[Rectal cancer surgery in Germany - a 10-year-analysis based on the data of the "Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine" at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg]. / Rektumkarzinomchirurgie in Deutschland - eine 10-Jahres-Übersicht auf der Grundlage der Daten des AN-Instituts für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin gGmbH an der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of rectal cancer has undergone pronounced changes during the last two decades. There has been a significant improvement in local tumour control due to consequent use of neo-adjuvant therapy and total mesorectal excision in cases of distal rectal cancer. The presented analysis examines the realisation of the multimodal therapy for rectal cancer under the conditions of routine patient-centred care over a period of ten years. METHOD: The data acquired in the prospective multicentre observational study "Quality Assurance - Rectal Cancer" from the years 2000 to 2010 were analysed. N = 33,724 patients were documented. The resection rate was 95.2 %. The rate of curative resection was 84.2 %. RESULTS: No change was detected in perioperative total morbidity and lethality during the course of the study. The percentage of patients with neo-adjuvant treatment and curative resection rose from 5.6 % (2000) to 40.5 % (2012). The rate of performed TME in distal rectal cancer rose from 75.2 % (2000) to 95.3 % (2012). For patients who underwent curative resection in the years 2000/2001 the 5-year local recurrence rate was 11.7 %, while it was found to be 4.6 % for patients who were thus treated in the years 2005/2006 (p < 0.001). There was no improvement of total survival. CONCLUSION: While an increase in the use of neo-adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer and the establishment of TME in routine patient-centred care have led to a significant improvement in local tumour control with a constant total morbidity and lethality, there is no detectable influence on the patients' total survival.

[Acute appendicitis - clinical health-service research on the current surgical therapy]. / Akute Appendizitis - Klinische Versorgungsforschung zur aktuellen chirurgischen Therapie.

INTRODUCTION: With about 135,000 operations every year appendectomy is one of the most frequent surgical operations in Germany. Acute appendicitis has shown changes in diagnosis and therapy with time. The status of the laparoscopic appendectomy has had to be redefined recently. The aim of this study was to make an analysis of the current surgical therapy for appendicitis and the individual procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three prospective multi-centre quality assurance studies (1988 / 89, 1996 / 97; 2008 / 09) of the "An-Institut" acquired 17,732 treatments from all supply levels of Germany. RESULTS: The average age of patients increased within of the three studies from 25.7 to 34.6 years. Within the studies in 1996 / 97 and in 2008 / 09 the share of laparoscopic appendectomy advanced from 33.1 to 85.8 percent. In the study from 2008 / 09 the laparoscopic appendectomy showed a significant advantage over the conventional technique in terms of wound-healing disturbances (p < 0.001) and a clinical duration of stay (p < 0.001). At no stage of the appendix inflammation did the laparoscopic appendectomy lead to a significant increase of intraabdominal abscesses. Compared with the conventional technique the operating time was shorter (46.6 min vs. 53.5 min). Currently the use of a stapler is the mostly frequently applied method of appendiceal stump closure (83.6 percent). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy is the most common method of current operative therapy. In comparison to former publications, there is no proof of any disadvantages of laparoscopic appendectomy.

[Surgical treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction - results achieved in multicentre studies]. / Multizentrische Ergebnisse der chirurgischen Therapie der Karzinome des ösophagogastralen Übergangs.

