Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.

The high sensitivity of night vision requires that rod photoreceptors reliably and reproducibly signal the absorption of single photons, a process that depends on tight regulation of intracellular cGMP concentration through the phototransduction cascade. Here in the mouse (Mus musculus), we studied a single-site D167A mutation of the gene for the α subunit of rod photoreceptor phosphodiesterase (PDEA), made with the aim of removing a noncatalytic binding site for cGMP. This mutation unexpectedly eliminated nearly all PDEA expression and reduced expression of the ß subunit (PDEB) to ∼5%-10% of WT. The remaining PDE had nearly normal specific activity; degeneration was slow, with 50%-60% of rods remaining after 6 months. Responses were larger and more sensitive than normal but slower in rise and decay, probably from slower dark turnover of cGMP. Remarkably, responses became much less reproducible than WT, with response variance increasing for amplitude by over 10-fold, and for latency and time-to-peak by >100-fold. We hypothesize that the increase in variance is the result of greater variability in the dark-resting concentration of cGMP, produced by spatial and temporal nonuniformity in spontaneous PDE activity. This variability decreased as stimuli were made brighter, presumably because of greater spatial uniformity of phototransduction and the approach to saturation. We conclude that the constancy of the rod response depends critically on PDE expression to maintain adequate spontaneous PDE activity, so that the concentration of second messenger is relatively uniform throughout the outer segment.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Rod photoreceptors in the vertebrate retina reliably signal the absorption of single photons of light by generating responses that are remarkably reproducible in amplitude and waveform. We show that this reproducibility depends critically on the concentration of the effector enzyme phosphodiesterase (PDE), which metabolizes the second messenger cGMP and generates rod light responses. In rods with the D167A mutation of the α subunit of PDE, only 5%-10% of PDE is expressed. Single-photon responses then become much more variable than in WT rods. We think this variability is caused by spatial and temporal inhomogeneity in the concentration of cGMP in darkness, so that photons absorbed in different parts of the cell produce responses of greatly varying amplitude and waveform.

Elevated energy requirement of cone photoreceptors.

We have used recent measurements of mammalian cone light responses and voltage-gated currents to calculate cone ATP utilization and compare it to that of rods. The largest expenditure of ATP results from ion transport, particularly from removal of Na+ entering outer segment light-dependent channels and inner segment hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, and from ATP-dependent pumping of Ca2+ entering voltage-gated channels at the synaptic terminal. Single cones expend nearly twice as much energy as single rods in darkness, largely because they make more synapses with second-order retinal cells and thus must extrude more Ca2+ In daylight, cone ATP utilization per cell remains high because cones never remain saturated and must continue to export Na+ and synaptic Ca2+ even in bright illumination. In mouse and human retina, rods greatly outnumber cones and consume more energy overall even in background light. In primates, however, the high density of cones in the fovea produces a pronounced peak of ATP utilization, which becomes particularly prominent in daylight and may make this part of the retina especially sensitive to changes in energy availability.

A Novel Role for UNC119 as an Enhancer of Synaptic Transmission.

Mammalian UNC119 is a ciliary trafficking chaperone highly expressed in the inner segment of retinal photoreceptors. Previous research has shown that UNC119 can bind to transducin, the synaptic ribbon protein RIBEYE, and the calcium-binding protein CaBP4, suggesting that UNC119 may have a role in synaptic transmission. We made patch-clamp recordings from retinal slices in mice with the UNC119 gene deleted and showed that removal of even one gene of UNC119 has no effect on the rod outer segment photocurrent, but acted on bipolar cells much like background light: it depolarized membrane potential, decreased sensitivity, accelerated response decay, and decreased the Hill coefficient of the response-intensity relationship. Similar effects were seen on rod bipolar-cell current and voltage responses, and after exposure to bright light to translocate transducin into the rod inner segment. These findings indicate that UNC119 deletion reduces the steady-state glutamate release rate at rod synapses, though no change in the voltage dependence of the synaptic Ca current was detected. We conclude that UNC119, either by itself or together with transducin, can facilitate the release of glutamate at rod synapses, probably by some interaction with RIBEYE or other synaptic proteins rather than by binding to CaBP4 or calcium channels.

Rod Photoreceptors Avoid Saturation in Bright Light by the Movement of the G Protein Transducin.

Rod photoreceptors can be saturated by exposure to bright background light, so that no flash superimposed on the background can elicit a detectable response. This phenomenon, called increment saturation, was first demonstrated psychophysically by Aguilar and Stiles and has since been shown in many studies to occur in single rods. Recent experiments indicate, however, that rods may be able to avoid saturation under some conditions of illumination. We now show in ex vivo electroretinogram and single-cell recordings that in continuous and prolonged exposure even to very bright light, the rods of mice from both sexes recover as much as 15% of their dark current and that responses can persist for hours. In parallel to recovery of outer segment current is an ∼10-fold increase in the sensitivity of rod photoresponses. This recovery is decreased in transgenic mice with reduced light-dependent translocation of the G protein transducin. The reduction in outer-segment transducin together with a novel mechanism of visual-pigment regeneration within the rod itself enable rods to remain responsive over the whole of the physiological range of vision. In this way, rods are able to avoid an extended period of transduction channel closure, which is known to cause photoreceptor degeneration.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Rods are initially saturated in bright light so that no flash superimposed on the background can elicit a detectable response. Frederiksen and colleagues show in whole retina and single-cell recordings that, if the background light is prolonged, rods slowly recover and can continue to produce significant responses over the entire physiological range of vision. Response recovery occurs by translocation of the G protein transducin from the rod outer to the inner segment, together with a novel mechanism of visual-pigment regeneration within the rod itself. Avoidance of saturation in bright light may be one of the principal mechanisms the retina uses to keep rod outer-segment channels from ever closing for too long a time, which is known to produce photoreceptor degeneration.

Lamprey vision: Photoreceptors and organization of the retina.

The lamprey is an important non-model vertebrate because it is an agnathan or jawless vertebrate and belongs to the superclass cyclostomata, a group that split off from the rest of the vertebrates 500 million years ago. Investigation of the lamprey retina may therefore reveal attributes of visual function that were characteristic of even the most primitive vertebrates. The rod and cone photoreceptors are a striking example, because the biochemistry and physiology of phototransduction is remarkably similar between lamprey and the rest of the vertebrates, including mammals. The fundamental mechanism of light sensation seems therefore to have emerged very early in the evolution of vertebrates in the late Cambrian. Some other characteristics of the retina are also similar and may be very old, but other features such as the morphology of ganglion cells are rather different in lamprey and other vertebrates. Even these differences may provide new insight into the various mechanisms vertebrates use for visual detection.

A hyperpolarizing rod bipolar cell in the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus.

Retinal bipolar cells receive direct input from rod and cone photoreceptors and send axons into the inner retina, synapsing onto amacrine and ganglion cells. Bipolar cell responses can be either depolarizing (ON) or hyperpolarizing (OFF); in lower vertebrates, bipolar cells receive mixed rod and cone input, whereas in mammals, input is mostly segregated into 14 classes of cone ON and OFF cells and a single rod ON bipolar cell. We show that lamprey, like mammals, have rod bipolar cells with little or no cone input, but these cells are OFF rather than ON. They have a characteristic morphology and a spectral sensitivity nearly indistinguishable from that of rod photoreceptors. In background light known to saturate rods, rod bipolar cells are also saturated and cannot respond to increment flashes. Our results suggest that early vertebrate progenitors of both agnathans and gnathostomes may have had a more fluid retinal organization than previously thought.

Light responses of mammalian cones.

Cone photoreceptors provide the foundation of most of human visual experience, but because they are smaller and less numerous than rods in most mammalian retinas, much less is known about their physiology. We describe new techniques and approaches which are helping to provide a better understanding of cone function. We focus on several outstanding issues, including the identification of the features of the phototransduction cascade that are responsible for the more rapid kinetics and decreased sensitivity of the cone response, the roles of inner-segment voltage-gated and Ca2+-activated channels, the means by which cones remain responsive even in the brightest illumination, mechanisms of cone visual pigment regeneration in constant light, and energy consumption of cones in comparison to that of rods.

A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

KEY POINTS: Most vertebrate eyes have rods for dim-light vision and cones for brighter light and higher temporal sensitivity. Rods evolved from cone-like precursors through expression of different transduction genes or the same genes at different expression levels, but we do not know which molecular differences were most important. We approached this problem by analysing rod and cone responses with the same model but with different values for model parameters. We showed that, in addition to outer-segment volume, the most important differences between rods and cones are: (1) decreased transduction gain, reflecting smaller amplification in the G-protein cascade; (2) a faster rate of turnover of the second messenger cGMP in darkness; and (3) an accelerated rate of decay of the effector enzyme phosphodiesterase and perhaps also of activated visual pigment. We believe our analysis has identified the principal alterations during evolution responsible for the duplex retina. ABSTRACT: Most vertebrates have rod and cone photoreceptors, which differ in their sensitivity and response kinetics. We know that rods evolved from cone-like precursors through the expression of different transduction genes or the same genes at different levels, but we do not know which molecular differences were most important. We have approached this problem in mouse retina by analysing the kinetic differences between rod flash responses and recent voltage-clamp recordings of cone flash responses, using a model incorporating the principal features of photoreceptor transduction. We apply a novel method of analysis using the log-transform of the current, and we ask which of the model's dynamic parameters need be changed to transform the flash response of a rod into that of a cone. The most important changes are a decrease in the gain of the response, reflecting a reduction in amplification of the transduction cascade; an increase in the rate of turnover of cGMP in darkness; and an increase in the rate of decay of activated phosphodiesterase, with perhaps also an increase in the rate of decay of light-activated visual pigment. Although we cannot exclude other differences, and in particular alterations in the Ca2+ economy of the photoreceptors, we believe that we have identified the kinetic parameters principally responsible for the differences in the flash responses of the two kinds of photoreceptors, which were likely during evolution to have resulted in the duplex retina.

The PDE6 mutation in the rd10 retinal degeneration mouse model causes protein mislocalization and instability and promotes cell death through increased ion influx.

The retinal degeneration model rd10 contains a missense mutation of the catalytic PDE6 ß subunit, which hydrolyzes cGMP in response to light. This model produces cell death more slowly than others caused by PDE6 loss of function, making it of particular interest for studying potential therapeutics. We used morphology, biochemistry, and single-cell physiology to examine the mechanism of rd10 degeneration. Our results show that the mutation produces no alteration of Pde6b RNA but does dramatically decrease maximal and basal PDE6 activity, apparently caused by a decrease in protein stability and transport. The enzymatic properties of the remaining mutant PDE6 appear to be nearly normal. We demonstrate that an increase in free cGMP, which would result from decreased PDE6 activity and serve to increase opening of the cGMP-gated channels and calcium influx, is an underlying cause of cell death: degeneration of rd10/Cngb1-/- double mutants is slower than the parent rd10 line. Paradoxically, degeneration in rd10/Cngb1-/- is also slower than in Cngb1-/- This rescue is correlated with a lowering of cGMP content in Cngb1-/- retinas and suggests that it may be caused by mislocalization of active PDE6. Single-cell recordings from rd10 rods show that the rates of rise and decay of the response are significantly slower; simulations indicate that these changes are primarily the result of the decrease in PDE6 concentration and rod collecting area. Together, these results provide insights into the complex mechanisms that underlie rd10-mediated retinal degeneration and a cautionary note for analysis of therapeutic interventions.

Role of recoverin in rod photoreceptor light adaptation.

KEY POINTS: Recoverin is a small molecular-weight, calcium-binding protein in rod outer segments that can modulate the rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation. We describe two additional and perhaps more important functions during photoreceptor light adaptation. Recoverin influences the rate of change of adaptation. In wild-type rods, sensitivity and response integration time adapt with similar time constants of 150-200 ms. In Rv-/- rods lacking recoverin, sensitivity declines faster and integration time is already shorter and not significantly altered. During steady light exposure, rod circulating current slowly increases during a time course of tens of seconds, gradually extending the operating range of the rod. In Rv-/- rods, this mechanism is deleted, steady-state currents are already larger and rods saturate at brighter intensities. We propose that recoverin modulates spontaneous and light-activated phophodiesterase-6, the phototransduction effector enzyme, to increase sensitivity in dim light but improve responsiveness to change in brighter illumination. ABSTRACT: Recoverin is a small molecular-weight, calcium-binding protein in rod outer segments that binds to G-protein receptor kinase 1 and can alter the rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation. A change in phosphorylation should change the lifetime of light-activated rhodopsin and the gain of phototransduction, but deletion of recoverin has little effect on the sensitivity of rods either in the dark or in dim-to-moderate background light. We describe two additional functions perhaps of greater physiological significance. (i) When the ambient intensity increases, sensitivity and integration time decrease in wild-type (WT) rods with similar time constants of 150-200 ms. Recoverin is part of the mechanism controlling this process because, in Rv-/- rods lacking recoverin, sensitivity declines more rapidly and integration time is already shorter and not further altered. (ii) During steady light exposure, WT rod circulating current slowly increases during a time course of tens of seconds, gradually extending the operating range of the rod. In Rv-/- rods, this mechanism is also deleted, steady-state currents are already larger and rods saturate at brighter intensities. We argue that neither (i) nor (ii) can be caused by modulation of rhodopsin phosphorylation but may instead be produced by direct modulation of phophodiesterase-6 (PDE6), the phototransduction effector enzyme. We propose that recoverin in dark-adapted rods keeps the integration time long and the spontaneous PDE6 rate relatively high to improve sensitivity. In background light, the integration time is decreased to facilitate detection of change and motion and the spontaneous PDE6 rate decreases to augment the rod working range.

