Primary and secondary data in emergency medicine health services research - a comparative analysis in a regional research network on multimorbid patients.

BACKGROUND: This analysis addresses the characteristics of two emergency department (ED) patient populations defined by three model diseases (hip fractures, respiratory, and cardiac symptoms) making use of survey (primary) and routine (secondary) data from hospital information systems (HIS). Our aims were to identify potential systematic inconsistencies between both data samples and implications of their use for future ED-based health services research. METHODS: The research network EMANET prospectively collected primary data (n=1442) from 2017-2019 and routine data from 2016 (n=9329) of eight EDs in a major German city. Patient populations were characterized using socio-structural (age, gender) and health- and care-related variables (triage, transport to ED, case and discharge type, multi-morbidity). Statistical comparisons between descriptive results of primary and secondary data samples for each variable were conducted using binomial test, chi-square goodness-of-fit test, or one-sample t-test according to scale level. RESULTS: Differences in distributions of patient characteristics were found in nearly all variables in all three disease populations, especially with regard to transport to ED, discharge type and prevalence of multi-morbidity. Recruitment conditions (e.g., patient non-response), project-specific inclusion criteria (e.g., age and case type restrictions) as well as documentation routines and practices of data production (e.g., coding of diagnoses) affected the composition of primary patient samples. Time restrictions of recruitment procedures did not generate meaningful differences regarding the distribution of characteristics in primary and secondary data samples. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary data types maintain their advantages and shortcomings in the context of emergency medicine health services research. However, differences in the distribution of selected variables are rather small. The identification and classification of these effects for data interpretation as well as the establishment of monitoring systems in the data collection process are pivotal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00011930 (EMACROSS), DRKS00014273 (EMAAGE), NCT03188861 (EMASPOT).

Emergency Departments as Care Providers for Patients with Cardiac Ambulatory Care Sensitive and Mental Health Conditions: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study with Patients and Physicians.

Mental health conditions are frequent among patients with somatic illnesses, such as cardiac diseases. They often remain undiagnosed and are related to increased utilization of outpatient services, including emergency department care. The objective of this qualitative study was to investigate the significance of the emergency department in the patients' course of treatment and from the physicians' perspective. An improved understanding of the subjective needs of this specific patient group should provide hints for targeted treatment. This study is part of the prospective EMASPOT study, which determined the prevalence of mental health conditions in emergency department patients with cardiac ambulatory care sensitive conditions. The study on hand is the qualitative part, in which 20 semi-structured interviews with patients and a focus group with six ED physicians were conducted. Data material was analyzed using the qualitative content analysis technique, a research method for systematically identifying themes or patterns. For interpretation, we used the "typical case approach". We identified five "typical patient cases" that differ in their cardiac and mental health burden of disease, frequency and significance of emergency department and outpatient care visits: (1) frequent emergency department users with cardiac diseases and mental health conditions, (2) frequent emergency department users without cardiac diseases but with mental health conditions, (3) needs-based emergency department users with cardiac diseases; (4) targeted emergency department users as an alternative to specialist care and (5) patients surprised by initial diagnose of cardiac disease in the emergency department. While patients often perceived the emergency department visit itself as a therapeutic benefit, emergency department physicians emphasized that frequent examinations of somatic complaints can worsen mental health conditions. To improve care, they proposed close cooperation with the patients' primary care providers, access to patients' medical data and early identification of mental health conditions after cardiac diagnoses, e.g., by an examination tool.

Study Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Single-Center Feasibility Study of Rheopheresis for Raynaud's Syndrome and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis (RHEACT Study).

Introduction: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) are frequent manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Despite being very common in SSc patients, both conditions have proven to be notoriously difficult to study. There are very few available approved drugs with varying efficacy. It has been shown that the presence of DU is associated with increased whole blood viscosity (WBV). Rheopheresis (RheoP) is an extracorporeal apheresis technique used to treat microcirculatory disorders by improving blood viscosity. Improved blood flow and wound healing after RheoP treatments have been reported in single case reports. Methods and Analysis: We report the clinical trial protocol of "A randomized controlled prospective single-center feasibility study of Rheopheresis for Raynaud's syndrome and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis (RHEACT)." RHEACT aims to investigate the efficacy of RheoP on the Raynaud Condition Score (RCS) as the primary efficacy outcome measure after 16 weeks from baseline. Thirty patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of two RheoP treatment groups or assigned to the standard of care (SoC) control group (intravenous iloprost). Secondary endpoints include changes in DU, changes in nailfold video capillaroscopy and patient-reported-outcomes (Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, FACIT-Fatigue, and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, quick version). Discussion: Apheresis techniques have been investigated in SSc but mainly in observational, retrospective studies, or single case reports. RheoP is a pathophysiologically driven potential new therapy for heavily burdened patients with SSc-associated secondary RP with or without DU. Ethics and Dissemination: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05204784). Furthermore, the study is made publicly available on the website of the German network of Systemic Sclerosis "Deutsches Netzwerk Systemische Sklerodermie (DNSS)."

