Sampling of the anterior apical region results in increased cancer detection and upgrading in transrectal repeat saturation biopsy of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether biopsy cores taken via a transrectal approach from the anterior apical region of the prostate in a repeat-biopsy population can result in an increased overall cancer detection rate and in more accurate assessment of the Gleason score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomised (end-fire vs side-fire ultrasound probe) evaluation of 288 men by repeat transrectal saturation biopsy with 28 cores taken from the transition zone, base, mid-lobar, anterior and the anterior apical region located ventro-laterally to the urethra of the peripheral zone. RESULTS: The overall prostate cancer detection rate was 44.4%. Improvement of the overall detection rate by 7.8% could be achieved with additional biopsies of the anterior apical region. Two tumours featuring a Gleason score 7 could only be detected in the anterior apical region. In three cases (2.34%) Gleason score upgrading was achieved by separate analysis of each positive core of the anterior apical region. A five-fold higher cancer detection rate in the anterior apical region compared with the transition zone could be shown. CONCLUSION: Sampling of the anterior apical region results in higher overall cancer detection rate in repeat transrectal saturation biopsies of the prostate. Specimens from this region can detect clinically significant cancer, improve accuracy of the Gleason Scoring and therefore may alter therapy.

Is repeated transurethral resection justified in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of repeated transurethral resection (TUR) in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer. METHODS: A second TUR was performed in 110 consecutive patients (24 women and 86 men) with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer. The mean age was 66 years (range 30 to 85). A second TUR was performed within 4 to 6 weeks after the initial TUR. After the first TUR, the pathologic stage was pTa in 31 patients (28%), pT1 in 76 (70%), and carcinoma in situ in 3 (2%). The pathologic records of the second TUR were reviewed and compared with the findings of the first operation. RESULTS: Cystoscopy before the second TUR was negative in 79 patients. Of these cases, 14 (17.7%) had cancer histologically. The second TUR was negative in 70 patients (63.6%). Twenty-two (20%) had residual cancer of the same stage, 9 (8.2%) had a lower stage, and 9 (8.2%) had a higher stage. Of 31 patients with Stage pTa and 76 patients with Stage pT1 at the first TUR, 19 (61.3%) and 51 (67.1%) had a negative second TUR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a second TUR for patients with superficial bladder cancer for several reasons. A negative second TUR provides important prognostic information. In addition, removal of residual cancer is achieved early. Finally, patients with pT1 G3 tumors are at high risk of residual, or even invasive, cancer and should be offered definitive therapy as early as possible.