RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effects of ozone exposure are unclear. Using measurements from the 87 participants in the Multicenter Ozone Study of oldEr Subjects (MOSES), we examined whether personal and ambient pollutant exposures before the controlled exposure sessions would be associated with adverse changes in pulmonary and cardiovascular function. METHODS: We used mixed effects linear regression to evaluate associations between increased personal exposures and ambient pollutant concentrations in the 96 h before the pre-exposure visit, and 1) biomarkers measured at pre-exposure, and 2) changes in biomarkers from pre-to post-exposure. RESULTS: Decreases in pre-exposure forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were associated with interquartile-range increases in concentrations of particulate matter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5) 1 h before the pre-exposure visit (-0.022 L; 95% CI -0.037 to -0.006; p = 0.007), carbon monoxide (CO) in the prior 3 h (-0.046 L; 95% CI -0.076 to -0.016; p = 0.003), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the prior 72 h (-0.030 L; 95% CI -0.052 to -0.008; p = 0.007). From pre-to post-exposure, increases in FEV1 were marginally significantly associated with increases in personal ozone exposure (0.010 L; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.026; p = 0.010), and ambient PM2.5 and CO at all lag times. Ambient ozone concentrations in the prior 96 h were associated with both decreased pre-exposure high frequency (HF) heart rate variability (HRV) and increases in HF HRV from pre-to post-exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed associations between increased ambient PM2.5, NO2, and CO levels and reduced pulmonary function, and increased ambient ozone concentrations and reduced HRV. Pulmonary function and HRV increased across the exposure sessions in association with these same pollutant increases, suggesting a "recovery" during the exposure sessions. These findings support an association between short term increases in ambient PM2.5, NO2, and CO and decreased pulmonary function, and increased ambient ozone and decreased HRV.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Poluentes Ambientais , Ozônio , Idoso , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Humanos , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/toxicidade , Ozônio/análise , Ozônio/toxicidade , Material Particulado/análise , Material Particulado/toxicidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Multicenter Ozone Study of oldEr Subjects (MOSES) was a multi-center study evaluating whether short-term controlled exposure of older, healthy individuals to low levels of ozone (O3) induced acute changes in cardiovascular biomarkers. In MOSES Part 1 (MOSES 1), controlled O3 exposure caused concentration-related reductions in lung function with evidence of airway inflammation and injury, but without convincing evidence of effects on cardiovascular function. However, subjects' prior exposures to indoor and outdoor air pollution in the few hours and days before each MOSES controlled O3 exposure may have independently affected the study biomarkers and/or modified biomarker responses to the MOSES controlled O3 exposures. METHODS: MOSES 1 was conducted at three clinical centers (University of California San Francisco, University of North Carolina, and University of Rochester Medical Center) and included healthy volunteers 55 to 70 years of age. Consented participants who successfully completed the screening and training sessions were enrolled in the study. All three clinical centers adhered to common standard operating procedures and used common tracking and data forms. Each subject was scheduled to participate in a total of 11 visits: screening visit, training visit, and three sets of exposure visits consisting of the pre-exposure day, the exposure day, and the post-exposure day. After completing the pre-exposure day, subjects spent the night in a nearby hotel. On exposure days, the subjects were exposed for 3 hours in random order to 0 ppb O3 (clean air), 70 ppb O3, and 120 ppm O3. During the exposure period the subjects alternated between 15 minutes of moderate exercise and 15 minutes of rest. A suite of cardiovascular and pulmonary endpoints was measured on the day before, the day of, and up to 22 hours after each exposure.In MOSES Part 2 (MOSES 2), we used a longitudinal panel study design, cardiopulmonary biomarker data from MOSES 1, passive cumulative personal exposure samples (PES) of O3 and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the 72 hours before the pre-exposure visit, and hourly ambient air pollution and weather measurements in the 96 hours before the pre-exposure visit. We used mixed-effects linear regression and evaluated whether PES O3 and NO2 and these ambient pollutant concentrations in the 96 hours before the pre-exposure visit confounded the MOSES 1 controlled O3 exposure effects on the pre- to post-exposure biomarker changes (Aim 1), whether they modified these pre- to post-exposure biomarker responses to the controlled O3 exposures (Aim 2), whether they were associated with changes in biomarkers measured at the pre-exposure visit or morning of the exposure session (Aim 3), and whether they were associated with differences in the pre- to post-exposure biomarker changes independently of the controlled O3 exposures (Aim 4). RESULTS: Ambient pollutant concentrations at each site were low and were regularly below the National Ambient Air Quality Standard levels. In Aim 1, the controlled O3 exposure effects on the pre- to post-exposure biomarker differences were little changed when PES or ambient pollutant concentrations in the previous 96 hours were included in the model, suggesting these were not confounders of the controlled O3 exposure/biomarker difference associations. In Aim 2, effects of MOSES controlled O3 exposures on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were modified by ambient NO2 and carbon monoxide (CO), and PES NO2, with reductions in FEV1 and FVC observed only when these concentrations were "Medium" or "High" in the 72 hours before the pre-exposure visit. There was no such effect modification of the effect of controlled O3 exposure on any other cardiopulmonary biomarker.As hypothesized for Aim 3, increased ambient O3 concentrations were associated with decreased pre-exposure heart rate variability (HRV). For example, high frequency (HF) HRV decreased in association with increased ambient O3 concentrations in the 96 hours before the pre-exposure visit (-0.460 ln[ms2]; 95% CI, -0.743 to -0.177 for each 10.35-ppb increase in O3; P = 0.002). However, in Aim 4 these increases in ambient O3 were also associated with increases in HF and low frequency (LF) HRV from pre- to post-exposure, likely reflecting a "recovery" of HRV during the MOSES O3 exposure sessions. Similar patterns across Aims 3 and 4 were observed for LF (the other primary HRV marker), and standard deviation of normal-to-normal sinus beat intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences in normal-to-normal sinus beat intervals (RMSSD) (secondary HRV markers).Similar Aim 3 and Aim 4 patterns were observed for FEV1 and FVC in association with increases in ambient PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5), CO, and NO2 in the 96 hours before the pre-exposure visit. For Aim 3, small decreases in pre-exposure FEV1 were significantly associated with interquartile range (IQR) increases in PM2.5 concentrations in the 1 hour before the pre-exposure visit (-0.022 L; 95% CI, -0.037 to -0.006; P = 0.007), CO in the 3 hours before the pre-exposure visit (-0.046 L; 95% CI, -0.076 to -0.016; P = 0.003), and NO2 in the 72 hours before the pre-exposure visit (-0.030 L; 95% CI, -0.052 to -0.008; P = 0.007). However, FEV1 was not associated with ambient O3 or sulfur dioxide (SO2), or PES O3 or NO2 (Aim 3). For Aim 4, increased FEV1 across the exposure session (post-exposure minus pre-exposure) was marginally significantly associated with each 4.1-ppb increase in PES O3 concentration (0.010 L; 95% CI, 0.004 to 0.026; P = 0.010), as well as ambient PM2.5 and CO at all lag times. FVC showed similar associations, with patterns of decreased pre-exposure FVC associated with increased PM2.5, CO, and NO2 at most lag times, and increased FVC across the exposure session also associated with increased concentrations of the same pollutants, reflecting a similar recovery. However, increased pollutant concentrations were not associated with adverse changes in pre-exposure levels or pre- to post-exposure changes in biomarkers of cardiac repolarization, ST segment, vascular function, nitrotyrosine as a measure of oxidative stress, prothrombotic state, systemic inflammation, lung injury, or sputum polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) percentage as a measure of airway inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Our previous MOSES 1 findings of controlled O3 exposure effects on pulmonary function, but not on any cardiovascular biomarker, were not confounded by ambient or personal O3 or other pollutant exposures in the 96 and 72 hours before the pre-exposure visit. Further, these MOSES 1 O3 effects were generally not modified, blunted, or lessened by these same ambient and personal pollutant exposures. However, the reductions in markers of pulmonary function by the MOSES 1 controlled O3 exposure were modified by ambient NO2 and CO, and PES NO2, with reductions observed only when these pollutant concentrations were elevated in the few hours and days before the pre-exposure visit. Increased ambient O3 concentrations were associated with reduced HRV, with "recovery" during exposure visits. Increased ambient PM2.5, NO2, and CO were associated with reduced pulmonary function, independent of the MOSES-controlled O3 exposures. Increased pollutant concentrations were not associated with pre-exposure or pre- to post-exposure changes in other cardiopulmonary biomarkers. Future controlled exposure studies should consider the effect of ambient pollutants on pre-exposure biomarker levels and whether ambient pollutants modify any health response to a controlled pollutant exposure.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/farmacologia , Sistema Cardiovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/farmacologia , Ozônio/farmacologia , Sistema Respiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Testes de Função RespiratóriaRESUMO
Rare variants are thought to contribute to the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is more common amongst the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population. A family-based approach using exome sequencing of AJ individuals with IBD was employed with a view to identify novel rare genetic variants for this disease. Exome sequencing was performed on 960 Jewish individuals including 513 from 199 multiplex families with up to eight cases. Rare, damaging variants in loci prioritized by linkage analysis and those shared by multiple affected individuals within the same family were identified. Independent evidence of association of each variant with disease was assessed. A number of candidate variants were identified, including in genes involved in the immune system. The ability to achieve statistical significance in independent case/control replication data was limited by power and was only achieved for variants in the well-established Crohn's disease gene, NOD2. This work demonstrates the challenges of identifying disease-associated rare damaging variants from exome data, even amongst a favorable cohort of familial cases from a genetic isolate. Further research of the prioritized rare candidate variants is required to confirm their association with the disease.
Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença , Variação Genética , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/genética , Judeus/genética , Proteína Adaptadora de Sinalização NOD2/genética , Fases de Leitura Aberta , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Ligação Genética , Humanos , Masculino , Linhagem , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodosRESUMO
Background: Targeted capture sequencing can potentially facilitate precision medicine, but the feasibility of this approach in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is unknown. Patients and methods: The FOrMAT (Feasibility of a Molecular Characterisation Approach to Treatment) study was a feasibility study enrolling patients with advanced GI malignancies from February 2014 to November 2015. Targeted capture sequencing (mainly using archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded diagnostic/resection samples) was carried out to detect mutations, copy number variations and translocations in up to 46 genes which had prognostic/predictive significance or were targets in current/upcoming clinical trials. Results: Of the 222 patients recruited, 215 patients (96.8%) had available tissue samples, 125 patients (56.3%) had ≥16 genes successfully sequenced and 136 patients (61.2%) had ≥1 genes successfully sequenced. Sample characteristics influenced the proportion of successfully sequenced samples, e.g. tumour type (colorectal 70.9%, biliary 52.6%, oesophagogastric 50.7%, pancreas 27.3%, P = 0.002), tumour cellularity (high versus low: 78.3% versus 13.3%, P ≤ 0.001), tumour content (high versus low: 78.6% versus 27.3%, P = 0.001) and type of sample (resection versus biopsy: 82.4% versus 47.6%, P ≤ 0.001). Currently, actionable alterations were detected in 90 (40.5%) of the 222 patients recruited (66% of the 136 patients sequenced) and 2 patients subsequently received a targeted therapy. The most frequently detected currently actionable alterations were mutations in KRAS, BRAF, TP53 and PIK3CA. For the 205 patients with archival samples, the median time to obtain sequencing results was 18.9 weeks, including a median of 4.9 weeks for sample retrieval and 5.1 weeks for sequencing. Conclusions: Targeted sequencing detected actionable alterations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, but tissue characteristics are of critical importance in determining sequencing success. Routine molecular profiling of GI tumours outside of clinical trials is not an effective use of healthcare resources unless more targeted drugs become available. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02112357.
Assuntos
Análise Mutacional de DNA/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/genética , Mutação , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , DNA de Neoplasias/química , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Estudos de Viabilidade , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Exposure to air pollution is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Most of the evidence supporting an association between air pollution and adverse cardiovascular effects involves exposure to particulate matter (PM). To date, little attention has been paid to acute cardiovascular responses to ozone, in part due to the notion that ozone causes primarily local effects on lung function, which are the basis for the current ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). There is evidence from a few epidemiological studies of adverse health effects of chronic exposure to ambient ozone, including increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease. However, in contrast to the well-established association between ambient ozone and various nonfatal adverse respiratory effects, the observational evidence for impacts of acute (previous few days) increases in ambient ozone levels on total cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed.Ozone is a prototypic oxidant gas that reacts with constituents of the respiratory tract lining fluid to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can overwhelm antioxidant defenses and cause local oxidative stress. Pathways by which ozone could cause cardiovascular dysfunction include alterations in autonomic balance, systemic inflammation, and oxidative stress. These initial responses could lead ultimately to arrhythmias, endothelial dysfunction, acute arterial vasoconstriction, and procoagulant activity. Individuals with impaired antioxidant defenses, such as those with the null variant of glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1), may be at increased risk for acute health effects.The Multicenter Ozone Study in oldEr Subjects (MOSES) was a controlled human exposure study designed to evaluate whether short-term exposure of older, healthy individuals to ambient levels of ozone induces acute cardiovascular responses. The study was designed to test the a priori hypothesis that short-term exposure to ambient levels of ozone would induce acute cardiovascular responses through the following mechanisms: autonomic imbalance, systemic inflammation, and development of a prothrombotic vascular state. We also postulated a priori the confirmatory hypothesis that exposure to ozone would induce airway inflammation, lung injury, and lung function decrements. Finally, we postulated the secondary hypotheses that ozone-induced acute cardiovascular responses would be associated with: (a) increased systemic oxidative stress and lung effects, and (b) the GSTM1-null genotype. METHODS: The study was conducted at three clinical centers with a separate Data Coordinating and Analysis Center (DCAC) using a common protocol. All procedures were approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of the participating centers. Healthy volunteers 55 to 70 years of age were recruited. Consented participants who successfully completed the screening and training sessions were enrolled in the study. All three clinical centers adhered to common standard operating procedures (SOPs) and used common tracking and data forms. Each subject was scheduled to participate in a total of 11 visits: screening visit, training visit, and three sets of exposure visits, each consisting of the pre-exposure day, the exposure day, and the post-exposure day. The subjects spent the night in a nearby hotel the night of the pre-exposure day.On exposure days, the subjects were exposed for three hours in random order to 0 ppb ozone (clean air), 70 ppb ozone, and 120 ppm ozone, alternating 15 minutes of moderate exercise with 15 minutes of rest. A suite of cardiovascular and pulmonary endpoints was measured on the day before, the day of, and up to 22 hours after, each exposure. The endpoints included: (1) electrocardiographic changes (continuous Holter monitoring: heart rate variability [HRV], repolarization, and arrhythmia); (2) markers of inflammation and oxidative stress (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], 8-isoprostane, nitrotyrosine, and P-selectin); (3) vascular function measures (blood pressure [BP], flow-mediated dilatation [FMD] of the brachial artery, and endothelin-1 [ET-1]; (4) venous blood markers of platelet activation, thrombosis, and microparticle-associated tissue factor activity (MP-TFA); (5) pulmonary function (spirometry); (6) markers of airway epithelial cell injury (increases in plasma club cell protein 16 [CC16] and sputum total protein); and (7) markers of lung inflammation in sputum (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMN], IL-6, interleukin-8 [IL-8], and tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α]). Sputum was collected only at 22 hours after exposure.The analyses of the continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, the brachial