Benefits of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to find out the benefits of retroperitoneoscopy for the most common urological diseases in children. RECENT FINDINGS: The emergence of minimally invasive surgery about 20 years ago revolutionized pediatric urology. In this context, laparoscopy and later retroperitoneoscopy were developed and applied to a wide spectrum of urological diseases. Both approaches have since presented benefits and disadvantages that have been documented in various series. The main indications of retroperitoneoscopy are presented, from the classical ablative surgery, like total or partial nephrectomy, to more advanced reconstructive surgery. The success rate is similar to open surgery. However, few comparative studies have been conducted. According to the most recent findings, retroperitoneoscopic surgery in children is feasible and safe if performed by well-trained surgeons. A pediatric urologist would favor the retroperitoneoscopic access to reach the upper urinary tract and the kidney because this is the "natural" way to treat the most common urological pediatric diseases.

Laparoscopy or retroperitoneoscopy for pediatric patients with adrenal masses?

Minimally invasive approach to the adrenal gland was first reported in 1992. Since then, the experience with the laparoscopic technique for adrenal disease in children has been limited. We report our experience with minimally invasive adrenal surgery in children. Two young girls (2 and 4 years old) with a left adrenal mass were operated using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in our Unit. Ultrasonography and MRI showed in the oldest a 2 x 3 cm adrenal mass, while in the youngest a 5.5 x 5 cm adrenal tumor was found. According to the pre-existing literature, we approached the smallest lesion via retroperitoneoscopy, and the largest one laparoscopically. The operating time was 110 minutes for retroperitoneoscopy and 75 minutes for laparoscopy. No major intra or postoperative complications occurred. There were no conversions to open surgery. Postoperative hospital stay was 5 days for both patients. In both cases, the anatomo-pathological result was an adenoma. Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is a safe and feasible procedure in children with good results. For lesions smaller than 3-4 cm retroperitonescopy is feasible, while for tumors larger than 5 cm, due to malignancy risk, the laparoscopic approach is indicated. To keep oncologic criteria it is important to avoid tumor rupture and to extract the specimen in an endobag.

Is retroperitoneoscopic renal ablative surgery easier and safer using a new hemostatic device compared with clips and monopolar coagulation? A comparative study.

AIM: The aim of study was to retrospectively analyze our series of total and partial retroperiotoneoscopic nephrectomies performed in the last 5 years. METHODS: Twenty-two procedures were performed, 20 patients underwent nephrectomy and 2 patients underwent partial nephrectomy. The 20 patients who underwent nephrectomy were divided in 2 groups: group 1 (G1) patients-1-10, for whom we performed the procedure using monopolar coagulation, and group 2 (G2) patients 11-20 for whom we used a new hemostatic device to perform dissection and hemostasis. The results were analyzed using χ2 test. The results of partial nephrectomies were analyzed separately. RESULTS: No conversion were reported. We analyzed 6 parameters to compare the results: operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion (NT), complications, time to oral intake (TOI), hospital stay (HS). OT in G1 was in median 85 minutes, in G2 65 minutes (P=0.004); EBL was 15 mL for G1 and 5 mL for G2 (P=0.000.), NT was not necessary in both, in G1 we had 2 complications and 1 complication in G2; TOI was day 1 for both groups; median HS was 3 days for both. As for heminephrectomy, OT was 120 and 140 min, EBL 30 mL in both, NT not necessary, TOI was 1 day and HS 4 and 5 days respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the use of a new hemostatic devices reduce significantly OT and EBL in children underwent renal ablative surgery for benign pathologies compared with the use of monopolar coagulation.

[Laparoscopy-assisted jejunostomy in neurological patients with chronic malnutrition and GERD. Technical considerations and analysis of the results]. / La digiunostomia laparo-assistita nei pazienti neurologici con malnutrizione cronica e RGE. Considerazioni tecniche ed analisi dei risultati.

