Monosomy X in isogenic human iPSC-derived trophoblast model impacts expression modules preserved in human placenta.

Mammalian sex chromosomes encode homologous X/Y gene pairs that were retained on the Y chromosome in males and escape X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in females. Inferred to reflect X/Y pair dosage sensitivity, monosomy X is a leading cause of miscarriage in humans with near full penetrance. This phenotype is shared with many other mammals but not the mouse, which offers sophisticated genetic tools to generate sex chromosomal aneuploidy but also tolerates its developmental impact. To address this critical gap, we generated X-monosomic human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) alongside otherwise isogenic euploid controls from male and female mosaic samples. Phased genomic variants in these hiPSC panels enable systematic investigation of X/Y dosage-sensitive features using in vitro models of human development. Here, we demonstrate the utility of these validated hiPSC lines to test how X/Y-linked gene dosage impacts a widely used model for human syncytiotrophoblast development. While these isogenic panels trigger a GATA2/3- and TFAP2A/C-driven trophoblast gene circuit irrespective of karyotype, differential expression implicates monosomy X in altered levels of placental genes and in secretion of placental growth factor (PlGF) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Remarkably, weighted gene coexpression network modules that significantly reflect these changes are also preserved in first-trimester chorionic villi and term placenta. Our results suggest monosomy X may skew trophoblast cell type composition and function, and that the combined haploinsufficiency of the pseudoautosomal region likely plays a key role in these changes.

Isogenic hiPSC models of Turner syndrome development reveal shared roles of inactive X and Y in the human cranial neural crest network.

Modeling the developmental etiology of viable human aneuploidy can be challenging in rodents due to syntenic boundaries, or primate-specific biology. In humans, monosomy-X (45,X) causes Turner syndrome (TS), altering craniofacial, skeletal, endocrine, and cardiovascular development, which in contrast remain unaffected in 39,X-mice. To learn how human monosomy-X may impact early embryonic development, we turned to human 45,X and isogenic euploid induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) from male and female mosaic donors. Because neural crest (NC) derived cell types are hypothesized to underpin craniofacial and cardiovascular changes in TS, we performed a highly-powered differential expression study on hiPSC-derived anterior neural crest cells (NCCs). Across three independent isogenic panels, 45,X NCCs show impaired acquisition of PAX7+SOX10+ markers, and disrupted expression of other NCC-specific genes, relative to their isogenic euploid controls. In particular, 45,X NCCs increase cholesterol biosynthesis genes while reducing transcripts that feature 5' terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) motifs, including those of ribosomal protein and nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. Such metabolic pathways are also over-represented in weighted co-expression gene modules that are preserved in monogenic neurocristopathy. Importantly, these gene modules are also significantly enriched in 28% of all TS-associated terms of the human phenotype ontology. Our analysis identifies specific sex-linked genes that are expressed from two copies in euploid males and females alike and qualify as candidate haploinsufficient drivers of TS phenotypes in NC-derived lineages. This study demonstrates that isogenic hiPSC-derived NCC panels representing monosomy-X can serve as a powerful model of early NC development in TS and inform new hypotheses towards its etiology.

Formative evaluation of an emergency department clinical decision support system for agitation symptoms: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The burden of mental health-related visits to emergency departments (EDs) is growing, and agitation episodes are prevalent with such visits. Best practice guidance from experts recommends early assessment of at-risk populations and pre-emptive intervention using de-escalation techniques to prevent agitation. Time pressure, fluctuating work demands, and other systems-related factors pose challenges to efficient decision-making and adoption of best practice recommendations during an unfolding behavioural crisis. As such, we propose to design, develop and evaluate a computerised clinical decision support (CDS) system, Early Detection and Treatment to Reduce Events with Agitation Tool (ED-TREAT). We aim to identify patients at risk of agitation and guide ED clinicians through appropriate risk assessment and timely interventions to prevent agitation with a goal of minimising restraint use and improving patient experience and outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study describes the formative evaluation of the health record embedded CDS tool. Under aim 1, the study will collect qualitative data to design and develop ED-TREAT using a contextual design approach and an iterative user-centred design process. Participants will include potential CDS users, that is, ED physicians, nurses, technicians, as well as patients with lived experience of restraint use for behavioural crisis management during an ED visit. We will use purposive sampling to ensure the full spectrum of perspectives until we reach thematic saturation. Next, under aim 2, the study will conduct a pilot, randomised controlled trial of ED-TREAT at two adult ED sites in a regional health system in the Northeast USA to evaluate the feasibility, fidelity and bedside acceptability of ED-TREAT. We aim to recruit a total of at least 26 eligible subjects under the pilot trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval by the Yale University Human Investigation Committee was obtained in 2021 (HIC# 2000030893 and 2000030906). All participants will provide informed verbal consent prior to being enrolled in the study. Results will be disseminated through publications in open-access, peer-reviewed journals, via scientific presentations or through direct email notifications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04959279; Pre-results.

Validation of risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism and bleeding in critically ill adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance of risk assessment models that were developed for adults, in predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding in critically ill adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adolescents 12 to 17 years old admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit who received cardiopulmonary support but did not have VTE on admission nor received anticoagulation. Discrimination, using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and precision-recall (AUPRC) curves, and calibration, using Hosmer-Lemeshow test, of the Geneva, Padua, IMPROVE VTE and IMPROVE Bleed models were calculated. RESULTS: Of 536 adolescents analyzed, 7 (1.3%) developed VTE and 13 (2.4%) bled. AUROCs of the Geneva, Padua and IMPROVE VTE models ranged from 0.46 to 0.59, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) including 0.5. AUPRCs ranged from 0.011 to 0.017, with 95% CIs including 0.013. Only IMPROVE VTE model had non-statistically significant Hosmer-Lemeshow test. IMPROVE Bleed model had AUROC and AUPRC of 0.75 and 0.062, with 95% CIs excluding 0.5 and 0.024, respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow test was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite similarities in coagulation between adolescents and adults, risk assessment models for VTE in adults should not be used for critically ill adolescents. The model for bleeding may be useful.