Improvement in eosinophilic esophagitis when using dupilumab for other indications or compassionate use.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab has been approved to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, and nasal polyps and is in active clinical trials for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Given its shared immunopathology, we hypothesized that EoE symptoms and inflammation would improve when dupilumab therapy was used for other allergic indications. OBJECTIVE: To measure the clinical and histologic response in EoE to dupilumab when treating other atopic diseases. METHODS: We completed a retrospective chart review of all patients at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Rady Children Hospital who were prescribed dupilumab for atopic dermatitis, asthma, or nasal polyps and had a concomitant clinical diagnosis of EoE. Demographic information along with histology, symptom scores, medications, and diet information were collected. Response to dupilumab was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were identified. Of which, 11 patients were prescribed dupilumab for asthma, 27 for atopic dermatitis, 3 for nasal polyps, and 4 for compassionate use for EoE. There was no follow-up data for 8 patients. Follow-up histology was available for 26 patients: 22 of 26 had less than 6 eosinophils per high power field after the initiation of dupilumab with significant improvement (pre: 52.9 + 35.1 to post: 4.5 + 10.9 eosinophils/high power field, P < .005). A total of 28 patients had improvement of symptoms, with 24 patients reporting complete resolution of symptoms after dupilumab initiation. Reductions in EoE treatment medications (swallowed steroids, proton pump inhibitors) or expansion of diet occurred in 29 patients treated with dupilumab. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab therapy initiated for atopic disease effectively induces symptomatic and histologic remission of esophageal disease and reduces the need for EoE-directed therapy in patients with concomitant EoE.

Differences in egg and milk food challenge outcomes based on tolerance to the baked form.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest inclusion of baked egg and milk in the diet of children with egg or cow's milk (CM) allergy might positively affect native tolerance. However, differences in native food reactivity based on historical baked tolerance are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in native egg and CM oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes based on presenting history of tolerance and exposure to these foods in the baked form. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of all egg and CM OFCs at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) over 4 years (N = 580). History of baked ingestion was compared with OFC pass rate, eliciting dose, epinephrine use, reaction classification, and recent skin test reaction or specific immunoglobulin E level. RESULTS: There were 115 egg- and 70 CM-positive challenge reactions, with most eliciting anaphylaxis. Children tolerating baked egg passed OFC more frequently (75%) compared with children who avoided baked egg (58%; P = .01) or never ingested egg (45%; P < .0001). For positive reactions, children tolerant of baked egg reacted at higher eliciting doses of native egg (median 3.0 g, range 0.125-15.75 g) compared with those avoiding baked egg (median 0.69 g, range 0.13-10.0 g; P = .03) and those with no egg exposure (median 0.88 g, range 0.13-13.88 g; P = .01). Further, epinephrine use was lower in children tolerating baked egg (10%) compared with children avoiding baked egg (22%; P = .02) and compared with children who never ingested egg (32%; P = .0001). These differences were not observed for CM challenges. CONCLUSION: Children who historically tolerated baked egg were less sensitive to native egg during OFC compared with children whose baked reactivity was largely unknown.

Invariant natural killer T cells from children with versus without food allergy exhibit differential responsiveness to milk-derived sphingomyelin.

BACKGROUND: A key immunologic feature of food allergy (FA) is the presence of a T(h)2-type cytokine bias. Ligation of the invariant natural killer T cell (iNKT) T-cell receptor (TCR) by sphingolipids presented via the CD1d molecule leads to copious secretion of T(h)2-type cytokines. Major food allergens (eg, milk, egg) are the richest dietary source of sphingolipids (food-derived sphingolipids [food-SLs]). Nonetheless, the role of iNKTs in FA is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of iNKTs in FA and to assess whether food-SL-CD1d complexes can engage the iNKT-TCR and induce iNKT functions. METHODS: PBMCs from 15 children with cow's milk allergy (MA), 12 children tolerant to cow's milk but with allergy to egg, and 13 healthy controls were incubated with α-galactosylceramide (αGal), cow's milk-sphingomyelin, or hen's egg-ceramide. iNKTs were quantified, and their cytokine production and proliferation were assessed. Human CD1d tetramers loaded with milk-sphingomyelin or egg-ceramide were used to determine food-SL binding to the iNKT-TCR. RESULTS: Milk-sphingomyelin, but not egg-ceramide, can engage the iNKT-TCR and induce iNKT proliferation and T(h)2-type cytokine secretion. Children with FA, especially those with MA, had significantly fewer peripheral blood iNKTs and their iNKTs exhibited a greater T(h)2 response to αGal and milk-sphingomyelin than iNKTs of healthy controls. CONCLUSION: iNKTs from children with FA, especially those with MA, are reduced in number and exhibit a T(h)2 bias in response to αGal and milk-sphingomyelin. These data suggest a potential role for iNKTs in FA.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders in patients with inborn errors of immunity: Data from the USIDNET registry.

Rationale: Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID), including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), are inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal mucosa mediated by complex immune mechanisms. Although there have been initial reports of EGID in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI), little is known about the presentation of EGID in immunodeficient individuals. Methods: We queried the U.S. Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET) for patient records including the terms eosinophilic esophagitis, gastritis, enteritis, or colitis. We analyzed 74 patient records from the database, including diagnoses, demographics, infectious history, laboratory findings, genetic studies, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes. Results: We examined 74 patient records. A total of 61 patients had isolated EoE, and 13 had distal gastrointestinal involvement consistent with EGID. The most common IEI were common variable immunodeficiency (43.2%), some form of combined immunodeficiency (21.6%), chronic granulomatous disease (8.1%), hyper-IgE syndrome (6.8%), and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (6.8%). The median age at presentation with IEI was 0.5 years (IQR 1.725, max 39 years) and 56.76% were male. Approximately 20% of the patients in the cohort received a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of IEI, but the timing of the HSCT in relationship to the EGID diagnosis was unknown. Conclusions: Here, we report EGID in a diverse cohort of IEI patients, suggesting that both non-EoE EGID and EoE can be seen as comorbid conditions with a variety of IEI. Our data suggests that EGID may be more common in patients with IEI than would be expected based on estimates of EGID in the general population.

Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Food Challenges: Experience from a Large Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy that is diagnosed based on clinical findings, but can be confirmed with oral food challenge (OFC). OFC is more often performed to assess the development of tolerance. Most studies describing OFCs in FPIES are limited in size. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe our experience with OFCs using our FPIES protocol. Patients were given one-third of serving size with a 4-hour observation period, followed by home titration to full dose. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent OFC via the FPIES protocol from 2014 to 2017. Data regarding the history of reaction, age at the time of challenge, and reactions during challenge or with home introduction were collected. RESULTS: A total of 169 OFCs were completed under the FPIES protocol, in 119 patients to 19 different foods. Thirty challenges (18%) were positive, with 17 challenges (10%) during initial challenge and 13 (7.7%) during home dosing. Most reactions during initial challenge required intravenous fluids (IVF), but hypotension was uncommon. One hundred thirty-nine (82%) OFCs were negative with home introduction, indicating tolerance to the challenged foods. The mean age of passing a challenge to milk, soy, and grain was earlier than that of other solid foods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that our FPIES OFC protocol is safe. Early administration of IVF may prevent the development of hypotension. It is difficult to stratify the risk of severe or delayed reaction based on patient characteristics, and more data are needed to identify those appropriate for home introduction.

Successful treatment of recalcitrant chronic idiopathic urticaria with sulfasalazine.

BACKGROUND: Antihistamines are the standard treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). For patients whose urticaria is unresponsive to antihistamines, the treatment options are limited. During the previous decade, there have been several case reports demonstrating success with sulfasalazine therapy. In this article, we present a case series evaluating sulfasalazine therapy for antihistamine-unresponsive CIU. OBSERVATIONS: Nineteen patients with antihistamine-unresponsive CIU were treated with sulfasalazine between 2002 and 2005. During sulfasalazine therapy, 14 patients (74%) reported significant improvement, 4 patients (21%) reported minimal improvement but were not satisfied with their symptom relief, and 1 patient (5%) reported a worsening of symptoms. Of the 13 patients who required systemic steroids to control their urticaria, all were able to reduce or discontinue steroid use during sulfasalazine therapy. Although 7 patients (37%) had adverse effects (eg, nausea, headache, mild or transient leukopenia, and transaminitis) that were thought to be caused by the use of sulfasalazine, they all kept taking the drug. CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates that sulfasalazine can be a successful and safe treatment option for patients with CIU who have not responded adequately to treatment with antihistamines. Sulfasalazine was steroid sparing in all subjects who were steroid dependent.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: clinical presentation in children.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in western nations. Symptoms in infants and young children include feeding difficulties, failure to thrive, and gastroesophageal reflux. School-aged children may present with vomiting, abdominal pain, and regurgitation; adolescents and adults with dysphagia and food impaction. Delayed diagnosis increases risk of stricture formation. Children with untreated EoE have tissue changes resembling airway remodeling. Endoscopy does not always correlate. Management centers on food elimination. Approaches include skin prick and patch testing, removal of foods, or an amino acid formula diet. Long-term elimination diets can produce nutritional deficiencies and have poor adherence.