Light adaptation and the evolution of vertebrate photoreceptors.

KEY POINTS: Lamprey are cyclostomes, a group of vertebrates that diverged from lines leading to jawed vertebrates (including mammals) in the late Cambrian, 500 million years ago. It may therefore be possible to infer properties of photoreceptors in early vertebrate progenitors by comparing lamprey to other vertebrates. We show that lamprey rods and cones respond to light much like rods and cones in amphibians and mammals. They operate over a similar range of light intensities and adapt to backgrounds and bleaches nearly identically. These correspondences are pervasive and detailed; they argue for the presence of rods and cones very early in the evolution of vertebrates with properties much like those of rods and cones in existing vertebrate species. ABSTRACT: The earliest vertebrates were agnathans - fish-like organisms without jaws, which first appeared near the end of the Cambrian radiation. One group of agnathans became cyclostomes, which include lamprey and hagfish. Other agnathans gave rise to jawed vertebrates or gnathostomes, the group including all other existing vertebrate species. Because cyclostomes diverged from other vertebrates 500 million years ago, it may be possible to infer some of the properties of the retina of early vertebrate progenitors by comparing lamprey to other vertebrates. We have previously shown that rods and cones in lamprey respond to light much like photoreceptors in other vertebrates and have a similar sensitivity. We now show that these affinities are even closer. Both rods and cones adapt to background light and to bleaches in a manner almost identical to other vertebrate photoreceptors. The operating range in darkness is nearly the same in lamprey and in amphibian or mammalian rods and cones; moreover background light shifts response-intensity curves downward and to the right over a similar range of ambient intensities. Rods show increment saturation at about the same intensity as mammalian rods, and cones never saturate. Bleaches decrease sensitivity in part by loss of quantum catch and in part by opsin activation of transduction. These correspondences are so numerous and pervasive that they are unlikely to result from convergent evolution but argue instead that early vertebrate progenitors of both cyclostomes and mammals had photoreceptors much like our own.

How rods respond to single photons: Key adaptations of a G-protein cascade that enable vision at the physical limit of perception.

Rod photoreceptors are among the most sensitive light detectors in nature. They achieve their remarkable sensitivity across a wide variety of species through a number of essential adaptations: a specialized cellular geometry, a G-protein cascade with an unusually stable receptor molecule, a low-noise transduction mechanism, a nearly perfect effector enzyme, and highly evolved mechanisms of feedback control and receptor deactivation. Practically any change in protein expression, enzyme activity, or feedback control can be shown to impair photon detection, either by decreasing sensitivity or signal-to-noise ratio, or by reducing temporal resolution. Comparison of mammals to amphibians suggests that rod outer-segment morphology and the molecules and mechanism of transduction may have evolved together to optimize light sensitivity in darkness, which culminates in the extraordinary ability of these cells to respond to single photons at the ultimate limit of visual perception.

Why are rods more sensitive than cones?

One hundred and fifty years ago Max Schultze first proposed the duplex theory of vision, that vertebrate eyes have two types of photoreceptor cells with differing sensitivity: rods for dim light and cones for bright light and colour detection. We now know that this division is fundamental not only to the photoreceptors themselves but to the whole of retinal and visual processing. But why are rods more sensitive, and how did the duplex retina first evolve? Cells resembling cones are very old, first appearing among cnidarians; the emergence of rods was a key step in the evolution of the vertebrate eye. Many transduction proteins have different isoforms in rods and cones, and others are expressed at different levels. Moreover rods and cones have a different anatomy, with only rods containing membranous discs enclosed by the plasma membrane. These differences must be responsible for the difference in absolute sensitivity, but which are essential? Recent research particularly expressing cone proteins in rods or changing the level of expression seem to show that many of the molecular differences in the activation and decay of the response may have each made a small contribution as evolution proceeded stepwise with incremental increases in sensitivity. Rod outer-segment discs were not essential and developed after single-photon detection. These experiments collectively provide a new understanding of the two kinds of photoreceptors and help to explain how gene duplication and the formation of rod-specific proteins produced the duplex retina, which has remained remarkably constant in physiology from amphibians to man.

