Non-visually-guided distance perception depends on matching torso fluctuations between training and test.

Blindwalking to replicate an instructed distance requires various sensory signals. Recent evidence in movement science across many organisms suggests that multifractal organization of connective tissue supports the use of these signals. Multifractal structure is a multiplicity of power laws defining distribution of proportion across many time scales that helps predict judgments of the objects' length. Present work tests whether the multifractal structure in postural accelerometry during blindwalking predicts blindwalking distance replications. Ten undergraduate student participants each completed 20 trials of distance-perception each comprising two laps. On each Lap 1, experimenters led participants to walk on any of five prescribed distances, randomly assigning half to walk Lap 1 with eyes open and another half to walked Lap 1 with eyes closed. On Lap 2, all participants walked with eyes closed to replicate instructed distances from Lap 1. We collected postural accelerometry from the torso during each lap. Regression modeling showed that multifractality of postural accelerometry on both Lap 1 and Lap 2 contributed significantly to Lap-2 blindwalking responses. According to this model, more accurate Lap-2 replications of Lap-1 distance came from eyes-closed participants whose posture had comparable multifractality on both laps. Multifractality provides insights into the sequence of exploratory behaviors for blindwalking responses to distance perception.

Self-trained perception need not be veridical: striking can exaggerate judgment by wielding and can transfer exaggeration to new stimuli.

Previous literature on self-training dynamic touch suggested that haptic judgments of length following wielding might benefit from new information through participants' own striking actions with the same stimuli. However, the conclusion that this self-training tended towards a veridical outcome of zero discrepancy between actual length and judged length was premature. In this replication, we allowed adult participants (n = 15) to strike on each trial and changed the stimuli in mid-experiment to determine whether striking helped participants build more accurate perceptions of length transferrable from one stimulus scale to another. We predicted that, if self-training led to better length judgments, the repeated striking would improve judgments and that, in turn, judgments following the switch of stimuli would show a good transfer of what participants had learned. On the other hand, self-training may simply exaggerate inertial properties of stimuli and may be sensitive to sudden changes in the scale of stimuli. Mixed-effect modeling of discrepancies show that striking only accentuated effects of inertial moment, producing exaggerated length judgments. Correlation between perceived length and actual length increased only for participants who experienced a switch in individual stimuli but not stimulus scale. We discuss the implications of these findings for any theoretical relationship between self-organization and veridicality.