Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(23): 858-864, 2021 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111059

RESUMO

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, older U.S. adults have been at increased risk for severe COVID-19-associated illness and death (1). On December 14, 2020, the United States began a nationwide vaccination campaign after the Food and Drug Administration's Emergency Use Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended prioritizing health care personnel and residents of long-term care facilities, followed by essential workers and persons at risk for severe illness, including adults aged ≥65 years, in the early phases of the vaccination program (2). By May 1, 2021, 82%, 63%, and 42% of persons aged ≥65, 50-64, and 18-49 years, respectively, had received ≥1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. CDC calculated the rates of COVID-19 cases, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and deaths by age group during November 29-December 12, 2020 (prevaccine) and April 18-May 1, 2021. The rate ratios comparing the oldest age groups (≥70 years for hospital admissions; ≥65 years for other measures) with adults aged 18-49 years were 40%, 59%, 65%, and 66% lower, respectively, in the latter period. These differential declines are likely due, in part, to higher COVID-19 vaccination coverage among older adults, highlighting the potential benefits of rapidly increasing vaccination coverage.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(12): ofac630, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36519121

RESUMO

Background: US tuberculosis (TB) guidelines recommend treatment ≥6 months with a regimen composed of multiple effective anti-TB drugs. Since 2003, a 4-month regimen for a specific subset of TB patients has also been recommended. Methods: We used 2011-2018 US National Tuberculosis Surveillance System data to characterize factors associated with 4-month (111-140 days) therapy among adult patients who had completed treatment and were potentially eligible at that time for 4-month therapy (culture-negative pulmonary-only TB, absence of certain risk factors, and initial treatment that included pyrazinamide). We used modified Poisson regression with backward elimination of main effect variables to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRRs). Results: During 2011-2018, 63 393 adults completed TB treatment: 5560 (8.8%) were potentially eligible for 4-month therapy; of these, 5560 patients (79%) received >4-month therapy (median, 193 days or ∼6 months). Patients with cavitary disease were more likely to receive >4-month therapy (aRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14) vs patients without cavitary disease. Patients more likely to receive 4-month therapy included patients treated by health departments vs private providers only (aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98), those in the South and West vs the Midwest, non-US-born persons (aRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99) vs US-born persons, and aged 25-64 years vs 15-24 years. Conclusions: Most patients potentially eligible for 4-month therapy were treated with standard 6-month courses. Beyond clinical eligibility criteria, other patient- and program-related factors might be more critical determinants of treatment duration.

3.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0236933, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at a greater risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) compared to people without HIV and of developing complications due to the complexity of TB/HIV coinfection management. METHODS: During 2013-2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 5 TB Regional Training and Medical Consultation Centers (RTMCCs) (now known as TB Centers of Excellence or COEs) to provide medical consultation to providers for TB disease and latent TB infection (LTBI), with data entered into a Medical Consultation Database (MCD). Descriptive analyses of TB/HIV-related consultations were conducted using SAS® software, version [9.4] to determine the distribution of year of consultation, medical setting and provider type, frequency of consultations regarding a pediatric (<18 years) patient, and to categorize key concepts and themes arising within consultation queries and medical consultant responses. RESULTS: Of 14,586 consultations captured by the MCD in 2013-2017, 544 (4%) were categorized as TB/HIV-related, with 100 (18%) received in 2013, 129 (24%) in 2014, 104 (19%) in 2015, 117 (22%) in 2016, and 94 (17%) in 2017. Most TB/HIV consultations came from nurses (54%) or physicians (43%) and from local (65%) or state health departments (10%). Only 17 (3%) of HIV-related consultations involved pediatric cases. Off the 544 TB/HIV consultations, 347 (64%) concerned the appropriate treatment regimen for TB/HIV or LTBI/HIV for a patient on or not on antiretroviral therapy (ART). CONCLUSIONS: The data support a clear and ongoing gap in areas of specialized HIV knowledge by TB experts that could be supplemented with proactive educational outreach. The specific categories of TB/HIV inquiries captured by this analysis are strategically informing future targeted training and educational activities planned by the CDC TB Centers of Excellence, as well as guiding HIV educational efforts at regional and national TB meetings.


Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./economia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Tuberculose/complicações , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Segurança , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
4.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 61(4): 896-904, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31852329

RESUMO

We conducted a population-based study of biologic, clinical, and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of multi-agent systemic therapy (MAST) by people living with HIV (PLWH) who were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Building on recent registry-based analyses, we linked records from the Georgia Cancer Registry, Georgia HIV/AIDS Surveillance Registry, and the Georgia Hospital Discharge Database to identify 328 PLWH adults (age ≥ 18) diagnosed with NHL within 2004-2012. Through logistic regression modeling, we examined factors associated with patients receiving MAST for NHL. Robust predictors included CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm3 around the time of cancer diagnosis, an advanced stage (III or IV) diagnosis of NHL, MSM HIV transmission, and having private health insurance. The strongest single predictor of MAST was CD4 count. Because there is now guideline-integrated evidence that PLWH receiving standard-of-care cancer therapy can achieve substantially improved outcomes, it is vital they have access to regimens routinely provided to HIV-negative cancer patients.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Infecções por HIV , Linfoma Relacionado a AIDS , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adulto , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Georgia/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA