Impact of surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer and subsequent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical staging (SS) is the gold standard for determination of the true extent of a patient's disease and is an important prognostic factor in cervical cancer. We investigated whether lymph node dissection (LND) prior to chemotherapy (CT) followed by radical surgery (RS) could modified overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: We performed a cohort analysis of 98 patients with cervical carcinoma. The experimental group consisted of 36 patients who underwent SS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and then by RS (objective response) or chemo-radiation therapy (with or without subsequent surgery when not possible). The control group consisted of 62 similarly treated patients without pretreatment SS. The value of this procedure as a diagnostic tool in defining the extent of disease was evaluated. Furthermore, LND/CT-associated treatment complications and the impacts on OS and DFS were also evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen (38.9%) patients had pelvic LN metastases and three (8.3%) patients had pelvic and para-aortic LN metastases. The 39-month OS and DFS rates for the current study were 80.6% for the staged group and 52% for non-staged treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SS in cervical cancer is a feasible and safe pretreatment procedure, and when associated with CT, it improves OS and DFS.

Clinical criteria as predictive factors of response to primary hormone therapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

This study investigates the efficacy of clinical criteria in selecting patients for primary tamoxifen therapy. A total of 60 breast cancer patients with large primary tumors and unknown hormonal receptor status were subjected to primary hormone therapy. Inclusion criteria were age over 60 years old or menopausal status for at least 10 years and no clinical evidence of inflammatory disease and fast tumor growth. The objective response rate was 55%. There was a positive correlation between the lack of clinical response and axillary lymph node metastasis (p = 0.009). Patients with objective response had significantly improved disease-free (p = 0.045) and overall (p = 0.0002) survival over those who did not have response to hormonal therapy. In multivariate analysis, the clinical response to therapy was the most powerful prognostic factor. This analysis demonstrates that clinical criteria were very effective predictor of response to neo-adjuvant hormone therapy in large breast tumors for postmenopausal women. Response to therapy is the major prognostic factor in primary tamoxifen-treated breast cancer.