BACKGROUND: Feeding difficulties and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are major problems in severely neurologically impaired children. Many patients are managed with a simple gastrostomy, with or without fundoplication. Unfortunately, fundoplication and gastrostomy are not devoid of complications, indicating the need for other options in the management of these patients. METHODS: Between January 2002 and June 2010, ten patients (age range, 18 months-14 years) have been treated by creating a jejunostomy with the laparoscopic-assisted procedure. The procedure was performed using 2-3 trocars. The technique consists of identifying the first jeujnal loop, grasping it 20-30 cm away from the Treitz ligament, and exteriorizing it to the trocar orifice under visual guide. The jejunostomy was created outside the abdominal cavity during open surgery. At the end of the jejunostomy, the correct position of the intestinal loops was evaluated via laparoscopy. RESULTS: Surgery lasted 40 min on average, the laparoscopic portion about 10 min. Hospital stay was 3 or 7 days for all patients. At the longest follow-up (8 years), all patients had experienced a significant weight gain. One patient died 1 year after the procedure of unknown causes. As for the other complications: 4/10 patients experienced peristomal heritema, 2/10 device's dislocation and 1 patient a peristomal granuloma. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted jejunostomy is a safe and effective procedure to adopt in neurologically impaired children with feeding problems and GER. We advocate the use of this procedure in neurologically impaired patients with feeding problems and reflux due to its overall practicability and because there is minimal surgical trauma. The improvement in the quality of life of these children after the jejunostomy seems to be the major advantage of this procedure. However the management of jejunostomy can be difficult for parents above all in the first postoperative months.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in premature babies weighing 3 kg or less.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and complication rate of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for small babies weighing 3 kg or less. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the surgical charts of 67 infants (47 boys and 20 girls) weighing 3 kg or less who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair in a 3-year period. A regular 5-mm scope was used for visualization, and 2 or 3-mm instruments were used for the closure of the inner inguinal ring using 3/0 non-absorbable suture. The median weight at surgery was 2,600 g (range 1,450-3,000 g). All except three were premature. RESULTS: Of the 67 infants, 15 (22.3 %) presented with an irreducible hernia. In three cases of irreducible hernias, we also performed a transumbilical appendectomy at the end of the hernia repair. Minor problems related with anesthesia were noted in four cases. Hernia recurrence was observed in three patients (4.4 %). No cases of testicular atrophy occurred. In 10 boys, we observed 12 cases of high testes, only 4 testes requiring subsequent orchiopexy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for babies weighing 3 kg or less is feasible, safe and perhaps even less technically demanding than open inguinal herniotomy.

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children using holmium: yag laser energy: results of a multicentric survey.

BACKGROUND: Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy has broadened the indications for ureteroscopic stone managements in adults, but few evidence are currently available in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to assess the outcome of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones in different locations in children. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of 149 patients (71 boys and 78 girls; median age 9.2 years) treated with Ho:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy in five international pediatric urology units over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients with renal calculi and/or with a history of ipsilateral stricture, renal failure, active urinary tract infection, or coagulation disorder. RESULTS: Stones were treated with dusting technique in all cases. The median stone size was 10.3 mm (range 5-17). Stones were located in the distal ureter in 77 cases (51.7%), in the middle ureter in 23 cases (15.4%), and in the proximal ureter in 49 cases (32.9%). The median operative time was 29.8 min (range 20-95). Intra-operative complications included five bleedings (3.3%) and seven stone retropulsions (4.7%). Overall stone-free rate was 97.3%. Overall postoperative complications rate was 4.0% and included two cases of stent migration (1.3%) (Clavien II) and four residual stone fragments (2.7%) that were successfully treated using the same technique (Clavien IIIb). On multivariate analysis, re-operation rate was significantly dependent on the proximal stone location and presence of residual fragments >2 mm (P = 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study is one of the largest pediatric series among those published until now. The study series reported a shorter operative time, a higher success rate, and a lower postoperative complications rate compared with previous series. A limitation of this study is that stone-free rates may be somewhat inaccurate using ultrasonography and plain X-ray compared with computed tomography (CT); the study's 97.3% success rate may be overestimated because no CT scan was done postoperatively to check the stone-free rate. Other limitations of this article include its retrospective nature, the multi-institutional participation, and the heterogeneous patient collective. CONCLUSION: The Ho:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy seems to be an excellent first-line treatment for children with ureteral stones, independently from primary location and size. However, patients with proximal ureteral stones and residual fragments >2 mm reported a higher risk to require a secondary procedure to become stone-free. Combination of techniques as well as appropriate endourologic tools are key points for the success of the procedure regardless of stones' size and location.