Cytokeratin staining for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Frozen section and intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC(N)) are 2 methods used for intraoperative pathologic assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The SLN evaluation of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) results in a relatively high number of false-negative results using either of these methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added benefits that intraoperative immunohistochemical-cytokeratin staining (I(CK-IHC)) can bring to IIC(N) in the evaluation of SLN in patients with ILC. METHODS: A total of 59 breast cancer patients with ILC underwent an SLN biopsy evaluated by our standard IIC(N) assessment in addition to I(CK-IHC). The results of IIC(N) with I(CK-IHC) were compared with the final histopathologic assessment consisting of standard hematoxylin and eosin staining and additional cytokeratin staining of nodes. RESULTS: Intraoperative evaluation of SLN using IIC(N) and I(CK-IHC) correctly diagnosed the nodal status in 45 of 59 (76.3%) patients. On final histopathologic assessment, 31 of 59 (52.5%) patients were found to have positive nodes. Using I(CK-IHC), 17 of these 31 positive cases (54.8%) were detected. Using IIC(N) alone, without the benefit of I(CK-IHC), only 13 of 31 (41.9%) positive cases were detected intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ILC, I(CK-IHC) staining in addition to IIC(N) improves accuracy over using IIC(N) alone. In this study, I(CK-IHC) staining demonstrated a 12.9% improvement in the detection of SLN metastases in patients with ILC. Cytopathologists should consider employing I(CK-IHC) staining to evaluate the touch-imprint slides of SLN in ILC patients.

The clinical relevance of positive sentinel nodes only versus positive nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in clinical outcomes for patients with histologically positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN+) compared with patients with histologically positive nonsentinel second echelon lymph nodes (NSLN+). METHODS: Eight hundred thirteen node positive patients from a prospectively accrued database of 3200 patients who underwent sentinel node mapping were evaluated. In all, 506 of the 813 patients (62%) were SLN+ only and 307 of the 813 patients (38%) were SLN+ plus at least one NSLN+. Patients' overall survival and disease-free survival were obtained and statistical analyses performed comparing the two groups. RESULTS: As the number of NSLN+ increased, there was a significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) between those patients who had 0 to 4 NSLN+ and those who had 5 or more NSLN+. The SLN+ only patients did not show significant differences with respect to survival, based on the number of SLN+ (overall survival, disease-free survival; P = 0.742). CONCLUSIONS: The survival (overall survival, disease-free survival) for patients with 3 or more SLN+ was not statistically different than for patients with 1 or 2 SLN+ (P = 0.742). However, an alteration of biologic behavior was observed when multiple NSLN+ contain metastatic breast cancer. Involvement of 5 or more NSLN+ portends a significantly (P = 0.001) worse prognosis, regardless of the number of SLN+.

Effect of 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This trial examines the utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of occult breast disease and its effect on surgical treatment. METHODS: Between October 2000 and March 2002, 76 of 1289 patients underwent bilateral breast MRI within 4 months of a mammogram. The MRI scan, mammogram, pathology reports, and physicians' notes were reviewed to determine impact of MRI on surgical treatment. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging detected 23 additional lesions in 19 patients not detected by mammogram. Cancer occult to mammography was detected by MRI in 6 women, constituting 7.9%. Magnetic resonance imaging impacted surgical treatment plans in 10 of 76 (13.2%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is effective at identifying new subclinical breast disease not seen on mammography. Ten of 76 patients (13.2%) who underwent MRI had their surgical management altered due to MRI findings. Specific criteria should be studied to know which subgroups would benefit most from breast MRI.

Clinical considerations in breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping: a Moffitt review.

Lymphatic mapping redefined the clinical significance of axillary lymph nodes in the treatment of breast cancer. Current literature supports the concept that any patient diagnosed with invasive breast cancer should in fact have their sentinel lymph nodes evaluated. However, there are many cases of " special situations in lymphatic mapping " . These special situations mark an important point that should be considered: When and who should undergo lymphatic mapping? A summary of these considerations/cases will be the focus of this report.

Use of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral breast recurrence or second primary breast cancer can develop in patients who have undergone breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This brings into question the necessity of complete axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) versus a second SLNB (remapping). Our objective is to determine the feasibility of a reoperative SLNB. STUDY DESIGN: A review of patients receiving a reoperative SLNB between April 1994 and December 2006 was conducted with IRB approval. Fifty-six patients underwent a second SLNB on the ipsilateral side an average of 42.5 months after their first SLNB. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully remapped in 45 of 56 (80.4%) patients. Of 45 patients successfully remapped, 36 (80%) were node negative and were spared CALND. There was only 1 patient (2.2%) in whom a sentinel lymph node was identified outside of the ipsilateral axilla. At 26 months mean followup for the second SLNB, there have been no axillary recurrences and 1 death. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that remapping sentinel nodes in patients with ipsilateral recurrence or new primary breast cancer after SLNB achieved success in 80.4% of patients. Overall, 80.0% (36 of 45) of the successfully remapped patients were spared a CALND.

Sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for determining axillary status and treatment prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy assesses an in vivo tumor response while increasing breast conservation. Axillary clearance of nodal disease after treatment defines prognostic stratification. Our study objective was to show that sentinel node staging before treatment can optimize posttreatment prognostic stratification in clinically N0 patients. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 42 (47%) clinically palpable or image-detected nodes (cN+) were histologically confirmed before treatment (group 1), and 47 (53%) patients without palpable lymph nodes (cN0) had a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy before treatment (group 2). Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, 82 (92%) of 89 patients had node-positive disease before treatment. Seven (8%) of 89 had negative SLNs and no completion axillary lymph node dissection, 24 (27%) patients had a complete pathologic axillary response (pCRAX; 11 [26%] of 42 in group 1 and 13 [33%] of 40 in group 2), and 58 (65%) of 89 had residual disease in the axilla. Breast-conserving therapy was applied to 27 (30%) of 89 patients. The seven SLN-negative patients had no axillary recurrence at 25 months, and pCRAX patients had a significantly higher overall survival than patients with residual disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the prognostic stratification of patients with a complete pathologic axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of SLN biopsy to cN0 patients before treatment increased accurate nodal staging by 53%, eliminated completion axillary lymph node dissection in 15%, and demonstrated an improved prognosis in 28% of pCRAX patients. SLN biopsy before treatment provides accurate staging of cN0 patients; allows acquisition of standard treatment markers, prognostic biomarkers, and microarray analysis; and affords prognostic stratification after treatment.

Accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology for sentinel lymph node evaluation in the treatment of breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The current report provides results from a large retrospective analysis of intraoperative imprint cytology performed on axillary sentinel lymph nodes (IIC(N)) removed over the course of 2137 breast surgeries (4905 lymph nodes). It is hoped that these results may serve as benchmarks for those interested in using this technique. METHODS: The current study included 2078 patients with T1-2 invasive breast carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and IIC(N). Lymph nodes were bivalved, imprinted, stained with Diff-Quik (Baxter Diagnostics, McGaw Park, IL), and reviewed by a cytopathologist. A positive intraoperative diagnosis led to immediate complete axillary lymph node dissection (CALND). On final pathology, lymph nodes found to be negative on hematoxylin and eosin staining were submitted for cytokeratin staining. RESULTS: Of the 2137 cases for which SLNB was performed, 673 were found to have positive lymph node status on final pathology. Of these 673 cases, 359 were identified by IIC(N), resulting in a sensitivity rate of 53.3%. The specificity and overall accuracy rates for this technique were 99.5% and 85.0%, respectively. In IDC cases, IIC(N) had a sensitivity rate of 55.5%, compared with 38.7% in ILC cases. Based on these results, the reoperative CALND rate was calculated to be approximately 14.7%, with 54.5% of these reoperative procedures being performed for cases in which lymph nodes positive only for micrometastases were found. Macrometastasis-positive lymph nodes that went undetected by IIC(N) were present in only 154 of the 2137 cases examined (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: IIC(N) accurately predicts final lymph node status in 85.0% of patients. Although the accuracy of this technique varies with tumor size and type, IIC(N) remains a time-efficient and cost-effective adjunct to SLNB.

Novel techniques in sentinel lymph node mapping and localization of nonpalpable breast lesions: the Moffitt experience.

The concept of lymphatic mapping has helped to redefine the clinical significance of lymph nodes with respect to breast cancer. The combination technique using both blue dye and radiocolloid is the most effective method of lymphatic mapping. The data in the literature support the concept that all patients undergoing lumpectomy or especially mastectomy should undergo lymphatic mapping if a diagnosis of invasive cancer is remotely possible. The low morbidity, high sensitivity, and specificity of mapping indicate its use for increasing numbers of patients thought initially not to be candidates for the procedure.

Radioactive seed localization breast biopsy and lumpectomy: can specimen radiographs be eliminated?

BACKGROUND: Wire localization (WL) is the current standard for surgical diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Many disadvantages inherent to WL are solved with radioactive seed localization (RSL). This trial investigated the ability of RSL to reduce the need for specimen radiographs and operating room delays associated with WL. METHODS: A total of 134 women were entered onto an institutional review board-approved study. RSL was performed by placing a titanium seed containing.29 to 20 mCi of iodine-125 to within 1 cm of the suggestive breast lesion. The surgeon used a handheld gamma detector to locate and excise the iodine-125 seed and the lesion. RESULTS: Specimen radiographs were eliminated in 98 (79%) of 124 patients. Surgical seed retrieval was 100% in 124 patients. No seed migration occurred after correct radiographical placement. A total of 26 (21%) of 124 patients required a specimen radiograph; 22 (85%) of these 26 were performed for microcalcifications. CONCLUSIONS: After surgical removal, RSL can eliminate specimen radiographs when the radiologist accurately places the seed and the pathologist grossly identifies the lesion. If small microcalcifications are noted before surgery, then specimen radiographs may be necessary. RSL reduced requirements for specimen radiographs, decreased OR time, improved incision placement, and improved resections to clear margins.