Family-Centered Care and Collaboration: A Scoping Review of Medical Guidance for Parental Substance Use.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of U.S. families are affected by substance use disorders. Both child- and adult- serving systems are called upon to care for families, yet the disciplines involved inherently have different priorities, preventing a true family-centered care model. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the scoping review was to explore the alignment of current national guidance related to the medical care of families affected by substance use disorders (SUD). In the review, we examined 1) the quality of the documents, 2) the documents' positions within the continuum of family-centered care and the promotion of multidisciplinary collaboration, and 3) potential gaps in the promotion of services for families. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: We chose a priori to manually examine the websites of national medical and public health associations for clinical practice and policy recommendations. We included documents published between 2016-2023 with selected keywords, totaling seven documents for review. We operationalized and rated each document's recommendations based on their promotion of "family-centered care" and "multidisciplinary collaboration." RESULTS: The quality of each document varied, with an average score of 5.2 out of 7. The average family-centeredness rating was 3.0 out of 7; five of the seven documents prioritized the parent's care over the child's. The average multidisciplinary collaboration rating was 2.8 out of 7. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Overall, we found low to moderate family-centered and multidisciplinary collaboration scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that despite these practices emerging as optimal for the care of families affected by SUD, the promotion of these practices has yet to be fully adopted in guidance statements by national medical disciplines.

Promoting community stakeholder engagement in research on treatment for pregnant women with opioid use disorder.

Aim: Community stakeholder engagement in research (CSER) can improve research relevance and efficiency as well as prevent harmful practices, particularly for vulnerable populations. Despite potential benefits, researchers lack familiarity with CSER methods. Methods: We describe CSER strategies used across the research continuum, including proposal development, study planning and the first years of a comparative effectiveness study of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Results: We highlight successful strategies, grounded in principles of engagement, to establish and maintain stakeholder relationships, foster bidirectional communication and trust and support active participation of women with opioid use disorder in the research process. Conclusion: CSER methods support research with a disenfranchised population. Future work will evaluate the impact of CSER strategies on study outcomes and dissemination.

Community stakeholder engagement in research on treatment for pregnant women with opioid use disorder builds and maintains stakeholder relationships, fosters communication and trust and supports active patient participation.

Integrated vs nonintegrated treatment for perinatal opioid use disorder: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with opioid use disorder and their infants often experience worse perinatal outcomes than women without opioid use disorder, including longer hospitalizations after delivery and a higher risk for preterm delivery. Integrated treatment models, which combine addiction treatment and maternity care, represent an innovative approach that is widely endorsed, however, limited studies have compared the outcomes between integrated and standard, nonintegrated programs from real-world programs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the perinatal and substance use outcomes for pregnant women with opioid use disorder receiving coordinated, colocated obstetrical care and opioid use disorder treatment (integrated treatment) and to compare it with those of women receiving obstetrical care and opioid use disorder treatment in distinct programs of care (nonintegrated treatment). STUDY DESIGN: In this observational, retrospective cohort study, we abstracted the perinatal and opioid use disorder treatment data from the records of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (n=225) who delivered at a rural, academic medical center from 2015 to 2017. The women either received integrated (n=92) or nonintegrated (n=133) opioid use disorder treatment and obstetrical care. Using inverse probability weighted regression models to adjust for a potential covariate imbalance, we evaluated the impact of the treatment model on the risk for preterm delivery and positive meconium or umbilical cord toxicology screens. We explored whether the number of obstetrical visits mediated this relationship by using a quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo algorithm. RESULTS: Women receiving integrated treatment were less likely to deliver prematurely (11.8% vs 26.6%; P<.001) and their infants had shorter hospitalizations (6.5±4.8 vs 10.7±16.2 days). Using a robust inverse probability weighted model showed that receiving integrated treatment was associated with a 74.7% decrease in the predicted probability of preterm delivery (average treatment effect, -0.19; standard error, 0.14; P<.001). There were no differences in the risk for a positive meconium or umbilical cord toxicology screen, a marker for second and third trimester substance use, between women receiving integrated treatment and those receiving coordinated treatment (29.4% vs 34.6%; P=.41), however, integrated treatment was associated with significantly lower rates of positive maternal urine toxicology screens at the time of delivery (35.9% vs 74.4%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of rural pregnant women with opioid use disorder, receiving integrated obstetrical care and opioid use disorder treatment was associated with a reduced risk for preterm birth, a lower risk for positive maternal urine toxicology screen at the time of delivery, and shorter infant hospitalization. This relationship was mediated by the number of obstetrical visits attended during pregnancy, suggesting that increased engagement with obstetrical care through integration of services may contribute to improved perinatal outcomes.

Education Research: A Qualitative Study on Student Perceptions of Neurology and Psychiatry Clerkship Integration.

OBJECTIVE: To explore student perceptions of the feasibility of neurology and psychiatry clerkship integration, including clinical education and competency evaluation, as there has been a call to improve undergraduate medical education integration of the disciplines to better develop physicians that can address nervous system disorders. METHOD: Via a constructivist grounded theory approach, we carried out 5 focus groups in 2016-2017 with 28 medical students who completed both independent clerkships. Investigator triangulation was used with iterative interpretation comparisons, and themes were identified using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Three major themes arose: (1) combining the clerkships was not favorable as students need sufficient time to delve deeper into each discipline; (2) students did not observe an integrated clinical approach by faculty; (3) there is positive value to making links between neurology and psychiatry for effective patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Students emphasized the importance of making stronger links between the 2 disciplines for their learning and to improve patient care; however, they did not observe this clinical approach in the workplace. Students perceived that integration of neurology and psychiatry clerkships should occur via increased affinity of the complementary discipline by trainees and faculty in each specialty.