorsal horn neurons at low stimulus intensities and frequencies increases isoflurane requirements for immobility via a NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism. At high stimulus intensities and frequencies, windup was resistant to isoflurane consistent with larger anesthetic requirements for immobility.

The excitatory and inhibitory effects of nitrous oxide on spinal neuronal responses to noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Because of the logistical obstacles to measurement under hyperbaric conditions, the effect of nitrous oxide (N2O) alone on spinal neuronal responses has not been tested. We hypothesized that, like other inhaled anesthetics, N2O would depress spinal neuronal responses to noxious stimulation. METHODS: The lumbar spinal cord was exposed in rats anesthetized with isoflurane. Mechanically ventilated rats were placed into a hyperbaric chamber and needle electrodes were inserted into the hindpaws. Isoflurane administration was discontinued and anesthesia converted to N2O by pressurizing the chamber with N2O. A microelectrode was inserted into the lumbar cord using computer-controlled motors and a hydraulic microdrive. Neuronal responses to electrical stimulation of the hindpaw were sought at 1.5, 2, and 2.5 atm N2O (0.8-1.3 minimum alveolar concentration). RESULTS: Increasing N2O partial pressures variably affected neuronal responses to a 2 s 100-Hz electrical stimulus. Neuronal depth and neuronal response were correlated, with superficial neurons tending to be facilitated, while deeper neurons were depressed; (overall responses were 1331 +/- 408, 1594 +/- 383, and 1578 +/- 500 impulses/min at 1.5, 2, and 2.5 atm N2O, respectively; mean, standard error). N2O did not affect neuronal responses to a repetitive "windup" stimulus. Infusion of the N-methyl-d-aspartate blocker MK-801 into separate rats increased the neuronal response to the 100-Hz stimulus (from 781 +/- 216 to 1352 +/- 269 impulses/min, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: N2O facilitated superficial spinal neuronal responses to noxious stimulation while depressing deeper neurons. These results suggest that anesthetic partial pressures of N2O have divergent effects on spinal neuronal responses to noxious stimulation, the specific responses depending on the depth of the spinal neurons.

Long ascending propriospinal projections from lumbosacral to upper cervical spinal cord in the rat.

The retrograde tracer cholera toxin beta-subunit (CTB) was used to trace long ascending propriospinal projections from neurons in the lumbosacral spinal cord to the upper cervical (C3) gray matter in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Following large 0.5 microl CTB injections restricted mainly to the upper cervical ventral horn (n=5), there were many lumbosacral CTB-positive neurons (14-17/section) in the intermediate gray and ventral horn (dorsal lamina VIII, medial VII extending into X) contralaterally, with fewer at corresponding ipsilateral locations. Labeled cells (4-8/section) were also observed in contralateral laminae IV-VI and the lateral spinal nucleus, with fewer ipsilaterally. Few labeled cells (<2/section) were observed in superficial laminae I-II. Smaller (0.15 microl) microinjections of CTB restricted to the upper cervical ventral gray matter labeled cells in contralateral laminae VII-VIII (approximately 6-9/section) with fewer ipsilaterally. There were relatively fewer (<2/section) in the intermediate dorsal horn and very few (<1/section) in lamina I. Larger (0.5 microl) CTB injections encompassing the C3 dorsal and ventral gray matter on one side labeled significantly more CTB-positive neurons (>6/section) in contralateral lamina I compared to ventral horn injections. These results suggest direct projections from ventromedially located neurons of lumbar and sacral segments to the contralateral ventral gray matter of upper cervical segments, as well as from neurons in the intermediate but not superficial dorsal horn. They further suggest that some lumbosacral superficial dorsal horn neurons project to the upper cervical dorsal horn. These propriospinal projections may be involved in coordinating head and neck movements during locomotion or stimulus-evoked motor responses.

The differential effects of halothane and isoflurane on windup of dorsal horn neurons selected in unanesthetized decerebrated rats.