Detection of single photons by toad and mouse rods.

Amphibian and mammalian rods can both detect single photons of light even though they differ greatly in physical dimensions, mammalian rods being much smaller in diameter than amphibian rods. To understand the changes in physiology and biochemistry required by such large differences in outer segment geometry, we developed a computational approach, taking into account the spatial organization of the outer segment divided into compartments, together with molecular dynamics simulations of the signaling cascade. We generated simulations of the single-photon response together with intrinsic background fluctuations in toad and mouse rods. Combining this computational approach with electrophysiological data from mouse rods, we determined key biochemical parameters. On average around one phosphodiesterase (PDE) molecule is spontaneously active per mouse compartment, similar to the value for toad, which is unexpected due to the much smaller diameter in mouse. A larger number of spontaneously active PDEs decreases dark noise, thereby improving detection of single photons; it also increases cGMP turnover, which accelerates the decay of the light response. These constraints explain the higher PDE density in mammalian compared with amphibian rods that compensates for the much smaller diameter of mammalian disks. We further find that the rate of cGMP hydrolysis by light-activated PDE is diffusion limited, which is not the case for spontaneously activated PDE. As a consequence, in the small outer segment of a mouse rod only a few activated PDEs are sufficient to generate a signal that overcomes noise, which permits a shorter lifetime of activated rhodopsin and greater temporal resolution.

Modulation of mouse rod photoreceptor responses by Grb14 protein.

Previous experiments have indicated that growth factor receptor-bound protein 14 (Grb14) may modulate rod photoreceptor cGMP-gated channels by decreasing channel affinity for cGMP; however, the function of Grb14 in rod physiology is not known. In this study, we examined the role of Grb14 by recording electrical responses from rods in which the gene for the Grb14 protein had been deleted. Suction-electrode recordings from single mouse rods showed that responses of dark-adapted Grb14(-/-) mice to brief flashes decayed more rapidly than strain-controlled wild type (WT) rods, with decreased values of both integration time and the exponential time course of decay (τREC). This result is consistent with an increase in channel affinity for cGMP produced by deletion of Grb14. However, Grb14(-/-) mouse rods also showed little change in dark current and a large and significant decrease in the limiting time constant τD, which are not consistent with an effect on channel affinity but seem rather to indicate modulation of the rate of inactivation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6). Grb14 has been reported to translocate from the inner to the outer segment in bright light, but we saw effects on response time course even in dark-adapted rods, although the effects were somewhat greater after rods had been adapted by exposure to bleaching illumination. Our results indicate that the mechanism of Grb14 action may be more complex than previously realized.

Genetic manipulation of rod-cone differences in mouse retina.

Though rod and cone photoreceptors use similar phototransduction mechanisms, previous model calculations have indicated that the most important differences in their light responses are likely to be differences in amplification of the G-protein cascade, different decay rates of phosphodiesterase (PDE) and pigment phosphorylation, and different rates of turnover of cGMP in darkness. To test this hypothesis, we constructed TrUx;GapOx rods by crossing mice with decreased transduction gain from decreased transducin expression, with mice displaying an increased rate of PDE decay from increased expression of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These two manipulations brought the sensitivity of TrUx;GapOx rods to within a factor of 2 of WT cone sensitivity, after correcting for outer-segment dimensions. These alterations did not, however, change photoreceptor adaptation: rods continued to show increment saturation though at a higher background intensity. These experiments confirm model calculations that rod responses can mimic some (though not all) of the features of cone responses after only a few changes in the properties of transduction proteins.

RDH12 allows cone photoreceptors to regenerate opsin visual pigments from a chromophore precursor to escape competition with rods.

