Analytical lessons learned from selected therapeutic protein drug comparability studies.

The successful implementation of process and product changes for a therapeutic protein drug, both during clinical development and after commercialization, requires a detailed evaluation of their impact on the protein's structure and biological functionality. This analysis is called a comparability exercise and includes a data driven assessment of biochemical equivalence and biological characterization using a cadre of analytical methodologies. This review focuses on describing analytical results and lessons learned from selected published therapeutic protein comparability case studies both for bulk drug substance and final drug product. An overview of the currently available analytical methodologies typically used is presented as well as a discussion of new emerging analytical techniques. The potential utility of several novel analytical approaches to comparability studies is discussed including distribution and stability of protein drugs in vivo, and enhanced evaluation of higher-order protein structure in actual formulations using hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance fingerprinting or empirical phase diagrams. In addition, new methods for detecting and characterizing protein aggregates and particles are presented as these degradants are of current industry-wide concern. The critical role that analytical methodologies play in elucidating the structure-function relationships for therapeutic protein products during the overall assessment of comparability is discussed.

Comparability assessments of process and product changes made during development of two different monoclonal antibodies.

To assess the impact of manufacturing changes on antibody structure and function during the course of product development, three comparability studies were performed for each of two different IgG1 monoclonal antibody product candidates. Comparability study #1 evaluated the effect of changing the cell line and bulk drug substance manufacturing process for cell culture and purification. Results indicated that these process changes led to differences in sialylation of N-glycans and/or C-terminal lysine levels. Comparability study #2 results confirmed that scale-up of the bulk process and transfer to the commercial site, combined with changing from a lyophilized to a liquid dosage form, did not impact the structural or functional integrity of the antibodies. Comparability study #3 examined possible differences arising when the liquid formulation filled into pre-filled syringes and vials. Results indicated nearly identical molecular structure, biological activity, and degradation profiles except for a small yet statistically significant increase in the levels of subvisible particles in pre-filled syringes. These results from comparability studies with two different monoclonal antibodies are discussed with respect to the timing of the manufacturing changes and overall comparability strategies to assure safety and efficacy during development.