A randomized, open-label, multicenter study of switching to brolucizumab with or without a loading dose for patients with suboptimal anatomically controlled neovascular age-related macular degeneration-the FALCON study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment initiation with brolucizumab, a new potent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, is typically performed with three monthly injections (loading dose) and has been well studied in treatment-naïve patients. However, no clinical data are available yet on whether or not anti-VEGF pretreated patients also benefit from a loading dose. In the clinical setting, different heterogeneous treatment patterns are used as no clinical trial has addressed this so far in a head-to-head comparison. Therefore, the FALCON study is investigating whether patients with unsatisfactory response to previous anti-VEGF treatments benefit from a loading dose at the switch to brolucizumab treatment. METHODS: FALCON is a 52-week, two-arm, randomized, open-label, multicenter, multinational study in patients with residually active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who will be randomized 1:1 and started with brolucizumab 6 mg loading (three monthly loading doses) or brolucizumab 6 mg non-loading (one initial injection) and consecutive treatment every 12 weeks, respectively. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the non-loading vs. loading arm in mean change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the mean value at week 40 to week 52. Secondary objectives include the assessment of anatomical outcomes, treatment intervals, safety and tolerability. RESULTS: FALCON will be the first study to assess treatment initiation with an anti-VEGF agent in a switch situation with or without loading dose in patients with nAMD. CONCLUSIONS: The results will support the optimization of treatment of patients with previous unsatisfactory anti-VEGF response. Therefore, we expect to see an impact on current clinical practice which has been established for more than a decade. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04679935, date of registration-22-Dec 2020; EUDRACT number: 2019-004763-53, date of registration-03 Dec 2019.

[Buckling Surgery: Old Fashioned or Cutting Edge?] / Buckelchirurgie: Old Fashion oder Cutting Edge?

For many decades, scleral buckling surgery was the only reasonable surgical procedure in eyes with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In recent years, primary vitrectomy has apparently become the treatment of choice, although evidence from comparative clinical trials is missing. In this article, data from clinical trials and indications for buckling surgery are presented.

Demographics of patients receiving Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in real-world practice: healthcare research data versus randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, non-interventional studies (NISs) might provide additional information to guide management in patients more representative to the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to compare baseline characteristics of patients receiving intravitreal treatment in the NIS OCEAN with those from published RCTs. METHODS: The ongoing OCEAN study enrolled patients treated with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME) or branch/central retinal vein occlusion (B/CRVO). Baseline patient characteristics were compared by indication within the OCEAN cohort. Furthermore, the characteristics were set in reference to those of published RCTs in the same indications. Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and assessed for statistically significant differences as indicated by non-overlapping CIs. RESULTS: Patient characteristics in the NIS OCEAN were evaluated for 3,614 patients with nAMD, 1,211 with DME, 204 with BRVO and 121 with CRVO. Between these groups, significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, and mean baseline VA were seen, reflecting known differences between the indications. Compared to the patient characteristics of published RCTs (trials selected by literature search: nAMD: 13 RCTs, DME: 9, RVO: 5), the OCEAN patients' mean age was significantly higher in every indication. The gender distributions across the trials were comparable, with only few differences between OCEAN and the RCTs. Regarding the mean baseline VA, notable differences were found in nAMD and in DME, with VA significantly higher in some RCTs and lower in others. CONCLUSIONS: The described differences underline the complementarity of NISs and RCTs. OCEAN covers a broader spectrum and more variability of patients than do RCTs. As baseline values may have impact on the treatment response (ceiling effect), there is an ongoing need for research in all patient subgroups. Country-specific assessments of patient populations can better reflect the real-world situation. NISs can deliver insights that RCTs may not, as NISs can include non-typical patients, patients with comorbidities, a broader age spectrum and patients of various disease stages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The NIS OCEAN was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02194803 ).

Distribution of internal carotid artery plaque locations among patients with central retinal artery occlusion in the Eagle study population.