artery ultrasound (BAU) images, and the blood and sputum samples were carried out by core laboratories. The results of all analyses were submitted directly to the DCAC.The variables analyzed in the statistical models were represented as changes from pre-exposure to post-exposure (post-exposure minus pre-exposure). Mixed-effect linear models were used to evaluate the impact of exposure to ozone on the prespecified primary and secondary continuous outcomes. Site and time (when multiple measurements were taken) were controlled for in the models. Three separate interaction models were constructed for each outcome: ozone concentration by subject sex; ozone concentration by subject age; and ozone concentration by subject GSTM1 status (null or sufficient). Because of the issue of multiple comparisons, the statistical significance threshold was set a priori at P < 0.01. RESULTS: Subject recruitment started in June 2012, and the first subject was randomized on July 25, 2012. Subject recruitment ended on December 31, 2014, and testing of all subjects was completed by April 30, 2015. A total of 87 subjects completed all three exposures. The mean age was 59.9 ± 4.5 years, 60% of the subjects were female, 88% were white, and 57% were GSTM1 null. Mean baseline body mass index (BMI), BP, cholesterol (total and low-density lipoprotein), and lung function were all within the normal range.We found no significant effects of ozone exposure on any of the primary or secondary endpoints for autonomic function, repolarization, ST segment change, or arrhythmia. Ozone exposure also did not cause significant changes in the primary endpoints for systemic inflammation (CRP) and vascular function (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and FMD) or secondary endpoints for systemic inflammation and oxidative stress (IL-6, P-selectin, and 8-isoprostane). Ozone did cause changes in two secondary endpoints: a significant increase in plasma ET-1 (P = 0.008) and a marginally significant decrease in nitrotyrosine (P = 0.017). Lastly, ozone exposure did not affect the primary prothrombotic endpoints (MP-TFA and monocyte-platelet conjugate count) or any secondary markers of prothrombotic vascular status (platelet activation, circulating microparticles [MPs], von Willebrand factor [vWF], or fibrinogen.).Although our hypothesis focused on possible acute cardiovascular effects of exposure to low levels of ozone, we recognized that the initial effects of inhaled ozone involve the lower airways. Therefore, we looked for: (a) changes in lung function, which are known to occur during exposure to ozone and are maximal at the end of exposure; and (b) markers of airway injury and inflammation. We found an increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after exposure to 0 ppb ozone, likely due to the effects of exercise. The FEV1 increased significantly 15 minutes after 0 ppb exposure (85 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 106; P < 0.001), and remained significantly increased from pre-exposure at 22 hours (45 mL; 95% CI, 26 to 64; P < 0.001). The increase in FVC followed a similar pattern. The increase in FEV1 and FVC were attenuated in a dose-response manner by exposure to 70 and 120 ppb ozone. We also observed a significant ozone-induced increase in the percentage of sputum PMN 22 hours after exposure at 120 ppb compared to 0 ppb exposure (P = 0.003). Plasma CC16 also increased significantly after exposure to 120 ppb (P < 0.001). Sputum IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α concentrations were not significantly different after ozone exposure. We found no significant interactions with sex, age, or GSTM1 status regarding the effect of ozone on lung function, percentage of sputum PMN, or plasma CC16. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter clinical study of older healthy subjects, ozone exposure caused concentration-related reductions in lung function and presented evidence for airway inflammation and injury. However, there was no convincing evidence for effects on cardiovascular function. Blood levels of the potent vasoconstrictor, ET-1, increased with ozone exposure (with marginal statistical significance), but there were no effects on BP, FMD, or other markers of vascular function. Blood levels of nitrotyrosine decreased with ozone exposure, the opposite of our hypothesis. Our study does not support acute cardiovascular effects of low-level ozone exposure in healthy older subjects. Inclusion of only healthy older individuals is a major limitation, which may affect the generalizability of our findings. We cannot exclude the possibility of effects with higher ozone exposure concentrations or more prolonged exposure, or the possibility that subjects with underlying vascular disease, such as hypertension or diabetes, would show effects under these conditions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We modelled the utility of applying a personalised screening approach for colorectal cancer (CRC) when compared with standard age-based screening. In this personalised screening approach, eligibility is determined by absolute risk which is calculated from age and polygenic risk score (PRS), where the PRS is relative risk attributable to common genetic variation. In contrast, eligibility in age-based screening is determined only by age. DESIGN: We calculated absolute risks of CRC from UK population age structure, incidence and mortality rate data, and a PRS distribution which we derived for the 37 known CRC susceptibility variants. We compared the number of CRC cases potentially detectable by personalised and age-based screening. Using Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analysis to calculate the heritability attributable to common variation, we repeated the analysis assuming all common CRC risk variants were known. RESULTS: Based on the known CRC variants, individuals with a PRS in the top 1% have a 2.9-fold increased CRC risk over the population median. Compared with age-based screening (aged 60: 10-year absolute risk 1.96% in men, 1.19% in women, as per the UK NHS National Bowel Screening Programme), personalised screening of individuals aged 55-69 at the same risk would lead to 16% fewer men and 17% fewer women being eligible for screening with 10% and 8%, respectively, fewer screen-detected cases. If all susceptibility variants were known, individuals with a PRS in the top 1% would have an estimated 7.7-fold increased risk. Personalised screening would then result in 26% fewer men and women being eligible for screening with 7% and 5% fewer screen-detected cases. CONCLUSION: Personalised screening using PRS has the potential to optimise population screening for CRC and to define those likely to maximally benefit from chemoprevention. There are however significant technical and operational details to be addressed before any such programme is introduced.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Idoso , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The current COVID-19 pandemic is not just a medical and social tragedy, but within the threat of the outbreak looms the potential for a significant and persistent negative mental health impact, based on previous experience with other pandemics such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and the earlier H1N1 outbreak of 1918. This piece will highlight the links between depression and viral illnesses and explore important overlaps with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, potentially implicating inflammatory mechanisms in those exposed to a range of viral agents. While containment of psychological distress currently focuses on social anxiety and quarantine measures, a second wave of psychological morbidity due to viral illness may be imminent.
Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Depressão/virologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Inflamação/epidemiologia , Inflamação/virologia , Pandemias , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/virologiaRESUMO
We describe a simple manganin foil resistance manometer for uniaxial stress measurements. The manometer functions at low pressures and over a range of temperatures. In this design, no temperature seasoning is necessary although the manometer must be prestressed to the upper end of the desired pressure range. The prestress pressure cannot be increased arbitrarily; irreversibility arising from shear stress limits its range. Attempting larger pressures yields irreproducible resistance measurements.
RESUMO
Seventeen separate mitochondrial hot spot mutations in a 100-bp target sequence (mitochondrial bp 10,030-10,130) were detected and measured in bronchial epithelial cell samples isolated from smokers and nonsmokers. Among the individuals sampled were three pairs of monozygotic twins in which one twin had never smoked and had a nonsmoking spouse, and the other had a smoking history of >10 pack-years. Individual point mutations present at frequencies as low as 10(-6) were detected. Partially denaturing electrophoresis was used to separate mutant from nonmutant sequences on the basis of their melting temperatures, and the target sequence was subsequently amplified via high-fidelity PCR with Pfu DNA polymerase. Tests were performed to determine whether mismatch intermediates or DNA adducts present in the cellular DNA were converted to mutants during PCR. Hot spot mutations were clearly observed in bronchial epithelial cells, and the same hot spots were observed consistently in different samples. Significant numerical variability in the mutant fractions for individual mutants was observed among samples and are ascribed to unequal mitochondrial segregation in stem and transition cells. The mutational spectra in smokers' samples did not differ significantly from the mutational spectra in nonsmokers' samples for this 100 bp of mitochondrial DNA. No smoking-specific hot spots were detected. The overall mutant fractions in smokers' samples were not elevated compared to those of nonsmokers. As much variability was observed between two samples from the same individual's lung as between a sample from a smoker and a sample from a nonsmoker. These findings demonstrate that inhaled tobacco smoke does not induce prominent point mutations in this 100-bp target mitochondrial sequence in smokers' bronchial epithelial cells. Endogenous factors (e.g., DNA replication errors or DNA damage by endogenous reactive chemicals) are suggested to be more likely to represent the most important contributors to mitochondrial mutagenesis.
Assuntos
Brônquios/química , DNA Mitocondrial/genética , Fumar , Adulto , Eletroforese Capilar , Células Epiteliais/química , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mutação Puntual , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Gêmeos MonozigóticosRESUMO
Normal bronchial epithelial cells (NBECs) are at risk for damage from inhaled and endogenous oxidative species and from epoxide metabolites of inhaled polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Epidemiological and in vitro data suggest that interindividual variation in this risk may result from variation in NBEC expression of enzymes that inactivate reactive species by conjugating them to glutathione. Quantitative competitive reverse transcription-PCR was used to measure mRNA levels of glutathione transferases (GSTs) and glutathione peroxidases (GSHPxs) in primary NBECs from subjects with or without bronchogenic carcinoma. Mean expression levels (mRNA/10(3) beta-actin mRNA) in NBECs from 23 subjects without bronchogenic carcinoma compared to those from 11 subjects with bronchogenic carcinoma respectively (in parentheses) were: mGST (26.0, 6.11), GSTM3 (0.29, 0.09), combined GSTM1,2,4,5 (0.98, 0.60), GSTT1 (0.84, 0.76), GSTP1 (287, 110), GSHPx (140, 62.1), and GSHPxA (0.43, 0.34). Levels of GSTP1, GSTM3, and GSHPx were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in NBECs from subjects with bronchogenic carcinoma. Further, the gene expression index formed by multiplying the values for mGST x GSTM3 x GSHPx x GSHPxA x GSTP1 had a sensitivity (90%) and specificity (76%) for detecting NBECs from bronchogenic carcinoma subjects that was better than any individual gene. In cultured NBECs derived from eight individuals without bronchogenic carcinoma and incubated under identical conditions such that environmental effects were minimized, the mean level of expression and degree of interindividual variation for each gene evaluated was less than that observed in primary NBECs. Data from these studies support the hypotheses that (a) interindividual variation in risk for bronchogenic carcinoma results in part from interindividual variation in NBEC expression of antioxidant genes; (b) gene expression indices will better identify individuals at risk for bronchogenic carcinoma than individual gene expression values; and (c) both hereditary and environmental exposures contribute to the level of and interindividual variation in gene expression observed in primary NBECs. Many epidemiological studies have been designed to evaluate risk associated with polymorphisms or gene expression levels of putative susceptibility genes based on measurements in surrogate tissues, such as peripheral blood lymphocytes. Based on data presented here, it will be important to include the assessment of NBECs in future studies. Measurement of antioxidant gene expression in NBECs may identify the 5-10% of individuals at risk for bronchogenic carcinoma. Bronchoscopic sampling of NBECs from smokers and ex-smokers then will allow susceptible individuals to be entered into surveillance and/or chemoprevention studies.