Mental health conditions in older multimorbid patients presenting to the emergency department for acute cardiac symptoms: Cross-sectional findings from the EMASPOT study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) examine the proportion of patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) for acute cardiac symptoms with comorbid mental health conditions (MHCs) comprising current depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder; (2) compare cardiac patients with and without MHCs regarding sociodemographic, medical, and psychological characteristics; and (3) examine recognition and treatment rates of MHCs. METHODS: Multimorbid patients, aged ≥50 years, presenting to an inner-city ED with acute cardiac symptoms including chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations, completed validated self-report instruments assessing MHCs and a questionnaire collecting psychosocial and medical information. In addition, routine medical data were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS: A total of 641 patients were included in the study. Mean (±SD) age was 68.8 (±10.8) years and 41.7% were female. Based on screening instruments, 28.4% of patients were affected with comorbid MHCs. Patients reported clinically significant symptoms of depression (23.3% PHQ-9 ≥10), generalized anxiety disorder (12.2% GAD-7 ≥10), and panic disorder (4.7% PHQ-PD). Patients with MHCs were more likely to be younger, female, lower educated, and unemployed. The presence of MHCs was associated with higher cardiac symptom burden and subjective treatment urgency as well as more psychosocial distress (PHQ-stress) and impaired quality of life (SF-12v2). Of all patients, 15.6% were identified with new or unrecognized MHCs. CONCLUSIONS: MHCs are prevalent in nearly one-third of patients presenting with cardinal cardiac symptoms. Thus, the ED visit offers an opportunity to identify and refer patients with MHCs to appropriate and timely care after exclusion of life-threatening conditions.

Improvement in self-reported eating-related psychopathology and physical health-related quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A pre-post analysis and comparison with conservatively treated patients with obesity.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on self-reported eating-related psychopathology and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Outcomes of the LSG group were compared with a group of conservatively treated (CT) patients, who underwent a 1-year multimodal weight reduction group program that included dietary advice, physical exercise, psychoeducation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, training in Jacobson's progressive muscle relaxation, and social group support. The setting was a multidisciplinary obesity center. METHOD: A sample of 103 patients with obesity were investigated using the Eating Disorder Inventory and the Short Form Health Survey before and, on average, 19 (±5) months after weight loss intervention. Thereof, 63 patients (age 45.6±10.9years, 71.4% females) underwent LSG, and 40 patients (age 50.6±11.3years, 77.5% females) underwent the CT program. Patients were assigned to either the surgical or the nonsurgical intervention group following clinical guidelines and patient preference. RESULTS: In the LSG group, excess weight loss (%EWL) was 53.0±24.0%, and body mass index (BMI) decreased from 51.5±8.1 to 38.0±7.7kg/m2. In the CT group, %EWL was 13.9±27.1%, and BMI decreased from 40.3±6.7 to 38.0±7.2kg/m2. Significant improvements in eating-related psychopathology were observed in both groups. Although both groups had a similar BMI after the respective interventions, LSG patients reported significantly greater body satisfaction and substantial improvement in perceived physical health from a lower baseline level than CT patients. DISCUSSION: In the second follow-up year, LSG was associated with greater weight loss from a higher baseline weight, and greater improvements in self-reported eating-related psychopathology and physical HRQoL compared with conservative treatment.

Changes in self-reported eating patterns after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a pre-post analysis and comparison with conservatively treated patients with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe obesity need to adapt to surgically induced changes in their eating behaviors to maintain treatment success. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on weight loss and on 3 dimensions of eating behavior, namely, cognitive restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. Outcomes of the LSG group were compared with a group of conservatively treated (CT) patients, who underwent a 1-year multimodal weight-reduction group program that included dietary advice, physical exercise, psychoeducation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, training in Jacobson's progressive muscle relaxation, and social group support. SETTING: The study setting was a multidisciplinary obesity center located in a university hospital. METHODS: A sample of 102 patients with obesity were investigated using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire before and, on average, 19 (±5) months after weight loss intervention. Of the 102 patients, 62 (age 45.8±10.8 years, 71% females) underwent LSG, and 40 patients (age 50.6±11.3 years, 77.5% females) underwent the CT program. Patients were assigned to either the surgical or the nonsurgical intervention group following clinical guidelines and patient preference. RESULTS: In the LSG group, total weight loss was 25.9±11.0%, excess weight loss was 52.8±24.1%, and body mass index decreased from 51.4±8.1 to 38.0±7.8 kg/m². In the CT group, total weight loss was 5.4±10.6%, excess weight loss was 13.9±27.1%, and body mass index decreased from 40.3±6.7 to 38.0±7.2 kg/m². Significant improvements in self-reported eating behaviors were observed in both groups, that is, an increased cognitive restraint of eating, a decreased disinhibition of eating control, and a reduced degree of perceived hunger. In contrast, whereas Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire scores before weight loss intervention did not differ between groups, LSG patients reported significantly greater reductions in disinhibition and hunger than CT patients did after weight loss intervention. In both groups, greater weight loss was associated with decreased hunger sensations. CONCLUSION: In the second follow-up year, LSG was associated with greater weight loss and greater improvements in self-reported eating behaviors compared with conservative treatment.

