Erector spinae block for postoperative pain management in lumbar disc hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Lumbar disc herniation is the most common spinal disorder and various less invasive techniques such as microdiscectomy have been described. However, postoperative pain management in patients undergoing discectomy is still commonly inadequate. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively easier technique with lower risks of complications, and can be performed to provide postoperative analgesia for various procedures. The current study aimed to determine the effect of ESP block on postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent elective lumbar disc herniation repair surgeries. METHODS: Fifty-four ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years scheduled for elective discectomy surgery were included in the study. Patients were randomized either to the ESP or control group. Ultrasound-guided ESP block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was performed preoperatively in the ESP group patients and a sham block was performed with 20 mL normal saline in the control group patients. All the patients were provided with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia devices containing morphine. Morphine consumption and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain were recorded 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: A significantly lower morphine consumption was observed at 6, 12, and 24 h timepoints in the ESP group (p < 0.05 for each timepoint). Total morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery decreased by 57% compared to that of the control group (11.3 ± 9.5 mg in the ESP group and 27 ± 16.7 mg in the control group). NRS scores were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ESP block provided effective analgesia in patients who underwent lumbar disc herniation surgery. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT03744689.

Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypospadias is a common congenital malformation in pediatric patients. Surgical repair of this malformation is a painful procedure and has long-term effects. Pudendal and penile nerve blocks are commonly preferred techniques for maintaining postoperative analgesia. However, the conventional landmark-based penile block technique involves numerous potential complications and provides a shorter analgesic period compared to the pudendal block. A promising ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block was recently described. We aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided penile nerve block with that of neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block. METHOD: Thirty-three patients aged 1-7 years were included in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were divided into two groups and received either ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block or neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block. All blocks were performed by the same two anesthesiologists, and the same surgeons performed the surgical procedures. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was used for postoperative pain management. The primary outcome of the study was time to first analgesic requirement. Secondary outcomes were FLACC scores at different time points, and types and cumulative doses of analgesic drugs. RESULTS: Dorsal penile nerve block provided longer analgesia than pudendal nerve block (32.29 ± 5.47 hours and 21.13 ± 3.53 hours, respectively; differences in mean: 11.16, 95% CI: 7.873-14.465) (P < .001). FLACC scores at the time of first analgesic requirement were significantly lower in dorsal penile nerve block group than pudendal nerve block group (median [IQR]: 2 [2-2.5] and 3 [3-5], respectively; differences in median: -1, 95% CI: -1.851 to -0.149) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block provided a longer analgesic period and reduced opioid consumption compared to neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block.

Analgesia nociception index (ani) monitoring in patients with thoracic paravertebral block: a randomized controlled study.

The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitoring during intraoperative period for patients with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) undergoing breast surgery under general anesthesia. This prospective randomized trial was performed after receiving ethics committee approval in 44 patients who were scheduled to undergo breast surgery under general anesthesia. TPVB was performed in the preoperative period using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% at T4 level. Anesthesia maintenance was provided with sevoflurane in O2: air mixture and remifentanil infusion. Intraoperative concentration of sevoflurane was adjusted according to BIS monitoring keeping the values between 40-60. In a randomized manner patients were divided into two groups. In Group control (n:22) intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate was regulated according to hemodynamic parameters, in Group ANI (n:22) remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to keep ANI monitoring values between 50-70. Total remifentanil consumption was recorded as micrograms. Demographic data, anesthesia and surgery time, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, post-anesthesia recovery time and requirement of additional analgesic in the recovery drug were recorded. There were no significant difference in demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, post-anesthesia recovery time and requirement of additional analgesic drug. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in total remifentanil consumption (Group ANI: 629.6 ± 422.4 mcg, Group control: 965.2 ± 543.6 mcg) (p = 0.027). In patients under general anesthesia ANI monitorisation can help optimisation of opioid consumption and provide data about nociception/antinociception intraoperatively but further experimental and clinical trials in a large scale are needed.

One operator's experience of ultrasound guided lumbar plexus block for paediatric hip surgery.

Lumbar plexus block has been shown to be effective for providing postoperative analgesia after major hip surgeries in children. The goal of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound guidance during lumbar plexus block in children undergoing hip surgery for congenital hip dislocation. After obtaining local institutional ethical committee approval and parental informed consent, ASA I or II, 1-6 years old children undergoing hip surgery were included into the study. Lumbar plexus block was performed after general anaesthesia using ultrasound guided Shamrock Method. Bupivacaine 0.25 % was used during block performance. Dose of the local anaesthetic was 1 ml/kg and the maximum dose was limited to 20 ml. In the postoperative period pain was assessed using modified CHEOPS (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) pain score. If pain score in the postoperative period exceeded 3, patients received IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg-1. Morphine 0.1 mg/kg-1 IV was planned to administer if pain scores were still higher than 3 despite paracetamol treatment. 75 patients whose mean age was 47 months were enrolled into the study. All blocks were performed successfully and without complications. Mean time for the first analgesic is found as 10 h after surgery. Only one patient required morphine in the recovery unit and 23 patients received paracetamol. US guided lumbar plexus block using Shamrock Method is an effective technique for providing postoperative analgesia after hip surgeries in children and it's effect lasts for 8-12 h after surgery.

