Ulnar Epiphysiodesis: Success of the Index Procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Premature radial physeal closure is a relatively rare occurrence in children. When isolated growth arrest of the radius with continued ulnar growth occurs, the resulting ulnar positive deformity leads to altered wrist mechanics and pain. Timely epiphysiodesis of the distal ulna with and without ulnar shortening osteotomy can address these issues, but continued ulnar overgrowth is a possible complication. We seek to evaluate the success rate of the primary epiphysiodesis of the ulna and associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: A chart review was conducted at 2 children's hospitals from 2008 to 2019. Patients between the ages of 6 and 18 years old, with premature distal radius physeal closure, with or without positive ulnar variance, and >2 months follow-up were included. We evaluated the following characteristics for each patient: demographics, initial cause of premature radial physeal closure, ulnar variance, additional procedures performed during epiphysiodesis, preoperative and postoperative pain, range of motion, instability. Summary statistics were conducted and expressed as proportions, medians and means. A paired t test evaluated change in ulnar variance for those who had an ulnar shortening osteotomy performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one wrists among 30 patients were identified, and the median age at the time of surgery was 12.2 years (interquartile range: 3.4). Ulnar shortening osteotomies were performed in 53.1% of cases and distal radius osteotomy in 15.6%. Bone graft was utilized in 25.8% of the epiphysiodesis procedures. There were 2 failures of primary epiphysiodesis indicating an index success rate of 93.7%. The average ulnar variance correction was 3.1 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.9, 4.4). The mean physeal time to closure was 134 days. Preoperative symptoms were resolved for 90.6% cases at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Ulnar epiphysiodesis successfully terminates ulnar physeal growth in 93.7% of cases. Preoperative symptoms were completely resolved with a median physeal closure of just over 4 months. Ulnar variance was corrected on average by 4.1 mm when a radial or ulnar shortening osteotomy was performed at the time of epiphysiodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

A comparison of fixation methods in adolescent patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescent patients treated with plate fixation to patients treated with intramedullary fixation to identify differences in complications and outcomes. MATERIALS & METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all adolescent patients with age between 10 and16 year and treated with intramedullary fixation or plate fixation for a diaphyseal both bone forearm fracture between 2005 and 2014. Demographic information and clinical data was collected. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate post-operative radial bow magnitude and location, time to union, and residual angulation. Complications were graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo Classification system. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 32 were treated with plate fixation and 70 with intramedullary fixation. The intramedullary nail group had 55% of complications classified as major. There were no major complications in the plate fixation group (P = 0.1). The radial bow was significantly more distal and smaller in magnitude in the intramedullary fixation group (P < 0.01). Of the patients who underwent intramedullary fixation, 76% required an open reduction of at least one forearm bone. There was increased time to radiographic union in patients treated with intramedullary fixation when compared to those treated with plates, 68 days versus 58 days (P = 0.03). A second operation was necessary for 91% of patients treated with intramedullary fixation compared to only 3% of patients treated with a plate (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescent patients remain challenging injuries to treat. Forearm bony anatomy is not completely restored with intramedullary fixation. Results suggested an association towards increased complication rates and complication severity with intramedullary fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 retrospective comparative study.