PURPOSE: Arterial emboli in the internal carotid artery (ICA) mainly cause cerebral ischemia; only 10 % of emboli reach the retinal arteries. Computational blood flow studies suggest that plaques situated in the ICA siphon may be a source of embolism to the ophthalmic artery (OA). To validate these calculated probabilities in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), we reanalyzed digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images from the Multicenter Study of the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye (EAGLE) study, a multicenter randomized study in patients with nonarteritic CRAO. METHODS: A reevaluation of 34 DSA studies was done from the interventional arm of the EAGLE study with regards to distribution of arterial plaques at specific ICA siphon locations and ICA stenosis. A comparison was made of plaque distribution to calculated probabilities for emboli reaching the OA from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a patient-specific ICA siphon. RESULTS: Most of the ICA plaques near the OA's origin were located in the cavernous ICA portion (31.3%). Of these, 12.5 % had plaques in the curvature opposite the OA origin, a location carrying the highest risk for embolization into the OA (according to the CFD model 12.6-13.2 % probability of embolisation into the OA). Also, 15.6 % had plaques in the paraclinoid ICA portion distal to the OA origin. CONCLUSIONS: There were 40.6% of the patients that had plaques in the cavernous and clinoid ICA portions presenting possible sources for embolic material generating RAO.

[ChatGPT and the German board examination for ophthalmology: an evaluation]. / ChatGPT und die deutsche Facharztprüfung für Augenheilkunde: eine Evaluierung.

PURPOSE: In recent years artificial intelligence (AI), as a new segment of computer science, has also become increasingly more important in medicine. The aim of this project was to investigate whether the current version of ChatGPT (ChatGPT 4.0) is able to answer open questions that could be asked in the context of a German board examination in ophthalmology. METHODS: After excluding image-based questions, 10 questions from 15 different chapters/topics were selected from the textbook 1000 questions in ophthalmology (1000 Fragen Augenheilkunde 2nd edition, 2014). ChatGPT was instructed by means of a so-called prompt to assume the role of a board certified ophthalmologist and to concentrate on the essentials when answering. A human expert with considerable expertise in the respective topic, evaluated the answers regarding their correctness, relevance and internal coherence. Additionally, the overall performance was rated by school grades and assessed whether the answers would have been sufficient to pass the ophthalmology board examination. RESULTS: The ChatGPT would have passed the board examination in 12 out of 15 topics. The overall performance, however, was limited with only 53.3% completely correct answers. While the correctness of the results in the different topics was highly variable (uveitis and lens/cataract 100%; optics and refraction 20%), the answers always had a high thematic fit (70%) and internal coherence (71%). CONCLUSION: The fact that ChatGPT 4.0 would have passed the specialist examination in 12 out of 15 topics is remarkable considering the fact that this AI was not specifically trained for medical questions; however, there is a considerable performance variability between the topics, with some serious shortcomings that currently rule out its safe use in clinical practice.

[Prospective noninterventional BLUE SKY study evaluating the efficacy of brolucizumab in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with neovascular AMD]. / Prospektive nichtinterventionelle BLUE SKY-Studie zur Beurteilung der Wirksamkeit von Brolucizumab bei unbehandelten und vorbehandelten Patienten mit neovaskulärer AMD.

Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the standard treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). In addition to the approved substances ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Novartis) and aflibercept (Eylea®, Bayer), bevacizumab (Avastin®, Roche) is also available. Furthermore, brolucizumab (Beovu®, Novartis) has been approved and has been available in Germany since April 2020. The multicenter, noninterventional prospective BLUE SKY study investigates brolucizumab treatment with different schemes in 600 treatment-naive and pretreated nAMD patients in routine clinical practice over a 24-month period. Besides general patient data, visual acuity and treatment data will be documented. Fluorescein angiography, fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography will be performed and analyzed by reading centers. The focus of the analysis will be on the intraretinal and subretinal fluid distribution as well as morphological MNV changes and injection frequency. Also, safety and adverse drug effects of brolucizumab, with a specific focus on inflammatory complications, particularly retinal (occlusive) vasculitis will be evaluated.

[Regression of idiopathic epiretinal membrane-Case report and consideration of the possible mechanism]. / Regression einer idiopathischen epiretinalen Gliose ­ Kasuistik und Überlegungen zum Mechanismus.