Capture of a photon by an opsin visual pigment isomerizes its 11-cis-retinaldehyde (11cRAL) chromophore to all-trans-retinaldehyde (atRAL), which subsequently dissociates. To restore light sensitivity, the unliganded apo-opsin combines with another 11cRAL to make a new visual pigment. Two enzyme pathways supply chromophore to photoreceptors. The canonical visual cycle in retinal pigment epithelial cells supplies 11cRAL at low rates. The photic visual cycle in Müller cells supplies cones with 11-cis-retinol (11cROL) chromophore precursor at high rates. Although rods can only use 11cRAL to regenerate rhodopsin, cones can use 11cRAL or 11cROL to regenerate cone visual pigments. We performed a screen in zebrafish retinas and identified ZCRDH as a candidate for the enzyme that converts 11cROL to 11cRAL in cone inner segments. Retinoid analysis of eyes from Zcrdh-mutant zebrafish showed reduced 11cRAL and increased 11cROL levels, suggesting impaired conversion of 11cROL to 11cRAL. By microspectrophotometry, isolated Zcrdh-mutant cones lost the capacity to regenerate visual pigments from 11cROL. ZCRDH therefore possesses all predicted properties of the cone 11cROL dehydrogenase. The human protein most similar to ZCRDH is RDH12. By immunocytochemistry, ZCRDH was abundantly present in cone inner segments, similar to the reported distribution of RDH12. Finally, RDH12 was the only mammalian candidate protein to exhibit 11cROL-oxidase catalytic activity. These observations suggest that RDH12 in mammals is the functional ortholog of ZCRDH, which allows cones, but not rods, to regenerate visual pigments from 11cROL provided by Müller cells. This capacity permits cones to escape competition from rods for visual chromophore in daylight-exposed retinas.

Modulation of mouse rod response decay by rhodopsin kinase and recoverin.

Light isomerizes 11-cis-retinal in a retinal rod and produces an active form of rhodopsin (Rh*) that binds to the G-protein transducin and activates the phototransduction cascade. Rh* is turned off by phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase [G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 1 (GRK1)] and subsequent binding of arrestin. To evaluate the role of GRK1 in rod light response decay, we have generated the transgenic mouse RKS561L in which GRK1, which is normally present at only 2-3% of rhodopsin, is overexpressed by ∼12-fold. Overexpression of GRK1 increases the rate of Rh* phosphorylation and reduces the exponential decay constant of the response (τ(REC)) and the limiting time constant (τ(D)) both by ∼30%; these decreases are highly significant. Similar decreases are produced in Rv(-/-) rods, in which the GRK1-binding protein recoverin has been genetically deleted. These changes in response decay are produced by acceleration of light-activated phosphodiesterase (PDE*) decay rather than Rh* decay, because light-activated PDE* decay remains rate limiting for response decay in both RKS561L and Rv(-/-) rods. A model incorporating an effect of GRK1 on light-activated PDE* decay rate can satisfactorily account for the changes in response amplitude and waveform. Modulation of response decay in background light is nearly eliminated by deletion of recoverin. Our experiments indicate that rhodopsin kinase and recoverin, in addition to their well-known role in regulating the turning off of Rh*, can also modulate the decay of light-activated PDE*, and the effects of these proteins on light-activated PDE* decay may be responsible for the quickening of response recovery in background light.

Loss of caveolin-1 impairs retinal function due to disturbance of subretinal microenvironment.

Caveolin-1 (Cav-1), an integral component of caveolar membrane domains, is expressed in several retinal cell types, including photoreceptors, retinal vascular endothelial cells, Müller glia, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. Recent evidence links Cav-1 to ocular diseases, including autoimmune uveitis, diabetic retinopathy, and primary open angle glaucoma, but its role in normal vision is largely undetermined. In this report, we show that ablation of Cav-1 results in reduced inner and outer retinal function as measured, in vivo, by electroretinography and manganese-enhanced MRI. Somewhat surprisingly, dark current and light sensitivity were normal in individual rods (recorded with suction electrode methods) from Cav-1 knock-out (KO) mice. Although photoreceptor function was largely normal, in vitro, the apparent K(+) affinity of the RPE-expressed α1-Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase was decreased in Cav-1 KO mice. Cav-1 KO retinas also displayed unusually tight adhesion with the RPE, which could be resolved by brief treatment with hyperosmotic medium, suggesting alterations in outer retinal fluid homeostasis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that reduced retinal function resulting from Cav-1 ablation is not photoreceptor-intrinsic but rather involves impaired subretinal and/or RPE ion/fluid homeostasis.