RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of patients with type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with either intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or retinal laser photocoagulation (RLP). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Infants treated for type I ROP with IVB or RLP. METHODS: Patients who were born between January 2011 and December 2014 and were treated in Farabi Eye Hospital were included. The outcomes were stratified and analyzed, based on the treatment type and ROP zone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for retreatment, time to regression, refractive errors, retinal adverse anatomic outcomes, and rate of complications. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-three patients were treated for type 1 ROP, of whom 493 (986 eyes) met inclusion criteria. Seven hundred twenty-four eyes (73.4%) received IVB, and 262 eyes (26.5%) received RLP. Re-treatment (because of recurrent or persistent retinopathy) occurred in 14.4% (106/724) of eyes initially treated with IVB and in 8.8% (23/262) eyes initially treated with RLP (P = 0.065). Re-treatment was not significantly different between the 2 groups for patients with zone I disease (P = 0.978). Re-treatment rate was considerably higher in patients with zone II disease treated with IVB (69/558 [12.3%]) compared with those treated with RLP (20/251 [7.9%]; P = 0.017). In the IVB group, 82.8% and 53.4% of eyes showed an avascular area in zone III (despite ROP regression) at 1 and 2 years after treatment, respectively. The spherical power and the spherical equivalent were significantly higher in eyes treated with RLP (-1.31±2.83 diopters [D] and -2.84±2.77 D, respectively) than eyes treated with IVB (0.19±3.21 D and -1.26±3.19 D, respectively; P = 0.016 and P = 0.007, respectively). Differences in astigmatic power were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both IVB and RLP are effective treatments for type 1 ROP. Longer follow-up time is necessary for infants treated with IVB. More patients with zone II disease treated with RLP achieved disease regression after a single treatment than those who received IVB, although outcomes after re-treatment were comparable except for a greater refractive error in patients treated with RLP.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab for Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in zone II ROP. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial. Preterm infants with a gestational age less than 34 weeks or birthweight less than 2000 g were examined at 4 weeks chronological age or 31 weeks postmenstrual age (whichever was later). Preterm infants with Zone-II/Stage 2 or 3 and plus disease were included. Eligible infants were randomized to receive either conventional indirect laser therapy or intravitreal bevacizumab injections (0.625 mg/0.025 ml). The primary outcome was defined as treatment failure: ROP persistence or recurrence by 90 weeks postmenstrual age. RESULTS: Our study population comprised 79 infants (158 eyes) with Zone-II ROP. Randomly, 43 infants (86 eyes) were assigned to receive intravitreal bevacizumab and 36 infants (72 eyes) to receive conventional indirect laser therapy. All the infants were followed up at least until 90 weeks postmenstrual age. Stage-3 ROP recurred in nine eyes (10.5%) in the bevacizumab group and one eye (1.4%) in the laser group (p value = 0.018). In recurrent cases after the second treatment, ROP in eight of the nine eyes (88.8%) in the bevacizumab group and the eye in the laser group regressed. CONCLUSION: Recurrence of neovascularization with bevacizumab monotherapy seems to be higher than that with conventional laser therapy among infants with Type 1 ROP in zone II ROP but reinjection of bevacizumab causes regression in most recurrent cases.