The Implementation of Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea in the Emergency Department Setting: Successes and Lessons Learned in 2 Jurisdictions.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) continues to develop antimicrobial resistance (AR), and treatment options are limited. ARNG surveillance aids in identifying threats and guiding treatment recommendations but has traditionally been limited to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. Large portions of STI care is delivered outside of STI clinics, such as emergency departments (EDs). These facilities might provide additional venues to expand surveillance and outbreak preparedness. METHODS: Through the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea program, Greensboro, NC, and Indianapolis, IN, identified 4 EDs in high-morbidity areas to expand culture collection. Patient demographics, culture recovery rates, and antimicrobial susceptibility results between EDs and local STI clinics were compared along with lessons learned from reviewing programmatic policies and discussions with key personnel. RESULTS: During the period 2018-2019, non-Hispanic Black patients were the most represented group at all 6 sites (73.6%). Age was also similar across sites (median range, 23-27 years). Greensboro isolated 1039 cultures (STI clinic [women, 141; men, 612; transwomen, 3]; EDs, 283 [women, 164; men, 119]). Indianapolis isolated 1278 cultures (STI clinic, 1265 [women, 125; men, 1139; transwomen, 1]; ED, 13 all male). Reduced azithromycin susceptibility was found at the Indianapolis (n = 86) and Greensboro (n = 25) STI clinics, and one Greensboro ED (n = 8).Implementation successes included identifying an on-site "champion," integrating with electronic medical records, and creating an online training hub. Barriers included cumbersome data collection tools, time constraints, and hesitancy from clinical staff. CONCLUSIONS: Partnering with EDs for ARNG surveillance poses both challenges and opportunities. Program success can be improved by engaging a local champion to help lead efforts.

Implementation and Evaluation of Gradient Strip Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in US Public Health Laboratories to Respond to Resistant Gonorrhea.

BACKGROUND: Gradient strip antimicrobial susceptibility testing using Etest is conducted by local public health jurisdictions participating in the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) program to inform public health responses to resistant gonorrhea. Proficiency testing results across the participating laboratories were analyzed and a comparison of Etest with the agar dilution method was conducted. METHODS: Laboratories participating in SURRG performed Etest for azithromycin (AZM), cefixime (CFX), and ceftriaxone (CRO). Concurrence between minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained with Etest versus the agar dilution method using corresponding isolates was defined as ±1 double dilution. Specific levels of reduced susceptibility were termed "alerts" and included isolates with the following MICs: ≥2.0 µg/mL (AZM), ≥0.25 µg/mL (CFX), and ≥0.125 µg/mL (CRO). Categorical (alert/nonalert) agreement was calculated for MICs determined using Etest and agar dilution methods. RESULTS: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea laboratories had high proficiency testing scores (≥98%) and low levels of interlaboratory variations in MICs. The overall concurrence of MICs (essential agreement) determined using agar dilution, and Etest was 96% (CRO), 96% (CFX), and 95% (AZM). Depending on the antibiotic tested, between 27% and 66% of isolates with alert MICs determined by Etest also had alert MICs using the reference agar dilution methodology; however, most of these alert MICs were detected at threshold levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MICs produced by SURRG laboratories using Etest have a high level of concurrence with agar dilution. Although confirmation of specific alert MICs varied, Etest facilities rapid detection and response to emerging resistant gonorrhea.