Role of the repeat expansion size in predicting age of onset and severity in RFC1 disease.

RFC1 disease, caused by biallelic repeat expansion in RFC1, is clinically heterogeneous in terms of age of onset, disease progression and phenotype. We investigated the role of the repeat size in influencing clinical variables in RFC1 disease. We also assessed the presence and role of meiotic and somatic instability of the repeat. In this study, we identified 553 patients carrying biallelic RFC1 expansions and measured the repeat expansion size in 392 cases. Pearson's coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between the repeat size and age at disease onset. A Cox model with robust cluster standard errors was adopted to describe the effect of repeat size on age at disease onset, on age at onset of each individual symptoms, and on disease progression. A quasi-Poisson regression model was used to analyse the relationship between phenotype and repeat size. We performed multivariate linear regression to assess the association of the repeat size with the degree of cerebellar atrophy. Meiotic stability was assessed by Southern blotting on first-degree relatives of 27 probands. Finally, somatic instability was investigated by optical genome mapping on cerebellar and frontal cortex and unaffected peripheral tissue from four post-mortem cases. A larger repeat size of both smaller and larger allele was associated with an earlier age at neurological onset [smaller allele hazard ratio (HR) = 2.06, P < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.53, P < 0.001] and with a higher hazard of developing disabling symptoms, such as dysarthria or dysphagia (smaller allele HR = 3.40, P < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.71, P = 0.002) or loss of independent walking (smaller allele HR = 2.78, P < 0.001; larger allele HR = 1.60; P < 0.001) earlier in disease course. Patients with more complex phenotypes carried larger expansions [smaller allele: complex neuropathy rate ratio (RR) = 1.30, P = 0.003; cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) RR = 1.34, P < 0.001; larger allele: complex neuropathy RR = 1.33, P = 0.008; CANVAS RR = 1.31, P = 0.009]. Furthermore, larger repeat expansions in the smaller allele were associated with more pronounced cerebellar vermis atrophy (lobules I-V ß = -1.06, P < 0.001; lobules VI-VII ß = -0.34, P = 0.005). The repeat did not show significant instability during vertical transmission and across different tissues and brain regions. RFC1 repeat size, particularly of the smaller allele, is one of the determinants of variability in RFC1 disease and represents a key prognostic factor to predict disease onset, phenotype and severity. Assessing the repeat size is warranted as part of the diagnostic test for RFC1 expansion.

Use, tolerability, benefits and side effects of orthotic devices in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

BACKGROUND: Shoe inserts, orthopaedic shoes, ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are important devices in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) management, but data about use, benefits and tolerance are scanty. METHODS: We administered to Italian CMT Registry patients an online ad hoc questionnaire investigating use, complications and perceived benefit/tolerability/emotional distress of shoe inserts, orthopaedic shoes, AFOs and other orthoses/aids. Patients were also asked to fill in the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology questionnaire, rating satisfaction with currently used AFO and related services. RESULTS: We analysed answers from 266 CMT patients. Seventy per cent of subjects were prescribed lower limb orthoses, but 19% did not used them. Overall, 39% of subjects wore shoe inserts, 18% orthopaedic shoes and 23% AFOs. Frequency of abandonment was high: 24% for shoe inserts, 28% for orthopaedic shoes and 31% for AFOs. Complications were reported by 59% of patients and were more frequently related to AFOs (69%). AFO users experienced greater emotional distress and reduced tolerability as compared with shoe inserts (p<0.001) and orthopaedic shoes (p=0.003 and p=0.045, respectively). Disease severity, degree of foot weakness, customisation and timing for customisation were determinant factors in AFOs' tolerability. Quality of professional and follow-up services were perceived issues. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of CMT patients is prescribed shoe inserts, orthopaedic shoes and/or AFOs. Although perceived benefits and tolerability are rather good, there is a high rate of complications, potentially inappropriate prescriptions and considerable emotional distress, which reduce the use of AFOs. A rational, patient-oriented and multidisciplinary approach to orthoses prescription must be encouraged.

