RESUMO
Spread through air spaces (STAS), an important prognostic indicator included in the 2015 World Health Organization classification, is defined as micropapillary, solid, and/or single tumor cell clusters beyond the edge of the main mass and distinct from processing artifacts. This study aimed to assess the interresponder agreement on current STAS criteria vs artifacts, identify discrepancies, and compare responses between pulmonary and general pathologists. A multiple-choice online questionnaire illustrating multiple criteria for STAS vs artifacts was available internationally for 6 days to Pulmonary Pathology Society members, thoracic pathology course attendees, and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology committee members. Additional 4 questions gathered demographic and practice setting information. One hundred thirty-six unique responses were analyzed. The majority were from North America and Europe (42.6% and 30.2%), practicing pulmonary pathology (70.6%) in academia (64.7%), and with >20 years of experience (31.6%). Excluding trainees, the greatest overall agreement was in defining solid and micropapillary tumor clusters of STAS located ≥3 alveolar spaces from the main tumor edge (91.5%) and recognizing strips of ciliated cells as artifacts (97.7%). Lesser agreement on STAS was evident when tumor cell clusters were immediately adjacent to the tumor edge, a single tumor cell cluster was present at the tissue edge, tumor cell clusters were jagged edged, or tumor cell clusters were admixed with ciliated cell strips (artifacts). There was no significant difference in agreements on STAS for multiple criteria between pulmonary and general pathologists. Significant interresponder agreement on STAS vs artifacts was achieved only for a few criteria. To improve the reproducibility of STAS vs artifacts, areas of lesser agreement require further clarification.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is an immunohistochemical marker commonly used to confirm cytomorphological concordant neuroendocrine tumors/carcinomas (NETs/NECs), demonstrating high utility in small samples. Previous reports have suggested comparable INSM1 staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks and formalin-fixed surgical pathology specimens. This study aimed to assess INSM1 immunoreactivity using both fixation methods and investigate potential factors contributing to its variable expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective query was performed (03/31/21-05/31/22) for NET/NEC cases that had both formalin- and CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. We collected clinical data and reporting of immunostains for each case. INSM1 staining was evaluated in both fixation methods, and reported as positive, negative, or equivocal. Equivocal INSM1 staining was further scored as a percentage of 1%-100% and intensity of weak (faint staining), moderate (darker staining), and strong (dense staining). RESULTS: Our search identified 20 cases from diverse body sites, including mediastinal lymph nodes (40%), pancreas (35%), lung (20%), and porta hepatis lymph nodes (5%). All cases exhibited a widespread positivity (over 90%) in formalin-fixed cell blocks. In contrast, CytoLyt fixed cells showed a negative stain in 65% of cases and 30% exhibited an equivocal positivity. CONCLUSIONS: While INSM1 is previously reported as a sensitive (75%-100%) and specific (82.7%-100%) marker for NET/NECs, our study found a reduced immunohistochemical staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. Consequently, false negative INSM1 immunohistochemical results in CytoLyt-fixed cell block material may pose a pitfall in the diagnosis of NET/NEC.