Establishing Mayo Clinic's Coronavirus Disease 2019 Virtual Clinic: A Preliminary Communication.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is taking a massive toll on health care systems globally. We developed the COVID-19 virtual clinic (CVC) in conjunction with drive through testing to cope with this situation. There are two arms of the CVC: (1) a screening arm and (2) positive patient arm. Screening is performed over the phone based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention screening guideline. Positive patients are followed at regular intervals by video appointments where concerns can be addressed by a provider while also tracking symptom progression. We enrolled 63 positive patients out of 1,153 screened for COVID-19 as of this writing. The CVC continues to address patients' concerns and symptoms in an effort to minimize emergency department and hospital patient volumes, as incidence increases. Drive through testing in conjunction with a virtual clinic allows us to provide high-quality care in an anxious time without consuming excessive personal protective equipment or unnecessarily exposing health care workers. This article could serve as a model to guide other practices to cope with this and future pandemics.

Esophageal Food Impaction: Causes, Elective Intubation, and Associated Adverse Events.

GOALS: The goal of this study is to examine the causes, type of adverse events (AE), and effects of elective intubation in outcomes associated with esophageal food impaction (EFI). BACKGROUND: EFI is a gastrointestinal emergency requiring immediate medical attention. STUDY: Retrospective review of all EFI cases presenting at 3 large tertiary centers from October 1, 2011 to October 31, 2014 and all cases registered in the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2012. Statistical analysis compared health care utilization, AEs, and outcomes in patients with or without elective intubation. RESULTS: A total of 214 cases presenting with EFI at our 3 referral hospitals and 4950 cases in the CORI database met inclusion criteria. Prevalence of structural disorders was similar in the Mayo Clinic and CORI datasets: 24.3% and 27.7% had strictures, and 3.8% and 2.5% had a tumor, respectively. AEs in the nonintubation group were 14.7% compared with 33.3% in the elective intubation group (P=0.003); however, 71.0% of these events were associated with EFI itself and not therapeutic procedure. Esophageal AEs were common (15.0%), followed by pulmonary and cardiovascular events with 3.0% and 1.4%, respectively. Severity of the AEs was influenced by the impaction-to-endoscopy time. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of structural esophageal disorders was similar to previous smaller studies. Elective intubation was associated with increased AEs; however, this is felt to be because of the nature of EFI itself and not by therapeutic endoscopy. Prolonged impaction-to-endoscopy time was associated with severe AEs.

Colonoscopy bowel preparation quality improvement for patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparations can necessitate early repeat of colonoscopy and increased healthcare costs. Established risk factors for suboptimal bowel preparation are known, yet data are lacking in the specific subgroup of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The primary aim of this study was to reduce inadequate bowel preparation rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplant via a quality improvement initiative targeting patient education. METHODS: A total of 121 patients undergoing evaluation at our institution prior to implementation of the quality improvement initiative and 91 patients undergoing evaluation after implementation were included. The initiative was an educational intervention via a 6-minute colonoscopy and split-prep bowel preparation educational video during the initial liver transplantation evaluation visit for all patients with scheduled colonoscopy. RESULTS: Inadequate bowel preparation was observed in 36 patients (29.8%) in the pre-intervention period compared to 29 patients (31.9%) in the post-intervention period. This corresponded to a lack of a significant difference in both single-variable analysis and multivariable analysis. Of note, there was a significantly higher rate of inadequate bowel preparation as ascites worsened (P=.028). CONCLUSION: Patient educational video failed to improve bowel preparations in patients undergoing colonoscopy with decompensated cirrhosis.

Once-daily omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate heals severe refractory reflux esophagitis with morning or nighttime dosing.