Assuntos
Brônquios/enzimologia , Carcinoma Broncogênico/enzimologia , Glutationa Peroxidase/genética , Glutationa Transferase/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/enzimologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Brônquios/citologia , Carcinoma Broncogênico/genética , Linhagem Celular , Células Cultivadas , Células Epiteliais/enzimologia , Feminino , Regulação Enzimológica da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Fatores Sexuais , FumarRESUMO
The concentration of particles in the ambient air is associated with deaths from cardiovascular disease, and determining the biologic mechanisms involved has been identified as a high-priority research need. Hypotheses have focused on the possibility of direct cardiac effects, or indirect effects related to inflammatory responses, including increased blood viscosity or increased blood coagulability. Ultrafine particles (UFPs; those smaller than 100 nm) may be important in cardiovascular effects because of their very high deposition efficiency in the pulmonary region, and their high propensity to penetrate the epithelium and reach interstitial sites. We have initiated human clinical studies of the health effects of UFPs using a mouthpiece exposure system. Healthy, nonsmoking subjects 18-55 years of age are exposed at rest for 2 hr to 10 microg/m3 carbon UFPs and to filtered air as a control. Preliminary findings indicate a relatively high overall deposition fraction (0.66 +/- 0.12 by particle number) consistent with model predictions and an absence of particle-associated symptoms or changes in lung function. Planned studies examine responses in susceptible subject groups, and the effects of particles of varying composition. Human clinical studies using model particles will complement other approaches such as epidemiologic, animal exposure, and in vitro studies in determining the mechanisms for heath effects related to ambient particle exposure.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Inflamação/induzido quimicamente , Sistema Respiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
The assessment of risk from exposure to environmental air pollutants is complex, and involves the disciplines of epidemiology, animal toxicology, and human inhalation studies. Controlled, quantitative studies of exposed humans help determine health-related effects that result from breathing the atmosphere. The major unique feature of the clinical study is the ability to select, control, and quantify pollutant exposures of subjects of known clinical status, and determine their effects under ideal experimental conditions. The choice of outcomes to be assessed in human clinical studies can be guided by both scientific and practical considerations, but the diversity of human responses and responsiveness must be considered. Subjects considered to be among the most susceptible include those with asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, and cardiovascular disease. New experimental approaches include exposures to concentrated ambient air particles, diesel engine exhaust, combustion products from smoking machines, and experimental model particles. Future investigations of the health effects of air pollution will benefit from collaborative efforts among the disciplines of epidemiology, animal toxicology, and human clinical studies.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Pneumopatias/induzido quimicamente , Projetos de Pesquisa , Toxicologia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto , Humanos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The Working Group on Neurogenic Inflammation proposed 11 testable hypotheses in the three domains of neurogenic inflammation, perceptual and central integration, and nonneurogenic inflammation. The working group selected the term people reporting chemical sensitivity (PRCS) to identify the primary subject group. In the domain of neurogenic inflammation, testable hypotheses included: PRCS have an increased density of c-fiber neurons in symptomatic tissues; PRCS produce greater quantities of neuropeptides and prostanoids than nonsensitive subjects in response to exposure to low-level capsaicin or irritant chemicals; PRCS have an increased and prolonged response to exogenously administered c-fiber activators such as capsaicin; PRCS demonstrate augmentation of central autonomic reflexes following exposure to agents that produce c-fiber stimulation; PRCS have decreased quantities of neutral endopeptidase in their mucosa; exogenous neuropeptide challenge reproduces symptoms of PRCS. In the domain of perceptual and central integration, testable hypotheses included: PRCS have alterations in adaptation, habituation, cortical representation, perception, cognition, and hedonics compared to controls; the qualitative and quantitative interactions between trigeminal and olfactory systems are altered in PRCS; higher integration of sensory inputs is altered in PRCS. In the domain of nonneurogenic inflammation, testable hypotheses included: increased inflammation is present in PRCS in symptomatic tissues and is associated with a heightened neurosensory response; PRCS show an augmented inflammatory response to chemical exposure. The working group recommended that studies be initiated in these areas.
Assuntos
Inflamação/etiologia , Sensibilidade Química Múltipla/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Células Quimiorreceptoras/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Quimiorreceptoras/fisiopatologia , Ética Médica , Humanos , Inflamação/fisiopatologia , Inflamação/psicologia , Modelos Biológicos , Sensibilidade Química Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Sensibilidade Química Múltipla/psicologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/fisiopatologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/psicologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Percepção , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
Exercise and inflammatory lung disorders such as asthma and acute lung injury increase exhaled nitric oxide (NO). This finding is interpreted as a rise in production of NO by the lungs (VNO) but fails to take into account the diffusing capacity for NO (DNO) that carries NO into the pulmonary capillary blood. We have derived equations to measure VNO from the following rates, which determine NO tension in the lungs (PL) at any moment from 1) production (VNO); 2) diffusion, where DNO(PL) = rate of removal by lung capillary blood; and 3) ventilation, where V A(PL)/(PB - 47) = the rate of NO removal by alveolar ventilation (V A) and PB is barometric pressure. During open-circuit breathing when PL is not in equilibrium, d/dt PL[V(L)/ (PB - 47)] (where V(L) is volume of NO in the lower airways) = VNO - DNO(PL) - V A(PL)/(PB - 47). When PL reaches a steady state so that d/dt = 0 and V A is eliminated by rebreathing or breath holding, then PL = VNO/DNO. PL can be interpreted as NO production per unit of DNO. This equation predicts that diseases that diminish DNO but do not alter VNO will increase expired NO levels. These equations permit precise measurements of VNO that can be applied to determining factors controlling NO production by the lungs.