In the presence of a symptomatic epiretinal gliosis, pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling to remove the membrane is usually indicated in clinical practice. According to common clinical experience, almost no independent regression of such an epiretinal membrane and thus healing of the pathology alone exists. Therefore, the unusual case of bilateral independent regression of idiopathic epiretinal gliosis and formation of a lamellar macular hole in a 73-year-old male patient is described. Considerations of the possible mechanism are presented based on the existing literature. These include separation of inflammatory versus noninflammatory membranes, possible separation of individual layers depending on the status of the posterior vitreous limiting membrane and also the possible action of proteolytic systems in the posterior vitreous region. Finally, the question arises, whether patients have to be informed about this fact before possible surgery.

[Clinical diagnostics and therapy for non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion]. / Diagnostik und Therapie beim nicht arteriitischen Zentralarterienverschluss.

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmological emergency situation. Known risk factors are arterial hypertension, cardial arrhythmia, arteriosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes. Elderly patients should be examined for an arteritic genesis. Young patients (< 45 years) without typical risk factors may suffer from thrombophilia. There is no uniform recommendation on how to treat non-arteritic CRAO. Many different interventions have been suggested in the literature, i. e., massaging the eye, systemic or local reduction of intraocular pressure, anticoagulation, either systemically administered venous thrombolysis or supraselective intra-arterial thrombolysis. In this review we present the causes of CRAO and diagnostic means to detect causes; we also critically discuss previously described therapeutic options. It is our aim to provide a guide through the necessary interdisciplinary diagnostics in co-operation with internal medicine and neurology and to recommend a multimodal therapy in patients with non-arteritic CRAO.

[Intravitreal drug therapy for retinal vein occlusion--pathophysiological mechanisms and routinely used drugs]. / Intravitreale Medikamenteneingabe bei retinalem Venenverschluss--pathophysiologische Mechanismen und angewandte Substanzen.

The novel therapeutic principle of intravitreal drug therapy for retinal vein occlusion has become an integrated constituent of clinical practice over the last years. The two substance classes that have been evaluated in large randomised clinical trials so far are corticosteroids and inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The reported treatment success of these intravitreally administered substances has lead not only to a paradigm shift in clinical care but has also advanced our understanding of the underlying pathophysiological principles of retinal vein occlusions. In this review the different substances are discussed, their mechanisms of action are analysed and the results of the large clinical trials available to date are critically evaluated. Furthermore, an approach to integrate these novel treatment options into the existing treatment regimes for retinal vein occlusions is suggested.

Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).

PURPOSE: The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) has been suggested as a promising test for quantifying the visual acuity (VA) of patients with very low vision, a condition often classified using the semi-quantitative clinical scale "counting fingers" (CF), "hand motion" (HM), "light perception" (LP) and "no light perception". The present study was designed to assess FrACT performance in a sizable number of CF, HM, and LP patients in order to generate a setting for future clinical studies in the low vision range. METHODS: We examined a total of 41 patients (LP, n = 11; CF, n = 15; HM, n = 15) with various eye diseases (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, ARMD), covering the clinical VA scale from LP to CF. The FrACT optotypes were presented at a distance of 50 cm on a 17-inch LCD monitor with four random orientations. After training, two FrACT measurements (test and retest) were taken, each comprising 30 trials. RESULTS: FrACT measures reproducibly the VA of CF and HM patients. In CF patients, FrACT resulted in a mean logMAR = 1.98 +/- 0.24 (corresponding to a decimal VA of 0.010), for HM in a mean logMAR = 2.28 +/- 0.15 (corresponding to a decimal VA of 0.0052). In all LP patients the FrACT values were close to what would be obtained by random guessing. The mean test-retest 95% confidence interval was 0.21 logMAR for CF patients and 0.31 logMAR for HM respectively. Test-retest variability declined from 24 to 30 trials, showing that at least 30 trials are necessary. CONCLUSION: FrACT can reproducibly quantify VA in the CF and HM range. We observed a floor effect for LP, and it was not quantifiable further. Quantitative VA measures are thus obtainable in the very low-vision range using FrACT.