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction are increasingly being considered as a separated tumour entity. The prognosis is rather poorer compared with that for distal gastric cancer. Data from a multicentre study as part of research on clinical care aim to reflect the current situation in surgical treatment after inauguration of neoadjuvant modalities. PATIENTS AND METHOD: As part of the ongoing prospective multicentre observational study QCGC 2 (German Gastric Cancer Study 2), 544 adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG 1-3) were registered from 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2009. RESULTS: Patients underwent surgical intervention in 108 (76.6 %) of the 141 surgical departments which provided data to the study. In 391 patients (82.5 %), R0 resection was achieved. Almost 60 % of the carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction were approached in departments with no more than 10 of these tumour lesions through the whole study period (3 years). Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 283 cases (53 %); the rate of neoadjuvant treatment was 34.4 % (n = 187). Intraoperative fresh frozen section was only included in intraoperative decision-making in 242 patients (60.8 %). In the revealed heterogeneous spectrum of surgical interventions, a limited number of transthoracic approaches (20 %) and a mediastinal lymphadenectomy rate of only 47 % were found. Hospital lethality was 6.6 %. In the adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction, a significantly lower median survival (25 months) compared with distal gastric cancer (38 months) was observed depending on the tumour stage. In addition, 5-year survival rate of AEG patients (33.1 %) was distinctly lower than for patients with distal gastric cancer (41.4 %). There was no significantly better survival by neoadjuvant treatment in the group of investigated patients. CONCLUSION: The results in the treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction in the multicentre setting including surgical departments of each profile and region even after introduction of multimodal therapeutic concepts are not satisfying. In particular, modern diagnostic and surgical strategies need to be widely used or their percentage has to be increased. In this context, centralisation of the surgical care of this specific tumour entity appears reasonable.

Factors influencing the quality of total mesorectal excision.

BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard of care for rectal cancer. Incomplete TME may lead to local recurrence. METHODS: Data from the multicentre observational German Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer Trial were used. Patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2009 were included. Multivariable analysis using a stepwise logistic regression model was performed to identify predictors of suboptimal TME. RESULTS: From a total of 6179 patients, complete data sets for 4606 patients were available for analysis. Pathological tumour category higher than T2 (pT3 versus pT1/2: odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.01 to 1.47), tumour distance from the anal verge less than 8 cm (OR 1.27, 1.05 to 1.53), advanced age (65-80 years: OR 1.25, 1.03 to 1.52; over 80 years: OR 1.60, 1.15 to 2.22), presence of intraoperative complications (OR 1.63, 1.15 to 2.30), monopolar dissection technique (OR 1.43, 1.14 to 1.79) and low case volume (fewer than 20 procedures per year) of the operating surgeon (OR 1.20, 1.06 to 1.36) were independently associated with moderate or poor TME quality. CONCLUSION: TME quality was influenced by patient- and treatment-related factors.

Endorectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma--do the literature results really correspond to the realities of routine clinical care?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This multicenter, prospective, country-wide quality-assurance study at more than 300 hospitals in Germany was designed to characterize and analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the routine clinical staging of rectal carcinoma (depth of tumor infiltration). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were surveyed between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2008. Those who received neoadjuvant therapy after EUS were excluded. The correspondence between the EUS assessment of tumor depth (uT) and that determined by histology (pT) was calculated, and the influence of hospital volume upon the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values was investigated. RESULTS: At 384 hospitals providing care at all levels, 29 206 patients were included; of the 27 458 treated by surgical resection, EUS was performed for 12 235 (44.6 %). Of these, 7096 did not receive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, allowing a uT-pT comparison. The uT-pT correspondence was 64.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 63.6 % - 65.8 %); the frequency of understaging was 18 % (95 %CI 17.1 % - 18.9 %) and that of overstaging was 17.3 % (95 %CI 16.4 % - 18.2 %). The kappa coefficient was greatest in the category T1 (κ = 0.591). For T3 tumors κ was 0.468. The poorest correspondence was found for T2 and T4 tumors (κ = 0.367 and 0.321, respectively). A breakdown by hospital volume showed that the uT-pT correspondence was 63.2 % (95 %CI 61.5 % - 64.9 %) for hospitals undertaking ≤ 10 EUS/year, 64.6 % (95 %CI 62.9 % - 66.2 %) for doing 11 - 30 EUS/year, and 73.1 % (95 %CI 69.4 % - 76.5 %) for those hospitals performing > 30 EUS/year. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical routine, the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in staging rectal carcinoma does not attain the very good results reported in the literature. Only in the hands of diagnosticians with a large case volume of rectal carcinoma patients can EUS lead to therapy-relevant decisions.

Quality assessment of colorectal cancer care: an international online model.

AIM: We present an alternative approach to quality assessment in colorectal cancer, enabling a direct comparison of improvement at the level of the care provider. METHOD: In 2000, a quality assessment project in colorectal cancer in Germany was started. Data were provided for every patient treated for colorectal cancer. The enrolment questionnaire described patient data, risk factors, reason for hospitalization, diagnostics prior to surgery, surgical procedures, intraoperative complications, general and surgical complications in postoperative period, pathological report and discharge status. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2007, there were 57 429 patients included in the study. The total number of 372 hospitals that took part in the project varied from 153 to 281 per year. The overall resection rate for colon cancer was 97.1% and 94.8% for rectal cancer. Although the localization of rectal tumours did not vary, the percentage of abdominoperineal excisions fell from 26.1% in 2000 to 21.3% in 2008 (P < 0.001). Hospital mortality for colon cancer varied between 3.2% and 4.2% (P Pearson chi-square 0.032, linear-by-linear 0.257) and for rectal cancer between 2.7% and 3.7% (P Pearson chi-square 0.233). Patient age was not related to in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: The proposed model of quality assessment shows validity and results comparable to population-based studies. It does not require support from the health care system, making its implementation possible in every hospital worldwide.

Low-volume centre vs high-volume: the role of a quality assurance programme in colon cancer surgery.

AIM: The study aimed to determine whether hospitals within a quality assurance programme have outcomes of colon cancer surgery related to volume. METHOD: Data were used from an observational study to determine whether outcomes of colon cancer surgery are related to hospital volume. Hospitals were divided into three groups (low, medium and high) based on annual caseload. Cancer staging, resected lymph nodes, perioperative complications and follow up were monitored. Between 2000 and 2004, 345 hospitals entered 31,261 patients into the study: 202 hospitals (group I) were classified as low volume (<30 operations; 7760 patients; 24.8%), 111 (group II) as medium volume (30-60; 14,008 patients; 44.8%) and 32 (groups III) as high volume (>60; 9493 patients; 30.4%). RESULTS: High-volume centres treated more patients in UICC stages 0, I and IV, whereas low-volume centres treated more in stages II and III (P<0.001). There was no significant difference for intra-operative complications and anastomotic leakage. The difference in 30-day mortality between the low and high-volume groups was 0.8% (P=0.023).Local recurrence at 5 years was highest in the medium group. Overall survival was highest in the high-volume group; however, the difference was only significant between the medium and high-volume groups. For the low and high-volume groups, there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates. CONCLUSION: A definitive statement on outcome differences between low-volume and high-volume centres participating in a quality assurance programme cannot be made because of the heterogeneity of results and levels of significance. Studies on volume-outcome effects should be regarded critically.

[Quality evaluation in colorectal surgery in dependence on health-care categories of hospitals - minor differences in outcome with room for improvement in process quality]. / Qualität der Kolorektalchirurgie in Abhängigkeit von der Versorgungsstufe - geringe Unterschiede in der Ergebnisqualität bei Verbesserungspotenzial in der Prozessqualität leisten der Zertifizierung an deutschen Krankenhäusern Vorschub.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, different variables focusing on quality of colorectal surgery were investigated with respect to hospital categories: university hospital - U; hospital with maximum care responsibility (with a full spectrum of medical disciplines) - M; secondary care hospital with central regional responsibility (6-9 departments) - S; primary care hospital with local responsibility (2-5 departments) - G; The primary goal of this study was to analyse the current standard of care in patients with colorectal carcinoma in Germany. METHODS: From 2000-2004, data of 47 435 patients with colorectal cancer were evaluated, using data compiled in the German multi-centred observational study "Colon/Rectal Carcinoma". Analysis was performed for all variables with respect to hospital categories. Due to the remarkable number of patients, differences between the groups were to be regarded as significant if p<0.01. RESULTS: Preoperative colonoscopy (U: 70.1% M: 70.4% S: 67.9% G: 67.2) and preoperative determination of serum tumour markers (U: 83.8% M: 80.1% S: 81.9% G: 77.1) mainly indicate the quality of gastroenterological work-up before surgical intervention. In general, standards established by the "German Cancer Association" were not met and showed significantly lower rates for primary and secondary care hospitals. In contrast, variables indicating quality of perioperative course and outcome: rate of anastomotic leak (U: 2.1% M: 2.8% S: 2.1% G: 3.1%), rate of surgical intervention (U: 4.3% M: 3.1% S: 3.5% G: 3.1%) and mortality rate (U: 4.4% M: 2.2% S: 3.5% G: 4.1%) were in accordance with the requirements and did not differ significantly between all groups. However, an analysis of surgical and histopathological process quality (complete histology: U: 96.3% M: 93.6% S: 91.9% G: 90.9%) revealed significant differences with results being significantly lower for primary care hospitals. CONCLUSION: There is in principle no necessity to centre colorectal surgery in tertiary care hospitals as quality parameters focusing on results and outcome are comparable. However, in primary care hospitals, there are deficits with regards to process quality. Therefore, all measures aiming to enhance in particular process quality, i. e., hospital certification or participation with quality assurance studies, are highly desirable to further improve patient care.