Halothane and isoflurane, in the peri-minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) range, exert differential effects on spinal nociceptive neurons, whereby halothane further depresses their responses from 0.8 to 1.2 MAC, whereas isoflurane does not. We presently investigated if these anesthetics differentially affect windup, the progressive increase in neuronal responses to repetitive noxious stimuli, over a broad concentration range from 0 to 1.2 MAC. In decerebrated rats, single-unit recordings were made from dorsal horn neurons exhibiting windup to 20 1-Hz C-fiber strength electrical stimuli. Halothane and isoflurane (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 MAC) were tested in a counterbalanced crossover protocol. Increasing halothane and isoflurane from 0 to 1.2 MAC progressively suppressed the response to the first stimulus, as well as summed responses to all stimuli (to 34% +/- 8% and 50% +/- 8%, respectively; P < 0.05). Absolute windup (summed response minus 20x the first response) was suppressed by both anesthetics from 0 to 0.8 MAC, with further depression by halothane but not isoflurane at 1.2 MAC. Responses of neurons isolated at 0 MAC were partially, but never totally, depressed at 0.8 MAC. The dose-dependent suppression of windup is consistent with reduced temporal summation of pain. Further depression at 1.2 MAC halothane, but not isoflurane, suggests different sites of immobilizing action for these two anesthetics. Immobility seems to not be mediated by severe anesthetic depression of a subpopulation of nociceptive neurons.

Contrasting roles of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in the production of immobilization by conventional and aromatic anesthetics.

We hypothesized that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors mediate some or all of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to prevent movement in the face of noxious stimulation, and that this capacity to prevent movement correlates directly with the in vitro capacity of such anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. To test this hypothesis, we measured the effect of IV infusion of the NMDA blockers dizocilpine (MK-801) and (R)-4-(3-phosphonopropyl) piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (CPP) to decrease the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic that prevents movement in 50% of subjects given a noxious stimulation) of 8 conventional anesthetics (cyclopropane, desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and xenon) and 8 aromatic compounds (benzene, fluorobenzene, o-difluorobenzene, p-difluorobenzene, 1,2,4-trifluorobenzene, 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene, pentafluorobenzene, and hexafluorobenzene) and, for comparison, etomidate. We postulated that MK-801 or CPP infusions would decrease MAC in inverse proportion to the in vitro capacity of these anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. This notion proved correct for the aromatic inhaled anesthetics, but not for the conventional anesthetics. At the greatest infusion of MK-801 (32 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) the MACs of conventional anesthetics decreased by 59.4 +/- 3.4% (mean +/- sd) and at 8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) by 45.5 +/- 4.2%, a decrease not significantly different from a 51.4 +/- 19.0% decrease produced in the EC50 for etomidate, an anesthetic that acts solely by enhancing gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors. We conclude that some aromatic anesthetics may produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation by blocking the action of glutamate on NMDA receptors but that conventional inhaled anesthetics do not.

Do N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to suppress the temporal summation that contributes to minimum alveolar concentration?

Antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors markedly decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetics. To assess the importance of suppression of the temporal summation NMDA receptor component of MAC, we stimulated the tail of rats with trains of electrical pulses of varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and determined the inhaled anesthetic concentrations (crossover concentrations) that suppressed movement at different ISIs. The slopes of crossover concentrations versus ISIs provided a measure of temporal summation for each anesthetic. We studied five anesthetics that differ widely in their in vitro capacity to block NMDA receptors. To block NMDA receptor transmission and reveal the NMDA receptor component, the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK801, was separately added during each anesthetic. Halothane, isoflurane, and hexafluorobenzene did not appreciably suppress the NMDA receptor components of temporal summation, which contributed to 21% to 29% of MAC (P < 0.05 for each). Xenon and o-difluorobenzene suppressed these components to 8% to 0%, respectively, of MAC (neither significant), consistent with their greater NMDA receptor blocking action in vitro. NMDA receptor blockade may contribute to the MAC produced by inhaled anesthetics that potently inhibit NMDA receptors in vitro but not those that have a limited in vitro effect.

