RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether varied or repeated b-values provide better diffusion MRI data for discriminating cortical areas with a data-driven approach. METHODS: Data were acquired from three volunteers at 1.5T with b-values of 800, 1400, 2000 s/mm2 along 64 diffusion-encoding directions. The diffusion signal was sampled from gray matter in seven regions of interest (ROIs). Rotational invariants of the local diffusion profile were extracted as features that characterize local tissue properties. Random forest classification experiments assessed whether classification accuracy improved when data with multiple b-values were used over repeated acquisition of the same (1400 s/mm2) b-value to compare all possible pairs of the seven ROIs. Three data sets from the Human Connectome Project were subjected to similar processing and analysis pipelines in eight ROIs. RESULTS: Three different b-values showed an average improvement in correct classification rates of 5.6% and 4.6%, respectively, in the local and HCP data over repeated measurements of the same b-value. The improvement in correct classification rate reached as high as 16% for individual binary classification experiments between two ROIs. Often using only two of the available three b-values were adequate to make such an improvement in classification rates. CONCLUSION: Acquisitions with varying b-values are more suitable for discriminating cortical areas.
Assuntos
Conectoma , Substância Cinzenta , Encéfalo , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Substância Cinzenta/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por ComputadorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The National COVID-19 Chest Imaging Database (NCCID) is a centralized database containing mainly chest X-rays and computed tomography scans from patients across the UK. The objective of the initiative is to support a better understanding of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) and the development of machine learning technologies that will improve care for patients hospitalized with a severe COVID-19 infection. This article introduces the training dataset, including a snapshot analysis covering the completeness of clinical data, and availability of image data for the various use-cases (diagnosis, prognosis, longitudinal risk). An additional cohort analysis measures how well the NCCID represents the wider COVID-19-affected UK population in terms of geographic, demographic, and temporal coverage. FINDINGS: The NCCID offers high-quality DICOM images acquired across a variety of imaging machinery; multiple time points including historical images are available for a subset of patients. This volume and variety make the database well suited to development of diagnostic/prognostic models for COVID-associated respiratory conditions. Historical images and clinical data may aid long-term risk stratification, particularly as availability of comorbidity data increases through linkage to other resources. The cohort analysis revealed good alignment to general UK COVID-19 statistics for some categories, e.g., sex, whilst identifying areas for improvements to data collection methods, particularly geographic coverage. CONCLUSION: The NCCID is a growing resource that provides researchers with a large, high-quality database that can be leveraged both to support the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and as a test bed for building clinically viable medical imaging models.