Ultrasound guided bilateral cervical plexus block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following thyroid surgery.

Thyroid surgery may cause severe postoperative pain and discomfort for patients. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is one of the regional anesthesia techniques that can provide postoperative analgesia for thyroid surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate analgesic effect of ultrasound (US) guided SCPB in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Fifty ASA I-II patients, aged 20-60, were included in this single blinded study. In a randomized and prospective manner patients were allocated to either SCPB or control group. Bilateral SCPB was performed preoperatively under US guidance using 10 ml 0.25 % bupivacaine for each side. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled analgesia method with morphine intravenous. Primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary outcome measures were comparison of opioid side effects like nausea and vomiting and analyzed using Chi square test. VAS scores for pain at postoperative 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th h were similar in SCPB and control groups (Median VAS values were 2.5, 3, 2, 0 and 3.5, 3, 2, 0 respectively). Postoperative morphine consumption was lower in SCPB group compared to control group at postoperative 6th, 12th, and 24th h (Median doses of morphine consumption were 4, 8, 9 and 5, 9, 11 mg respectively) (P < 0.05). Eight patients in the control group and six patients in the SCBP group had vomiting. Seven patients in the SCPB and none in the control group had hoarseness. Our study has shown that US guided SCPB has a significant analgesic effect in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Further studies are required to search for the optimal LA dose during US guided SCPB.

A comparison of the EZ-Blocker with a Cohen Flex-Tip blocker for one-lung ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: The EZ-Blocker (IQ Medical Ventures BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands) is a newly designed device for one-lung ventilation. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Cohen Flex-Tip bronchial blocker (Cook, Bloomington, IN) and the EZ-Blocker for one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. DESIGN: Randomized and prospective. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 40 patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to 2 study groups: Patients who received the Cohen Flex-Tip blocker were assigned to the Cohen group, and patients who received the EZ-Blocker were assigned to the EZ group. In both groups, fiberoptic guidance was used during placement of the bronchial blockers. Comparisons between the groups included the time to correct placement, the incidence of malpositioning, and the satisfaction level of the surgeon (good, fair, poor). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One-lung ventilation was achieved successfully for all patients. The time to correct placement (mean±SD) was significantly shorter in the EZ group (146±56 seconds) compared with the Cohen group (241±51 seconds; p=0.01). The incidence of malpositioning was significantly lower in the EZ group compared with the Cohen group (p=0.018). Surgeon satisfaction was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, both bronchial blockers provided similar surgical exposure during thoracic procedures. The EZ-Blocker had a shorter time to correct positioning and less frequent intraoperative malpositioning.

The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway devices such as the LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) and I-gel, which have an additional lumen for the insertion of a gastric tube, can be useful in the management of the difficult airway. OBJECTIVE: To test the performance of these two devices in the difficult paediatric airway. DESIGN: Randomised double-blind study. SETTING: Anaesthesia department, university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II children undergoing elective surgery. INTERVENTION: After obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent from the parents, we compared the size 2 LMA-S with the I-gel in a simulated airway scenario made more difficult by using a cervical collar to limit mouth opening and neck movement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary aim was to compare the oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA-S and the I-gel. The secondary aims were to compare success rate, insertion time, time to pass a gastric tube and fibreoptic view of the larynx. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal leak pressure (mean ±â€ŠSD) for the LMA-S was significantly higher than with the I-gel (20.9 ±â€Š3.2 versus 18.9 ±â€Š3.2 cmH2O, P = 0.019). First attempt success rate for the LMA-S was 100 and 90% for the I-gel (P > 0.05). Insertion time of the LMA-S was shorter than I-gel (11.2 ±â€Š1.8 versus 13.5 ±â€Š2.4 s, P = 0.001). Gastric tube placement was possible in all patients. The mean insertion time of the gastric tube was shorter with the LMA-S than with the I-gel (10.3 ±â€Š3.6 versus 12.7 ±â€Š3.2 s, P = 0.009). Fibreoptic laryngeal views were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the simulated difficult airway in children, both airway devices provided effective ventilation. Paediatric size 2 LMA-S sustained a higher airway pressure before leaking and was quicker to insert than the I-gel equivalent. These differences may not be clinically significant.