Administration of epinephrine does not increase learning of fear to tone in rats anesthetized with isoflurane or desflurane.

Previous reports suggest that the administration of epinephrine increases learning during deep barbiturate-chloral hydrate anesthesia in rats but not during anesthesia with 0.4% isoflurane in rabbits. We revisited this issue, using fear conditioning to a tone in rats as our experimental model for learning and memory and isoflurane and desflurane as our anesthetics. Expressed as a fraction of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of rats, the amnestic 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for fear to tone in control rats inhaling isoflurane and injected with saline intraperitoneally (i.p.) was 0.32 +/- 0.03 MAC (mean +/- se) compared with 0.37 +/- 0.06 MAC in rats injected with 0.01 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. and 0.38 +/- 0.03 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. For desflurane, the amnestic ED(50) were 0.32 +/- 0.05 MAC in control rats receiving a saline injection i.p. versus 0.36 +/- 0.04 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. We conclude that exogenous epinephrine does not decrease amnesia produced by inhaled isoflurane or desflurane, as assessed by fear conditioning to a tone in rats.

Isoflurane depresses windup of C fiber-evoked limb withdrawal with variable effects on nociceptive lumbar spinal neurons in rats.

Windup is a progressive increase in responses of nociceptive spinal cord neurons to repeated electrical C fiber stimulation. We hypothesized that isoflurane would depress windup at approximately the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) required to suppress purposeful movement in response to noxious stimulation. We recorded windup responses in single lumbar spinal neurons (n = 17) to a series of 15 repetitive electrical stimuli delivered at 1 Hz to the hindpaw at C fiber strength; hindpaw withdrawal force was simultaneously recorded. The total number of action potentials per 15 stimuli (mean +/- sem as a percentage of each neuron's maximal response) was 83% +/- 5%, 84% +/- 5%, 67% +/- 7%, and 57% +/- 8% at 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4 MAC, respectively. The 0.9 and 1.1 MAC values differed significantly from each other, whereas the 0.7 and 0.9 MAC values differed from the 1.4 MAC value (P < 0.05). The reduced firing was attributed to a depression of the initial C fiber-evoked responses in most units, and a reduction in windup slope over the initial 5 stimuli in 6 units. Muscle force was 67%, 11%, and 4% of the 0.7 MAC value at 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4 MAC, respectively. Isoflurane depressed excitability and variably affected windup of lumbar spinal cord neurons, while uniformly depressing windup of limb withdrawals in a concentration-dependent manner.

Isoflurane causes anterograde but not retrograde amnesia for pavlovian fear conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Production of retrograde amnesia by anesthetics would indicate that these drugs can disrupt mechanisms that stabilize memory. Such disruption would allow suppression of memory of previous untoward events. The authors examined whether isoflurane provides retrograde amnesia for classic (Pavlovian) fear conditioning. METHODS: Rats were trained to fear tone by applying three (three-trial) or one (one-trial) tone-shock pairs while breathing various constant concentrations of isoflurane. Immediately after training, isoflurane administration was either discontinued, maintained unchanged, or rapidly increased to 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration for 1 h longer. Groups of rats were similarly trained to fear context while breathing isoflurane by applying shocks (without tones) in a distinctive environment. The next day, memory for the conditioned stimuli was determined by presenting the tone or context (without shock) and measuring the proportion of time each rat froze (appeared immobile). For each conditioning procedure, the effects of the three posttraining isoflurane treatments were compared. RESULTS: Rapid increases in posttraining isoflurane administration did not suppress conditioned fear for any of the training procedures. In contrast, isoflurane administration during conditioning dose-dependently suppressed conditioning (P < 0.05). Training to tone was more resistant to the effects of isoflurane than training to context (P < 0.05), and the three-trial learning procedure was more was more resistant than the one-trial procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane provided intense dose-dependent anterograde but not retrograde amnesia for classic fear conditioning. Isoflurane appears to disrupt memory processes that occur at or within a few minutes of the conditioning procedure.

