Giving Breath to Motor Neurons: Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation Slows Disease Progression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) improves amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) quality of life and survival. However, data about its effect on disease progression are still lacking. Here, we test whether NIMV use changed the rate of functional decline among ALS patients. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we included 448 ALS patients followed up at the ALS Center in Turin, Italy, who underwent NIMV during the disease course. The primary outcome was the change in functional decline after NIMV initiation adjusting for covariates. Functional decline was based on the nonrespiratory items of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). RESULTS: NIMV initiation resulted in a slower functional decline (mean improvement = 0.16 points per month, 95% confidence interval = 0.12-0.19, p < 0.001), with consistent effects observed across various demographic factors, including sex, age at diagnosis, and disease duration before NIMV initiation. This finding was replicated using the PRO-ACT (Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials) dataset. The favorable impact of NIMV on ALSFRS-R progression was evident independently of disease stages. Notably, NIMV benefits were not dose-dependent but were particularly prominent for nighttime respiratory support. INTERPRETATION: NIMV significantly influences the rate of motor progression in ALS, and this effect is not determined by the nonlinearity of ALSFRS-R trajectory. The functional decline slowed following NIMV initiation, independently of the site of disease onset or disease severity at the time of NIMV initiation. Our findings underscore the importance of timely NIMV initiation for all ALS patients and highlight the need to consider NIMV-induced slowing of disease progression when evaluating clinical trial outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:817-822.

Sex Differences in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival and Progression: A Multidimensional Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate sex-related differences in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) prognosis and their contributing factors. METHODS: Our primary cohort was the Piemonte and Aosta Register for ALS (PARALS); the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) and the Answer ALS databases were used for validation. Survival analyses were conducted accounting for age and onset site. The roles of forced vital capacity and weight decline were explored through a causal mediation analysis. Survival and disease progression rates were also evaluated after propensity score matching. RESULTS: The PARALS cohort included 1,890 individuals (44.8% women). Men showed shorter survival when stratified by onset site (spinal onset HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, p = 0.0439; bulbar onset HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.70, p = 0.006917), although women had a steeper functional decline (+0.10 ALSFRS-R points/month, 95% CI 0.07-0.15, p < 0.00001) regardless of onset site. Instead, men showed worse respiratory decline (-4.2 forced vital capacity%/month, 95% CI -6.3 to -2.2, p < 0.0001) and faster weight loss (-0.15 kg/month, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.05, p = 0.0030). Causal mediation analysis showed that respiratory function and weight loss were pivotal in sex-related survival differences. Analysis of patients from PRO-ACT (n = 1,394, 40.9% women) and Answer ALS (n = 849, 37.2% women) confirmed these trends. INTERPRETATION: The shorter survival in men is linked to worse respiratory function and weight loss rather than a faster disease progression. These findings emphasize the importance of considering sex-specific factors in understanding ALS pathophysiology and designing tailored therapeutic strategies. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:159-169.