[Right- and left-sided colonic cancer - different tumour entities]. / Karzinome des rechten und linken Kolons - verschiedene Tumorentitäten?

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the Western world. In the past two decades, a growing amount of data has been reported suggesting that carcinomas of the right and left colon should be considered as different tumour entities. The aim of this review is to present a detailed analysis of the current knowledge regarding differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer and potential consequences for daily practice. METHODS: For this report all articles with relevant information on differences between right- and left-sided colon carcinoma found via Pubmed searches were analysed. Furthermore, findings of a previous study performed by our group were included. RESULTS: Patients with right-sided colon cancer are significantly older, predominantly women, with a higher rate of comorbidities. Most of the large epidemiological studies reported a continued rightward shift of colorectal cancer. Histopathologically, carcinoma of the right colon show a higher percentage of poorly differentiated, locally advanced tumours with a higher rate of mucinous carcinoma and different pattern of metastatic spread. Survival is significantly worse in patients with right-sided carcinomas. There are numerous genetic differences which account for the distinct carcinogenesis and biological behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The numerous findings regarding differences between right- and left-sided colon cancers should have an impact on colon cancer screening and therapy. Firstly, there are defined risk groups which should receive complete colonoscopy, particularly if they present with symptoms suspicious for colon carcinoma. Furthermore, location of the colon cancer should be considered before group stratification into genetic, clinical and especially chemotherapy trials. A more tailored approach to colon cancer treatment would be highly desirable if future trials further support the hypothesis of two distinct tumour entities.

Palliative stoma creation: comparison of laparoscopic vs conventional procedures.

BACKGROUND: The creation of a stoma is an established therapeutic concept for the palliation of non-resectable rectal carcinomas and advanced tumours infiltrating the pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two prospective country-wide multicentre studies, each conducted over a similar period of time, the peri-operative course and postoperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs laparotomy-based stoma construction were compared. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients underwent palliative laparoscopic construction; 550 patients received a stoma via a laparotomy. The intra-operative complication rate was lower after open surgery than after laparoscopic surgery (2.7 vs 5.6%; p = 0.15), although the difference was not significant. With regard to general (30.9 vs 15.6%; p = 0.003) and also specific postoperative complications (13.8 vs 5.6%; p = 0.029), however, a significant advantage of the laparoscopic approach was seen. Furthermore, mortality in the laparoscopic group was also significantly lower (4.4 vs 14.0%; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Palliative stoma done via laparoscopy had significantly better outcomes in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in comparison with the open surgical procedure.

[Diagnosis of and therapy for gastric cancer--work-flow]. / Diagnostik und Therapie des Magenkarzinoms--Workflow.

AIM: This review comments on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in the classical meaning--excluding adenocarcinoma of the -oesophagogastric junction. Algorithms of diagnosis and care with respect to tumour stage are presented. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Besides oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for the accurate diagnosis of T categories and as a selection criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Computed tomography is recommended for preoperative evaluation of tumours > T1, laparoscopy has become an effective stag-ing tool in T3 and T4 tumours avoiding unnecessary laparotomies and improving the detection of small -liver and peritoneal metastases. TREATMENT: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection are indicated in superficial cancer confined to the mucosa with special characteristics (T1 a / no ulcer / G1, 2 / Laurén intestinal / L0 / V0 / tumour size < 2 cm). In all other cases total gastrectomy or distal subtotal gastric resection are indicated, the latter in cases of tumours located in the distal two-thirds of the stomach. Standard lymphadenectomy (LAD) is the D2 LAD without distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is still the preferred type of reconstruction. An additional pouch reconstruction should be considered in -patients with favourable prognosis, this also -applies for the preservation of the duodenal passage by jejunum interposition. Extended organ resections are only indicated in cases where a R0-resection is possible. Hepatic resection for metachronous or synchronous liver metastases is rarely advised since 50 % of patients with liver metastases show concomitant peritoneal dissemination of the disease. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing gastrectomy at a high-volume centre is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a better prognosis, however, clear thresholds for case load cannot be given. Perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy are based on the MAGIC and MacDonald trials. Perioperative chemotherapy should be performed in patients with T3 and T4 tumours with the aim to increase the likelihood of curative R0-resection by downsizing the tumour. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy cannot be recommended since its benefit has so far not been proven in randomised trials. In selected patients with incomplete lymph-node dissection and questionable R0-resection postoperative chemoradiotherapy may be debated.

[Rare tumor of the epididymis]. / Seltene Raumforderung des Nebenhodens.

A 51-year-old man with known ethyl toxic chronic pancreatitis presented with a tumor of the left epididymis. Immunohistological examination disclosed it as a metastasis of a pancreatic carcinoma. Paratesticular metastases of a pancreatic carcinoma are very rare. Nevertheless a metastasis of a primary pancreatic carcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of a tumor of the paratesticular tissue. The epididymis should be integrated in the diagnostic procedures of pancreatic carcinoma.

[Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer].

Prospective study, included 117 patients with esophageal cancer, all received resection of the esophagus through laparatomy and and right-side thoracotomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 70,0% of patients demonstrated stage higher then IIb UICC. R0 resection was possible in 101 patients (86,3%). Hospital lethality was 5,1%. Overall lethality among the operated patients was 21,4%. Long-term follow-up results were obtained in 96,6%. Surgical treatment alone does not provide satisfactory results for the patients with cancer of esophagus. Further therapy individualization and combination of surgery with modern neoadjuvant chemotherapy can provide better prognosis for these patients.

[Investigations on in-hospital mortality in pancreatic surgery : Results of a multicenter observational study]. / Untersuchungen zur Hospitalletalität in der Pankreaschirurgie : Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: The rate of hospital mortality (in-hospital mortality) after complex pancreatic resections cannot be used as a decision-making criterion with no further analysis and specification. Such analysis has to provide a risk-adjusted benchmarking including a continuous evaluation taking into account the frequency of a surgical procedure and its competent perioperative management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of the Prospective Evaluation study Elective Pancreatic surgery (PEEP), overall 2003 patients were enrolled over a 3-year time period from 01 January 2006 to 12 December 2008, who underwent elective pancreatic surgery in 27 surgical departments. Included in the study were only hospitals which perform pancreatic resections. In addition to the analysis of the current situation of the operative treatment of pancreatic diseases, the complex aspects of the in-hospital mortality as a main outcome parameter were investigated. RESULTS: Out of all enrolled patients (n = 2003), 75 patients (3.7%) died during the hospital stay. In the group of 1045 patients with partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), 43 patients did not survive the hospital stay (4.1%). Similarly, such low in-hospital mortality rates were observed after total pancreatoduodenectomy (3.8%) and after left-sided resection of the pancreas (1.9%). With respect to a univariate risk stratification, advanced age and an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 and 4 had a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate regression analysis within the PD group revealed an increased need for blood transfusions and a delay in oral feeding as factors closely associated with specific complications with a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates were found when comparing hospital volume groups, such as 10-20 vs. >20 cases/year for the 831 Kausch-Whipple procedures for adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. DISCUSSION: An adequate in-hospital mortality rate in the continuous benchmarking represents an acceptable quality level of structural and therapeutic predictions in pancreatic resections. The participation of surgical departments with complex oncosurgical interventions in clinical multicenter observational studies as a contribution to research on surgical care appears reasonable and recommendable since the results of such studies can provide a contribution to decision-making processes in daily surgical practice.