Phenotypic spectrum of myelin protein zero-related neuropathies: a large cohort study from five mutation clusters across Italy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the clinical features of a large cohort of patients with myelin protein zero (MPZ)-related neuropathy, focusing on the five main mutation clusters across Italy. METHODS: We retrospectively gathered a minimal data set of clinical information in a series of patients with these frequent mutations recruited among Italian Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) registry centres, including disease onset/severity (CMTES-CMT Examination Score), motor/sensory symptoms and use of orthotics/aids. RESULTS: We collected data from 186 patients: 60 had the p.Ser78Leu variant ('classical' CMT1B; from Eastern Sicily), 42 the p.Pro70Ser (CMT2I; mainly from Lombardy), 38 the p.Thr124Met (CMT2J; from Veneto), 25 the p.Ser44Phe (CMT2I; from Sardinia) and 21 the p.Asp104ThrfsX13 (mild CMT1B; from Apulia) mutation. Disease severity (CMTES) was higher (p<0.001) in late-onset axonal forms (p.Thr124Met=9.2±6.6; p.Ser44Phe=7.8±5.7; p.Pro70Ser=7.6±4.8) compared with p.Ser78Leu (6.1±3.5) patients. Disease progression (ΔCMTES/year) was faster in the p.Pro70Ser cohort (0.8±1.0), followed by p.Ser44Phe (0.7±0.4), p.Thr124Met (0.4±0.5) and p.Ser78Leu (0.2±0.4) patients. Disease severity (CMTES=1.2±1.5), progression (ΔCMTES/year=0.1±0.4) and motor involvement were almost negligible in p.Asp104ThrfsX13 patients, who, however, frequently (78%, p<0.001) complained of neuropathic pain. In the other four clusters, walking difficulties were reported by 69-85% of patients, while orthotic and walking aids use ranged between 40-62% and 16-28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest MPZ (and late-onset CMT2) cohort ever collected, reporting clinical features and disease progression of 186 patients from five different clusters across Italy. Our findings corroborate the importance of differentiating between 'classical' childhood-onset demyelinating, late-onset axonal and mild MPZ-related neuropathy, characterised by different pathomechanisms, in view of different therapeutic targets.

Conduction slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies: Electrophysiology meets pathology.

Nerve conduction studies are usually the first diagnostic step in peripheral nerve disorders and their results are the basis for planning further investigations. However, there are some commonplaces in the interpretation of electrodiagnostic findings in peripheral neuropathies that, although useful in the everyday practice, may be misleading: (1) conduction block and abnormal temporal dispersion are distinctive features of acquired demyelinating disorders; (2) hereditary neuropathies are characterized by uniform slowing of conduction velocity; (3) axonal neuropathies are simply diagnosed by reduced amplitude of motor and sensory nerve action potentials with normal or slightly slow conduction velocity. In this review, we reappraise the occurrence of uniform and non-uniform conduction velocity slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies attempting, with a translational approach, a correlation between electrophysiological and pathological features as derived from sensory nerve biopsy in patients and animal models. Additionally, we provide some hints to navigate in this complex field.

Long-term treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with patisiran: multicentre, real-world experience in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv, v for variant) amyloidosis with polyneuropathy is a rare disease caused by mutations in the transthyretin gene. In ATTRv amyloidosis, multisystem extracellular deposits of amyloid cause tissue and organ dysfunction. Patisiran is a small interfering RNA molecule drug that reduces circulating levels of mutant and wild-type TTR proteins. Prior to its regulatory approval, patisiran was available in Italy through a compassionate use programme (CUP). The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term outcomes of patients who entered into the CUP. METHODS: This was a multicentre, observational, retrospective study of patients with ATTRv amyloidosis treated with patisiran. The analysis included change from baseline to 12, 24, 36 and 48 months in familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) stage, polyneuropathy disability (PND) class, neuropathy impairment score (NIS), modified body mass index (mBMI), Compound Autonomic Dysfunction Test (CADT), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale and Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) questionnaire. Safety data were also analysed. RESULTS: Forty patients from 11 Italian centres were enrolled: 23 in FAP 1 (6 in PND 1 and 17 in PND 2) and 17 in FAP 2 (8 in PND 3a and 9 in PND 3b) stage. In this population, the mean NIS at baseline was 71.4 (± 27.8); mBMI, 917.1 (± 207) kg/m2; KPS, 67.1 (± 14.0); Norfolk QoL-DN, 62.2 (± 25.2); and CADT, 13.2 (± 3.3). Statistical analysis showed few significant differences from baseline denoting disease stability. No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Patisiran largely stabilised disease in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis.

Clinical and pathology characterization of small nerve fiber neuro(no)pathy in cerebellar ataxia with neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Biallelic mutation/expansion of the gene RFC1 has been described in association with a spectrum of manifestations ranging from isolated sensory neuro(no)pathy to a complex presentation as cerebellar ataxia with neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS). Our aim was to define the frequency and characteristics of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) in RFC1 disease at different stages. METHODS: RFC1 cases were screened for SFN using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 questionnaires. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. If available, lower limb skin biopsy samples were evaluated for somatic epidermal and autonomic subepidermal structure innervation and compared to healthy controls (HCs). RESULTS: Forty patients, median age at onset 54 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49-61) and disease duration 10 years (IQR 6-16), were enrolled. Mild-to-moderate positive symptoms (median Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory score 12.1/50, IQR 5.5-22.3) and relevant autonomic disturbances (median Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 37.0/100, IQR 17.7-44.3) were frequently reported and showed scarce correlation with disease duration. A non-length-dependent impairment in nociception was evident in both clinical and paraclinical investigations. An extreme somatic denervation was observed in all patients at both proximal (fibers/mm, RFC1 cases 0.0 vs. HCs 20.5, p < 0.0001) and distal sites (fibers/mm, RFC1 cases 0.0 vs. HCs 13.1, p < 0.0001); instead only a slight decrease was observed in cholinergic and adrenergic innervation of autonomic structures. CONCLUSIONS: RFC1 disease is characterized by a severe and widespread somatic SFN. Skin denervation may potentially represent the earliest feature and drive towards the suspicion of this disorder.

Frequency, entity and determinants of fatigue in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fatigue, a disabling symptom in many neuromuscular disorders, has been reported also in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT). The presence of fatigue and its correlations in CMT was investigated. METHODS: The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) was administered to CMT patients from the Italian Registry and a control group. An MFIS score >38 indicated abnormal fatigue. The correlation with disease severity and clinical characteristics, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, and drug use was analysed. RESULTS: Data were collected from 251 CMT patients (136 women) and 57 controls. MFIS total (mean ± standard deviation 32 ± 18.3, median 33), physical (18.9 ± 9.7, 20) and psychosocial (2.9 ± 2.4, 3) scores in CMT patients were significantly higher than controls. Abnormal fatigue occurred in 36% of the patients who, compared to patients with normal scores, had more severe disease (median CMT Examination Score 9 vs. 7), more frequent use of foot orthotics (22% vs. 11%), need of support for walking (21% vs. 8%), hand disability (70% vs. 52%) and positive sensory symptoms (56% vs. 36%). Patients with abnormal fatigue had significantly increased frequency of anxiety/depression/general distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), somnolence (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), obesity (body mass index ≥ 30) and use of anxiolytic/antidepressant or anti-inflammatory/analgesic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue is a relevant symptom in CMT as 36% of our series had scores indicating abnormal fatigue. It correlated with disease severity but also with anxiety, depression, sleepiness and obesity, indicating different components in the generation of fatigue. CMT patients' management must include treatment of fatigue and of its different generators, including general distress, sleepiness and obesity.