Disentangling the relationship between social cognition, executive functions and behaviour changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Social cognition (SC) deficits are included in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTDS) revised diagnostic criteria. However, the impact of SC assessment on cognitive classification and the cognitive-behavioural correlates of SC remain unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the impact of SC assessment on ALS-FTDS categorisation and explore the relationship of SC with executive functions (EF) and behaviour changes in a cohort of ALS patients. METHODS: 121 patients and 56 healthy controls from the Turin ALS Centre underwent cognitive/behavioural testing, including the SC subdomains of facial emotion recognition, and cognitive and affective theory of mind (ToM). RESULTS: Patients performed significantly worse than controls in all SC explored domains, and 45% of patients exhibited a deficit in at least one SC test, dissociated from the presence of EF deficits. In 13% of cases, the SC deficit was isolated and subclinical. SC assessment contributed to the attribution of cognitive impairment in 10% of patients. Through a statistical clustering approach, we found that ToM only partially overlaps with EF while behaviour changes are associated with emotional disorders (anxiety and depression). CONCLUSIONS: SC is overall independent of EF in ALS, with ToM only partially associated with specific EF measures, and behaviour changes associated with emotional disorders. The influence of SC on cognitive categorisation and the frequent identification of a subclinical SC impairment have implications in a clinical setting, considering the substantial impact of cognitive impairment on disease burden and therapeutic choices.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024 supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2024 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2024, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patient·es, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient·e. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia: Revised Edition 2023.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2023 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2023 supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgment in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2023 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2023, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patients, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2022.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2022 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2022 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2022 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2022, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patients, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Risk Factors Involved in Central-to-Radial Arterial Pressure Gradient During Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient may occur after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which, in some patients, may last for a prolonged time after CPB. Whenever there is a pressure gradient, the radial artery pressure measure may underestimate a more centrally measured systemic pressure, which may result in a misguided therapeutic strategy. It is clinically important to identify the risk factors that may predict the appearance of a central-to-radial pressure gradient, because more central sites of measurements might then be considered to monitor systemic arterial pressure in high-risk patients. The objective of this study was to assess preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for central-to-radial pressure gradient. METHODS: Seventy-three patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB were included in this prospective observational study. A significant central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient was defined as a difference of 25 mm Hg in systolic pressure or 10 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure for a minimum of 5 minutes. Preoperative data included demographics, presence of comorbidities, and medications. Intraoperative data included type of surgery, CPB and aortic clamping time, use of inotropic drugs, and vasodilators or vasopressors agents. The diameter of the radial and femoral artery was measured before the induction of anesthesia using B-mode ultrasonography. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients developed a central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (45%). Patients with a significant pressure gradient had a smaller weight (71.0 ± 16.9 vs 79.3 ± 17.3 kg, P = 0.041), a smaller height (162.0 ± 9.6 vs 166.3 ± 8.6 cm, P = 0.047), a smaller radial artery diameter (0.24 ± 0.03 vs 0.29 ± 0.05 cm, P < 0.001), and were at a higher risk as determined by the Parsonnet score (30.3 ± 24.9 vs 17.0 ± 10.9, P = 0.007). In addition, a longer aortic clamping time (85.8 ± 51.0 vs 64.2 ± 29.3 minutes, P = 0.036), mitral and complex surgery (P = 0.007 and P = 0.017, respectively), and administration of vasopressin (P = 0.039) were identified as potential independent predictors of a central-to-radial pressure gradient. By using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following independent risk factors were identified: Parsonnet score (odds ratio [OR], 1.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-1.127, P = 0.002), aortic clamping time >90 minutes (OR, 8.521; 95% CI, 1.917-37.870, P = 0.005), and patient height (OR, 0.933, 95% CI, 0.876-0.993, P = 0.029). The relative risk (RR) estimates remained statistically significant for the Parsonnet score and the aortic clamping time ≥90 minutes (RR, 1.010; 95% CI, 1.003-1.018, P = 0.009 and RR, 2.253; 95% CI, 1.475-3.443, P < 0.001 respectively) while showing a trend for patient height (RR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.948-1.001, P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Central-to-radial gradients are common in cardiac surgery. The threshold for using a central site for blood pressure monitoring should be low in small, high-risk patients undergoing longer surgical interventions to avoid inappropriate administration of vasopressors and/or inotropic agents.

The role of peripheral immunity in ALS: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation has been proposed as a relevant mechanism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Still, comprehensive data on ALS patients' innate and adaptive immune responses and their effect on the clinical phenotype are lacking. Here, we investigate systemic immunity in a population-based ALS cohort using readily available hematological indexes. METHODS: We collected clinical data and the complete blood count (CBC) at diagnosis in ALS patients from the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Register for ALS (PARALS) from 2007 to 2019. Leukocytes populations, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic-immune-inflammation index (SII), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were derived from CBC. All variables were analyzed for association with clinical features in the entire cohort and then in sex- and age-based subgroups. RESULTS: Neutrophils (P = 0.001) and markers of increased innate immunity (NLR, P = 0.008 and SII, P = 0.006) were associated with a faster disease progression. Similarly, elevated innate immunity correlated with worse pulmonary function and shorter survival. The prognosis in women also correlated with low lymphocytes (P = 0.045) and a decreased LMR (P = 0.013). ALS patients with cognitive impairment exhibited lower monocytes (P = 0.0415). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The dysregulation of the systemic immune system plays a multifaceted role in ALS. More specifically, an elevated innate immune response is associated with faster progression and reduced survival. Conversely, ALS patients with cognitive impairment showed a reduction in monocyte count. Additionally, immune response varied according to sex and age, thus suggesting that involved immune pathways are patient specific. Further studies will help translate those findings into clinical practice or targeted treatments.