Assuntos
Óxido Nítrico/biossíntese , Sistema Respiratório/metabolismo , Pressão do Ar , Asma/fisiopatologia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Humanos , Hiperventilação/fisiopatologia , Modelos Biológicos , Alvéolos Pulmonares/fisiologia , Capacidade de Difusão Pulmonar/fisiologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Mecânica Respiratória/fisiologiaRESUMO
Human airways produce nitric oxide (NO), and exhaled NO increases as expiratory flow rates fall. We show that mixing during exhalation between the NO produced by the lower, alveolar airways (VL(NO)) and the upper conducting airways (VU(NO)) explains this phenomenon and permits measurement of VL(NO), VU(NO), and the NO diffusing capacity of the conducting airways (DU(NO)). After breath holding for 10-15 s the partial pressure of alveolar NO (PA) becomes constant, and during a subsequent exhalation at a constant expiratory flow rate the alveoli will deliver a stable amount of NO to the conducting airways. The conducting airways secrete NO into the lumen (VU(NO)), which mixes with PA during exhalation, resulting in the observed expiratory concentration of NO (PE). At fast exhalations, PA makes a large contribution to PE, and, at slow exhalations, NO from the conducting airways predominates. Simple equations describing this mixing, combined with measurements of PE at several different expiratory flow rates, permit calculation of PA, VU(NO), and DU(NO). VL(NO) is the product of PA and the alveolar airway diffusion capacity for NO. In seven normal subjects, PA = 1.6 +/- 0.7 x 10(-6) (SD) Torr, VL(NO) = 0.19 +/- 0.07 microl/min, VU(NO) = 0.08 +/- 0.05 microl/min, and DU(NO) = 0.4 +/- 0.4 ml. min(-1). Torr(-1). These quantitative measurements of VL(NO) and VU(NO) are suitable for exploring alterations in NO production at these sites by diseases and physiological stresses.
Assuntos
Óxido Nítrico/biossíntese , Alvéolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Sistema Respiratório/metabolismo , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Pressão Parcial , Capacidade de Difusão Pulmonar/fisiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Measurements of nitric oxide (NO) pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL(NO)) multiplied by alveolar NO partial pressure (PA(NO)) provide values for alveolar NO production (VA(NO)). We evaluated applying a rapidly responding chemiluminescent NO analyzer to measure DL(NO) during a single, constant exhalation (Dex(NO)) or by rebreathing (Drb(NO)). With the use of an initial inspiration of 5-10 parts/million of NO with a correction for the measured NO back pressure, Dex(NO) in nine healthy subjects equaled 125 +/- 29 (SD) ml x min(-1) x mmHg(-1) and Drb(NO) equaled 122 +/- 26 ml x min(-1) x mmHg(-1). These values were 4.7 +/- 0.6 and 4.6 +/- 0.6 times greater, respectively, than the subject's single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (Dsb(CO)). Coefficients of variation were similar to previously reported breath-holding, single-breath measurements of Dsb(CO). PA(NO) measured in seven of the subjects equaled 1.8 +/- 0.7 mmHg x 10(-6) and resulted in VA(NO) of 0.21 +/- 0.06 microl/min using Dex(NO) and 0.20 +/- 0.6 microl/min with Drb(NO). Dex(NO) remained constant at end-expiratory oxygen tensions varied from 42 to 682 Torr. Decreases in lung volume resulted in falls of Dex(NO) and Drb(NO) similar to the reported effect of volume changes on Dsb(CO). These data show that rapidly responding chemiluminescent NO analyzers provide reproducible measurements of DL(NO) using single exhalations or rebreathing suitable for measuring VA(NO).
Assuntos
Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Alvéolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Capacidade de Difusão Pulmonar/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Monóxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Medições Luminescentes , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Óxido Nítrico/análise , Mecânica Respiratória/fisiologiaRESUMO
This report describes methods for measuring nitric oxide production by the lungs' lower alveolar airways (VNO), defined as those alveoli and bronchioles well perfused by the pulmonary circulation. Breath holding or vigorous rebreathing for 15-20 s minimizes removal of NO from the lower airways and results in a constant partial pressure of NO in the lower airways (PL). Then the amount of NO diffusing into the perfusing blood will be the pulmonary diffusing capacity for NO (DNO) multiplied by PL and by mass balance equals VNO, or VNO = DNO(PL). To measure PL, 10 normal subjects breath held for 20 s followed by exhalation at a constant flow rate of 0.83 +/- 0.14 (SD) l/s or rebreathed at 59 +/- 15 l/min for 20 s while NO was continuously measured at the mouth. DNO was estimated to equal five times the single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. By using breath holding, PL equaled 2.9 +/- 0.8 mmHg x 10(-6) and VNO equaled 0.39 +/- 0.12 microl/min. During rebreathing PL equaled 2.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg x 10(-6) and VNO equaled 0.29 +/- 0.11 microl/min. Measurements of NO at the mouth during rapid, constant exhalation after breath holding for 20 s or during rebreathing provide reproducible methods for measuring VNO in humans.