Clinical spectrum and frequency of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in Italy: Data from the National CMT Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data are reported from the Italian CMT Registry. METHODS: The Italian CMT Registry is a dual registry where the patient registers and chooses a reference center where the attending clinician collects a minimal dataset of information and administers the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination/Neuropathy Score. Entered data are encrypted. RESULTS: Overall, 1012 patients had registered (535 females) and 711 had received a genetic diagnosis. Demyelinating CMT (65.3%) was more common than axonal CMT2 (24.6%) and intermediate CMT (9.0%). The PMP22 duplication was the most frequent mutation (45.2%), followed by variants in GJB1 and MPZ (both ~10%) and MFN2 (3.3%) genes. A relatively high mutation rate in some "rare" genes (HSPB1 1.6%, NEFL 1.5%, SH3TC2 1.5%) and the presence of multiple mutation clusters across Italy was observed. CMT4A was the most disabling type, followed by CMT4C and CMT1E. Disease progression rate differed depending on the CMT subtype. Foot deformities and walking difficulties were the main features. Shoe inserts and orthotic aids were used by almost one-half of all patients. Scoliosis was present in 20% of patients, especially in CMT4C. Recessive forms had more frequently walking delay, walking support need and wheelchair use. Hip dysplasia occurred in early-onset CMT. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian CMT Registry has proven to be a powerful data source to collect information about epidemiology and genetic distribution, clinical features and disease progression of CMT in Italy and is a useful tool for recruiting patients in forthcoming clinical trials.

Risk of disease relapse, safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the risk of relapse after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and its safety and tolerability, in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies. METHODS: In this multicenter, cohort and case-crossover study, the risk of relapse associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was assessed by comparing the frequency of relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients who underwent or did not undergo vaccination. Frequency of relapse in the 3 months prior to and after vaccination, and safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 336 patients were included (278 CIDP, 58 MMN). Three hundred and seven (91%) patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Twenty-nine patients (9%) did not undergo vaccination. Mild and transient relapses were observed in 16 (5%) patients (13 CIDP, 3 MMN) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and in none of the patients who did not undergo vaccination (relative risk [RR] 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-52.25). There was no increase in the specific risk of relapse associated with type of vaccine or diagnosis. Comparison with the 3-month control period preceding vaccination revealed an increased risk of relapse after vaccination (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.35-11.82), which was restricted to CIDP patients (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.07-9.84). The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate local and systemic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in CIDP and MMN patients does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of relapse at the primary end-point, although a slightly increased risk in CIDP patients was found compared to the 3 months before vaccination.

Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19: A 1-year observational multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many single cases and small series of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were reported during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outbreak worldwide. However, the debate regarding the possible role of infection in causing GBS is still ongoing. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate epidemiological and clinical findings of GBS diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic in northeastern Italy in order to further investigate the possible association between GBS and COVID-19. METHODS: Guillain-Barré syndrome cases diagnosed in 14 referral hospitals from northern Italy between March 2020 and March 2021 were collected and divided into COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative. As a control population, GBS patients diagnosed in the same hospitals from January 2019 to February 2020 were considered. RESULTS: The estimated incidence of GBS in 2020 was 1.41 cases per 100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval 1.18-1.68) versus 0.89 cases per 100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval 0.71-1.11) in 2019. The cumulative incidence of GBS increased by 59% in the period March 2020-March 2021 and, most importantly, COVID-19-positive GBS patients represented about 50% of the total GBS cases with most of them occurring during the two first pandemic waves in spring and autumn 2020. COVID-19-negative GBS cases from March 2020 to March 2021 declined by 22% compared to February 2019-February 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Other than showing an increase of GBS in northern Italy in the "COVID-19 era" compared to the previous year, this study emphasizes how GBS cases related to COVID-19 represent a significant part of the total, thus suggesting a relation between COVID-19 and GBS.

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis overview.

Hereditary amyloidogenic transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis is a rare autosomal dominantly inherited disorder caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. The pathogenetic model of ATTRv amyloidosis indicates that amyloidogenic, usually missense, mutations destabilize the native TTR favouring the dissociation of the tetramer into partially unfolded species that self-assemble into amyloid fibrils. Amyloid deposits and monomer-oligomer toxicity are the basis of multisystemic ATTRv clinical involvement. Peripheral nervous system (autonomic and somatic) and heart are the most affected sites. In the last decades, a better knowledge of pathomechanisms underlying the disease led to develop novel and promising drugs that are rapidly changing the natural history of ATTRv amyloidosis. Thus, clinicians face the challenge of timely diagnosis for addressing patients to appropriate treatment. As well, the progressive nature of ATTRv raises the issue of presymptomatic testing and risk management of carriers. The main aim of this review was to focus on what we know about ATTRv so far, from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations, diagnosis and hence patient's monitoring and treatment, and from presymptomatic testing to management of carriers.

Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19: an observational multicentre study from two Italian hotspot regions.

OBJECTIVE: Single cases and small series of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been reported during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak worldwide. We evaluated incidence and clinical features of GBS in a cohort of patients from two regions of northern Italy with the highest number of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: GBS cases diagnosed in 12 referral hospitals from Lombardy and Veneto in March and April 2020 were retrospectively collected. As a control population, GBS diagnosed in March and April 2019 in the same hospitals were considered. RESULTS: Incidence of GBS in March and April 2020 was 0.202/100 000/month (estimated rate 2.43/100 000/year) vs 0.077/100 000/month (estimated rate 0.93/100 000/year) in the same months of 2019 with a 2.6-fold increase. Estimated incidence of GBS in COVID-19-positive patients was 47.9/100 000 and in the COVID-19-positive hospitalised patients was 236/100 000. COVID-19-positive patients with GBS, when compared with COVID-19-negative subjects, showed lower MRC sum score (26.3±18.3 vs 41.4±14.8, p=0.006), higher frequency of demyelinating subtype (76.6% vs 35.3%, p=0.011), more frequent low blood pressure (50% vs 11.8%, p=0.017) and higher rate of admission to intensive care unit (66.6% vs 17.6%, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an increased incidence of GBS during the COVID-19 outbreak in northern Italy, supporting a pathogenic link. COVID-19-associated GBS is predominantly demyelinating and seems to be more severe than non-COVID-19 GBS, although it is likely that in some patients the systemic impairment due to COVID-19 might have contributed to the severity of the whole clinical picture.

Hereditary neuropathies: A pathological perspective.

Hereditary neuropathies may result from mutations in genes expressed by Schwann cells or neurons that affect selectively the peripheral nervous system (PNS) or may represent a minor or major component of complex inherited diseases that involve also the central nervous system and/or other organs and tissues. The chapter is constantly expanding and reworking, thanks to advances of molecular genetics; next-generation sequencing is identifying a plethora of new genes and is revolutionizing the diagnostic approach. In the past, diagnostic sural nerve biopsies paved the way to the discovery and elucidation of major genes and molecular pathways associated to most frequent hereditary motor-sensory neuropathies. Nowadays, a sural nerve biopsy may prove useful in selected cases for the differential diagnosis of an acquired neuropathy when clinical examination, nerve conduction studies, and molecular tests are not sufficiently informative. Skin biopsy has emerged as a minimally invasive window on the PNS, which may provide biomarkers of progression and clues to the physiopathology and molecular pathology of inherited neuropathies. The aim of our review is to illustrate the pathological features of more frequent and paradigmatic hereditary neuropathies and to highlight their correlations with the roles of the involved genes and functional consequences of related molecular defects.

Acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies and COVID-19 vaccines: Practical recommendations from the task force of the Italian Peripheral Nervous System Association (ASNP).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To develop recommendations for vaccination for coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. METHODS: Key questions were formulated in order to perform a literature review on the safety and efficacy of vaccines in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Based on the best evidence and expert opinion, a list of recommendations was formulated to inform decision on vaccination for COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory neuropathies and increase adherence to vaccination programmes. RESULTS: Recommendations addressing safety and efficacy of vaccination in patients with inflammatory neuropathies were formulated. No data are currently available on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with inflammatory neuropathies or other immune-mediated conditions. There is only sparse data on the safety of previous available vaccines in patients with inflammatory neuropathies, but studies on other autoimmune disorders indicate that these are safe and mostly efficacious. Patients with inflammatory neuropathies might be at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: Patients with inflammatory neuropathies should be encouraged to adhere to the vaccination campaign for COVID-19. These recommendations provide guidance on the management of vaccinations for COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. More research is needed regarding the safety and efficacy of vaccination in patients with inflammatory neuropathies and other immune conditions.

