Characterizing Trends in Chronic Superficial Venous Disease Treatment among Medicare Beneficiaries from 2010 to 2018.

This study describes trends in surgical versus endovascular interventions for treatment of chronic superficial venous disease (SVD) in the Medicare population. Medicare Part B data from 2010 to 2018 were obtained. Claims for SVD treatment were identified using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Total percentage change in utilization rates and market share was determined for each provider group. Utilization of SVD treatments increased by 58%, mostly owing to growing utilization of endovascular treatments. There was a 66% decrease in surgical treatments. The utilization of ablation and sclerotherapy plateaued in 2016 and decreased in 2017-2018 with the advent of mechanochemical ablation, endovenous microfoam, and cyanoacrylate adhesive, respectively. Analysis showed that endovascular utilization increased across most specialties, with the largest growth seen in cardiology by 427%. Radiologists showed utilization growth of 125%, encompassing 11% of the market share. Endovascular treatment for SVD remains predominant, with increased utilization and concomitant decrease in surgical methods.

Imaging approach to COVID-19 associated pulmonary embolism.

The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) illness and deaths, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, continue to increase. Multiple reports highlight the thromboembolic complications, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), in COVID-19. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients with PE. There continues to be a rapid evolution of knowledge related to COVID-19 associated PE. This review summarises the current understanding of prevalence, pathophysiology, role of diagnostic imaging modalities, and management, including catheter-directed therapy for COVID-19 associated PE. It also describes infection control considerations for the radiology department while providing care for patients with COVID-19 associated PE.

Updated trends in percutaneous renal arteriography among radiologists and other specialties.

PURPOSE: Prior studies have demonstrated an overall decline in percutaneous renal artery angioplasty with and without stenting from 1988 to 2009. We evaluated the recent utilization trends in percutaneous renal arteriography (PTRA) among radiologists and non-radiologist providers from 2010 to 2018. METHODS: Data from the 2010-2018 nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service database were used to tabulate case volumes for PTRA. Annual utilization rates per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated and aggregated based on physician specialty: radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, general surgeons, or others. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, the overall utilization rate of PTRA markedly declined (-72% change; from 15.5 to 4.3 cases per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries). Proportionally, the cardiologist share of PTRA saw the greatest decline, falling from 74% market share in 2010 (11.4/15.5 cases) to only 36% market share in 2018 (1.6/4.3 cases). The market share of PTRA performed by radiologists grew from 12% market share in 2010 (1.9/15.5 cases) to 28% in 2018 (1.2/4.3 cases); despite this, the absolute number of PTRA performed by radiologists saw a smaller decline over this period (-34%; 1.9 to 1.2 cases). CONCLUSION: The total utilization rates of PTRA in the Medicare population has continued to decline from 2010 to 2018, likely due to clinical trials suggesting limited efficacy of angioplasty and stenting in the treatment of renovascular hypertension and other factors such as declining reimbursement. The overall and per-specialty rates continue to decline, reflecting an overarching trend away from procedural management of renovascular hypertension.

Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD).

Pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs) have replaced the concept of pelvic congestion syndrome encompassing venous origin chronic pelvic pain (VO-CPP) in women. The evaluation of women with VO-CPP includes the assessment for other causes of pelvic pain as well as imaging evaluation for pelvic varicosities measuring greater than 5 mm diameter, ovarian vein diameter, and flow direction, as well as iliac vein diameter and signs of compression. Proper identification of these patients can lead to high degrees of success eliminating chronic pelvic pain following ovarian vein embolization and/or iliac vein stenting. Strong encouragement is provided to use the symptoms, varices, pathophysiology classification for these patients and upcoming research studies on the specific symptoms of patients with VO-CPP will help elucidate patient selection for intervention. Additional future randomized controlled trials are also upcoming to evaluate for outcomes of ovarian vein embolization and iliac vein.

Radiologists and Clinical Trials: Part 1 The Truth About Reader Disagreements.

The debate over human visual perception and how medical images should be interpreted have persisted since X-rays were the only imaging technique available. Concerns over rates of disagreement between expert image readers are associated with much of the clinical research and at times driven by the belief that any image endpoint variability is problematic. The deeper understanding of the reasons, value, and risk of disagreement are somewhat siloed, leading, at times, to costly and risky approaches, especially in clinical trials. Although artificial intelligence promises some relief from mistakes, its routine application for assessing tumors within cancer trials is still an aspiration. Our consortium of international experts in medical imaging for drug development research, the Pharma Imaging Network for Therapeutics and Diagnostics (PINTAD), tapped the collective knowledge of its members to ground expectations, summarize common reasons for reader discordance, identify what factors can be controlled and which actions are likely to be effective in reducing discordance. Reinforced by an exhaustive literature review, our work defines the forces that shape reader variability. This review article aims to produce a singular authoritative resource outlining reader performance's practical realities within cancer trials, whether they occur within a clinical or an independent central review.

Investigator and independent review committee exploratory assessment and verification of tumor response in a non-Hodgkin lymphoma study.

Interpretation of endpoints (e.g. overall response rate) in clinical trials depends on the accurate and reliable measurement and identification of tumors. Regulatory agencies recommend blinded reviews of imaging data by independent review committees (IRCs). Differences in response outcomes that arise between IRCs and site investigators raise regulatory/sponsor concerns. Here, we evaluate discrepant tumor response assessments by the IRC and unblinded investigators (complete versus partial response, respectively) occurring in 52 (13% of 393 IRC-assessed responders) of 447 enrolled patients with treatment-naïve non-Hodgkin lymphoma from a randomized study. The IRC and investigators were 'likely correct' in 73% and 25% of cases, respectively (p < .001). Investigators were more likely to make errors by misinterpreting lymph node data and not utilizing PET results. This post hoc finding suggests a possible role for post-training site evaluation/audit, with retraining as needed, and a specialized consensus committee for concurrent blinded review of site/central data.