Plasma CHI3L1 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Potential Differential Diagnostic Biomarker.

(1) Background: Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are fatal neurodegenerative diseases. Biomarkers could help with defining patients' prognoses and stratifications. Besides neurofilaments, chitinases are a promising family of possible biomarkers which correlate with neuroinflammatory status. We evaluated the plasmatic levels of CHI3L1 in MNDs, MND mimics, and healthy controls (HCs). (2) Methods: We used a sandwich ELISA to quantify the CHI3L1 in plasma samples from 44 MND patients, 7 hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) patients, 9 MND mimics, and 19 HCs. We also collected a ALSFRSr scale, MRC scale, spirometry, mutational status, progression rate (PR), blood sampling, and neuropsychological evaluation. (3) Results: The plasma levels of the CHI3L1 were different among groups (p = 0.005). Particularly, the MND mimics showed higher CHI3L1 levels compared with the MND patients and HCs. The CHI3L1 levels did not differ among PMA, PLS, and ALS, and we did not find a correlation among the CHI3L1 levels and clinical scores, spirometry parameters, PR, and neuropsychological features. Of note, the red blood cell count and haemoglobin was correlated with the CHI3L1 levels (respectively, p < 0.001, r = 0.63; p = 0.022, and r = 0.52). (4) Conclusions: The CHI3L1 plasma levels were increased in the MND mimics cohort compared with MNDs group. The increase of CHI3L1 in neuroinflammatory processes could explain our findings. We confirmed that the CHI3L1 plasma levels did not allow for differentiation between ALS and HCs, nor were they correlated with neuropsychological impairment.

Shared and Unique Disease Pathways in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease Unveiled in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.

Recent evidence supports an association between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Indeed, prospective population-based studies demonstrated that about one-third of ALS patients develop parkinsonian (PK) signs, even though different neuronal circuitries are involved. In this context, proteomics represents a valuable tool to identify unique and shared pathological pathways. Here, we used two-dimensional electrophoresis to obtain the proteomic profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from PD and ALS patients including a small cohort of ALS patients with parkinsonian signs (ALS-PK). After the removal of protein spots correlating with confounding factors, we applied a sparse partial least square discriminant analysis followed by recursive feature elimination to obtain two protein classifiers able to discriminate (i) PD and ALS patients (30 spots) and (ii) ALS-PK patients among all ALS subjects (20 spots). Functionally, the glycolysis pathway was significantly overrepresented in the first signature, while extracellular interactions and intracellular signaling were enriched in the second signature. These results represent molecular evidence at the periphery for the classification of ALS-PK as ALS patients that manifest parkinsonian signs, rather than comorbid patients suffering from both ALS and PD. Moreover, we confirmed that low levels of fibrinogen in PBMCs is a characteristic feature of PD, also when compared with another movement disorder. Collectively, we provide evidence that peripheral protein signatures are a tool to differentially investigate neurodegenerative diseases and highlight altered biochemical pathways.

Effects of intracellular calcium accumulation on proteins encoded by the major genes underlying amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The aetiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is still poorly understood. The discovery of genetic forms of ALS pointed out the mechanisms underlying this pathology, but also showed how complex these mechanisms are. Excitotoxicity is strongly suspected to play a role in ALS pathogenesis. Excitotoxicity is defined as neuron damage due to excessive intake of calcium ions (Ca2+) by the cell. This study aims to find a relationship between the proteins coded by the most relevant genes associated with ALS and intracellular Ca2+ accumulation. In detail, the profile of eight proteins (TDP-43, C9orf72, p62/sequestosome-1, matrin-3, VCP, FUS, SOD1 and profilin-1), was analysed in three different cell types induced to raise their cytoplasmic amount of Ca2+. Intracellular Ca2+ accumulation causes a decrease in the levels of TDP-43, C9orf72, matrin3, VCP, FUS, SOD1 and profilin-1 and an increase in those of p62/sequestosome-1. These events are associated with the proteolytic action of two proteases, calpains and caspases, as well as with the activation of autophagy. Interestingly, Ca2+ appears to both favour and hinder autophagy. Understanding how and why calpain-mediated proteolysis and autophagy, which are physiological processes, become pathological may elucidate the mechanisms responsible for ALS and help discover new therapeutic targets.

Tailoring patients' enrollment in ALS clinical trials: the effect of disease duration and vital capacity cutoffs.

