Evaluation of Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures after the Introduction of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Results from a Large Tertiary Referral Center.

PURPOSE: Benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures following radical cystectomy are a critical complication. The incidence is highly dependent on study design, surgical technique and surgeon experience. We studied the incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy with an intracorporeal urinary diversion, and determined the influence of the introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single center, cohort study was performed between January 2012 and December 2017 in all patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which patient or disease-specific factors were associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures. RESULTS: Of 279 patients, 192 (69%) underwent open radical cystectomy and 87 (31%) underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. In total, 47/279 patients (17%) developed ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after a median of 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.7). The difference in incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures was statistically significant between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (13% vs 25%, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, only surgical technique (open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy) was independently associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures (p=0.004). There was a peak incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after robot-assisted radical cystectomy of 47% during the first year after introduction of the robot-assisted procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion can result in an initial peak incidence of strictures, highlighting the importance of surgeon experience and the presence of a learning curve. Nonetheless, after experience has been gained, our results show that patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion are still more likely to develop ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures compared to those undergoing open radical cystectomy.

Outcomes After Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: A Pan-European Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Western multicenter studies on distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR), also known as the Appleby procedure, for locally advanced pancreatic cancer are lacking. We aimed to study overall survival, morbidity, mortality and the impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization (PHAE). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study within the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary-Association, on DP-CAR between 1-1-2000 and 6-1-2016. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were radicality (R0-resection), 90-day mortality, major morbidity, and pancreatic fistulae (grade B/C). RESULTS: We included 68 patients from 20 hospitals in 12 countries. Postoperatively, 53% of patients had R0-resection, 25% major morbidity, 21% an ISGPS grade B/C pancreatic fistula, and 16% mortality. In total, 82% received (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and median overall survival in 62 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 18 months (CI 10-37). We observed no impact of PHAE on ischemic complications. CONCLUSIONS: DP-CAR combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is associated with acceptable overall survival. The 90-day mortality is too high and should be reduced. Future studies should investigate to what extent increasing surgical volume or better patient selection can improve outcomes.

Correction to: Outcomes After Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: A Pan-European Retrospective Cohort Study.

In the original article, the institutional author the E-AHPBA DP-CAR study group was misspelled. It is correct as reflected here. The original article has also been corrected.

Radiofrequency versus microwave ablation for intraoperative treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and the newer technique of microwave ablation (MWA) can both be of additional value in parenchyma preserving surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). MWA is less influenced by the heat-sink effect of surrounding vessels and can generate more heat in less time but RFA is still widely used. True comparing studies are scarce. METHODS: This single centre retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent ultrasound guided intraoperative ablation as a part of the surgical treatment of CRLM between 2013 and 2018. In September 2015, MWA was substituted for RFA. Outcomes included unsuccessful ablation rates at 1-year postoperative, 30-days major complication rates, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses to identify predictors of unsuccessful ablation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent RFA of 98 lesions (median 2) and 79 patients underwent MWA of 193 lesions (median 2). The median diameter of the ablated lesions was 9 mm for both RFA and MWA. Unsuccessful ablation was observed in 7 metastases (7.1%) after RFA and 14 metastases (7.3%) after MWA (p = 1.000). Complications requiring re-intervention were observed after 8 procedures, 2 complications in the RFA group (4.9%) versus 6 complications in the MWA group (7.6%, p = 0.714), of which 6 were liver-related. Ninety-day mortality did not occur. Ablation technique was not associated with unsuccessful ablations. CRLM size was associated with unsuccessful ablation in the per lesion analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative RFA and MWA were equally effective for treatment of small CRLM.