RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe sex differences in concussion characteristics in US Service Academy cadets. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. SETTING: Four US service academies. PARTICIPANTS: 2209 cadets (n = 867 females, n = 1342 males). INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Sex. OUTCOME MEASURES: Injury proportion ratios (IPR) compared the proportion of injuries by sex (females referent) for injury situation, certainty of diagnosis, prolonged recovery, recurrent injuries, mental status alterations, loss of consciousness (LOC), posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), retrograde amnesia (RGA), motor impairments, delayed symptom presentation, and immediate reporting. MAIN RESULTS: Concussions from varsity/intercollegiate sports [IPR of 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.10] and intramurals (IPR of 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.32) accounted for a larger proportion in males, whereas concussions outside of sport and military activities accounted for a smaller proportion among males (IPR of 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85). The proportion of concussions with prolonged recovery was lower among males (IPR of 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.78), while concussions with altered mental status (IPR of 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.38), LOC (IPR of 1.67, 95% CI 1.17-2.37), PTA (IPR of 1.94, 95% CI 1.43-2.62), and RGA (IPR of 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31) accounted for a larger proportion among males. A larger proportion of concussions that were immediately reported was observed in males (IPR of 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-2.31). Proportions of other characteristics (e.g., recurrent injuries) were not different between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of concussions occurred outside of sport and military training for female cadets, who also displayed proportionally longer recovery times than males, despite males demonstrating a higher proportion of LOC, PTA, and RGA. Possible factors may include different mechanisms of injury outside of sport and military training, different biopsychosocial states associated with sex or injury context, and delayed injury reporting when outside of an observed environment, possibly secondary to perceived stigma about reporting injuries.
RESUMO
Previous neuroimaging research has shown left hemisphere dominance during the semantic processing of embodied action-related stimuli. The goal of our research was to examine how action-related stimuli are processed in individuals after right or left hemispherectomy. S.M. (right hemispherectomy), J.H. (left hemispherectomy), and healthy control participants completed naming and semantic generation tasks with picture and word stimuli with referents that are used by arms or legs. Our results showed evidence of a dissociation for pictures of objects used by legs. Specifically, the naming task showed that, relative to controls, S.M. is impaired on accuracy, whereas J.H. performs closer to normal levels. For the semantic generation task, the opposite result was obtained and is consistent with the response time data. Our results suggest that the right hemisphere is critical for normal picture naming, whereas the left hemisphere is critical for normal semantic generation of action-related knowledge.