Herpes Simplex Virus-1 and Hand Sanitizer: A pilot study.

Purpose Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a highly contagious virus that manifests as a painful lesion and recurrences can be distressing to patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if the use of a 70% ethanol alcohol hand sanitizer alters the duration, size of the lesion, level of pain upon administering treatment, and overall daily discomfort during outbreak.Methods This study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) using 70% ethanol alcohol hand sanitizer for the experiment and medical grade mineral oil for the control group. The treatment and the control were dispensed in lip gloss applicators for applying medicament. Data was collected through the initial examination, a daily journal, photographs, and a reexamination day. Descriptive statistics and the independent sample t-test were used to analyze data (p=0.05).Results A total of 20 individuals completed the research study: ten in the experimental group and ten in the control group. The mean duration of HSV-1 lesions for the control group was 10.3 days while the mean duration of the HSV-1 lesions for the experimental group was 7.6 days. The mean size of lesions for the control group was 4.87 mm; the mean size for the experimental group was 4.25 mm. The mean pain score for the control group was 1.08 and the mean pain score for the experimental group was 2.74. The mean discomfort score for the control group was 1.33 while the mean discomfort score for the experimental group was 1.72. There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of duration, size of lesions, pain, and discomfort.Conclusion Based on the results of this pilot study, 70% ethanol alcohol hand sanitizer did not demonstrate statistical significance in the treatment and management of HSV-1 lesions. Additional research is needed with a larger sample size to determine if statistical differences can be measured.

A case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represented a significant breakthrough in cancer therapy. Recently, the combined use of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was approved as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Exposure to a novel and diverse spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has increased with the growing utilization of ICIs, however, a comprehensive understanding surrounding newer agents is still lacking. The incidence of kidney toxicities is rare but rising, often underreported due to the lack of confirmatory biopsies. Here, we present a rare case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable HCC. CASE: An 84-year-old male with T4N0M0 hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted after cycle 5 of atezolizumab due to decreased urine output and dysuria with a serum creatine of 4.7 mg/dL compared to a baseline of 1.3 mg/dL. To confirm the diagnosis of possible intrinsic renal injury, an ultrasound-guided non-focal biopsy of the left kidney was performed, revealing AIN. Potential exacerbatory medications, such as proton-pump inhibitors, were discontinued. The patient was discharged on oral steroids with improvement in serum creatinine. Before completing the steroid taper, the patient developed pneumocystis pneumonia and eventually transitioned to hospice care. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the valuable role renal biopsy can play in accurately capturing irAEs and guiding appropriate management in the setting of ICI-induced AKI. It also exemplifies important considerations for steroid treatment of irAEs in the setting of comorbidities, such as diabetes.

Effectiveness of an electronic health system-based best-practice advisory to enhance the time to de-escalation of vancomycin for respiratory indications.

Objective: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is highly unlikely when nasal-swab results are negative. We evaluated the impact of an electronic prompt regarding MRSA nasal screening on the length of vancomycin therapy for respiratory indications. Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center (Mayo Clinic) in Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: Eligible patients received empiric treatment with vancomycin for suspected or confirmed respiratory infections from January through April 2019 (preimplementation cohort) and from October 2019 through January 2020 (postimplementation cohort). Intervention: The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with suspected or confirmed respiratory indications. Pharmacists were prompted to order a MRSA nasal swab if it was not already ordered by the provider. Methods: We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary end point was incidence of acute kidney injury. Results: The study included 120 patients (preimplementation, n = 61; postimplementation, n = 59). Median time to de-escalation was significantly shorter for the postimplementation cohort: 76 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 52-109) versus 42 hours (IQR, 37-61; P = .002). Acute kidney injury occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the preimplementation cohort and in 3 patients (5%) in the postimplementation cohort (P = .01; number needed to treat, 8). Conclusions: Implementation of a BPA notification for MRSA nasal screening helped decrease the time to de-escalation of vancomycin.