Evidence Review-Social Determinants of Health for Veterans.

BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is committed to providing high-quality care and addressing health disparities for vulnerable Veterans. To meet these goals, VA policymakers need guidance on how to address social determinants in operations planning and day-to-day clinical care for Veterans. METHOD: MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts were searched from inception to January 2017. Additional articles were suggested by peer reviewers and/or found through search of work associated with US and VA cohorts. Eligible articles compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and/or Veterans engaged with those not engaged in VA healthcare. Our evidence maps summarized study characteristics, social determinant(s) addressed, and whether health behaviors, health services utilization, and/or health outcomes were examined. Qualitative syntheses and quality assessment were performed for articles on rurality, trauma exposure, and sexual orientation. RESULTS: We screened 7242 citations and found 131 eligible articles-99 compared Veterans vs non-Veterans, and 40 included engaged vs non-engaged Veterans. Most articles were cross-sectional and addressed socioeconomic factors (e.g., education and income). Fewer articles addressed rurality (N = 20), trauma exposure (N = 17), or sexual orientation (N = 2); none examined gender identity. We found no differences in rural residence between Veterans and non-Veterans, nor between engaged and non-engaged Veterans (moderate strength evidence). There was insufficient evidence for role of rurality in health behaviors, health services utilization, or health outcomes. Trauma exposures, including from events preceding military service, were more prevalent for Veterans vs non-Veterans and for engaged vs non-engaged Veterans (low-strength evidence); exposures were associated with smoking (low-strength evidence). DISCUSSION: Little published literature exists on some emerging social determinants. We found no differences in rural residence between our groups of interest, but trauma exposure was higher in Veterans (vs non-Veterans) and engaged (vs non-engaged). We recommend consistent measures for social determinants, clear conceptual frameworks, and analytic strategies that account for the complex relationships between social determinants and health.

Proteinase 3-specific antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Proteinase 3 (PR3)-specific antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is one of two major ANCA-associated vasculitis variants and is pathogenically linked to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). GPA is characterised by necrotising granulomatous inflammation that preferentially affects the respiratory tract. The small vessel vasculitis features of GPA are shared with microscopic polyangiitis. Necrotising granulomatous inflammation of GPA can lead to PR3-ANCA and small vessel vasculitis via activation of neutrophils and monocytes. B cells are central to the pathogenesis of PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis. They are targeted successfully by remission induction and maintenance therapy with rituximab. Relapses of PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis and toxicities associated with current standard therapy contribute substantially to remaining mortality and damage-associated morbidity. More effective and less toxic treatments are sought to address this unmet need. Advances with cellular and novel antigen-specific immunotherapies hold promise for application in autoimmune disease, including PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis. This Series paper describes the inter-related histopathological and clinical features, pathophysiology, as well as current and future targeted treatments for PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Dismissal disagreement and discharge delays: Associations of patient-clinician plan of care agreement with discharge outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients do not understand or agree with their clinicians about their discharge plan. However, the effect of disagreement on discharge outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To measure the correlation between patient-clinician care agreement and discharge outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed from September 2019 to March 2020 (Rochester, MN, USA). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine patients and their primary clinician (resident, advanced practice clinician or attending) hospitalized from September 2019-March 2020 at Mayo Clinic Hospital. Participants were independently surveyed following hospital day #3 ward rounds regarding the goals of the hospitalization and discharge planning. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Patient-clinician agreement for main diagnosis, patient's main concern, and four domains of discharge planning was assessed. Readiness for hospital discharge, delayed discharge, and 30-day readmission was measured. Then, associations between patient-clinician agreement, delayed discharge, and 30-day readmissions were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 436 patients and clinicians, 17.7% completely agreed about what needs to be accomplished before dismissal, 40.8% agreed regarding discharge date, and 71.1% agreed regarding discharge location. In the multivariable model, patient-clinician agreement scores were not significantly correlated with discharge outcomes. Patient-clinician agreement on discharge location was higher for those discharged to home (81.5%) versus skilled nursing facility (48.5%) or assisted living (42.9%) (p < .0001). The agreement on the expected length of stay was highest for home-goers (45.9%) compared to skilled nursing (32.0%) or assisted living (21.4%) (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients and their clinicians frequently disagree about when and where a patient will go after hospitalization, particularly for those discharged to a skilled nursing facility. While disagreement did not predict discharge outcomes, our findings suggest opportunities to improve effective communication and promote shared mental models regarding discharge earlier in the hospital stay.