Assuntos
Óxido Nítrico/biossíntese , Alvéolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Humanos , Medições Luminescentes , Medidas de Volume Pulmonar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óxido Nítrico/análise , Pico do Fluxo Expiratório , Alvéolos Pulmonares/fisiologia , Mecânica Respiratória/fisiologiaRESUMO
Humans are exposed to silicones in a number of commercial and consumer products. Some of these silicones, including octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), are volatile. Therefore, there is a potential for respiratory exposure. A pharmacokinetic analysis of respiratory exposure to D4 is presented in the accompanying paper (M. J. Utell et al., 1998, Toxicol. Sci. 44, 206-213). Possible immune effects of respiratory exposure to D4 are investigated in this paper. Normal volunteers were exposed to 10 ppm D4 or air for 1 h via a mouthpiece using a double-blind, crossover study design. Assays were chosen to screen for immunotoxicity or a systemic inflammatory response. Assessment of immunotoxicity included enumeration of peripheral lymphocyte subsets and functional assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Because in humans there is no direct test for adjuvant effect of respiratory exposure, we analyzed proinflammatory cytokines and acute-phase reactants in peripheral blood, markers for a systemic inflammatory response, as surrogate markers for adjuvancy. These tests were repeated when the volunteers were reexposed to D4 approximately 3 months after this initial exposure. Blood was obtained prior to exposure, immediately postexposure, and 6 and 24 h postexposure. In these short-term, controlled human exposures, no immunotoxic or proinflammatory effects of respiratory exposure to D4 were found.
Assuntos
Imunidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Siloxanas/toxicidade , Adulto , Citocinas/biossíntese , Citocinas/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiologia , Ativação Linfocitária/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Siloxanas/administração & dosagem , Siloxanas/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Propentofylline is a novel therapeutic agent for dementia that readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and acts by blocking the uptake of adenosine and inhibiting the enzyme phosphodiesterase. In vitro and in vivo its mechanism of action appears to be twofold; it inhibits the production of free radicals and reduces the activation of microglial cells. It therefore interacts with the inflammatory processes that are thought to contribute to dementia, and given its mechanism of action is a possible disease modifying agent rather than a purely symptomatic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of propentofylline for people with dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 5 February 2003. Aventis, the manufacturing pharmaceutical company, was asked for data from unpublished studies but declined to enter into correspondence. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded double-blind randomized controlled trials of propentofylline compared with a placebo or another treatment group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: There were detailed reports of only four of the nine included studies. The efficacy of propentofylline was reviewed for undifferentiated dementia as there were not enough data to attempt a subgroup analysis for the types of dementia. MAIN RESULTS: The following statistically significant treatment effects in favour of propentofylline are reported. Cognition at 3, 6 and 12 months including MMSE at 12 months. [MD 1.2, 95%CI 0.12 to 2.28, P=0.03] Severity of dementia at 3, 6 and 12 months including CGI at 12 months [MD -0.21, 95%CI -0.39 to -0.03, P=0.03]. Activities of Daily Living (NAB) at 6 and 12 months [MD -1.20, 95%CI -2.22 to -0.18, P=0.02]. Global Assessment (CGI) at 3 months [MD -0.48, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.21, P=0.0006], but not at later times. Tolerability There were minimal data on adverse effects and drop-outs. There were a statistically significant treatment effects in favour of placebo at 12 months, for the number of dropouts, [OR=1.43, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.90, P=0.03]. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence that propentofylline might benefit cognition, global function and activities of daily living of people with Alzheimer's disease and/or vascular dementia. The meta-analyses reported here are far from satisfactory as a summary of the efficacy of propentofylline, considering the unpublished information on another 1200 patients in randomized trials that exists. Unfortunately Aventis has been unwilling to correspond with the authors, significantly limiting the scope of this review.
Assuntos
Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Xantinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Demência Vascular/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Doença de Pick/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Ultrafine particles (UFP) may contribute to the morbidity and mortality associated with exposure to ambient particles, but few data are available on ultrafine particle numbers in indoor air, where susceptible subjects spend most of their time. We measured particle number, UFP size distribution, and total suspended particulate (JSP) mass in three locations: (I) a medical floor in a large tertiary care hospital, (2) outdoor air above a construction site outside the hospital, and (3) an environmental exposure chamber with purification of intake air. Mass and number concentrations were recorded continuously in each location over 70-110 h. Mean ± SD particle (p) numbers were 3.63 ± 1.l5 } 10(3) p/cm(3) in the hospital, 3.05 ± 6.65 } 10(4) p/cm(3) outside, and 5.86 ± 2.11 } 10(2) p/cm(3) in the environmental chamber. In the hospital, particle number and mass declined during the evening hours when the unit was less active, with the particle number as low as 1.15 } 10(3) p/cm(3). Particle numbers peaked (2.78 } 10(4) p/cm(3)) in the morning hours when activity on the unit was the most intense. "Spikes" in fine particle number were often not accompanied by increases in TSP mass. In the hospital, a distinct population of ultrafine particles (median diameter approximately 23 nm) was observed during the lunch hour, suggesting a change in particle source during this time. Outdoor fine particle numbers above the construction site were highly variable, reaching peaks of greater than 1.7 } 10(6) p/cm(3). These data suggest that, in the indoor environment, particle numbers and size distribution vary with intensity and type of local activity, and significant peaks in particle number are not detected with daily averages. Monitoring of particle mass may be an inaccurate measure of exposure to ultrafine particles indoors.