Ultrasound-guided greater auricular nerve block for surgical anesthesia of the external ear.

The Greater Auricular Nerve (GAN), a branch of the cervical plexus, is used to provide anesthesia or pain relief in the ear and neck region. This case report details the use of a GAN block in a 71-year-old male patient with basal cell carcinoma on his right auricular helix. Due to multiple comorbidities (myocardial infarction resulting in a cardiac stent, hypertension), regional anesthesia was preferred. We aim to share our experience with the GAN block for ear surgery.

Visual Evaluation of Plethysmographic Waveforms: Introducing the Simple Systolic Ratio as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness.

Objective: For patient safety, maintaining hemodynamic stability during surgical procedures is critical. Dynamic indices [such as systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV)], have recently seen an increase in use. Given the risks associated with such invasive techniques, there is growing interest in non-invasive monitoring methods-and plethysmographic waveform analysis. However, many such non-invasive methods involve intricate calculations or brand-specific monitors. This study introduces the simple systolic ratio (SSR), derived from pulse oximetry tracings, as a non-invasive method to assess fluid responsiveness. Methods: This prospective observational study included 25 adult patients whose SPV, PPV, and SSR values were collected at 30-min intervals during open abdominal surgery. The SSR was defined as the ratio of the tallest waveform to the shortest waveform within pulse tracings. The correlations among SSR, SPV, and PPV were analyzed. Additionally, anaesthesia specialists visually assessed pulse oximetry tracings to determine fluid responsiveness using the SSR method. Results: Strong correlations were observed between SSR and both SPV (r = 0.715, P < 0.001) and PPV (r = 0.702, P < 0.001). Receiver operator curve analysis identified optimal SSR thresholds for predicting fluid responsiveness at 1.47 for SPV and 1.50 for PPV. A survey of anaesthesia specialists using the SSR method to visually assess fluid responsiveness produced an accuracy rate of 83%. Conclusion: Based on the strong correlations it exhibits with traditional markers, SSR has great potential as a clinical tool, especially in resource-limited settings. However, further research is needed to establish its role, especially as it pertains to its universal applicability across monitoring devices.

Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy for Hip Fracture Surgery: A Case Report.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a muscular dystrophy that can affect individuals of all age groups. Its prevalence is reported to be 0.4-1 in 10,000 people. Because of the low occurrence of FSHD, anaesthetic management is primarily based on expert opinions, case reviews, or brief series. Here, we present the case of a 72-year-old woman with FSHD who underwent hip fracture (HF) surgery. To prevent respiratory compromise due to FSHD, we opted for lumbar-sacral plexus block. To the best of our knowledge, there is no information in the literature regarding the use of combined lumbar-sacral plexus block in patients with FSHD undergoing HF surgery.

Anesthesiological and surgical perspectives on using 8 mmHg versus 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effects of 8 mmHg and 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (PNP) pressures on operative, postoperative, and anesthesiological parameters in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: In this prospective study, 43 patients undergoing RARP performed by a single experienced surgeon were randomly assigned to either the low-pressure group (8 mmHg - Group I) or the standard-pressure group (12 mmHg - Group II). We evaluated the operative and postoperative parameters from both urological and anesthesiological perspectives. All patients were treated using the AirSeal® insufflation system. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of console time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, or hospital length of stay. PNP was increased due to bleeding in six patients in the 8 mmHg group and two patients in the 12 mmHg group. Except for the heart rate measured five minutes after the initial incision, there were no observed differences between the groups in terms of blood pressure, ventilation, and administered medications. The heart rate was significantly lower in Group I (54.4 vs. 68.8, p=0.006). Additionally, during the surgery, the number of manipulations performed by the anesthesiologists, including drug administrations and ventilator management, was significantly lower in Group I (6.1 vs. 9.6, p=0.041). CONCLUSION: In RARP, while the 8 mmHg PNP pressure does not demonstrate differences in operative parameters compared to the 12 mmHg pressure, it offers the advantage of requiring fewer anesthetic interventions, thus minimizing the impact on cardiovascular and respiratory systems.

The Ventilatory Changes of Pediatric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Patients.

