Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 25(2): 279-288, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950805

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients undergo myelosuppressive chemotherapy to allow engraftment of stem cells and are at particularly high risk for bacterial infections and adverse outcomes. Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant are at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections, including infections with multidrug-resistant pathogens. Cefepime is a commonly prescribed antibiotic for empiric therapy in hematopoietic cell transplant patients, but there is minimal data describing cefepime resistance rates, risk factors for resistance, and clinical outcomes associated with cefepime-resistant infections. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years old) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with a culture positive for a gram-negative rod between January 2010 and January 2016 were spilt into two groups: cefepime susceptible and cefepime nonsusceptible . The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors for cefepime nonsusceptible through multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included (27 cefepime nonsusceptible, 80 cefepime-susceptible), yielding a 25.2% nonsusceptibility rate. Multivariable analysis yielded age >60 years old, Klebsiella spp. infection, Acinetobacter spp. infection, healthcare exposures within 90 days, acute gastrointestinal graft-vs-host-disease, and chronic graft-vs-host-disease at multiple locations as significant risk factors for cefepime nonsusceptible. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of the model was 0.851. Thirty-day all-cause mortality (29.6% versus 16.3%, p = 0.13) and length of hospitalization (19 versus 12.5 days, p = 0.0650) were numerically higher in the cefepime nonsusceptible group. CONCLUSIONS: Hematopoietic cell transplant patients with acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease, extensive chronic graft-vs-host-disease, advanced age, previous healthcare exposures, or infections with Klebsiella and Acinetobacter are at increased risk for cefepime nonsusceptible. Patients infected with cefepime nonsusceptible pathogens may have higher rates of mortality and length of hospitalization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefepima/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transplante Homólogo
2.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 11(5): 467-70, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19638004

RESUMO

Oral vancomycin is often considered the drug of choice for severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease due to both its efficacy and pharmacokinetics. The potential for absorption is not well described in patients with impaired gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. We describe a case of significant and potentially toxic absorption of oral vancomycin in a peripheral blood stem cell transplant patient with grade IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the GI tract. In patients with GI GVHD clinicians need to be aware of the potential for oral absorption and, in select cases, monitoring of levels may be appropriate.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trato Gastrointestinal , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Absorção Intestinal/fisiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Gastroenteropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Trato Gastrointestinal/imunologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/imunologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
3.
Arch Intern Med ; 158(19): 2124-8, 1998 Oct 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9801179

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the efficacy of ondansetron hydrochloride compared with prochlorperazine maleate for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care, university hospital. Seventy-eight patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee replacement procedures received a single dose of ondansetron hydrochloride (n = 37), 4 mg intravenously, or prochlorperazine maleate (n = 41), 10 mg intramuscularly, at the end of the surgical procedure. Rescue therapy was administered every 4 hours as needed during the initial 48 hours. Primary outcome measures were the incidences and severity of PONV. Secondary outcome measures included the number of rescue antiemetic doses required, number of physical therapy cancellations because of PONV, length of hospital stay, and cost of antiemetic agents administered. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (81% vs 56%; odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.4) as was the severity of nausea (P = .04). Multivariate analysis identified administration of ondansetron, history of PONV, obesity, and female sex as risk factors for a nausea event. The incidence of vomiting tended to be greater in the ondansetron group (49% vs 32%; odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-5.0). The need for rescue antiemetic therapy was also greater in the ondansetron group (46% vs 27%; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-6.0). The mean antiemetic drug cost per patient was significantly greater for the ondansetron group ($47.56 vs $2.47; P<.001). However, the proportion of patients who were unable to participate in physical therapy because of PONV and the median length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Prochlorperazine is associated with superior efficacy and significant cost savings compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacement procedures.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Ondansetron/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Proclorperazina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antieméticos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Ondansetron/economia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/economia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologia , Proclorperazina/economia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(3): 402-10, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25531283

RESUMO

Obesity is an important public health problem that may influence the outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We studied 898 children and adults receiving first-time allogeneic hematopoietic SCTs between 2004 and 2012. Pretransplant body mass index (BMI) was classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight or obese using the WHO classification or age-adjusted BMI percentiles for children. The study population was predominantly Caucasian, and the median age was 51 years (5 months-73 years). The cumulative 3-year incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese patients was 20%, 19%, 20% and 33%, respectively. Major causes of NRM were acute and chronic GVHD. The corresponding incidence of relapse was 30%, 41%, 37% and 30%, respectively. Three-year OS was 59%, 48%, 47% and 43%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that obesity was associated with higher NRM (hazard ratio (HR) 1.43, P=0.04) and lower relapse (HR 0.65, P=0.002). Pretransplant plasma levels of ST2 and TNFR1 biomarkers were significantly higher in obese compared with normal weight patients (P=0.04 and P=0.05, respectively). The increase in NRM observed in obese patients was partially offset by a lower incidence of relapse with no difference in OS.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Adolescente , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA