Excessive iodine intake during pregnancy in Somali refugees.

Iodine deficiency and excess are both associated with adverse health consequences, with fetuses, children and pregnant women being most vulnerable to the devastating effects of severe deficiency. It is often assumed that the iodine status of a population if displaced or in a remote or emergency situation is low. However, there is little evidence available to support this assumption, especially among long-term food-aid-dependent pregnant women. An effectiveness trial of a prenatal multiple-micronutrient supplement that contained 150 µg day(-1) iodine was conducted in two refugee camps in the North Eastern Province of Kenya in 2002. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was measured in a subsample of pregnant women attending antenatal care in Dagahaley (control camp) (n = 74) and Ifo (intervention camp) (n = 63). There was no significant difference in median UIC between the two camps (P = 0.118). The combined median UIC was 730 µg L(-1) (interquartile range, 780) (5.77 µmol L(-1)) and exceeded the upper safe limit of 500 µg L(-1) (3.95 µmol L(-1)) for pregnant women (P < 0.001), indicating excessive iodine intake. About 20% of the study subjects had 'more than adequate' urinary iodine, while over 71% had excessive UIC. Salt iodine content varied between 5.1 and 80.1 ppm in the five market salt samples analysed. In conclusion, excessive iodine intake was evident in the Dadaab refugee camps. Further research needs to be conducted to investigate the source of excess iodine, to determine the measures needed to address excessive iodine intake and to reconsider the World Health Organization/World Food Programme/United Nations Children's Fund guidance on supplementation of vulnerable groups in emergencies.

The nutritional iodine supply of Belgian neonates is still insufficient.

UNLABELLED: Belgium used to be affected by mild iodine deficiency. Improvement in iodine nutrition has been recently documented in schoolchildren in Belgium in spite of the absence of any systematic programme of iodine supplementation. The question arises as to whether this 'silent iodine prophylaxis' affected also the neonates. A total of 185 random urine samples were collected from 90 full term and 65 preterm neonates in Brussels on day 5 and repeated on day 30 in 30 preterms who were bottle-fed with iodine-enriched formula-milk. The iodine content was also determined in 58 samples of breast-milk on day 5. The median urinary iodine on day 5 in full term neonates was 86 micro g/l, which is markedly higher than the figure of 48 micro g/L reported 15 years previously in neonates in the same area but still much lower than normal for this age group (150-200 micro g/l). The mean iodine content of breast-milk was 78 micro g/l, which is unchanged as compared to 15 years ago and is about 66% of normal. Finally, the median urinary iodine increased from 60 micro g/l on day 5 to 150 micro g/l on day 30 in preterms bottle-fed with iodine-enriched formula-milk. CONCLUSION: the status of iodine nutrition has also improved spontaneously in Belgian neonates but has not yet normalised. Lactating and probably pregnant women remain clearly iodine deficient. The iodine-enriched formula-milk for preterms is efficient in correcting their iodine deficiency. National measures are urgently required for correction of iodine deficiency in Belgium.