Ophthalmology Workforce Projections in the United States, 2020 to 2035.

PURPOSE: To analyze ophthalmology workforce supply and demand projections from 2020 to 2035. DESIGN: Observational cohort study using data from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis (NCHWA). METHODS: Data accessed from the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website were compiled to analyze the workforce supply and demand projections for ophthalmologists from 2020 to 2035. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Projected workforce adequacy over time. RESULTS: From 2020 to 2035, the total ophthalmology supply is projected to decrease by 2650 full-time equivalent (FTE) ophthalmologists (12% decline) and total demand is projected to increase by 5150 FTE ophthalmologists (24% increase), representing a supply and demand mismatch of 30% workforce inadequacy. The level of projected adequacy was markedly different based on rurality by year 2035 with 77% workforce adequacy versus 29% workforce adequacy in metro and nonmetro geographies, respectively. By year 2035, ophthalmology is projected to have the second worst rate of workforce adequacy (70%) of 38 medical and surgical specialties studied. CONCLUSIONS: The HRSA's Health Workforce Simulation Model forecasts a sizeable shortage of ophthalmology supply relative to demand by the year 2035, with substantial geographic disparities. Ophthalmology is one of the medical specialties with the lowest rate of projected workforce adequacy by 2035. Further dedicated workforce supply and demand research for ophthalmology and allied professionals is needed to validate these projections, which may have significant future implications for patients and providers. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Gene therapy for age-related macular degeneration: potential, feasibility, and pitfalls.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The landscape for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is rapidly changing with addition of biosimilars and now United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nonneovascular AMD (nnAMD) treatment options. These developments have inspired a burgeoning pipeline of gene therapy approaches focused on similar antivascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and complement related pathways. Historic and more recent setbacks in the gene therapy pipeline, including intraocular inflammatory reactions, have raised important concerns for adverse events related to AMD therapeutics both for gene and nongene approaches. The specific clinical profile of these therapeutics approaching later stage clinical trials are complex and under active investigation; however, these options hold promise to disrupt the current landscape and change management paradigms for one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. RECENT FINDINGS: This review covers current gene therapy approaches for neovascular AMD (nAMD) and nnAMD. Intravitreal, suprachoroidal, and subretinal delivery routes are discussed with attention to technical procedure, capabilities for transgene delivery to target tissue, immunogenicity, and collateral effects. Suprachoroidal delivery is an emerging approach which may bridge some of the practical drawbacks for intravitreal and subretinal methods, though with less elaborated immunologic profile. In parallel to delivery modification, viral vectors have been cultivated to target specific cells, with promising enhancements in adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors and persistent interest in alternate viral and nonviral delivery vectors. Ongoing questions such as steroid or immunosuppressive regimen and economic considerations from a payer and societal perspective are discussed. SUMMARY: The present review discusses emerging gene therapy options which could foster new, more durable nAMD and nnAMD therapeutics. These options will need refinement with regards to route, vector, and dosage, and specialists must decipher the specific clinical risk benefit profile for individual patients. Ongoing concerns for immunogenicity or dosage related adverse events could stifle progress, while further vector development and refined delivery techniques have the potential to change the safety and efficacy of currently options in the pipeline.

Safety of recent ophthalmic drugs and devices for wet macular degeneration.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With frequent antivascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) injections well established as the standard of care in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focus has now shifted towards decreasing treatment burden without compromising safety and efficacy. This review summarizes clinical stage and recently approved drugs and devices for nAMD, with an emphasis paid to safety concerns and their implications for product adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Three strategies have emerged to decrease the treatment burden associated with the current standard of care: more durable intravitreal agents, sustained-release modalities and gene therapy. The appearance of biosimilars will further impact drug availability and cost. As patterns of adverse events emerge from clinical trial or postmarketing surveillance data, manufacturers have proactively responded by appointing independent review committees or issuing voluntary recalls. However, the example of one biosimilar approved outside of the USA and European Union demonstrates how early safety concerns, even when addressed by substantive data, can generate lingering uncertainty. SUMMARY: As the number of promising new treatments in nAMD continues to grow, so too does the amount of data that providers must sift through. The perception of safety surrounding first movers in each new therapeutic area is sure to affect adoption of that modality more broadly.

Potential Cost Savings Associated with a Multiuse Preoperative and Preinjection Eyedrop Protocol.