[Esophageal carcinoma. Results after esophageal resection]. / Osophaguskarzinom. Unizentrische Ergebnisse nach Resektionsbehandlung.

BACKGROUND: The central element of the multimodal therapy concept for esophageal carcinomas is operative resection. This is a complex visceral surgical intervention that calls for standardized and interdisciplinary perioperative management. Continuous control of results is essential for evaluating therapy concepts. METHOD: Data of patients who had undergone thoracoabdominal resection of an esophageal carcinoma were recorded and evaluated in a prospective single center study within the framework of internal quality control. RESULTS: In the time span between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2005, 193 patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated. Of these, 97 (50.7%) received single-stage abdominothoracal resection without neoadjuvant primary therapy. In 70% of these cases, an advanced tumor stage was present (UICC IIb or higher). R0 resection was achieved in 83 patients (85.5%). The rate of hospital mortality was found to be 6.2% (n=6). In a follow-up examination rate of 95.6%, an overall 5-year survival rate of 25% was found for all resected patients and 30% for those who received curative resection. CONCLUSION: The long-term results reached by surgery alone are comparable to those published in the current literature but are still not satisfying. A more individual approach to therapy with increased selection of patients for the application of modern neoadjuvant concepts could lead to an improvement in prognosis.

[Clinical value of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer]. / Stellenwert der laparoskopischen Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms in der klinischen Routine.

BACKGROUND: Using data and analysis compiled in the nationwide German Colon/Rectal Cancer qualitative multicenter study, the aim of this study was to determine the value of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in clinical routine. METHODS: From 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2003, patients with colon cancer resections were evaluated for short-term postoperative and long-term oncologic results associated with operative approach (laparoscopic vs conversion vs open). RESULTS: Of 21,721 patients with colon cancer, 949 (4.4%) underwent laparoscopic resection. These patients were younger (P<0.001) with lower ASA risk factors (P<0.001) and earlier UICC tumor stages (P<0.001) than open resected patients. They also showed reduced overall morbidity (P<0.001), in-hospital mortality (P=0.001), and shorter hospital stays (P<0.001). The rates of intraoperative and specific complications remained unchanged. Nineteen percent of the patients had resections converted to open approaches. These had the highest overall morbidity and longest hospital stays. Their mortality was three times that of the group with complete laparoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: The open approach remained the standard of surgical care in colon cancer for the study duration. Laparoscopic surgery was used in only a small number of patients. By virtue of preferential patient selection, better early postoperative and long-term results could be achieved for the laparoscopic group than with the open approach. Conversions were shown to be associated with inferior results at the high rate of 19%. To ensure optimal results, laparoscopic surgery for colon carcinoma should be conducted by an experienced surgeon in an appropriately selected patient pool.

[Gender-specific differences of the early postoperative and oncosurgical long-term outcome in rectal cancer-data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study]. / Genderspezifische Unterschiede im frühpostoperativen und onkochirurgischen Langzeitoutcome nach Rektumkarzinomresektion.

BACKGROUND: Gender-specific aspects have been increasingly considered in clinical medicine, also in oncological surgery. AIM: To analyze gender-specific differences of early postoperative and oncological outcomes after rectal cancer resection based on data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of the multicenter prospective observational study "Quality assurance in primary rectal cancer", data on tumor site, exogenic and endogenic risk factors, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedures, tumor stage, intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients with the histological diagnosis of rectal cancer were registered. Data from the years 2005-2006 and 2010-2011 were investigated with respect to gender-specific differences of postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality, local recurrency rate, disease-free and overall survival by univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Overall, data from 10,657 patients were evaluated: 60.9% of the patients were male, who were significantly younger (p < 0.001). Men had a significantly higher rate of alcohol (p < 0.001) and nicotine abuse (p < 0.001) as well as a trend to a higher body mass index (BMI) compared with women. Although, there was no significant difference in the distribution of various tumor stages comparing men and women, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was used significantly more often in male patients (p < 0.001). In addition, male patients underwent an abdominoperineal rectum exstirpation more often, whereas creation of an enterostoma and Hartmann's procedure were more frequently used in women (p < 0.001 each). Multivariate analysis revealed that male patients developed a higher overall morbidity (odds ratio, OR: 1.5; p < 0.001) during both study periods and from 2010-2011 a higher hospital mortality (OR: 1.8; p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 36 months, gender did not have a significant impact on overall survival, disease-free survival or on the local tumor recurrency. The 5­year overall survival was 60.5%, disease-free survival 63.8% and local recurrency rate was 5%. CONCLUSION: Independent of other variables, gender differences were found with respect to early postoperative outcome but not to oncological long-term results after surgery of rectal cancer.

Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: : Anastomotic leakage has a major impact on morbidity and mortality in rectal cancer surgery. Its relevance to oncological outcome is controversial. This observational study investigated the influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome. METHODS: : Data for 1741 patients undergoing curative resection of rectal cancer (located less than 12 cm from the anal verge) with normal healing were compared with those for 303 patients who experienced anastomotic leakage. Morbidity, mortality and long-term oncological outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: : Median follow-up was 40 months. Patients with anastomotic leakage had a higher postoperative mortality rate than those with no leakage (4.3 versus 1.2 per cent; P < 0.001). Patients with leakage necessitating surgical treatment had a higher 5-year local recurrence rate (17.5 versus 10.1 per cent; P = 0.006) and a lower 5-year disease-free survival rate (70.9 versus 75.4 per cent; P = 0.020) than those without leakage. Patients with anastomotic leakage not requiring surgical intervention did not have a worse oncological outcome. CONCLUSION: : A negative prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and disease-free survival was found only for patients with leakage needing surgical revision.

Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer.

AIM: Studies analysing the outcome after resection of low rectal cancer that has not infiltrated the anal sphincter reveal poorer long-term outcomes after abdominoperineal resections (APR) in comparison with low anterior resections (LAR). Further, a relationship between the frequency of APR and LAR for low rectal cancer and hospital volume is known. Our aim was to investigate the independent impact of hospital volume and type of resection on oncological outcomes after resection of low rectal cancer. METHOD: In a prospective multi-centre observational study of 1557 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing LAR or APR, the long-term oncological outcomes were analysed for their dependence on hospital volume and type of procedure. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that patients undergoing APR had a higher local recurrence rate (p = 0.022) and shorter disease-free survival (p < 0.001) than patients undergoing LAR, while hospital volume showed merely a tendency to impact the local recurrence rate (p = 0.060). With regard to disease-free survival, no dependence on hospital volume was to be found (p = 0.201). The rate of APR was significantly associated with hospital volume (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed an independent impact of hospital volume on local recurrence rate, while disease-free survival was influenced by the type of surgical procedure performed. CONCLUSION: In the surgical treatment of low rectal cancer the hospital volume has a major impact on outcome. The type of procedure does not affect the local recurrence rate but the disease free survival.

Risk factors and management of arterial emboli of the upper and lower extremities.

AIM: Analysis of risk factors for the outcome of arterial embolism of the extremities (EE). METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003, all patients (n=200) with an EE diagnosed in various departments of the hospital were recruited and analysed retrospectively (single center study). Exclusion criteria were isolated digital emboli, iatrogenic emboli and arterial thromboses. For statistical analysis was used the multivariate nominal regression. RESULTS: There were 138 (69%) leg, and 62 (31%) arm, emboli. Preoperative angiography was performed in 88 patients; a total of 119 (59.5%) cases of incomplete ischemia (leg n=69, arm n=50) were seen. The most common cause of the embolism (73%) was atrial fibrillation (AF). One hundred and seventhyt four patients (87%) were treated by primary surgery. The major amputation rate (lower limb) was 4.3%. Additional arterial emboli were seen in 14 (7%). The mortality rate was 13% (upper extremity embolism 4.8%; lower extremity embolism 16.7%; P=0.021). After discharge, 32.2% of the patients received oral anticoagulation, and 37.9% antiplatelet therapy. The statistical analysis identified postoperative cerebral/visceral thromboembolism as independent risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factor for EE is AF. Hospital mortality is determined by comorbidity and cerebral or visceral embolism. For this reason, effective oral anticoagulation is required, but is possible in only one-third of the patients after discharge.