Objective: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has proven to be a successful treatment method for achalasia in both adult and pediatric patients. Yet, there is a lack of evidence for anaesthetic management of pediatric patients who underwent POEM procedure. In this study, we aim to present perioperative and postoperative management strategies for pediatric patients with achalasia from in anaesthesia aspect. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for 16 pediatric patients at a single center who underwent POEM procedure for achalasia between 2017 and 2020. Patients' data regarding demographics, preoperative diet, body mass index, perioperative monitoring and vitals, airway management, anaesthesia maintenance, mechanical ventilation settings duration of recovery, length of stay, pain management and adverse events were evaluated. Results: The study cohort included 7 female and 9 male patients with a mean age of 5.5 years. Anaesthesia maintenance was provided with 0.8-1.2 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane in a 40-60% O2-air mixture, Remifentanil infusion and bolus doses of Rocuronium. The median age was 3 years for patients ventilated in pressure controlled ventilation mode and 10 years in volume controlled ventilation mode. Respiration rate and minute ventilation were adjusted to maintain end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) below 45 mmHg. Needle decompression was applied for 14 patients (87.5%) for treatment of capnoperitoneum. The mean procedure duration and recovery room duration were 66 (±22.9) minutes and 62 (±21) minutes, respectively. Postoperative pain management is provided with paracetamol and tramadol in total 8 patients (50%). There was no adverse event during postoperative period and all patients discharged in a mean time of 3 days. Conclusion: POEM has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients. Due to challenging nature of the pediatric patients, it is important to acknowledge that the procedure requires specialized anaesthesia management. Management of perioperative complications of increased ETCO2 requires understanding the physiologic results of pneumo-mediastinum and pneumo-peritoneum. Beside the known anaesthetic management strategies, a tailored approach should be adopted for each patient. Further investigations should be conducted to develop standardized management.

The effect of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative analgesia in robot assisted prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain continues to represent an important problem even after minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which results in discomfort in the postoperative period and sometimes prolongs hospital stays. Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are used in addition to systemic analgesics with the multimodal approach in postoperative pain management. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks are becoming increasingly important, especially in minimally invasive surgeries. Another important cause of discomfort is urinary catheter pain. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effect of rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort in robotic prostatectomy operations. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from March to August 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approval for the study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent, and adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Condition classification I to III planned for robotic prostatectomy operations under general anesthesia were enrolled. Following computer-assisted randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups, and general anesthesia was induced in all cases. Rectus sheath block was performed under general anesthesia and at the end of the surgery. No fascial plane block was applied to the patients in the non-rectus sheath block (RSB) group.Postoperative pain and urinary catheter pain were assessed using a numerical rating scale. Fentanyl was planned as rescue analgesia in the recovery room. In case of numerical rating scale scores of 4 or more, patients were given 50 µg fentanyl IV, repeated if necessary. The total fentanyl dose administered was recorded in the recovery room. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was planned for all patients. All patients' pain (postoperative pain at surgical site and urethral catheter discomfort) scores and total morphine consumption in the recovery unit and during follow-ups on the ward (3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) in the postoperative period were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Total tramadol consumption during follow-up on the ward was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Fentanyl consumption in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group at 0 to 12 hours and 12 to 24 hours. Total opioid consumption was 8.81 mg in the RSB group and 19.87 mg in the non-RSB group. A statistically significant decrease in urethral catheter pain was noted in the RSB group at all time points. CONCLUSION: RSB exhibits effective analgesia by significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption in robotic prostatectomy operations.

Selective Dorsal Scapular Nerve and Long Thoracic Nerve Blocks for Rescue Analgesia in Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis Surgery: A Case Report.

Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (STA) surgery is performed to stabilize the scapula in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). Postoperative pain could be a major problem even while using erector spinae plane block (ESPB). We performed a preoperative ESPB with an intraoperative ESPB catheter, but rescue analgesia was needed for pain in the periscapular area in the postoperative period. The patient's pain score was reduced by applying an ultrasound-guided dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) and long thoracic nerve (LTN) block. Selective DSN and LTN blocks can be effective in enhancing postoperative analgesia in STA surgery.

Effects of erector spinae plane block on opioid consumption in patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane block is a relatively new regional anesthesia technique that is expected to provide some benefits for postoperative analgesia. This study investigated the effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption in kidney donors undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-two donors scheduled for elective hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were randomly divided into the block (25 donors) and control (27 donors) groups. Donors in the block group received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance, whereas the control group received no block treatment. The primary outcome measure was the amount of fentanyl administered via patient-controlled analgesia at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included the duration of stay, opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit, and pain scores during the recording hours. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding total opioid consumption converted to intravenous morphine equivalent administered via patient-controlled analgesia (33.3±21.4 mg vs. 37.5±18.5 mg; P=0.27) and in the postanesthesia care unit (1.5±0.9 mg vs. 1.4±0.8 mg; P=0.55). The duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (86.3±32.6 min vs. 85.7±33.6 min; P=0.87) was similar between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the postoperative donor-reported NRS pain scores (P>0.05 for all the time points). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative erector spinae plane block is not an effective strategy for reducing postoperative pain or opioid consumption in patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Different block combinations are needed for optimal pain management in hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.