Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting to Prevent Recurrent Cholecystitis in Deferred Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGS) has been proposed as one of the adjunctive treatments, apart from antibiotics, before surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis whose cholecystectomy could not be performed or was deferred. Currently, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of ETGS in those who receive and do not receive ETGS. We aimed to compare the rates of recurrent cholecystitis at 3 and 6 months in these 2 groups. METHODS: Between 2020 and 2023, eligible acute calculous cholecystitis patients with a high probability of common bile duct stone, who were surgical candidates but could not have an early cholecystectomy during COVID-19 surgical lockdown, were randomized into groups A (received ETGS) and B (did not receive ETGS). A definitive cholecystectomy was performed at 3 months or later in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 120 eligible patients were randomized into group A (n = 60) and group B (n = 60). In group A, technical and clinical success rates were 90% (54 of 60) and 100% (54 of 54), respectively. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, group A had a significantly lower rate of recurrence than group B at 3 months (0% [0 of 60] vs 18.3% [11 of 60]; P = .001). At 3-6 months, group A showed a nonsignificantly lower rate of recurrent cholecystitis compared to group B (0% [0 of 32] vs 10% [3 of 30]; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: ETGS could prevent recurrent cholecystitis in acute cholecystitis patients with common bile duct stone whose cholecystectomy was deferred for 3 months. In those who did not receive ETGS, the majority of recurrences occurred within 3 months. (Thaiclinicaltrials.org, Number TCTR20200913001).

The Efficacy of Metoclopramide for Gastric Visualization by Endoscopy in Patients With Active Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The 2021 American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines suggested using of intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) to enhance endoscopic view and reduce the need for repeat endoscopy. Evidence on intravenous metoclopramide, which is more accessible, is scant, especially in patients with active UGIB. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide for gastric visualization in patients with active UGIB. METHODS: Between April 10, 2021, and October 8, 2022, this double-blind, double-center randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with active UGIB (hematemesis or presence of fresh blood in the nasogastric tube). The eligible patients were randomly assigned in a concealed 1:1 allocation to metoclopramide or placebo. The primary outcome was adequate visualization by objective endoscopic visualized gastroduodenal scores (EVS). Secondary outcomes included mean difference in EVS, duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), immediate hemostasis, need for a second look EGD, units of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and 30-day rebleeding rate. RESULTS: Of the 68 eligible patients, 3 of each group were excluded by protocol violation. Finally, 62 patients (31 metoclopramide and 31 placebo) were analyzed. The percentage of patients with adequate visualization in metoclopramide and placebo group was 77.4% and 61.6% (odds ratio [OR] 2.16 [0.71-6.58], P = 0.16). The need for a second look EGD in the 72 hours was lower in the metoclopramide group (3.2% vs 22.6%, OR 0.11 [0.01-0.99], P = 0.02), whereas the other secondary outcomes were not different. However, in gastric lesions subgroup analysis, metoclopramide improved the adequate visualization rate (92.9% vs 50%, OR 13 [1.32-128.10], P = 0.03) and mean EVS at fundus (1.79 ± 0.42 vs 1.29 ± 0.72; P = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Metoclopramide did not improve endoscopic visualization but decreased the need for second look EGD in patients with overall active UGIB. It improved gastric visualization in those with UGIB due to gastric lesions, primarily by improving visualization in the fundus ( ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04771481).

Intermediate- to long-term outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting in patients with gallstone-related disease: a 10-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGS) can be a bridging therapy to elective cholecystectomy or a permanent gallbladder drainage method in patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease who are awaiting cholecystectomy or are unfit for surgery, respectively. We evaluated the intermediate- to long-term outcomes of ETGS in these groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 234 patients (acute cholecystitis = 147), who were unfit for surgery (n = 50) or had deferred cholecystectomy (n = 184) and who underwent ETGS between 2012 and 2021. A 7-Fr, 15-cm, double-pigtail plastic stent was placed for ETGS without scheduled stent exchange. Biliary event-free rates (i. e. cholecystitis and cholangitis) were determined at 6 months, 1 year, and ≥ 2 years. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success rates were 84.6 % (198/234) and 97.4 % (193/198), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis (n = 193) showed a biliary event-free rate of 99 % (95 %CI 0.95-1.00) at 6 months, 92 % (95 %CI 0.87-0.97) at 1 year, and 76 % (95 %CI 0.65-0.93) at ≥ 2 years, during a median follow-up period of 564 days (range 200-3001 days). CONCLUSIONS: ETGS is an effective biliary drainage method that should be considered in selected cases with common bile duct stone where cholecystectomy could not be performed or was deferred. The biliary event-free rates of ≥ 76 % up to ≥ 2 years further support the use of ETGS in these patient groups.

Diagnostic validity and learning curve of non-NBI expert endoscopists in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopists' experience influences narrow-band imaging (NBI)-guided gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) diagnostic performance. We aimed to evaluate the general gastroenterologists (GE) performance in NBI-guided GIM diagnosis compared to NBI experts (XP) and assess GEs' learning curve. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 10/2019 and 2/2022. Histology-proven GIM who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were randomly assessed by 2XPs or 3GEs. Endoscopists' performance on NBI-guided diagnoses were compared to the pathological diagnosis (gold standard) in five areas of the stomach according to the Sydney protocol. The primary outcome were GIM diagnosis validity scores of GEs compared to XPs. The secondary outcome was the minimum number of lesions required for GEs to achieve an accuracy of GIM diagnosis ≥ 80%. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-five lesions from 189 patients (51.3% male, mean age 66 ± 10 years) were examined. GEs performed EGD in 128 patients with 690 lesions. the GIM diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of GEs compared to the XPs, were 91% vs.93%, 73% vs.83%, 79% vs.83%, 89% vs.93%, and 83% vs.88%, respectively. GEs demonstrated lower specificity (mean difference - 9.4%; 95%CI - 16.3, 1.4; p = 0.008) and accuracy (mean difference - 5.1%; 95%CI - 3.3, 6.3; p = 0.006) compared to XPs. After 100 lesions (50% GIM), GEs achieved an accuracy of ≥ 80% and all diagnostic validity scores were comparable to the XPs (p < 0.05 all). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to XPs, GEs had lower specificity and accuracy for GIM diagnosis. The learning curve for a GE to achieve comparable performance to XPs would necessitate at least 50 GIM lesions. Created with BioRender.com.

Amount of contamination on the face shield of endoscopists during upper endoscopy between patients in two positions: A randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been recognized as an aerosol-generating procedure. This study aimed to systematically compare the degree of face shield contamination between endoscopists who performed EGD on patients lying in the left lateral decubitus (LL) and prone positions. METHODS: This is a randomized trial in patients scheduled for EGD between April and June 2020. Eligible 212 patients were randomized with 1:1 allocation. Rapid adenosine triphosphate test was used to determine contamination level using relative light units of greater than 200 as a cutoff value. All eligible patients were randomized to lie in either the LL or prone position during EGD. The primary outcome was the rate of contamination on the endoscopist's face shield. RESULTS: The majority of patients were female (63%), with a mean age of 60 ± 13 years. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no face shield contamination after EGD in either group. The number of coughs in the LL group was higher than the prone group (1.38 ± 1.8 vs 0.89 ± 1.4, P = 0.03). The mean differences in relative light units on the face shield before and after EGD in the LL and prone groups were 9.9 ± 20.9 and 4.1 ± 6 (P = 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSION: As measured by the adenosine triphosphate test, performing diagnostic EGD does not lead to contamination on the face shield of the endoscopist. However, placing patients in the prone position may further mitigate the risk.

Performance status of targeted biopsy alone versus Sydney protocol by non-NBI expert gastroenterologist in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis.

Background and study aims According to a recent guideline, patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) should have at least five biopsies performed under the Sydney protocol to evaluate for risk of extensive GIM. However, only narrow-band imaging (NBI)-targeted biopsy may be adequate to diagnose extensive GIM. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2019 and October 2020. Patients with histology-proven GIM were enrolled. All patients underwent standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed by a gastroenterology trainee. The performing endoscopists took biopsies from either a suspected GIM area (NBI-targeted biopsy) or randomly (if negative for GIM read by NBI) to complete five areas of the stomach as per the Sydney protocol. The gold standard for GIM diagnosis was pathology read by two gastrointestinal pathologists with unanimous agreement. Results A total of 95 patients with GIM were enrolled and 50 (52.6%) were men with a mean age of 64 years. Extensive GIM was diagnosed in 43 patients (45.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of NBI-targeted biopsy vs. the Sydney protocol were 88.4% vs.100 %, 90.3% vs. 90.3%, 88.4% vs. 89.6%, 90.3% vs. 100%, and 89.5% vs. 94.7%, respectively. The number of specimens from NBI-targeted biopsy was significantly lower than that from Sydney protocol (311vs.475, P  < 0.001). Conclusions Both NBI-targeted biopsy and Sydney protocol by a gastroenterologist who was not an expert in NBI and who has experience with diagnosis of at least 60 cases of GIM provided an NPV higher than 90%. Thus, targeted biopsy alone with NBI, which requires fewer specimens, is an alternative option for extensive GIM diagnosis.

Real-time semantic segmentation of gastric intestinal metaplasia using a deep learning approach.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous artificial intelligence (AI) models attempting to segment gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) areas have failed to be deployed in real-time endoscopy due to their slow inference speeds. Here, we propose a new GIM segmentation AI model with inference speeds faster than 25 frames per second that maintains a high level of accuracy. METHODS: Investigators from Chulalongkorn University obtained 802 histological-proven GIM images for AI model training. Four strategies were proposed to improve the model accuracy. First, transfer learning was employed to the public colon datasets. Second, an image preprocessing technique contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization was employed to produce clearer GIM areas. Third, data augmentation was applied for a more robust model. Lastly, the bilateral segmentation network model was applied to segment GIM areas in real time. The results were analyzed using different validity values. RESULTS: From the internal test, our AI model achieved an inference speed of 31.53 frames per second. GIM detection showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, negative predictive, accuracy, and mean intersection over union in GIM segmentation values of 93%, 80%, 82%, 92%, 87%, and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The bilateral segmentation network combined with transfer learning, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, and data augmentation can provide high sensitivity and good accuracy for GIM detection and segmentation.