Perceptions of older people who have experienced physical restraint.

It is well documented that the use of physical restraints on older people has been linked to negative clinical outcomes. However, less is known about the personal perspective of those who have been restrained. This study examines the perceptions of older people who have experienced physical restraints in a rehabilitation ward. A purposive sample was used of 17 male and female patients who were restrained. The patients were interviewed using the Subjective Experience of Being Restrained instrument (Strumpf and Evans, 1988) which is a semi-structured interview schedule. The most commonly used restraint devices included side rails, screw-on tabletops and reclining chairs. The data were analysed using content analysis. The results indicate mixed feelings regarding physical restraints. Patients' impressions of physical restraints included indifference of the devices to their perceived safety value. Overall, a minority of patients (n = 4) had positive feelings about physical restraints as they provided a sense of security to them. However, the negative comments of the patients were more prevalent and their responses were categorized in terms of institutional control, ritualised care, entrapment and discomfort, and possible alternatives.

Relatives' perceptions of side rail use on the older person in hospital.

With an increasing emphasis on improving standards in the care of older people, the use of physical restraints has received growing attention in the nursing literature. Physical restraint use has been likened to abuse as it impedes the movement of a person, encourages dependence on staff and denies autonomy. Side rails (cot sides, bed rails) can be considered as a physical restrain device. The therapeutic use of restraint has not previously been adequately explained. Furthermore, there is a dearth of literature examining the personal experience of physical restraint use. The Family Interview Guide (Strumpf and Evans, 1988) was used to explore perceptions of nine relatives whose family had side rails used during their care in an older person ward. The findings of the study suggest that while families place value on the perceived safety function of side rails, they nonetheless have worries about their use. These pertain to the risk of patient entrapment and possible injury. Patients' relatives associated side rails with ritualized practice in gerontology and make suggestions for the re-design of side rails. The study also highlights the potential for increased family participation in the decision to use side rails.

Side rails as physical restraints: the need for appropriate assessment.

Side rails are commonly used in the care of the older person. They can be classified as a physical restraint if they restrict the movement of an individual and also if the individual has an inability to have them removed/lowered at will. Advanced age should not be an indicator for side rail use and an individualized approach in patient assessment is advised.

The relationships between health beliefs and utilization of free health examinations in older people living in a community setting in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of demographics and the health beliefs of older people on uptake of a free annual health examination administered by the Twu-Tyan Bureau of Sanitation (TTBS), Pingtung, Taiwan. BACKGROUND: The free health examination is a preventive intervention with potential to detect illness. This programme for older people aged 65 years and over, has been available free in some areas since 1980. METHOD: A stratified random systematic sample of 200 men and women over 65 years was selected and consisted of 100 individuals who had undertaken the free health examination and 100 who had not. A 17-item Health Belief Scale (HBS) was used to glean information on their health beliefs and uptake of a free health examination. FINDINGS: It was found that those with higher education and higher economic status had a greater uptake. Family support was also found to influence take-up. A statistically significant difference was found between the health beliefs of users and nonusers. Users perceived a higher level of seriousness and susceptibility to ill health than nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: A number of practical pointers are given that might help clinicians increase uptake rates in such health promotion programmes. These encompass understanding the influence of key demographical and social factors, perceived susceptibility, severity and benefits of the intervention, barriers to attendance and self-efficacy.

Side rails as physical restraints in the care of older people: a management issue.

This article explores the use of side rails within the context of physical restraint in gerontological practice. It is debated that side rails can be considered as a form of physical restraint if the individual cannot voluntarily remove/lower the device if he/she wishes to do so. The value of side rails as a protective medium is debated with regard to their association with injuries sustained as a result. Side rails should be used with caution and within a risk management context. Frailty should not be an indicator for the use of side rails, an individualized approach to determine patient's suitability to side rails is advocated.