PURPOSE: To calculate the cost savings associated with a multiuse preoperative and preinjection eyedrop protocol. DESIGN: Economic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing ophthalmic surgical procedures requiring preoperative dilation and intravitreal injections. METHODS: Economic modeling with scenario analysis was used to derive the value for cost savings secondary to a protocol in which perioperative mydriatic eyedrop bottles are used across multiple patients versus the current protocol in which drop bottles are wasted after single-patient use. Similar analyses were performed for a multiuse povidone-iodine protocol for intravitreal injections. Sensitivity analyses were used to test baseline model assumptions with varying degrees of waste and patient volume. RESULTS: The multiuse mydriatic protocol allowed for a 97.1% reduction in the number of eyedrop bottles required for the single-use protocol (1037 bottles vs. 35 850 bottles). This led to an estimated 5-year cost savings of approximately $240 000 (nominal) per institution (performing an average of 1434 cases/year) in the base case. This savings varied minimally in sensitivity analyses accounting for practical limitations (loss, expiration, or contamination) of multiuse containers, with savings of 97.54% to 95.00% for excess supply ranges from 0% to 100% in the multiuse protocol. Likewise, the cost savings varied minimally in sensitivity analyses for eyedrop sizes, with savings of 99.23% to 96.69% for mydriatic eyedrop sizes of 15 µl per drop to 65 µl per drop, respectively, in the multiuse protocol. Over a 5-year period, for povidone-iodine drops before performing intravitreal injection, the multiuse protocol required 153 bottles compared with 41 954 bottles (99.6% reduction) for the current single-use protocol, resulting in a nominal cost savings of $41 801, which varied minimally in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Multiuse perioperative mydriatic eyedrops are a viable option for cost and environmental waste reduction for ophthalmologic procedures and surgeries requiring dilation. Likewise, multiuse povidone-iodine may allow for large relative cost reduction for in-office procedures. The total potential savings over 5 years was estimated at more than $280 000 before adjusting for inflation.

USE OF THE ISCHEMIC INDEX ON WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY TO CHARACTERIZE A CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION AS ISCHEMIC OR NONISCHEMIC.

PURPOSE: To understand the relationship between baseline ischemic index (IsI) values on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography and classification as ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of CRVO patients imaged using ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography from which IsI values were calculated. An ischemic CRVO was defined as those eyes with an afferent pupillary defect and counting fingers acuity or worse or neovascularization during the first year of follow-up. Logistic regression was performed to characterize the relation between the IsI and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 60 treatment-naive CRVO patients with baseline ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography and ≥1 year of follow-up were identified. Those with an IsI ≥35% were significantly more likely to have an ischemic CRVO during the first year of follow-up than those with an IsI <35% (83.3 vs. 13.9%, odds ratio 111, P < 0.0001). Baseline and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution acuity were worse in eyes with an IsI ≥35% (1.18 vs. 0.46, P < 0.001 and 1.26 vs. 0.45, P < 0.001, respectively) despite similar baseline and final central subfield thickness (P = 0.1-0.23). CONCLUSION: A baseline IsI of ≥35% on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography in eyes with treatment-naive CRVO was sensitive (90%) and specific (92.5%) for classification as an ischemic CRVO during the first year of follow-up.

The role of cystoid macular edema as a marker in the progression of non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between cystoid macular edema (CME) and disease severity and progression in non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients seen between 2008 and 2016 with npAIR as defined by electroretinogram (ERG) dysfunction, visual field changes, presence of antiretinal antibodies, a negative malignancy workup, and no other apparent cause for visual dysfunction. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were reviewed for each patient. A minimum follow-up of 1 year was necessary for study inclusion. The presence or absence of CME and the length of the preserved EZ on the centermost line scan of the SD-OCT images was recorded at each visit. The main outcome measure assessed was the rate of EZ loss (EZ final - EZ initial / days follow-up) over time, a marker for disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes (16 patients) were included with an average follow-up of 42 months. Twenty-one eyes (66%) had CME on initial presentation and final follow-up (group 1), eight eyes (25%) did not have CME on presentation or final follow-up (group 2), and three eyes (9%) did not have CME on presentation but developed CME during follow-up (group 3). Group 1 eyes had a lower maximal a-wave amplitude (59.0 vs. 220.9 mV, p = 0.012) and lower maximal b-wave amplitude (88.1 vs 256.9 mV, p = 0.017) on baseline ERG compared to Group 2 eyes. The rate of EZ loss over time was significantly greater for group 1 with CME compared to group 2 without CME both at 12 months (- 1.26 µm/day vs. - 0.26 µm/day, p = 0.022) and at final follow-up (- 1.03 µm/day vs. - 0.08 µm/day, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CME was associated with decreased ERG amplitudes and greater velocity of EZ loss, suggesting that CME is a useful biomarker of more severe and more progressive disease in npAIR.

CHOROIDAL TUMOR BIOPSY: A Review of the Current State and a Glance Into Future Techniques.

