Clinical characteristics and risk factors for severe COVID-19 in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients: A multicentric cohort study.

Kidney transplant recipients might be at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, risk factors for relevant outcomes remain uncertain in this population. This is a multicentric kidney transplant cohort including 104 hospitalized patients between March 4 and April 17, 2020. Risk factors for death and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were investigated, and clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. The mean age was 60 years. Forty-seven patients (54.8%) developed ARDS. Obesity was associated to ARDS development (OR 2.63; P = .04). Significant age differences were not found among patients developing and not developing ARDS (61.3 vs 57.8 years, P = .16). Seventy-six (73%) patients were discharged, and 28 (27%) died. Death was more common among the elderly (55 and 70.8 years, P < .001) and those with preexisting pulmonary disease (OR 2.89, P = .009). At admission, higher baseline lactate dehydrogenase (257 vs 358 IU/mL, P = .001) or ARDS conferred higher risk of death (HR 2.09, P = .044). In our cohort, ARDS was equally present among young and old kidney recipients. However, the elderly might be at higher risk of death, along with those showing higher baseline LDH at admission.

Kidney Graft Outcomes in High Immunological Risk Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplants.

Recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) have a lower risk of rejection compared with recipients of kidney transplants alone. However, there is disagreement about the impact of pretransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen sensitization on patient and kidney graft survival in the long term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the recipient immunological risk and comorbidities in renal graft outcomes on SLKT. We reviewed the SLKTs performed in our center from May 1993 until September 2017. Patient and graft survival were analyzed according to the immunological risk, comorbidities, liver and kidney rejection episodes, immunosuppression, and infections. A total of 20 recipients of SLKT were considered in the high immunological risk (HIR) group, and 68 recipients were included in the low immunological risk (LIR) control group. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection, second renal transplant, and time on dialysis prior to transplantation were significantly higher in the HIR group. The incidence of acute kidney rejection was higher in the HIR group (P<0.01). However, death-censored kidney graft survival as well as the estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow-up were not different between the 2 groups. Comorbidities, but not the immunological risk, impact negatively on patient survival. Despite the higher incidence of rejection in the HIR SLKT group, longterm renal function and graft survival were similar to the LIR group.

The development of a predictive model of graft function in uncontrolled donors after circulatory death: validity of a pulsatile renal preservation machine cut-off value for kidney acceptance.

BACKGROUND: The criteria for kidney suitability in uncontrolled donors after circulatory death (uDCD) procured after regional normothermic perfusion are based on macroscopic appearance and renal haemodynamic values with final renal resistance (FRR). However, these criteria have not been analysed to predict the future graft function. This study presents a model to predict the outcome in uDCD kidneys and define the predictive FRR value. METHODS: All uDCD kidney transplants performed in our hospital from 2004 to 2016 were included. Donors and recipients and pre-transplantation data are described. The endpoint was glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥30 mL/min at 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 194 recipients were included. FRR in donors ≥60 years old was (mean ± SD) 0.27 ± 0.11 versus 0.22 ± 0.09 mmHg/mL/min in donors <60 years (P = 0.042). Kidney survival was 88.2% versus 84% at 12 months and 60.7% versus 30.8% at 120 months (P = 0.067). For the group of recipients from donors ≥60 years, the FRR was 0.37 ± 0.08 mmHg/mL/min in the GFR <30 mL/min group versus 0.18 ± 0.06 mmHg/mL/min in the GFR ≥30 mL/min group (P < 0.001). The value FRR ≥0.3 mmHg/mL/min predicts 59-79% of GFR <30 mL/min [odds ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-6.40; P < 0.001]. The predictive accuracy of FRR for GFR by ROC curve was 0.968 (95% CI). The best cut-off for FRR was 0.3 mmHg/mL/min to predict GFR at 6 months with a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in uDCD donors the combination of donor age ≥60 years together with FRR ≥0.3 mmHg/mL/min could predict poor outcome at 6 months after transplantation in low immunological risk recipients.

IgA nephropathy recurs early in the graft when assessed by protocol biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in the allograft is common. Factors related to IgA recurrence are unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of IgAN recurrence as assessed by protocol biopsies and to identify predictive factors for recurrence. METHODS: We identified 65 protocol biopsies taken before the second year post-transplantation in patients with IgAN as primary renal disease. Diagnosis of recurrence of IgA was based on the detection of at least 1+ mesangial deposits of IgA. Pathological findings and clinical characteristics were retrospectively compared between recurrent and non-recurrent cases. RESULTS: IgAN recurrence rate was 32%. Mesangial C3 was detected in 83% of recurrent cases versus 17% in non-recurrent patients (P < 0.001). Normal urinalysis was observed in 52%. Non-recurrent patients had arteriolar hyalinosis in 31% of the cases versus none in IgAN recurrence (P = 0.006). Seventy-nine per cent of cyclosporine users were free of recurrence, whereas 45% of the patients without cyclosporine experienced recurrence (P = 0.03). The odds ratio (OR) for IgAN recurrence in patients using cyclosporine was 0.3 (confidence interval 0.1-0.9). Zero HLA-DR mismatch was associated with non-recurrence (P < 0.01). The OR for IgA recurrence was 6.7 if any degree of DR mismatch was present. IgAN recurrent patients had better glomerular filtration rate, but after censoring delayed graft function, the differences disappeared. Graft loss due to IgA recurrence was only 3%. CONCLUSIONS: IgAN recurrence rate was 32%. The histological diagnosis was not accompanied by abnormalities in the urinalysis in one-half of the patients. Full DR match and cyclosporine were associated with non-recurrence.

Decreased Kidney Graft Survival in Low Immunological Risk Patients Showing Inflammation in Normal Protocol Biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: The pros and cons for implementing protocol biopsies (PB) after kidney transplantation are still a matter of debate. We aimed to address the frequency of pathological findings in PB, to analyze their impact on long-term graft survival (GS) and to analyze the risk factors predicting an abnormal histology. METHODS: We analyzed 946 kidney PB obtained at a median time of 6.5 (±2.9) months after transplantation. Statistics included comparison between groups, Kaplan-Meier and multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: PB diagnosis were: 53.4% normal; 46% IFTA; 12.3% borderline and 4.9% had subclinical acute rejection (SCAR). Inflammation had the strongest negative impact on GS. Therefore we split the cases into: "normal without inflammation", "normal with inflammation", "IFTA without inflammation", "IFTA with inflammation" and "rejection" (including SCAR and borderline). 15-year GS in PB diagnosed normal with inflammation was significantly decreased in a similar fashion as in rejection cases. Among normal biopsies, inflammation increased significantly the risk of 15-y graft loss (P = 0.01). Variables that predicted an abnormal biopsy were proteinuria, previous AR and DR-mismatch. CONCLUSION: We conclude that inflammation in normal PB is associated with a significantly lower 15-y GS, comparable to rejection or IFTA with inflammation.