CIDP, CMT1B, or CMT1B plus CIDP?

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 (CMT1) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have distinct clinical and neurophysiological features that result from dysmyelination in CMT1 and macrophage-mediated segmental demyelination in CIDP. CMT1 may occur in genetically isolated cases with atypical presentations that converge phenotypically with CIDP; in rare cases, however, CMT1 may be complicated by superimposed CIDP. We report the case of a patient harboring a de novo heterozygous null mutation of the myelin protein zero (MPZ) gene and affected by subclinical CMT1B who became symptomatic due to superimposed CIDP. Peripheral nerve high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) aided in establishing the coexistence of CMT1B and CIDP; the diagnosis was further supported by favorable clinical, neurophysiological, and ultrasound responses to immunoglobulin therapy.

Convergent pathological and ultrasound features in hereditary syndromic and non-syndromic minifascicular neuropathy related to DHH.

Minifascicular neuropathy (MN) is a rare, autosomal recessive disease with prominent structural changes of peripheral nerves. So far, it has been observed in females with a 46,XY karyotype and mutations of the Desert Hedgehog (DHH) gene, thus linking MN to gonadal dysgenesis (GD) and disorders of sex development (DSD). However, a 46,XX proband with normal female sex and gender development underwent clinical evaluations, nerve conduction studies and genetic screening for a severe motor-sensory neuropathy with a pathological phenotype that hinted at MN. Indeed, sural nerve biopsy revealed a profound disturbance of perineurium development with a thin and loose structure. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) also disclosed diffuse changes of nerve echotexture that visibly correlated with the pathological features. After extensive genetic testing, a novel homozygous DHH null mutation (p.Ser185*) was identified in the proband and in her sister, who was affected by a similar motor-sensory neuropathy, but was eventually found to be a 46,XY patient according to a late diagnosis of DSD with complete GD. DHH should therefore be considered as a possible cause of rare non-syndromic hereditary motor-sensory neuropathies, regardless of DSD. Furthermore, HRUS could effectively smooth the complex diagnostic workup as it demonstrated a high predictive power to detect MN, providing the same detailed correlations to the pathologic features of the nerve biopsy and Dhh-/- mice in both sisters. Hence, HRUS may assume a pivotal role in guiding molecular analysis in individuals with or without DSD.

Sporadic hereditary neuropathies misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Pitfalls and red flags.

Hereditary neuropathies may be misdiagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). A correct diagnosis is crucial for avoiding unnecessary therapies and access genetic counseling. We report on nine patients (seven men, mean age 49.2 ± 16.1) diagnosed with and treated as CIDP, in whom mutations or variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genes associated with hereditary neuropathies were reported. All underwent neurological and neurophysiological examination, eight also cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. In 4/9, nerve ultrasound and/or MR-neurography were performed. All the patients complained of progressive upper or lower limbs sensory-motor symptoms, with heterogeneous disease duration (1-34 years, mean 8.6 ± 10.8). Neurophysiology showed demyelinating signs in seven patients, mixed findings with predominant axonal damage in two patients. Neuroimaging disclosed diffuse abnormalities at proximal and distal segments. Molecular screening showed PMP22 duplication in two patients, mutations in the MPZ, EGR2, and GJB1 genes were reported in each of the remaining patients. The two patients with mixed neurophysiological findings had p.Val30Met mutation in the transthyretin gene. Two patients had VUS in the MARS and HSPB1 genes. Four patients had partial response to immunomodulant therapies, and CSF and neurophysiological features suggesting an inflammatory condition concomitant with the hereditary neuropathy. Hereditary neuropathy may be misdiagnosed with CIDP. The most common pitfalls are CSF (high protein levels and oligoclonal bands), incorrect interpretation of neurophysiology, and transient benefit from therapies. Neuroimaging may be helpful in cases with atypical presentations or when severe axonal damage complicate the neurophysiological interpretation.