BACKGROUND: Morning dose or twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is often prescribed to heal severe reflux esophagitis. AIM: Compare the effect of single dose morning (control arm) versus nighttime (experimental arm) omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate (Zegerid(®)) (IR-OME) on esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. METHODS: Adult outpatients with Los Angeles grade C or D esophagitis were allocated to open-label 40 mg IR-OME once a day for 8 weeks in a prospective, randomized, parallel design, single center study. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and validated self-report symptom questionnaires were completed at baseline and follow-up. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 128 (72 %) eligible subjects participated [64 (70 %) male, mean age 58 (range 19-86), median BMI 29 (range 21-51), 58 C:34 D]. Overall, 81 (88 %) subjects healed [n = 70 (76 %)] or improved [n = 11 (12 %)] erosions. There was no significant difference (morning vs. night) in mucosal healing [81 vs. 71 %, (p = 0.44)] or symptom resolution [heartburn (77 vs. 65 %, p = 0.12), acid regurgitation (82 vs. 73 %, p = 0.28)]. Prevalence of newly identified Barrett's esophagus was 14 % with half diagnosed only after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily IR-OME (taken morning or night) effectively heals severe reflux esophagitis and improves GERD symptoms. Results support the clinical practice recommendation to repeat EGD after 8 weeks PPI therapy in severe esophagitis patients to assure healing and exclude Barrett's esophagus.

Burn Pits: A Possible Trigger for Achalasia.

A 45-year-old female veteran of the United States Air Force (USAF), who was exposed to burn pits on multiple occasions while deployed in the Middle East, presented for a second opinion regarding ongoing chest pain and regurgitation after a Heller myotomy for achalasia. An esophageal X-ray showed no meaningful peristalsis, a slight diverticulum in the distal esophagus, and easy passage of liquids through the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Esophageal manometry findings were consistent with type 3 achalasia. Based on these and endoscopic evaluation, the prior surgical intervention appeared to be successful for lower esophageal sphincter disruption, so symptoms were managed medically with a proton pump inhibitor, trazodone, and a long-acting nitrate resulting in 70% improvement. We present this case because the patient developed achalasia with a notable history of exposure to open-air burn pits during her military service. While we acknowledge that causality cannot be proven, our case is the first we are aware of that shows a temporal association between burn pit exposure and achalasia. In August of 2022, the United States Congress passed the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, which expanded the healthcare benefits of veterans exposed to burn pits, making identification of associated conditions a relevant and important endeavor.

Association Between Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Acute Complicated Diverticulitis.

Background Gastrointestinal manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are increasingly recognized. Through potentially overlapping pathophysiology, co-occurrence of COVID-19 and first-time acute diverticulitis has been reported. Our study aims to further characterize this association in COVID-19-positive patients within a large tertiary care academic center. Methodology Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who subsequently developed acute diverticulitis within 30 days were identified between 2020 and 2022. COVID-19 and acute diverticulitis were diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction and computed tomography, respectively. Patients with prior history of acute diverticulitis were excluded. Patient characteristics and comorbid conditions were collected. Characterization of the COVID-19 course (treatment setting, medical/ventilatory therapy) and acute diverticulitis (treatment setting, medical/surgical therapy, complications) was performed retrospectively. Subanalysis was performed by COVID-19 vaccination status, the severity of COVID-19, and the timing of acute diverticulitis diagnosis. Results A total of 81 patients were identified, with a median duration between COVID-19 diagnosis and acute diverticulitis of 13 days (interquartile range = 2.5-21.0), with 44.4% of patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. The all-cause complication rate of acute diverticulitis was noted to be 59.3%, most commonly intestinal perforation (39.5%), abscess formation (37.0%), and peritonitis (14.8%). Although a trend toward increased all-cause complications (65.9%), intestinal perforation (43.9%), and peritonitis (19.5%) was noted in unvaccinated patients, this did not reach significance. Although all-cause complication rate did not differ in patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis at the time of COVID-19 presentation, a significantly elevated incidence of intestinal perforation (55.9% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01), peritonitis (29.4% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.01), and the need for emergent surgical intervention (38.2% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.01) was noted. Conclusions Our study indicates that patients diagnosed with first-time acute diverticulitis within 30 days of COVID-19 infection have a high complication rate, most commonly intestinal perforation. Additionally, patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis at the same time as COVID-19 detection had a significantly elevated rate of complications and emergent surgical needs. Given the high complication rate, patients who develop diverticulitis within a short timeframe of COVID-19 infection may benefit from increased clinician vigilance and monitoring.