[Oral anticoagulation : Current overview and perioperative management in ophthalmic surgery]. / Orale Antikoagulation : Aktuelle Übersicht und perioperatives Management in der Ophthalmochirurgie.

Antithrombotic treatment with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents can increase the risk for perioperative bleeding. In contrast to other surgical fields, the optimal perioperative management in ophthalmic surgery has not yet been exactly defined and, thus, is not standardized. In this contribution, we provide an overview of currently available oral anticoagulants and discuss potential strategies for the management of these agents in different ophthalmic surgical procedures.

[Does the micropulse laser have an effect on chronic CSC?] / Hat der Mikropulslaser bei chronischer CCS einen Effekt?

INTRODUCTION: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most common cause of vision loss without an evidence-based treatment recommendation. A positive effect of micropulse laser (MPL) treatment has been described in the literature in recent years. This study aimed to reappraise these results in a patient population with chronic CSC. METHODS: Patients suffering from chronic CSC with a source point detectable in fluorescein angiography (longer than 3 months duration and unresponsive to treatment with eplerenone and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors) were identified and included in this prospective and consecutive case study. Patients were controlled with a yellow laser (577 nm) after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and then every 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included (28 eyes). The mean duration of anamnesis was 444 days (90-1412 days) and the mean duration of the observation period after MPL was 257 days (42-909 days). The foveal retinal thickness measured 351.7 ± 82.4 µm before, compared to 253.6 ± 86.48 µm after MPL (mean of all patients over the whole observation period). Visual acuity was 0.33 ± 0.21 logMAR prior to MPL and 0.30 ± 0.22 logMAR posttreatment. Of the patients two underwent a second MPL and three patients underwent photodynamic treatment (PDT) after insufficient clinical improvement and were consequently excluded from the study. CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness in this patient population with chronic CSC was significantly reduced after MPL treatment with no significant changes of visual acuity. No side effects of MPL were observed. Larger studies including control groups are warranted to quantify the effects of MPL further.

[Work sampling in ophthalmological clinical studies. A multicenter field study]. / Zeiterfassung in ophthalmologischen klinischen Studien. Eine multizentrische Feldstudie.

BACKGROUND: Work in clinical studies is generally more elaborate and therefore more time-consuming in comparison to the clinical routine. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the time consumption in the German ophthalmological clinical trial centers. METHODS: The members of the working group of the German Ophthalmology Society clinical study centers (Arbeitsgemeinschaft DOG Klinische Studienzentren) were asked to fill in three questionnaires about best estimations for the time spent on study-related procedures and administration. Additionally, work sampling was performed for each employee at each study center over a period of 3 weeks. RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 9 of the 11 centers. Overall, 5504 working hours were recorded. On an average working day, the time spent for both documentation and administration averaged 4 h each. Operative interventions consumed a significant amount of time (2.8 h), as did ophthalmological examinations (2.5 h) and obtaining informed consent (1.5 h). The recorded time consumption for visual acuity testing, informed consent and documentation was well aligned with the best estimates of the three questionnaires. By contrast, interventions, ophthalmological examinations and biomaterial sample handling were underrated in the best estimations. DISCUSSION: A considerable amount of time in clinical studies is spent on documentation and administration. From work sampling, ophthalmological examinations and biomaterial sampling turned out to be surprisingly time consuming. This is probably due to preparation and postprocessing tasks. It is important to consider this when calculating the overall costs of a clinical study. In addition, many administrative activities cannot be attributed to specific patients and can therefore not be compensated on the basis of case payments alone. Additional remuneration is required to fully cover the costs in an ophthalmological study center.

Rapamycin reduces VEGF expression in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and inhibits RPE-induced sprouting angiogenesis in vitro.

Anti-VEGF treatment has become accepted first-line treatment for choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration. However, VEGF-inhibition does not always lead to sustained CNV-reduction. In this study, the effect of rapamycin was superior to VEGF-inhibition in a co-culture assay of endothelial cells (ECs) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Rapamycin reduced EC sprouting in groups that did not respond to anti-VEGF treatment. Rapamycin did not induce EC apoptosis, but reduced both VEGF-production in RPE and the responsiveness of ECs to stimulation. Rapamycin might therefore be a therapeutic option for CNV patients that do not respond sufficiently to the established anti-VEGF treatments.