Objective: To evaluate how Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients' mortality rates change, based on different levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) and disease duration, providing a scheme of mortality rates of a real population of ALS patients to improve the design of future RCTs. Methods: One random spirometry for each ALS patient was selected during four time intervals from disease onset: (1) ≤12 months; (2) ≤18 months; (3) ≤24 months; (4) ≤36 months. Date of spirometry corresponded to date of trial entry, while time interval onset-spirometry to disease duration at enrollment. Mortality rates from inclusion were computed at different time intervals. Based on progression rates, patients were stratified in slow, intermediate and fast progressors. Survival from recruitment was calculated depending on FVC, disease duration and progression rate. Results: We included 659 patients in group 1, 888 in group 2, 1019 in group 3 and 1102 in group 4. Mortality rates were higher in each group at reducing the FVC cutoff used for recruitment (p < 0.001). Median survival decreased when lowering FVC and disease duration cutoffs (p < 0.001); a higher median disease progression rate of included patients led to lower median survival from recruitment. The proportion of recruited fast progressors raised when shortening disease duration and lowering FVC cutoff. Conclusions: This is a simple model for setting eligibility criteria, based on mortality rates of patients depending on FVC and disease duration, to select the best population for RCTs, tailored to trials' primary endpoints and duration.

A novel splice site FUS mutation in a familial ALS case: effects on protein expression.

Objective: To investigate the impact of a novel heterozygous FUS mutation in the acceptor splice site of intron 14 (c.1542 - 1 g > t) on protein expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) from a familial ALS patient. Methods: PBMC were isolated for mRNA analysis (cDNA synthesis, sequencing and one-step RT-PCR), Western Immunoblot (WI), and Immunofluorescence (IF). Results: cDNA analysis revealed the skipping of exon 15 and a premature stop codon at c.228. RT-PCR showed reduced FUS mRNA by more than half compared to a healthy control (HC) and an ALS patient without genetic mutations (wtALS). In WI FUS band intensity in the proband was 30-50% compared to HC and wtALS. An antibody expected to detect only the wild-type protein did not reveal any reduction of FUS band intensity compared to the other antibodies. IF showed no difference among HC, wtALS, and the proband. Discussion: The reduction of FUS mRNA and protein in PBMC suggests the absence of the truncated protein, probably due to nonsense-mediated decay, leading to loss of function.

Validation of the Italian version of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) administered to patients and their caregivers.

Introduction: The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) functional rating scale - revised (ALSFRS-R) is the most widely used tool for the clinical monitoring in ALS patients. Despite his usefulness as a multidimensional scale, the combined score derived from different domains is not linearly related to symptoms severity. The Rasch-Built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) has recently been developed to overcome some of these limitations. Objectives: To validate the Italian version of the ROADS scale and assess the reliability of its administration to patients versus their respective caregivers and the correlation to the corresponding ALSFRS-R. Methods: In the Turin ALS Center, the ROADS Scale questionnaire was administered together with ALSFRS-R to 55 ALS patients and their caregivers during regular follow-up assessments. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman's rho, Bland-Altman difference plots, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), one-way random effects were used for proper comparison. Results: Their correlation coefficient between patients and caregivers ROADS was found to be very high (ICC 0.95, p < 0.001). Stratifying for age, sex, site of onset, type of caregiver, disease duration, and progression rate, ICC values that did not change significantly among the considered categories. We also found a high correlation between ROADS and ALSFRS-R total score (patients' correlation coefficient: 0.88). Conclusions: The Italian version of the ROADS scale is a valid and reliable tool to monitor disease burden, showing a high level of agreement between the responses given by patients and caregivers.