Pharmacological treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying pharmacological agents for transthyretin (TTR)-related familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) have become available in the last decade, but evidence on their efficacy and safety is limited. This review focuses on disease-modifying pharmacological treatment for TTR-related and other FAPs, encompassing amyloid kinetic stabilisers, amyloid matrix solvents, and amyloid precursor inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of disease-modifying pharmacological agents for familial amyloid polyneuropathies (FAPs). SEARCH METHODS: On 18 November 2019, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase. We reviewed reference lists of articles and textbooks on peripheral neuropathies. We also contacted experts in the field. We searched clinical trials registries and manufacturers' websites. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs investigating any disease-modifying pharmacological agent in adults with FAPs. Disability due to FAP progression was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were severity of peripheral neuropathy, change in modified body mass index (mBMI), quality of life, severity of depression, mortality, and adverse events during the trial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: The review included four RCTs involving 655 people with TTR-FAP. The manufacturers of the drugs under investigation funded three of the studies. The trials investigated different drugs versus placebo and we did not conduct a meta-analysis. One RCT compared tafamidis with placebo in early-stage TTR-FAP (128 randomised participants). The trial did not explore our predetermined disability outcome measures. After 18 months, tafamidis might reduce progression of peripheral neuropathy slightly more than placebo (Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) in the lower limbs; mean difference (MD) -3.21 points, 95% confidential interval (CI) -5.63 to -0.79; P = 0.009; low-certainty evidence). However, tafamidis might lead to little or no difference in the change of quality of life between groups (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) total score; MD -4.50 points, 95% CI -11.27 to 2.27; P = 0.19; very low-certainty evidence). No clear between-group difference was found in the numbers of participants who died (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.74; P = 0.63; very low-certainty evidence), who dropped out due to adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.54; P = 0.73; very low-certainty evidence), or who experienced at least one severe adverse event during the trial (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.62; P = 0.79; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT compared diflunisal with placebo (130 randomised participants). At month 24, diflunisal might reduce progression of disability (Kumamoto Score; MD -4.90 points, 95% CI -7.89 to -1.91; P = 0.002; low-certainty evidence) and peripheral neuropathy (NIS plus 7 nerve tests; MD -18.10 points, 95% CI -26.03 to -10.17; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence) more than placebo. After 24 months, changes from baseline in the quality of life measured by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score showed no clear difference between groups for the physical component (MD 6.10 points, 95% CI 2.56 to 9.64; P = 0.001; very low-certainty evidence) and the mental component (MD 4.40 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 8.99; P = 0.063; very low-certainty evidence). There was no clear between-group difference in the number of people who died (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.41; P = 0.17; very low-certainty evidence), in the number of dropouts due to adverse events (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.39 to 10.87; P = 0.39; very low-certainty evidence), and in the number of people who experienced at least one severe adverse event (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.32; P = 0.73; very low-certainty evidence) during the trial. One RCT compared patisiran with placebo (225 randomised participants). After 18 months, patisiran reduced both progression of disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale; least-squares MD 8.90 points, 95% CI 7.00 to 10.80; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence) and peripheral neuropathy (modified NIS plus 7 nerve tests - Alnylam version; least-squares MD -33.99 points, 95% CI -39.86 to -28.13; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence) more than placebo. At month 18, the change in quality of life between groups favoured patisiran (Norfolk QOL-DN total score; least-squares MD -21.10 points, 95% CI -27.20 to -15.00; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence). There was little or no between-group difference in the number of participants who died (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.74; P = 0.35; low-certainty evidence), dropped out due to adverse events (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.82; P = 0.017; low-certainty evidence), or experienced at least one severe adverse event (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.28; P = 0.58; low-certainty evidence) during the trial. One RCT compared inotersen with placebo (172 randomised participants). The trial did not explore our predetermined disability outcome measures. From baseline to week 66, inotersen reduced progression of peripheral neuropathy more than placebo (modified NIS plus 7 nerve tests - Ionis version; MD -19.73 points, 95% CI -26.50 to -12.96; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence). At week 65, the change in quality of life between groups favoured inotersen (Norfolk QOL-DN total score; MD -10.85 points, 95% CI -17.25 to -4.45; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence). Inotersen may slightly increase mortality (RR 5.94, 95% CI 0.33 to 105.60; P = 0.22; low-certainty evidence) and occurrence of severe adverse events (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.57; P = 0.16; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. More dropouts due to adverse events were observed in the inotersen than in the placebo group (RR 8.57, 95% CI 1.16 to 63.07; P = 0.035; low-certainty evidence). There were no studies addressing apolipoprotein AI-FAP, gelsolin-FAP, and beta-2-microglobulin-FAP. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the pharmacological treatment of FAPs from RCTs is limited to TTR-FAP. No studies directly compare disease-modifying pharmacological treatments for TTR-FAP. Results from placebo-controlled trials indicate that tafamidis, diflunisal, patisiran, and inotersen may be beneficial in TTR-FAP, but further investigations are needed. Since direct comparative studies for TTR-FAP will be hampered by sample size and costs required to demonstrate superiority of one drug over another, long-term non-randomised open-label studies monitoring their efficacy and safety are needed.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: experience from a large Italian tertiary neuromuscular center.