PURPOSE: To review the indications for and the methods of obtaining biopsies in eyes with uveal melanoma. In addition, this review provides recommendations for avoiding biopsy-related complications and discusses the future directions of biopsy techniques for uveal melanoma. METHODS: This review is based on a presentation by the authors (PM and MM) at the 2017 Duke Advanced Vitreoretinal Surgery Course and an extensive literature review using PubMed. RESULTS: Transscleral and transvitreal fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and transvitreal vitrectomy-assisted biopsy techniques are described. The use of 25- and 27-gauge needles and vitreous cutters through a transvitreal approach are most commonly used. Complications are uncommon but may include vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, and rarely, extraocular extension. Proper technique and precautions will minimize the occurrence of these rare complications. CONCLUSION: Biopsy of uveal melanoma either using a needle or vitrectomy-assisted procedures is safe and these techniques continue to improve with new vitreoretinal surgical advances.

Acute Zonal Occult Outer Retinopathy Associated With Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis.

A 17-year-old girl presented with unilateral retrobulbar optic neuritis as well as bilateral funduscopic findings and outer retinal dysfunction suggestive of acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR). Fundus autofluorescence abnormalities, visual field loss, and electroretinographic changes were supportive of bilateral AZOOR. MRI was consistent with the diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), which is defined as a central nervous system demyelinating event that may herald the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS). While AZOOR previously has been linked to MS and demyelinating white matter lesions in the brain, our case seems unique due to concurrent development of AZOOR and retrobulbar optic neuritis as a CIS.

A Retrospective Review of Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Orbitopathy with Endoscopic Preservation of the Inferomedial Orbital Bone Strut.

PURPOSE: To determine incidence of new-onset diplopia, resolution of preexisting diplopia, and impact on proptosis resulting from endoscopic orbital decompression with and without preservation of the inferomedial orbital strut for thyroid orbitopathy. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing endoscopic 2- or 3-wall decompression with or without preservation of the strut for thyroid orbitopathy from January 2012 to June 2015. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (45 orbits) were included and divided into 4 primary categories: 2-wall decompression with strut preservation (4 orbits, 8%), 2-wall decompression with strut removal (7 orbits, 16%), 3-wall decompression with strut preservation (27 orbits, 60%), and 3-wall decompression with strut removal (7 orbits, 16%). The incidence of new-onset diplopia was 20% (2/10 patients without preoperative diplopia) overall and 16% in the strut preservation group (1/6 patients without preoperative diplopia). Resolution of diplopia occurred in 4 of 16 patients (25%) with preoperative diplopia, and all 4 had been treated with a 3-wall decompression with strut preservation. Resolution of diplopia in the group treated with strut preservation was 36% (4/11 patients with preoperative diplopia), and 0% of the 5 diplopic patients treated without strut preservation. Reduction in proptosis was statistically greater in those treated with strut removal (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that endoscopic orbital decompression with preservation of the inferomedial bone strut results in a comparable to lower rate of new-onset diplopia compared with other reported techniques. When combined with 3-wall balanced decompression, this technique demonstrates a high rate of resolution of preexisting diplopia.

Q Fever-Associated Chorioretinitis.

Coxiella burnetii is the causative agent in Q fever, a zoonotic disease. Ocular manifestations of this disease are extremely rare and have been infrequently reported. In this report, we describe a rare case of chorioretinitis in a patient incompletely treated for Q fever. We highlight the unique ocular manifestation with multimodal imaging, and the importance of a thorough history and prompt and correct treatment of the disease with systemic therapy. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:xx-xx.].

Serous Retinopathy Associated With Combination MEK and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor.

Purpose: To present a case of a chemotherapy regimen combining a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor leading to serous retinopathy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of a single case was performed. Results: A 67-year-old man with pancreatic and prostate cancer developed bilateral multifocal pockets of subretinal fluid while on an experimental chemotherapy regimen combining an MEK inhibitor (trametinib) and an FGFR inhibitor (erdafitinib). Conclusions: Given that FGFR lies upstream to the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, retinal toxicity may be more severe and more common with FGFR-MEK combination therapy. Future studies are necessary to guide ophthalmic surveillance.

Trends in Imaging Utilization Among United States Medicare Beneficiaries and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study characterizes trends in ophthalmic imaging volume and utilization in the United States among and assesses the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Utilization of macular optical coherence tomography (OCT), optic nerve OCT, and fundus photography steadily increased from 2013 to 2020 and was not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, there was minimal adoption of anterior segment OCT and a decline in the utilization of dye-based angiography. Utilization patterns may be impacted by the advent of new technologies, role of the clinician, and alignment with treatment paradigms. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:661-665.].

Time-driven Activity-based Costing Analysis of Fluorescein Angiography.

PURPOSE: To use electronic health record (EHR) time logs and time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost profile of office-based fluorescein angiography (FA). DESIGN: Economic analysis. SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing routine FA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 92235) at Vanderbilt Eye Institute in fiscal year 2022. METHODS: Process flow mapping for routine FA was used to define the care episode after manual observation. Deidentified time logs were sourced from the EHR and all manually validated to calculate durations for each stage. The cost of materials was calculated from internal financial figures. Cost per minute for space, equipment, and personnel were based on internal figures. Published fluorescein costs were used for base-case analysis with scenario analysis based on a range of internal figures from pharmacy quotes. These inputs were used for a TDABC analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time-driven activity-based costing of FA episode of care. Secondary scenario analyses focus on breakeven scenarios for key inputs, including medication costs RESULTS: Cost analysis of office-based FA resulted in an average total cost of $152.95 (nominal) per interpreted study per patient, which was $36.52 more than the maximum Medicare reimbursement for CPT 92235 in Mac Locality for Tennessee 10312 for fiscal year 2022 ($116.43; $76.11 [technical component] and $40.33 [physician component]). The negative contribution margin is strongly influenced by the cost of fluorescein, which comprises 39.8% of the episode costs, excluding overhead. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis here shows that the recently increased cost of fluorescein has driven up the cost of office-based FA relative to the current maximum allowable Medicare reimbursement, leading to a negative contribution margin and financial loss. Given conservative cost estimates here, it is unlikely for profitability to be achieved without changes in the cost of fluorescein or increased reimbursement. These results may be informative for policy discussion regarding appropriate reimbursement for codes using injectable fluorescein. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Applicant Perceptions of In-Person versus Virtual Interview Format for Surgical Retina Fellowship.

Purpose This article compares applicants' perceptions of and experiences with virtual and in-person interviews for surgical retina fellowship. Methods A survey was distributed via email to all applicants of three vitreoretinal surgery fellowship programs for the 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023 application cycles. Main Outcome Measures Participants were surveyed regarding cost; burden of scheduling; number of applications and interviews completed; ability to gain a true feel of the program, location, and preceptor; and number of work and surgical days missed. Results Of 151 applicants contacted, 36 completed the survey (23.8% response rate). Of the respondents, 25.0% attended only virtual interviews, 19.4% attended mostly virtual interviews, 30.6% attended mostly in-person interviews, and 25.0% attended half virtual and half in-person interviews. Average expenditure was significantly lower for applicants with mostly and completely virtual interviews compared with applicants with mostly in-person and half virtual, half in-person ( p < 0.001). Applicants with mostly virtual interviews reported a lower ability to gain a true perception of the program and the program location ( p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in burden of scheduling, number of interviews completed, or number of work and surgical days missed. When applicants were asked what type of interview format they would prefer if they could repeat the cycle, those who interviewed mostly in-person largely chose in-person as their preference (72.7%), while participants who interviewed mostly or completely virtually were evenly split between in-person, virtual, and hybrid ( p = 0.136). Conclusion As fellowship programs and institutions decide whether they will return to in-person interviews or maintain a virtual interview format in the long term, they must weigh the lower cost of virtual interviews with the improved ability to gain a more accurate perception of the program and location allowed by in-person interviews, as well as potentially greater satisfaction with the in-person format.

Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of AI-Generated Medical Responses: An Evaluation of the Chat-GPT Model.

Background: Natural language processing models such as ChatGPT can generate text-based content and are poised to become a major information source in medicine and beyond. The accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT for medical queries is not known. Methods: Thirty-three physicians across 17 specialties generated 284 medical questions that they subjectively classified as easy, medium, or hard with either binary (yes/no) or descriptive answers. The physicians then graded ChatGPT-generated answers to these questions for accuracy (6-point Likert scale; range 1 - completely incorrect to 6 - completely correct) and completeness (3-point Likert scale; range 1 - incomplete to 3 - complete plus additional context). Scores were summarized with descriptive statistics and compared using Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis testing. Results: Across all questions (n=284), median accuracy score was 5.5 (between almost completely and completely correct) with mean score of 4.8 (between mostly and almost completely correct). Median completeness score was 3 (complete and comprehensive) with mean score of 2.5. For questions rated easy, medium, and hard, median accuracy scores were 6, 5.5, and 5 (mean 5.0, 4.7, and 4.6; p=0.05). Accuracy scores for binary and descriptive questions were similar (median 6 vs. 5; mean 4.9 vs. 4.7; p=0.07). Of 36 questions with scores of 1-2, 34 were re-queried/re-graded 8-17 days later with substantial improvement (median 2 vs. 4; p<0.01). Conclusions: ChatGPT generated largely accurate information to diverse medical queries as judged by academic physician specialists although with important limitations. Further research and model development are needed to correct inaccuracies and for validation.