[Arteriovenous dissection for branch retinal vein occlusion]. / Arteriovenöse Dissektion beim Venenastverschluss.

Arteriovenous dissection (AVD) is a surgical maneuver to separate the retinal artery and vein at the crossing site in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The published studies showed an evidence level 3. AVD seems to be maintainable in patients with recent onset of BRVO and decimal visual acuity < or =0.4.

[Retinal manifestation in hematological diseases]. / Retinabeteiligung bei hämatologischen Erkrankungen.

Hematological diseases can lead to ocular manifestations. Retinal manifestation occurs in patients with anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic syndromes. It is not uncommon for the ocular findings to be the first manifestation of the systemic disease. In these patients the correct diagnosis can be difficult because as a rule the retinal involvement is unspecific. In cases of unexplained retinal changes with hemorrhage and cotton wool spots, an underlying hematological disease should be suspected and the appropriate diagnostics should be recommended.

[Ultra-widefield angiography for retinal vein occlusion : How large is large enough?] / Ultraweitwinkelangiographie beim retinalen Venenverschluss : Wie groß ist groß genug?

BACKGROUND: The introduction of full fundus angiography (FAG) for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) has enriched diagnostic imaging; however, it is unclear how much of the retina has to be visualized to evaluate the risk of neovascularization. We investigated the 102° Spectralis camera to assess if imaging beyond the central 102° is necessary. METHODS: In this retrospective study we assessed 80 eyes of 80 patients with RVO to analyze central and peripheral ischemia using the ultra-widefield 102° Spectralis camera. The standard viewer software was used to delineate ischemic areas (IA) and to measure the amount of pixels of IA in correlation to the total amount of pixels in the peripheral image. RESULTS: Among the 80 eyes with RVO there were 51 eyes with ischemic areas (central and/or peripheral), of which IA could be detected in 49 eyes by analyzing a fovea-centered FAG image. The average IA in these 51 eyes was 23.5% of the total image area and 53.7% of disc areas, respectively. DISCUSSION: A fovea-centered FAG image with a 102° angle appears to be sufficient to determine the clinically relevant extent of IA. Old recommendations and imaging methods should be rethought. The 102° Spectralis camera provides a clinically suitable, fast and exact method which might replace old methods to describe and document the extent of ischemia by disc areas.

[Management of anticoagulants in ophthalmic surgery-a survey among ophthalmic surgeons in Germany]. / Umgang mit gerinnungshemmenden Substanzen in der Ophthalmochirurgie ­ eine Umfrage unter Ophthalmochirurgen in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: As our population ages and comorbidities rise, ophthalmic surgeons are increasingly faced with patients on anticoagulant therapy or with clotting disorders. The ophthalmic surgeon has to weigh the perioperative risk of haemorrhage when anticoagulation continues against the risk of thromboembolism caused by discontinuation or changing the patient's medication (bridging, switching, cessation). There are currently no guidelines or recommendations. METHODS: A survey was sent to the DOG (German Ophthalmologic Society) divisions and associated surgical organizations to determine the status quo. A questionnaire was sent out and filled out by the different groups of specialists. RESULTS: All four divisions of the DOG and four associated organizations returned completed questionnaires. Surgical interventions were listed that are carried out during anticoagulant therapy without exceptions, as well as interventions that were classified to require medical adjustment. Although the assessments varied, general consensus was achieved regarding interventions not requiring adjustments due to anticoagulants (i. e., intravitreal injection, cataract surgery, laser and corneal operations, simple muscle surgery), and those interventions requiring adjustments in medications (glaucoma operations, complex retina surgery, eye socket surgery, complex surgery of the lid). CONCLUSION: Main result of this survey was the specification of serious bleeding complications which are permanent vision loss and re-operation. They could serve as endpoint parameters for essential future investigations. Nevertheless, this survey makes clear that the decision about an adjustment of anticoagulant medication in ophthalmic surgery is currently made individually and not based on established standards.