Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared midterm results using low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs; 18F) and standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs; 22F-24F) for endovascular pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. METHODS: From July 2005 to March 2015, 134 asymptomatic patients underwent endovascular repair of a pararenal or TAAA using multibranched aortic stent grafts. In March 2011, we started using a LPSG with nitinol stents and thin-walled polyester fabric. Prospectively collected data on operative repair, complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: LPSGs were used in 37 patients (8 women [21.6%]; mean ± standard deviation age, 72.5 ± 8 years) and SPSGs in 97 patients (25 [26%] women; mean age, 73 ± 8 years). Medical comorbidities, aneurysm size, and aneurysm extent were similar in the LPSG and SPSG groups. Mean follow-up time was longer in the SPSG group (3.1 ± 2 years) than in the LPSG group (1.3 ± 0.9 years; P < .001). Operative time, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and perioperative death were not significantly different between the two groups (P > .05). Aneurysm-related death, rupture, stent graft migration, type I or III endoleaks, aneurysm enlargement >5 mm, branch vessel occlusion, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (P > .05). However, the combined outcome of conduit use or access artery injury occurred at a lower rate in the LPSG group than in the SPSG group (16% vs 36%; P = .03). Women experienced significantly higher rates of conduit use and access artery injury than men after repair with SPSGs (64% vs 26%, respectively; P = .001) but similar rates after repair with the LPSG (25% vs 14%, respectively; P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: LPSGs had similar safety profile and midterm outcomes compared with the SPSGs for treatment of pararenal and TAAA. The substitution of LPSGs for SPSGs lowered the number of patients who required conduit insertion to avoid access artery injury, especially in women, thereby reducing an otherwise striking gender difference.

Standard off-the-shelf versus custom-made multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The complex aortic branch anatomy in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and pararenal aortic aneurysms (PRAAs) presents a challenge for endovascular repair. The multibranched endovascular device has durable midterm results with use of a custom branch stent graft (CSG) configuration. The midterm results with use of the standard branch stent graft (SSG) configuration are unknown, but it has the advantage of off-the-shelf technology. The goal of this study was to compare the midterm outcomes of CSG and SSG multibranched endovascular devices. METHODS: From July 2005 to September 2014, 133 patients underwent elective endovascular repair of TAAA and PRAA in a prospective trial. Beginning in December 2008, SSGs were used in those with suitable anatomy. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age, 71 ± 7 years; 11 women [22%]) were treated using SSGs, and 83 patients (mean age, 74 ± 9 years; 22 women [26.5%]) underwent repair using CSGs. The SSG and CSG groups were similar with regard to aneurysm size, aneurysm extent, and medical comorbidities, with the sole exception of lung disease, which was more common in the SSG group. All stent grafts were deployed as intended, with no conversions to open repair. Mean ± standard deviation follow-up (days) was 694 ± 525 for the SSG group and 942 ± 764 for the CSG group (P = .045). There were no significant differences in aneurysm-related death, renal failure requiring dialysis, stroke, endoleak, visceral or renal branch occlusion, lower extremity weakness, or reintervention (P > .05 for each). The volume of contrast material was significantly lower in those with SSGs compared with CSGs (P = .016), but there were no significant differences in operative or fluoroscopy times. Time to treatment (days from consent to surgery) was significantly lower in SSG patients compared with CSG patients (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with suitable anatomy, the use of SSGs for TAAA and PRAA repair results in significantly shorter wait times to surgery and is as safe, effective, and durable in the midterm compared with CSGs.