Correlation of New Criteria for Malnutrition Assessment in Hospitalized Patients: AND-ASPEN Versus SGA.

Objectives: Identifying malnutrition in the hospitalized patient is important as it correlates with increased morbidity. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is recognized in the literature as a standardized and validated method for diagnosing malnutrition. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) developed a comprehensive method (AND-ASPEN criteria) for diagnosing malnutrition that has yet to be validated. In effort to validate the AND-ASPEN criteria for identifying malnutrition, this study investigated whether AND-ASPEN criteria would correlate with SGA in hospitalized patients.Methods: A cohort of patients >18 years old admitted to a tertiary hospital and assessed for malnutrition using AND-ASPEN criteria were randomly selected, and a retrospective review was completed. Criteria needed to perform SGA were extracted from the electronic medical record and SGA data were calculated and compared to AND-ASPEN malnutrition scoring. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between the SGA and AND-ASPEN malnutrition score. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median or frequency.Results: A total of 409 patients were reviewed and 225 (55%) met inclusion criteria. SGA malnutrition scores classified 47.1% (n = 106) of subjects as well-nourished, 32% (n = 72) moderately malnourished, and 20.9% (n = 47) severely malnourished. The AND-ASPEN malnutrition scores classified 43.8% (n = 179) of the subjects as well-nourished, 26.2% (n = 107) as moderately malnourished, and 30.1% (n = 123) severely malnourished. The SGA score and AND-ASPEN malnutrition diagnosis were found to be correlated (p < 0.001). There was no association between age or length of stay with either assessment tool.Conclusions: The AND-ASPEN criteria for diagnosing malnutrition correlated with SGA in identifying nutritional status in hospitalized adult patients. Future prospective studies capturing the impact of malnutrition diagnosis, medical and nutrition interventions with patient outcomes are warranted to confirm the impact of early and accurate identification of malnutrition of patient outcomes.

The breath print represents a novel biomarker of malnutrition in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: The breath print is a quantitative measurement of molecules in exhaled breath and represents a new frontier for biomarker identification. It is unknown whether this state-of-the-art, noninvasive method can detect malnutrition. We hypothesize that individuals with malnutrition will present with a distinguishable breath print. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients with previously analyzed breath samples to identify malnutrition. Breath was analyzed by selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Registered dietitians conducted a retrospective chart review to collect malnutrition diagnoses and nutrition status indicators. Patients were categorized into one of four groups: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), PAH with malnutrition (PAH-Mal), control, and control with malnutrition (Control-Mal), based on the malnutrition diagnosis present in the patient's chart. Principle component analysis was conducted to characterize the breath print. A logistic regression model with forward selection was used to detect the best breath predictor combination of malnutrition. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients met inclusion criteria (PAH: 52; PAH-Mal: 10; control: 10; Control-Mal: 2). Levels of 1-octene (PAH-Mal, 5.1 ± 1.2; PAH, 12.5 ± 11.2; P = 0.005) and ammonia (PAH-Mal, 14.6 ± 15.8; PAH, 56.2 ± 64.2; P = 0.013) were reduced in PAH-Mal compared with PAH. The combination of 1-octene (P = 0.010) and 3-methylhexane (P = 0.045) distinguished malnutrition in PAH (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve: 0.8549). CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study provides the first evidence that the breath print is altered in malnutrition. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and establish whether breath analysis may be a useful tool to screen for malnutrition in the clinical setting.

Underrecognition of Malnutrition in Advanced Cancer: The Role of the Dietitian and Clinical Practice Variations.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition (MN) often goes unrecognized due to ineffective screening techniques. Published standards for multidisciplinary care exist but no consensus on best nutritional assessment for hospitalized patients. Malnutrition is common in cancer and adversely affects clinical outcomes. The Cleveland Clinic Nutrition Therapy Department used in-house criteria to classify MN in hospitalized patients. This study aimed to evaluate the registered dietitian (RD)'s role, the use of these criteria in the acute care palliative medicine unit (ACPMU), and investigate MN prevalence and severity among admitted patients with cancer. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed for newly admitted patients with cancer to the ACPMU with a first time RD consult and completed nutritional therapy assessment. Physician (MD) assessments were derived from admission notes. Cox regression model assessed the association of MN prevalence and severity with survival. McNemar's test determined whether a prevalence difference existed between RD and MD. RESULTS: Variations existed in criteria used to identify MN. Seventy percent had MN, with the majority (61%) classed as moderate to severe. Prevalence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.88; P = .002) and severity (HR: 1.22; P = .006) were associated with significantly increased mortality. Evaluations by RD and MD were highly congruent, but MDs underrecorded nutritional status. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition was prevalent and clinically important, even in those on nutritional support. Variations in MN identification were common. Physicians underrecorded MN but were accurate for prevalence and severity when recorded. The data confirm the RD's important role in MN assessment. Comparable clinical practice and better communication between physicians and dietitians should improve cancer care and optimize quality of life.