Number of bottles of esophageal biopsies in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The number of bottles of esophageal biopsies needed for the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unclear, despite cost differences. AIMS: Assess the clinical outcomes between patients with one and two bottles of esophageal biopsies for the assessment of EoE. METHODS: Retrospective study of adults who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for esophageal symptoms between January 2015 and June 2021 and findings of ≥15 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf). Patients with one bottle (1 bottle-EoE) had biopsies from the entire or proximal esophagus. Patients with two bottles had biopsies separated from the distal and proximal esophagus and were separated into those with ≥ 15 eos/hpf in both bottles (2 bottle Dif-EoE), or the distal bottle alone (2 bottle Lim-EoE). The primary outcomes were endoscopic findings at follow-up EGD as assessed by the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) and the presence of ≥15 eos/hpf. RESULTS: Of 85 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who met inclusion criteria, 49 had 2 bottle Dif-EoE, 18 had 2 bottle Lim-EoE, and 18 had 1 bottle-EoE. At median follow-up of 3.3-5.6 months, more patients with 1 bottle EoE had dysphagia (p = 0.029), however there were no differences in the EREFS (p = 0.14) or presence of ≥15 eos/hpf (p = 0.39). More patients with 2 bottle Dif-EoE were treated with topical steroids (16.3% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.039) and diet (20.4% vs. 0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic and histologic outcomes were similar in patients who had one and two bottles for esophageal biopsies in the evaluation of EoE.

Development of Achalasia in a Patient With Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction.

Development of concurrent achalasia and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is rare, although esophageal dysmotility is common in patients with CIPO and may suggest worse clinical outcomes. We present a case of a 63-year-old man with a 15-year history of CIPO who developed postprandial regurgitation, vomiting, and dysphagia and was diagnosed with achalasia through radiographic and endoscopic findings. This is only the third case in the reported literature that involves both conditions. Rather than representing 2 separate disorders, CIPO and achalasia may instead represent neurogenic variants of 1 underlying condition affecting the myenteric plexus.

Creating a Dedicated Pandemic Ambulatory Clinic: Lessons Learned From COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 is highly infectious and the pandemic requires many adaptations to how we deliver medical care. Early in the pandemic, much of this focus was on hospital and emergency department care delivery models to ensure the safety of non-COVID-19 patients and health care workers. However, providing much needed outpatient assessments for COVID-19 patients during a pandemic is also fraught with challenges. From our review of the literature, best practices for a dedicated pandemic ambulatory outpatient clinic have not previously been described. We present a model for creating a dedicated ambulatory pandemic clinic at our institution for the acute care needs of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: To address the current pandemic, the Mayo Acute Symptoms of COVID-19 Clinic was implemented on April 13, 2020, with the aims of providing a stand-alone location for COVID-19 patients to have acute outpatient evaluations as well as diagnostics. RESULTS: Recognized challenges addressed included consideration of airflow recirculation patterns in standard medical office buildings, optimization of protocols to conserve personal protective equipment (PPE), limiting total exposure time during patient flow, and reducing surfaces and spaces that patients would physically contact. To this end, unique methods of patient scheduling, patient flow process, staff training, and PPE protocols were developed and are explained in detail in this article. CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as inevitably in future pandemics, outpatient medical facilities need to be prepared to care for nonhospitalized and nonemergent pandemic patients. We offer a practical approach that has been successful at our institution, with opportunity for local adaptation based on need and resources.