Phenotype Analysis of Fused in Sarcoma Mutations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Background and Objectives: Pathogenic variations in fused in sarcoma (FUS) are among the most common genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) worldwide. They are supposedly characterized by a homogeneous pure motor phenotype with early-onset and short disease duration. However, a few FUS-mutated cases with a very late disease onset and slow progression have been reported. To analyze genotype-phenotype correlations and identify the prognostic factors in FUS-ALS cases. Methods: We identified and cross-sectionally analyzed 22 FUS-ALS patient histories from a single-center cohort of 2,615 genetically tested patients and reviewed 289 previously published FUS-ALS cases. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, followed by the log-rank test and multivariate Cox analysis. Results: Survival of FUS-ALS is age-dependent: In our cohort, early-onset cases had a rapid disease progression and short survival (p = 0.000003) while the outcome of FUS-mutated patients with mid-to-late onset did not differ from non-FUS-ALS patients (p = 0.437). Meta-analysis of literature data confirmed this trend (p = 0.00003). This survival pattern is not observed in other ALS-related genes in our series. We clustered FUS-ALS patients in 3 phenotypes: (1) axial ALS, with upper cervical and dropped-head onset in mid-to-late adulthood; (2) benign ALS, usually with a late-onset and slow disease progression; and (3) juvenile ALS, often with bulbar onset and preceded by learning disability or mild mental retardation. Those phenotypes arise from different mutations. Discussion: We observed specific genotype-phenotype correlations of FUS-ALS and identified age at onset as the most critical prognostic factor. Our results demonstrated that FUS mutations underlie a specific subtype of ALS and enable a careful stratification of newly diagnosed FUS-ALS cases for clinical course and potential therapeutic windows. This will be crucial in the light of incoming gene-specific therapy.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caregiver burden and patients' quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To assess patients Quality of life (QoL) and the burden of their caregivers during Covid-19 pandemic and specifically the impact of two-month lockdown period. Methods: In April 2020, a total of 60 patients and 59 caregivers were administered by phone scales assessing patients' QoL (McGill QoL Questionnaire), general health status (EQ-5D-5L), and caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview). The administration was repeated one month after the end of lockdown measures, with the addition of a qualitative questionnaire (COVID-QoL Questionnaire) exploring family reorganization and personal perception of lock down. Results: QoL and perceived health status did not worsen during lockdown, while caregiver burden increased (p = 0.01). Patient's QoL and caregiver burden were inversely correlated at T1 (ZBI total score mildly correlated with Mc Gill existential subscore, p = 0.02, rho = 0.30 and with Mc Gill total score, p = 0.05, rho = 0.265). No significant correlations were found at T2. According to the COVID-QoL questionnaire, caregivers perceived lower family help compared to patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Restricted measures of lockdown period during COVID-19 pandemic did not result in a significant reduction of QoL in our cohort of ALS patients, while caregiver burden significantly increased. ALS motor impairment may have played a role in the unchanged life conditions of patients. Instead, the restriction of family help for primary caregivers could be responsible of their increased burden, reflecting the importance of a wide social support in the management of this clinical condition.

Markers of blood-brain barrier disruption increase early and persistently in COVID-19 patients with neurological manifestations.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with disorders affecting the peripheral and the central nervous system. A high number of patients develop post-COVID-19 syndrome with the persistence of a large spectrum of symptoms, including neurological, beyond 4 weeks after infection. Several potential mechanisms in the acute phase have been hypothesized, including damage of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). We tested weather markers of BBB damage in association with markers of brain injury and systemic inflammation may help in identifying a blood signature for disease severity and neurological complications. Methods: Blood biomarkers of BBB disruption (MMP-9, GFAP), neuronal damage (NFL) and systemic inflammation (PPIA, IL-10, TNFα) were measured in two COVID-19 patient cohorts with high disease severity (ICUCovid; n=79) and with neurological complications (NeuroCovid; n=78), and in two control groups free from COVID-19 history, healthy subjects (n=20) and patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; n=51). Samples from COVID-19 patients were collected during the first and the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Lombardy, Italy. Evaluations were done at acute and chronic phases of the COVID-19 infection. Results: Blood biomarkers of BBB disruption and neuronal damage are high in COVID-19 patients with levels similar to or higher than ALS. NeuroCovid patients display lower levels of the cytokine storm inducer PPIA but higher levels of MMP-9 than ICUCovid patients. There was evidence of different temporal dynamics in ICUCovid compared to NeuroCovid patients with PPIA and IL-10 showing the highest levels in ICUCovid patients at acute phase. On the contrary, MMP-9 was higher at acute phase in NeuroCovid patients, with a severity dependency in the long-term. We also found a clear severity dependency of NFL and GFAP levels, with deceased patients showing the highest levels. Discussion: The overall picture points to an increased risk for neurological complications in association with high levels of biomarkers of BBB disruption. Our observations may provide hints for therapeutic approaches mitigating BBB disruption to reduce the neurological damage in the acute phase and potential dysfunction in the long-term.