Common variants at 5q22 associate with pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic disorder characterized by the accumulation of eosinophils in the esophagus. We report association of EoE with variants at chromosome 5q22 encompassing TSLP and WDR36 (rs3806932, combined P = 3.19 x 10(-9)). TSLP is overexpressed in esophageal biopsies from individuals with EoE compared with unaffected individuals, whereas WDR36 expression is unaltered between the two groups. These data implicate the 5q22 locus in the pathogenesis of EoE and identify TSLP as the most likely candidate gene in the region.

Basophil phenotypes in chronic idiopathic urticaria in relation to disease activity and autoantibodies.

Potentially pathogenic IgG autoantibodies to IgE or its receptor, Fc epsilonRIalpha, have been detected in approximately 40% of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) patients. CIU patients' basophils display distinct altered Fc epsilonRIalpha-mediated degranulation. CIU patients with basophil histamine release in response to polyclonal goat anti-human IgE > or = 10% are classified as CIU responders (CIU-R) and < 10% are CIU non-responders (CIU-NR). We compared the presence of autoantibodies to basophil degranulation phenotypes and to disease status (active or inactive). Sera were collected from non-CIU subjects and CIU subjects who participated in a longitudinal study of disease severity and had defined basophil degranulation phenotypes. Immunoenzymetric assays (IEMA) quantified IgG anti-Fc epsilonRIalpha and anti-IgE. IgG anti-Fc epsilonRIalpha antibody was detected in 57% of CIU-R (n=35), 55% of CIU-NR (n=29), and 57% of non-CIU subjects (n=23), whereas IgG anti-IgE was present in 43% of CIU-R, 45% of CIU-NR, and 30% of non-CIU subjects. Both the autoantibody levels and the functional basophil phenotype remained stable in subjects with active disease (n=16), whereas there was an enhancement in basophil function as subjects evolved into a state of remission (n=6), which appears independent of the presence of autoantibody. IEMAs detected a similar frequency of autoantibodies in CIU-R, CIU-NR, and non-CIU subjects. Basophil function may be independent of IEMA-detected autoantibodies.

Immediate type I hypersensitivity response implicated in worsening injection site reactions to adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors such as adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab play an increasingly important role in the management of a variety of chronic inflammatory disorders. With their increasing use, a wide spectrum of dermatological adverse effects, including injection site reactions and the development of dermatitis, have been recognized. Previous studies have implicated the role of the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in mediation of injection site reactions to etanercept. To our knowledge, there have been no published studies on immunologic mechanism of injection site reactions to adalimumab to date. OBSERVATIONS: We describe 2 patients with a history of worsening injection site reactions to adalimumab. Findings from skin testing in both patients were suggestive of an immediate type I hypersensitivity reaction to adalimumab. A histamine release assay performed on peripheral blood leukocytes from both patients demonstrated significant histamine release on exposure to adalimumab. Furthermore, passive transfer of serum from one of the allergic patients to basophils from a nonatopic, healthy donor sensitized those cells to release significant amounts of histamine with exposure to adalimumab. Conclusion This study demonstrates that an IgE-mediated immediate type I hypersensitivity reaction plays a role in the mediation of worsening injection site reactions in some patients receiving adalimumab.