Determinants of Weight Loss following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: The Role of Psychological Burden, Coping Style, and Motivation to Undergo Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The amount of excess weight loss (%EWL) among obese patients after bariatric surgery varies greatly. However, reliable predictors have not been established yet. The present study evaluated the preoperative psychological burden, coping style, and motivation to lose weight as factors determining postoperative treatment success. METHODS: The sample included 64 morbidly obese patients with a preoperative BMI of 51 ± 8 kg/m(2) who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Well-established questionnaires were applied before surgery to assess the psychological burden in terms of "perceived stress" (PSQ-20), "depression" (PHQ-9), "anxiety" (GAD-7), and "mental impairment" (ISR) as well as coping style (Brief COPE) and motivation to lose weight. %EWL as an indicator for treatment success was assessed on average 20 months after surgery. RESULTS: Based on the %EWL distribution, patients were classified into three %EWL groups: low (14-39%), moderate (40-59%), and high (60-115%). LSG patients with high %EWL reported significantly more "active coping" behavior prior to surgery than patients with moderate and low %EWL. Patients' preoperative psychological burden and motivation to lose weight were not associated with %EWL. CONCLUSION: An "active coping" style might be of predictive value for better weight loss outcomes in patients following LSG intervention.

Surgically and conservatively treated obese patients differ in psychological factors, regardless of body mass index or obesity-related co-morbidities: a comparison between groups and an analysis of predictors.

OBJECTIVE: For the treatment of obesity, both conservative and surgical procedures are available. Psychological factors are likely to influence the choice of treatment; however, to date, systematic studies that investigate these factors are few in number. The aim of our study was to analyze whether patients who undergo a surgical treatment differ from those who require a conservative treatment in regard to psychological factors, regardless of their somatic conditions. Furthermore, predictors of treatment choice will be examined. METHODS: A total of 244 patients (189 women), with a mean body mass index of 45.1 kg/m2, underwent a weight reduction treatment, with 126 patients undergoing bariatric surgery and 118 patients participating in a conservative, multimodal outpatient weight reduction program. Differences in the results of the psychological questionnaires between conservatively and surgically treated patients were evaluated through the use of t-tests, χ2-tests and an ANCOVA. For the analysis of the predictors, logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Surgically and conservatively treated obese patients differ in psychological, somatic, and socio-demographic factors. The psychological differences between the groups are independent of obesity-related co-morbidities, such as body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and coronary heart disease. The following psychological and somatic factors equally predict the choice of bariatric surgery: apathy, delegated active coping, a sense of coherence, complaints, type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI, and age. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal studies are required to assess the predictive value of the psychological factors in regard to the postsurgical weight course to improve the pre-surgical screening and treatment selection process. The pre-surgical identification of psychological predictors should result in a more personalized medicine course and may ensure long term outcomes.

Psychological and sociodemographic predictors of premature discontinuation of a 1-year multimodal outpatient weight-reduction program: an attrition analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Attrition rates of up to 77% have been reported in conservative weight-reduction programs for the treatment of obesity. In view of the cost of such programs to the health system, there is a need to identify the variables that predict premature discontinuation of treatment. Previous studies have focused mainly on somatic and sociodemographic parameters. The prospective influence of psychological factors has not been systematically investigated to date. METHODS: A total of 164 patients (138 of whom were women) with a mean age of 45 years and a mean body mass index of 39.57 participated in a 1-year outpatient weight-reduction program at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin University Hospital. The program included movement therapy, dietary advice, psychoeducational and behavioral interventions, relaxation procedures, and consultations with a specialist in internal medicine and a psychologist. Patients also underwent regular laboratory and psychological testing. The results were evaluated using a t-test, χ(2)-test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-one of the 164 patients (61 women, mean age = 43 years, mean body mass index = 39.53) withdrew before the end of the program (attrition rate = 43.3%). While there were no differences between the somatic and metabolic characteristics of those who withdrew and those who remained, the sociodemographic and psychological factors had some relevance. In particular, "expectation of self-efficacy" (Fragebogen zu Selbstwirksamkeit, Optimismus und Pessimismus [SWOP]), "not working," "tiredness" (Berliner Stimmungsfragebogen [BSF]), "pessimism" (SWOP) and "positive reframing" (Brief-COPE) were found to play a role in whether participants subsequently dropped out of the treatment. "Support coping" (Brief-COPE) and "older age" prior to the start of treatment were identified as variables that promoted treatment adherence. CONCLUSION: The results are discussed in light of previous findings and with regard to whether the modules of the weight-reduction program should be adapted.