Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabet Med ; 41(7): e15291, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279705

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the reliability of hospital discharge codes for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke compared with adjudicated diagnosis, and to pilot a scalable approach to adjudicate records on a population-based sample. METHODS: A population-based sample of 685 people with diabetes admitted (1274 admissions) to one of three Australian hospitals during 2018-2020 were randomly selected for this study. All medical records were reviewed and adjudicated. RESULTS: Cardiovascular diseases were the most common primary reason for hospitalisation in people with diabetes, accounting for ~17% (215/1274) of all hospitalisations, with HF as the leading cause. ICD-10 codes substantially underestimated HF prevalence and had the lowest agreement with the adjudicated diagnosis of HF (Kappa = 0.81), compared with AMI and stroke (Kappa ≥ 0.91). While ICD-10 codes provided suboptimal sensitivity (72%) for HF, the performance was better for AMI (sensitivity 84%; specificity 100%) and stroke (sensitivity 85%; specificity 100%). A novel approach to screen possible HF cases only required adjudicating 8% (105/1274) of records, correctly identified 78/81 of HF admissions and yielded 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: While ICD-10 codes appear reliable for AMI or stroke, a more complex diagnosis such as HF benefits from a two-stage process to screen for suspected HF cases that need adjudicating. The next step is to validate this novel approach on large multi-centre studies in diabetes.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hospitalização , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Austrália/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Prevalência , Adulto
2.
Intern Med J ; 48(2): 124-128, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589617

RESUMO

Recording patient weight is a standard practice for all hospital admissions, with this measurement influencing other daily practices that rely on the delivery of safe and effective patient care. Patient weight is important in the areas of medication prescribing, fluid balance and assessment of nutrition. In particular, prescribing narrow therapeutic index medications may result in significant harm as a potential consequence of inaccurate dosing. Despite its importance, it is evident that bodyweight measurements are recorded in only 13.5-55% of hospital patients, in a variety of settings including the emergency department, intensive care unit, medical and surgical wards. Barriers to compliance of healthcare staff include additional workload, patient handling and availability of appropriate weighing equipment. Hospitals and patients would benefit from enhancing compliance with the systematic weighing of patients, staff training and removing barriers to performing this task.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Hospitais/normas , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA