Bottleneck analysis approach to accelerate newborn care services in two regions in Ghana: implications for national newborn care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to describe application of a data-driven approach (bottleneck analysis [BNA] approach process) to accelerate newborn care services in two regions and what effect it had on national-level newborn care interventions in Ghana. STUDY DESIGN: A mixed-method approach was used for the study. The BNA tool generated quantitative data and group discussions provided phenomenological explanations to identified service gaps. METHODS: Regional newborn care health service assessments were conducted in November 2013 through desk reviews, field and health facility visits and coaching/mentorship. The BNA tool (an excel-based tool) directly utilized service coverage data and programme monitoring and review reports in Ghana. Outputs were generated based on service coverage indicators: supply side/health system factors (commodities, human resource and access), demand side (service utilization) and quality/effective coverage. National targets were used as benchmarks to assess gaps in coverage indicators. RESULTS: Key health system bottlenecks included absence/stock-out of essential newborn care commodities/resuscitation kits and absence of updated policies at services delivery points. In both regions, less than 55% of health facilities had at least 80% of midwives trained to provide essential obstetric and newborn care, management of preterm babies, resuscitation and inpatient paediatric care. In addition, less than 35% of pregnant women were assisted by a skilled birth attendant (midwife) and monitored with a partograph in the two regions. Demand-side bottlenecks included cultural preference for home deliveries, limited knowledge on importance of postnatal care and poor community involvement.The BNA approach in the two regions resulted in the development of national and other regional operational plans and monitoring and evaluation framework for newborn care services in Ghana over the period 2012-2016, and a relative improvement in neonatal mortality at the regional and national level. CONCLUSION: The BNA tool and approach provided data-driven planning for newborn care service delivery in a low-income setting. It identified gaps in service coverage based on empirical data at lower levels of the health system and garnered strategies in addressing bottlenecks to newborn care services at the national level.

Regional disparities in immunization services in Ghana through a bottleneck analysis approach: implications for sustaining national gains in immunization.

BACKGROUND: Immunization is considered one of the most cost effective public health interventions for reducing child morbidity, mortality and disability. The aim of this work is to describe the application of the Bottleneck analysis (BNA) process to assess gaps in immunization services in Ghana and implications for sustaining the gains in Immunization coverage. METHODS: A national assessment was conducted in May 2015, through use of desk reviews, field visits and key informant interviews. Quantitative data were analysed with the BNA Tool (an excel-based tool) based directly on service coverage data and programme monitoring and review reports in Ghana. Outputs were generated based on service coverage indicators; supply side/health system factors (commodities, human resource and access), demand side (service utilisation) and quality/effective coverage. National targets were used as benchmarks to assess gaps in coverage indicators. RESULTS: In all, only 50% of regions and districts had health facilities with at least 80% of health care workers training provided in-service training on routine immunization; only 40% of district had communities with functional fixed or outreach EPI service delivery point and over 70% of regions and districts had challenges with effective coverage of infants aged 0-11 months fully immunized during the past year. Other key health system bottlenecks included, limited number of fixed and outreach sites, difficult to reach island communities along the Volta Basin, inadequate storage facilities for vaccines at lower levels, stock out of vaccines and auto destruct syringes and absence of updated policies/field guides at services delivery points/facilities. In addition, inadequate in-service training in routine Immunization and absence of good quality data were major challenges. Demand side bottlenecks included fear of mothers on the safety of multiple vaccines and limited active involvement of communities in Immunization service delivery. CONCLUSION: The BNA tool and approach provided data driven planning of health service in Ghana. This resulted in the development of regional and national operational plans for immunization and will be the baseline for evaluating the national programme in three years.

Use of hub cutters and the volume of sharp waste and occurrence of needle-stick injuries during 2011 mass immunization campaigns against yellow fever in Ghana: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Current WHO best infection control practices for injections do not address the use of hub cutters due to insufficient evidence on safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the use of hub cutters on 1) the frequency of needle-stick injuries (NSIs) and other blood exposures among workers and 2) the volume of sharps waste in a mass vaccination campaign setting. METHODS: During yellow fever vaccination in Ghana, we conducted a cohort study on the use of hub cutters. We compared two groups---one group using hub cutters and a control group---for the occurrences of NSIs and the volume of sharp waste produced. RESULTS: In the control arm, vaccinators used 284 482 syringes in 825 vaccination sessions. In the group using hub cutter, vaccinators used 397 079 syringes in 1599 sessions. Among vaccinators, the rate of NSI was not significantly (p=0.14) different between the hub cutter users (0.15/10 000 syringes) and the control group (0.04/10 000). Factors such as workload, lack of organization and pressure seemed to have influence the occurrence of NSIs. With all the limitations of the work, the volume of sharp waste per 10 000 syringes was 0.24 m(3) in the hub cutter users and 0.41 m(3) in the control group---a reduction of 41.2%. Vaccinators found hub cutters easy to use and safe. Use of hub cutter was not associated with increased duration of work. CONCLUSION: The use of hub cutters did not increase the risk of NSIs. More training is needed to facilitate its implementation in mass campaign setting.