Temporal summation governs part of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia may delay the onset of movement in response to noxious stimulation. The authors hypothesized that the production of immobility could involve depression of time-related processes involved in the generation of movement. METHODS: The delays (latencies) between onset of tail clamp (n = 16) or 50-Hz continuous electrical stimulation (n = 8) and movement were measured in rats equilibrated at 0.1-0.2% increasing steps of isoflurane. In other rats (n = 8), the isoflurane concentrations just permitting and preventing movement (crossover concentrations) in response to trains of 0.5-ms 50-V square-wave pulses of interstimulus intervals of 10, 3, 1, 0.3, or 0.1 s during the step increases were measured. These measures were again made during administration of intravenous MK801, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist that can block temporal summation (n = 6). Temporal summation refers to the cumulative effect of repeated stimuli. Crossover concentrations to 10- and 0.1-s interstimulus interval pulses ranging in voltage from 0.25-50 V were also measured (n = 4). RESULTS: The increase in concentrations from 0.6 to nearly 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration progressively increased latency from less than 1 s to 58 s. Shortening the interstimulus interval (50 V) pulses from 10 to 0.1 s progressively increased crossover concentrations from 0.6 to 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration. In contrast, during MK801 administration shortening interstimulus intervals did not change crossover concentrations, producing a flat response to change in the interstimulus interval. Increasing the voltage of interstimulus interval pulses increased the crossover concentrations but did not change the response to change in interstimulus intervals for pulses greater than 1 V. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the duration or frequency (interstimulus interval) of stimulation increases the concentration of isoflurane required to suppress movement by a 0.4 minimum alveolar concentration MK801 blocks this effect, a finding consistent with temporal summation (which requires intact N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity) at concentrations of up to 1 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane.

Short-term memory resists the depressant effect of the nonimmobilizer 1-2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) more than long-term memory.

UNLABELLED: The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N, also termed F6) does not suppress movement to noxious stimuli but does suppress learning of fear-potentiated startle. The mechanism whereby 2N suppresses this learning is unknown. Herein, we report the effect of 2N on suppression of two other forms of learning, fear conditioning to context and to tone. Because 2N does not cause sedation, we could study the effect of 2N on short-term memory (memory for fear conditioning measured during or immediately after training) as well as on long-term memory (measured 24 h after training). The EC(50) for suppression of long-term memory (the concentration decreasing memory by 50%) of fear conditioning to context was 2.00% plus/minus 0.01% (mean plus/minus SEM), and for fear conditioning to tone was 3.45% plus/minus 0.26%, (P < 0.05). The EC(50) for suppression of short-term memory of fear conditioning to context was 2.59% plus/minus 0.21% (P < 0.05, compared with long-term memory of context conditioning), whereas short-term memory of fear conditioning to tone was not suppressed by 3.5%, the largest concentration studied. Thus, short-term memory resists the depressant effect of 2N more than long-term memory, fear conditioning to tone is less vulnerable to the effect of 2N than fear conditioning to context, and 3.5% 2N does not preclude transmission of tone and shock signals to the site where tone-shock associations are formed. IMPLICATIONS: The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane has a greater depressant effect on long-term memory than short-term memory, suggesting that it impairs the processes responsible for the retention of memory more than for the formation of memory itself.

Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration.

Studies using molecular modeling, genetic engineering, neurophysiology/pharmacology, and whole animals have advanced our understanding of where and how inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration; MAC) by actions on the spinal cord. Numerous ligand- and voltage-gated channels might plausibly mediate MAC, and specific amino acid sites in certain receptors present likely candidates for mediation. However, in vivo studies to date suggest that several channels or receptors may not be mediators (e.g., gamma-aminobutyric acid A, acetylcholine, potassium, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3, opioids, and alpha(2)-adrenergic), whereas other receptors/channels (e.g., glycine, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and sodium) remain credible candidates.