INTRODUCTION: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is the most common inherited neuromuscular disease. Thanks to the advances of the latest generation sequencing, more than 80 causative genes have been reported to date. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we have analyzed clinical, electrophysiological, and genetic data of CMT patients in care at Neuromuscular Center of Messina University Hospital, Messina, Italy, for at least 22 years (from 1994 to 2016). Our center is the only reference center for genetic neuropathies in Sicily and in the southern part of Calabria. RESULTS: We reviewed the clinical records of 566 patients with the aim to evaluate how many patients received a genetic diagnosis and the distribution of the genetic subtypes. About 352/566 (62.19%) received a genetic diagnosis. The most frequent genetic diagnoses were CMT1A/PMP22 duplication (51.13%), followed by HNPP/PMP22 deletion (15.05%), CMT1B/MPZ mutation (10.22%), CMTX/GJB1 mutation (9.37%), and CMT2F/HSPB1 (4%). Other rare mutations included MFN2 mutation (n. 8 pts), BSCL2 mutation (n.8 pts), PMP22 point mutation (n.7 pts), GDAP1 mutation (n.4 pts), GARSmutation (n. 2 pts), TRPV4 mutation (n. 2 pts), LITAF mutation (n.1 pt), and NEFL mutation (n. 1 pt). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further data on frequency of CMT genes, subtypes in a wide Mediterranean area and contributes to help clinicians in addressing the genetic testing workup.

Expanding the spectrum of genes responsible for hereditary motor neuropathies.

BACKGROUND: Inherited peripheral neuropathies (IPNs) represent a broad group of genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorders, including axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2 (CMT2) and hereditary motor neuropathy (HMN). Approximately 60%-70% of cases with HMN/CMT2 still remain without a genetic diagnosis. Interestingly, mutations in HMN/CMT2 genes may also be responsible for motor neuron disorders or other neuromuscular diseases, suggesting a broad phenotypic spectrum of clinically and genetically related conditions. Thus, it is of paramount importance to identify novel causative variants in HMN/CMT2 patients to better predict clinical outcome and progression. METHODS: We designed a collaborative study for the identification of variants responsible for HMN/CMT2. We collected 15 HMN/CMT2 families with evidence for autosomal recessive inheritance, who had tested negative for mutations in 94 known IPN genes, who underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES) analyses. Candidate genes identified by WES were sequenced in an additional cohort of 167 familial or sporadic HMN/CMT2 patients using next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel analysis. RESULTS: Bioinformatic analyses led to the identification of novel or very rare variants in genes, which have not been previously associated with HMN/CMT2 (ARHGEF28, KBTBD13, AGRN and GNE); in genes previously associated with HMN/CMT2 but in combination with different clinical phenotypes (VRK1 and PNKP), and in the SIGMAR1 gene, which has been linked to HMN/CMT2 in only a few cases. These findings were further validated by Sanger sequencing, segregation analyses and functional studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes that can be associated with a specific disease gene, as well as the complexity of the pathogenesis of neuromuscular disorders.