Basophil histamine release activity and disease severity in chronic idiopathic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Altered basophil degranulation phenotypes are found in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CIU disease severity in relation to basophil histamine release (HR) characteristics. METHODS: Patients with CIU were recruited from allergy and dermatology clinics. Patients with recent use of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants were excluded. Patients completed disease severity surveys and had blood basophils isolated and stimulated for HR using polyclonal goat anti-human IgE and N-formyl-met-leu-phe. The HR was measured using automated fluorometry. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to investigate relationships between HR data and CIU disease measures. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed surveys, of which 34 were further categorized into 2 subgroups based on basophil HR response to anti-IgE stimulation: responders (> or = 10% HR) and nonresponders (< 10% HR). Responders and nonresponders reported similar use of oral corticosteroids, work absences, and quality-of-life impairment but differed in their patterns of medications used for CIU. Basophil responders had a trend of higher use of the emergency department for CIU management. Multivariate regression revealed that patients with the basophil responder phenotype experienced significantly higher current itch scores (P = .02) compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Quality-of-life impairment is similar in CIU basophil subsets. Patients with CIU with a basophil responder phenotype report longer disease duration, a higher frequency of emergency department use, and significantly higher itch severity.

Expression of activation markers on basophils in a controlled model of anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis has variable clinical presentations and lacks reliable biomarkers. Expression of activation markers on basophils has been useful in assessing sensitization in IgE-mediated diseases but has not been examined in vivo in anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: The study's goals were to assess the baseline expression of activation markers on basophils in individuals with a sting reaction history, the degree of change in expression of these markers after intentional sting challenge, and the relationship between in vitro and in vivo activation marker expression. METHODS: Patients allergic to insect venom were enrolled and grouped by clinical category defined by a history of a systemic or large local reaction and use of venom immunotherapy. Blood was collected before and after sting challenge. Enriched basophils were analyzed for activation marker expression. In select subjects, basophils were examined after in vitro stimulation with insect venom for activation marker expression and histamine release. RESULTS: Of 35 sting-challenge participants, 21 provided adequate samples for analysis. Pre-sting basophil CD63 expression was significantly higher in systemic reactors on immunotherapy. Following sting challenge, the rise in basophil CD69 expression and CD203c was significantly higher in systemic reactors on immunotherapy. Levels of activation markers on basophils were greater after in vitro venom stimulation than after in vivo challenge. CONCLUSION: Broader shifts in expression of basophil activation markers after in vivo challenge occurred among subjects with a history of in vivo systemic anaphylaxis despite venom immunotherapy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Basophil activation markers may be potential biomarkers for anaphylaxis.

Basophil FcepsilonRI histamine release parallels expression of Src-homology 2-containing inositol phosphatases in chronic idiopathic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Basophils are implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). Autoantibodies to the IgE receptor (FcepsilonRI) and serum histamine releasing activity have been detected in some subjects with CIU, although their role in vivo is unclear. Basophils of patients with CIU have altered FcepsilonRI-mediated histamine release (HR); however, the mechanism is unknown. In the basophil FcepsilonRI signaling pathway, protein levels of Src-homology 2-containing-5'-inositol phosphatase (SHIP)-1 are inversely correlated with the release of mediators or releasability. A related phosphatase, SHIP-2, is a negative regulator of monocyte IgG receptor (FcgammaR) signaling . We hypothesized that SHIP levels are altered in CIU basophils. METHODS: Blood basophils were isolated from cold urticaria, CIU, or normal donors, and FcepsilonRI-dependent and independent HR were quantified. Protein levels of SHIP-1, SHIP-2, spleen tyrosine kinase, and phosphorylated Akt were determined by Western blotting. Subjects' serum was tested for serum histamine releasing activity and anti-FcepsilonRIalpha antibodies. RESULTS: CIU basophils displayed a bimodal response to anti-IgE activation. One half of CIU subjects' basophils had reductions in anti-IgE-induced HR and were designated nonresponders (CIU NR). CIU NR basophil HR remained diminished at 10-fold to 30-fold higher doses of anti-IgE. CIU anti-IgE responder basophils had HR similar to normal subjects. SHIP-1 and SHIP-2 proteins were increased in CIU NR basophils and were linked to reduced phosphoAkt after anti-IgE stimulation. CIU basophil anti-IgE response was not related to the presence of serologic factors. CONCLUSION: In CIU basophils, the observed changes in FcepsilonRI signaling pathway molecule expression may underlie changes in releasability. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with CIU can be segregated on the basis of basophil functional phenotype.