Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Hematol ; 103(8): 3155-3163, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907755

RESUMO

Disease recurrence is the leading cause of treatment failure in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Post-transplant maintenance therapy, guided by monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD), is commonly administered; however, relapse rates remain high. This prospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of epigenetic agents as prophylactic therapy in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive AML. Thirty high-risk patients received prophylactic therapy (n = 17 and n = 13 in the chidamide and AZA groups, respectively) between January 2019 and July 2023. 34 high-risk patients who received preemptive treatment due to molecular relapse were included in the analysis. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the prophylactic group compared to the preemptive group (82.82% vs. 51.38%, P = 0.014; 86.42% vs. 56.16%, P = 0.025, respectively); 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 13.8% and 36.40%, respectively (P = 0.037). In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with epigenetic agents may improve long-term prognosis and is well-tolerated in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive high-risk AML. Timely post-transplant prophylactic therapy may be more effective than preemptive therapy based on positive MRD results.


Assuntos
Subunidade alfa 2 de Fator de Ligação ao Core , Epigênese Genética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Subunidade alfa 2 de Fator de Ligação ao Core/genética , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Epigênese Genética/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteína 1 Parceira de Translocação de RUNX1/genética , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasia Residual , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Aloenxertos , Azacitidina/uso terapêutico , Aminopiridinas
2.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1324019, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505288

RESUMO

Introduction: Retrospective studies have suggested that Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) provide a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in patients with liver disease. However, it is uncertain whether this finding can be extended to the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cohort. Therefore, we aim to examine the protective potential of UDCA against SARS-CoV-2 infection in recently received allo-HSCT patients. Methods: During the initial Omicron variant wave in China (December 2022 to February 2023), we conducted a prospective observational study involving 91 hospitalized patients who had undergone allo-HSCT within the previous 6 months as part of the National Longitudinal Cohort of Hematological Diseases (NICHE). Throughout hospitalization, we continuously monitored the status of COVID-19 using SARS-CoV-2 PCR kits or SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests. Results: Among these patients, 67.0% (n = 61) were confirmed to have contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. For the 52 patients evaluated, 23.1% experienced a severe or critical clinical course. There was no difference in the infection rate or severity of COVID-19 between the UDCA group and the non-UDCA group. We found that only patients transplanted between 3 and 6 months ago demonstrated a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those who received allo-HSCT within 3 months (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.241, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.287-8.814, P = 0.016). But other clinical factors, such as administration of UDCA, showed no difference. Notably, only age ≥38 years old remained as an independent risk factor for a severe clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 3.664, 95% CI: 1.129-13.007, P = 0.035). Conclusion: The effectiveness of UDCA in protecting newly allo-HSCT recipients against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed. Presently, the most effective strategy appears to be minimizing exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04645199, identifier NCT04645199.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Adulto , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA